mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 14:11:52 +00:00
block: remove split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same}
The split code in blkdev_issue_{discard,write_same} can go away now that any driver that cares does the split. We have to make sure bio size doesn't overflow. For discard, we set max discard sectors to (1<<31)>>9 to ensure it doesn't overflow bi_size and hopefully it is of the proper granularity as long as the granularity is a power of two. Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e28997ec4
commit
b49a0871be
@ -26,6 +26,13 @@ static void bio_batch_end_io(struct bio *bio)
|
||||
bio_put(bio);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure that max discard sectors doesn't overflow bi_size and hopefully
|
||||
* it is of the proper granularity as long as the granularity is a power
|
||||
* of two.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define MAX_BIO_SECTORS ((1U << 31) >> 9)
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* blkdev_issue_discard - queue a discard
|
||||
* @bdev: blockdev to issue discard for
|
||||
@ -43,8 +50,6 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
|
||||
DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(wait);
|
||||
struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
|
||||
int type = REQ_WRITE | REQ_DISCARD;
|
||||
unsigned int max_discard_sectors, granularity;
|
||||
int alignment;
|
||||
struct bio_batch bb;
|
||||
struct bio *bio;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
@ -56,21 +61,6 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
|
||||
if (!blk_queue_discard(q))
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Zero-sector (unknown) and one-sector granularities are the same. */
|
||||
granularity = max(q->limits.discard_granularity >> 9, 1U);
|
||||
alignment = (bdev_discard_alignment(bdev) >> 9) % granularity;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ensure that max_discard_sectors is of the proper
|
||||
* granularity, so that requests stay aligned after a split.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
max_discard_sectors = min(q->limits.max_discard_sectors, UINT_MAX >> 9);
|
||||
max_discard_sectors -= max_discard_sectors % granularity;
|
||||
if (unlikely(!max_discard_sectors)) {
|
||||
/* Avoid infinite loop below. Being cautious never hurts. */
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & BLKDEV_DISCARD_SECURE) {
|
||||
if (!blk_queue_secdiscard(q))
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
@ -84,7 +74,7 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
|
||||
blk_start_plug(&plug);
|
||||
while (nr_sects) {
|
||||
unsigned int req_sects;
|
||||
sector_t end_sect, tmp;
|
||||
sector_t end_sect;
|
||||
|
||||
bio = bio_alloc(gfp_mask, 1);
|
||||
if (!bio) {
|
||||
@ -92,21 +82,8 @@ int blkdev_issue_discard(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, max_discard_sectors);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If splitting a request, and the next starting sector would be
|
||||
* misaligned, stop the discard at the previous aligned sector.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
req_sects = min_t(sector_t, nr_sects, MAX_BIO_SECTORS);
|
||||
end_sect = sector + req_sects;
|
||||
tmp = end_sect;
|
||||
if (req_sects < nr_sects &&
|
||||
sector_div(tmp, granularity) != alignment) {
|
||||
end_sect = end_sect - alignment;
|
||||
sector_div(end_sect, granularity);
|
||||
end_sect = end_sect * granularity + alignment;
|
||||
req_sects = end_sect - sector;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = sector;
|
||||
bio->bi_end_io = bio_batch_end_io;
|
||||
@ -165,10 +142,8 @@ int blkdev_issue_write_same(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sector,
|
||||
if (!q)
|
||||
return -ENXIO;
|
||||
|
||||
max_write_same_sectors = q->limits.max_write_same_sectors;
|
||||
|
||||
if (max_write_same_sectors == 0)
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
/* Ensure that max_write_same_sectors doesn't overflow bi_size */
|
||||
max_write_same_sectors = UINT_MAX >> 9;
|
||||
|
||||
atomic_set(&bb.done, 1);
|
||||
bb.error = 0;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user