mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 08:31:55 +00:00
ASoC: arizona: Tie SYSCLK to DRC signal activity widgets
The intent is for SYSCLK to be tied to all input and output widgets such that it turns on whenever the chip is in use. It is not tied to the DRC signal activity detect virtual outputs, whilst in practice this is unlikely to cause an issue (as an input will likely also be powered up) best to correct. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1a695a905c
commit
9fc772eca1
@ -899,6 +899,8 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route cs47l24_dapm_routes[] = {
|
||||
|
||||
{ "MICSUPP", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
{ "DRC2 Signal Activity", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC1L" },
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC1R" },
|
||||
{ "DRC2 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC2L" },
|
||||
|
@ -1713,6 +1713,7 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route wm5102_dapm_routes[] = {
|
||||
|
||||
{ "MICSUPP", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC1L" },
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC1R" },
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
@ -1997,6 +1997,8 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route wm5110_dapm_routes[] = {
|
||||
|
||||
{ "MICSUPP", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
{ "DRC2 Signal Activity", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC1L" },
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC1R" },
|
||||
{ "DRC2 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC2L" },
|
||||
|
@ -1166,6 +1166,7 @@ static const struct snd_soc_dapm_route wm8998_dapm_routes[] = {
|
||||
|
||||
{ "MICSUPP", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "SYSCLK" },
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC1L" },
|
||||
{ "DRC1 Signal Activity", NULL, "DRC1R" },
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user