[PATCH] i386: Some additional chipset register values validation.

On i945, a mmconfig range hitting the f0000000-ffffffff zone conflicts
with the APIC registers and others.  Consider it invalid.

On E7520, values 0000 and f000 for the window register are defined
invalid in the documentation.

I haven't seen a bios use these values, but who trusts biosen these
days?

Signed-off-by: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>

 arch/i386/pci/mmconfig-shared.c |   25 +++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
This commit is contained in:
Olivier Galibert 2007-05-02 19:27:22 +02:00 committed by Andi Kleen
parent 6c2af35820
commit b5229dbb85

View File

@ -60,14 +60,19 @@ static const char __init *pci_mmcfg_e7520(void)
u32 win;
pci_conf1_read(0, 0, PCI_DEVFN(0,0), 0xce, 2, &win);
pci_mmcfg_config_num = 1;
pci_mmcfg_config = kzalloc(sizeof(pci_mmcfg_config[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pci_mmcfg_config)
return NULL;
pci_mmcfg_config[0].address = (win & 0xf000) << 16;
pci_mmcfg_config[0].pci_segment = 0;
pci_mmcfg_config[0].start_bus_number = 0;
pci_mmcfg_config[0].end_bus_number = 255;
win = win & 0xf000;
if(win == 0x0000 || win == 0xf000)
pci_mmcfg_config_num = 0;
else {
pci_mmcfg_config_num = 1;
pci_mmcfg_config = kzalloc(sizeof(pci_mmcfg_config[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pci_mmcfg_config)
return NULL;
pci_mmcfg_config[0].address = win << 16;
pci_mmcfg_config[0].pci_segment = 0;
pci_mmcfg_config[0].start_bus_number = 0;
pci_mmcfg_config[0].end_bus_number = 255;
}
return "Intel Corporation E7520 Memory Controller Hub";
}
@ -108,6 +113,10 @@ static const char __init *pci_mmcfg_intel_945(void)
if ((pciexbar & mask) & 0x0fffffffU)
pci_mmcfg_config_num = 0;
/* Don't hit the APIC registers and their friends */
if ((pciexbar & mask) >= 0xf0000000U)
pci_mmcfg_config_num = 0;
if (pci_mmcfg_config_num) {
pci_mmcfg_config = kzalloc(sizeof(pci_mmcfg_config[0]), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pci_mmcfg_config)