Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-11-13 23:51:39 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

locking/mutex: Refactor mutex_spin_on_owner()

Browse Source 
As suggested by Davidlohr, we could refactor mutex_spin_on_owner().

Currently, we split up owner_running() with mutex_spin_on_owner().
When the owner changes, we make duplicate owner checks which are not
necessary. It also makes the code a bit obscure as we are using a
second check to figure out why we broke out of the loop.

This patch modifies it such that we remove the owner_running() function
and the mutex_spin_on_owner() loop directly checks for if the owner changes,
if the owner is not running, or if we need to reschedule. If the owner
changes, we break out of the loop and return true. If the owner is not
running or if we need to reschedule, then break out of the loop and return
false.

Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@hp.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: chegu_vinod@hp.com
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1422914367-5574-3-git-send-email-jason.low2@hp.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Jason Low 2015-02-02 13:59:27 -08:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent 07d2413a61
commit be1f7bf217
1 changed files with 22 additions and 25 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

47
kernel/locking/mutex.c
View File

@ -217,44 +217,41 @@ ww_mutex_set_context_slowpath(struct ww_mutex *lock,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_MUTEX_SPIN_ON_OWNER
static inline bool owner_running(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
{
if (lock->owner != owner)
return false;
/*
* Ensure we emit the owner->on_cpu, dereference _after_ checking
* lock->owner still matches owner, if that fails, owner might
* point to free()d memory, if it still matches, the rcu_read_lock()
* ensures the memory stays valid.
*/
barrier();
return owner->on_cpu;
}
/*
* Look out! "owner" is an entirely speculative pointer
* access and not reliable.
*/
static noinline
int mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
bool mutex_spin_on_owner(struct mutex *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
{
bool ret;
rcu_read_lock();
while (owner_running(lock, owner)) {
if (need_resched())
while (true) {
/* Return success when the lock owner changed */
if (lock->owner != owner) {
ret = true;
break;
}
/*
* Ensure we emit the owner->on_cpu, dereference _after_
* checking lock->owner still matches owner, if that fails,
* owner might point to free()d memory, if it still matches,
* the rcu_read_lock() ensures the memory stays valid.
*/
barrier();
if (!owner->on_cpu || need_resched()) {
ret = false;
break;
}
cpu_relax_lowlatency();
}
rcu_read_unlock();
/*
* We break out of the loop above on either need_resched(), when
* the owner is not running, or when the lock owner changed.
* Return success only when the lock owner changed.
*/
return lock->owner != owner;
return ret;
}
/*