jbd2: fix FS corruption possibility in jbd2_journal_destroy() on umount path

On umount path, jbd2_journal_destroy() writes latest transaction ID
(->j_tail_sequence) to be used at next mount.

The bug is that ->j_tail_sequence is not holding latest transaction ID
in some cases. So, at next mount, there is chance to conflict with
remaining (not overwritten yet) transactions.

	mount (id=10)
	write transaction (id=11)
	write transaction (id=12)
	umount (id=10) <= the bug doesn't write latest ID

	mount (id=10)
	write transaction (id=11)
	crash

	mount
	[recovery process]
		transaction (id=11)
		transaction (id=12) <= valid transaction ID, but old commit
                                       must not replay

Like above, this bug become the cause of recovery failure, or FS
corruption.

So why ->j_tail_sequence doesn't point latest ID?

Because if checkpoint transactions was reclaimed by memory pressure
(i.e. bdev_try_to_free_page()), then ->j_tail_sequence is not updated.
(And another case is, __jbd2_journal_clean_checkpoint_list() is called
with empty transaction.)

So in above cases, ->j_tail_sequence is not pointing latest
transaction ID at umount path. Plus, REQ_FLUSH for checkpoint is not
done too.

So, to fix this problem with minimum changes, this patch updates
->j_tail_sequence, and issue REQ_FLUSH.  (With more complex changes,
some optimizations would be possible to avoid unnecessary REQ_FLUSH
for example though.)

BTW,

	journal->j_tail_sequence =
		++journal->j_transaction_sequence;

Increment of ->j_transaction_sequence seems to be unnecessary, but
ext3 does this.

Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
OGAWA Hirofumi 2016-03-09 23:47:25 -05:00 committed by Theodore Ts'o
parent 2d90c160e5
commit c0a2ad9b50

View File

@ -1430,11 +1430,12 @@ out:
/**
* jbd2_mark_journal_empty() - Mark on disk journal as empty.
* @journal: The journal to update.
* @write_op: With which operation should we write the journal sb
*
* Update a journal's dynamic superblock fields to show that journal is empty.
* Write updated superblock to disk waiting for IO to complete.
*/
static void jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal_t *journal)
static void jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal_t *journal, int write_op)
{
journal_superblock_t *sb = journal->j_superblock;
@ -1452,7 +1453,7 @@ static void jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal_t *journal)
sb->s_start = cpu_to_be32(0);
read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
jbd2_write_superblock(journal, WRITE_FUA);
jbd2_write_superblock(journal, write_op);
/* Log is no longer empty */
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
@ -1738,7 +1739,13 @@ int jbd2_journal_destroy(journal_t *journal)
if (journal->j_sb_buffer) {
if (!is_journal_aborted(journal)) {
mutex_lock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex);
jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal);
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
journal->j_tail_sequence =
++journal->j_transaction_sequence;
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal, WRITE_FLUSH_FUA);
mutex_unlock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex);
} else
err = -EIO;
@ -1997,7 +2004,7 @@ int jbd2_journal_flush(journal_t *journal)
* the magic code for a fully-recovered superblock. Any future
* commits of data to the journal will restore the current
* s_start value. */
jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal);
jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal, WRITE_FUA);
mutex_unlock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex);
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
J_ASSERT(!journal->j_running_transaction);
@ -2043,7 +2050,7 @@ int jbd2_journal_wipe(journal_t *journal, int write)
if (write) {
/* Lock to make assertions happy... */
mutex_lock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex);
jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal);
jbd2_mark_journal_empty(journal, WRITE_FUA);
mutex_unlock(&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex);
}