mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 22:21:40 +00:00
cpusets: Remove/update outdated comments
cpuset_track_online_cpus() is no longer present. So remove the outdated comment and replace it with reference to cpuset_update_active_cpus() which is its equivalent. Also, we don't lack memory hot-unplug anymore. And David Rientjes pointed out how it is dealt with. So update that comment as well. Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120524141700.3692.98192.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
7ddf96b02f
commit
a1cd2b13f7
@ -2034,9 +2034,8 @@ static struct cpuset *cpuset_next(struct list_head *queue)
|
||||
* before dropping down to the next. It always processes a node before
|
||||
* any of its children.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* For now, since we lack memory hot unplug, we'll never see a cpuset
|
||||
* that has tasks along with an empty 'mems'. But if we did see such
|
||||
* a cpuset, we'd handle it just like we do if its 'cpus' was empty.
|
||||
* In the case of memory hot-unplug, it will remove nodes from N_HIGH_MEMORY
|
||||
* if all present pages from a node are offlined.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
scan_cpusets_upon_hotplug(struct cpuset *root, enum hotplug_event event)
|
||||
@ -2137,7 +2136,7 @@ void cpuset_update_active_cpus(bool cpu_online)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Keep top_cpuset.mems_allowed tracking node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY].
|
||||
* Call this routine anytime after node_states[N_HIGH_MEMORY] changes.
|
||||
* See also the previous routine cpuset_track_online_cpus().
|
||||
* See cpuset_update_active_cpus() for CPU hotplug handling.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int cpuset_track_online_nodes(struct notifier_block *self,
|
||||
unsigned long action, void *arg)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user