mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 22:21:40 +00:00
futex: Handle transient "ownerless" rtmutex state correctly
Gratian managed to trigger the BUG_ON(!newowner) in fixup_pi_state_owner().
This is one possible chain of events leading to this:
Task Prio Operation
T1 120 lock(F)
T2 120 lock(F) -> blocks (top waiter)
T3 50 (RT) lock(F) -> boosts T1 and blocks (new top waiter)
XX timeout/ -> wakes T2
signal
T1 50 unlock(F) -> wakes T3 (rtmutex->owner == NULL, waiter bit is set)
T2 120 cleanup -> try_to_take_mutex() fails because T3 is the top waiter
and the lower priority T2 cannot steal the lock.
-> fixup_pi_state_owner() sees newowner == NULL -> BUG_ON()
The comment states that this is invalid and rt_mutex_real_owner() must
return a non NULL owner when the trylock failed, but in case of a queued
and woken up waiter rt_mutex_real_owner() == NULL is a valid transient
state. The higher priority waiter has simply not yet managed to take over
the rtmutex.
The BUG_ON() is therefore wrong and this is just another retry condition in
fixup_pi_state_owner().
Drop the locks, so that T3 can make progress, and then try the fixup again.
Gratian provided a great analysis, traces and a reproducer. The analysis is
to the point, but it confused the hell out of that tglx dude who had to
page in all the futex horrors again. Condensed version is above.
[ tglx: Wrote comment and changelog ]
Fixes: c1e2f0eaf0
("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")
Reported-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a6w6x7bb.fsf@ni.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87sg9pkvf7.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
3cea11cd5e
commit
9f5d1c336a
@ -2380,10 +2380,22 @@ retry:
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Since we just failed the trylock; there must be an owner.
|
||||
* The trylock just failed, so either there is an owner or
|
||||
* there is a higher priority waiter than this one.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
newowner = rt_mutex_owner(&pi_state->pi_mutex);
|
||||
BUG_ON(!newowner);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the higher priority waiter has not yet taken over the
|
||||
* rtmutex then newowner is NULL. We can't return here with
|
||||
* that state because it's inconsistent vs. the user space
|
||||
* state. So drop the locks and try again. It's a valid
|
||||
* situation and not any different from the other retry
|
||||
* conditions.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!newowner)) {
|
||||
err = -EAGAIN;
|
||||
goto handle_err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(argowner != current);
|
||||
if (oldowner == current) {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user