From b193049375b04df3ada8c3347b7083db95918bc3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pan Xinhui Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2016 05:23:52 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] locking/pv-qspinlock: Use cmpxchg_release() in __pv_queued_spin_unlock() cmpxchg_release() is more lighweight than cmpxchg() on some archs(e.g. PPC), moreover, in __pv_queued_spin_unlock() we only needs a RELEASE in the fast path(pairing with *_try_lock() or *_lock()). And the slow path has smp_store_release too. So it's safe to use cmpxchg_release here. Suggested-by: Boqun Feng Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: paulus@samba.org Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org Cc: waiman.long@hpe.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1474277037-15200-2-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h index 3acf16d79cf4..e3b5520005db 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h +++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock_paravirt.h @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ __visible void __pv_queued_spin_unlock(struct qspinlock *lock) * unhash. Otherwise it would be possible to have multiple @lock * entries, which would be BAD. */ - locked = cmpxchg(&l->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, 0); + locked = cmpxchg_release(&l->locked, _Q_LOCKED_VAL, 0); if (likely(locked == _Q_LOCKED_VAL)) return;