mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-29 14:21:47 +00:00
Bluetooth: Fix locking in bt_accept_enqueue() for BH context
With commite163376220
("Bluetooth: Handle bt_accept_enqueue() socket atomically") lock_sock[_nested]() is used to acquire the socket lock before manipulating the socket. lock_sock[_nested]() may block, which is problematic since bt_accept_enqueue() can be called in bottom half context (e.g. from rfcomm_connect_ind()): [<ffffff80080d81ec>] __might_sleep+0x4c/0x80 [<ffffff800876c7b0>] lock_sock_nested+0x24/0x58 [<ffffff8000d7c27c>] bt_accept_enqueue+0x48/0xd4 [bluetooth] [<ffffff8000e67d8c>] rfcomm_connect_ind+0x190/0x218 [rfcomm] Add a parameter to bt_accept_enqueue() to indicate whether the function is called from BH context, and acquire the socket lock with bh_lock_sock_nested() if that's the case. Also adapt all callers of bt_accept_enqueue() to pass the new parameter: - l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb() - uses lock_sock() to lock the parent socket => process context - rfcomm_connect_ind() - acquires the parent socket lock with bh_lock_sock() => BH context - __sco_chan_add() - called from sco_chan_add(), which is called from sco_connect(). parent is NULL, hence bt_accept_enqueue() isn't called in this code path and we can ignore it - also called from sco_conn_ready(). uses bh_lock_sock() to acquire the parent lock => BH context Fixes:e163376220
("Bluetooth: Handle bt_accept_enqueue() socket atomically") Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
8c57983bf7
commit
c4f5627f7e
@ -276,7 +276,7 @@ int bt_sock_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg);
|
||||
int bt_sock_wait_state(struct sock *sk, int state, unsigned long timeo);
|
||||
int bt_sock_wait_ready(struct sock *sk, unsigned long flags);
|
||||
|
||||
void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk);
|
||||
void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk, bool bh);
|
||||
void bt_accept_unlink(struct sock *sk);
|
||||
struct sock *bt_accept_dequeue(struct sock *parent, struct socket *newsock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -154,15 +154,25 @@ void bt_sock_unlink(struct bt_sock_list *l, struct sock *sk)
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_sock_unlink);
|
||||
|
||||
void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk)
|
||||
void bt_accept_enqueue(struct sock *parent, struct sock *sk, bool bh)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BT_DBG("parent %p, sk %p", parent, sk);
|
||||
|
||||
sock_hold(sk);
|
||||
lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
|
||||
if (bh)
|
||||
bh_lock_sock_nested(sk);
|
||||
else
|
||||
lock_sock_nested(sk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
|
||||
|
||||
list_add_tail(&bt_sk(sk)->accept_q, &bt_sk(parent)->accept_q);
|
||||
bt_sk(sk)->parent = parent;
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
if (bh)
|
||||
bh_unlock_sock(sk);
|
||||
else
|
||||
release_sock(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
parent->sk_ack_backlog++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(bt_accept_enqueue);
|
||||
|
@ -1252,7 +1252,7 @@ static struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_sock_new_connection_cb(struct l2cap_chan *chan)
|
||||
|
||||
l2cap_sock_init(sk, parent);
|
||||
|
||||
bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk);
|
||||
bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk, false);
|
||||
|
||||
release_sock(parent);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -988,7 +988,7 @@ int rfcomm_connect_ind(struct rfcomm_session *s, u8 channel, struct rfcomm_dlc *
|
||||
rfcomm_pi(sk)->channel = channel;
|
||||
|
||||
sk->sk_state = BT_CONFIG;
|
||||
bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk);
|
||||
bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk, true);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Accept connection and return socket DLC */
|
||||
*d = rfcomm_pi(sk)->dlc;
|
||||
|
@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ static void __sco_chan_add(struct sco_conn *conn, struct sock *sk,
|
||||
conn->sk = sk;
|
||||
|
||||
if (parent)
|
||||
bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk);
|
||||
bt_accept_enqueue(parent, sk, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int sco_chan_add(struct sco_conn *conn, struct sock *sk,
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user