- Prevent the leaking of a debug timer in futex_waitv()

- A preempt-RT mutex locking fix, adding the proper acquire semantics
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEzv7L6UO9uDPlPSfHEsHwGGHeVUoFAmOxn1cACgkQEsHwGGHe
 VUp+AQ/9GilVlaWqloC+sDK/7qTLfmQjR/XwQPii2pMBUO1oRFT7mG+dG7lKNpRL
 WCLTVIrzG528ORJytvMGuqx+CqenuTGPFI9rtizxdtRlNZyiS33hvlaGBPY7XYY7
 G2qugGKuZ7WVKZpq6szPwnrMuWjdsd+XOO+NE3h/5kI2T7ZukmlXl9/EtVii7+y3
 LGVjMhN+R0XCMCPSSPtFx5eUGalemPnGSBcX/Qb4zG1MphSPURFKHEQmWHZzgrkg
 6fmqx773u2mquxTYeEy0FDLjOYFEHlzDFgRtIDBaziHIxjzO/5r09m8RDF2mXetW
 W/pf/Iduh2TZWwJDngmUi0JxqOzz0l8T/6vSCuArYWkjb+0zDOPHuCYwif2iHAQo
 pMn+O5nAtLMZhdk+yjTs4abQ11q9owLh0nGps4A2SKgJIH0mL2BICwRotzuV1sxf
 CGnoOxIxZuZGq8xMoHp6sJ8e4RnJHBAt7PKrCsLTkPAjKjgmBpqshVav//kyCFeY
 2R4rgRY/a42Z86uNSysVnxxkop4vRgTZ3l7TijzyeIbycI7v9WMADk0TKTDgsMbL
 nEnlZPWXJGYNXH71ZPV5TPgidHfiO68sVKerXWRrWRLyGHhY2TC67Lz29vTAlbMK
 NdOM6pO0DkaKSLxEJ6qso819ePnRA/2O5B7xU/Ll7vONjCpHlFw=
 =9LHF
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'locking_urgent_for_v6.2_rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip

Pull locking fixes from Borislav Petkov:

 - Prevent the leaking of a debug timer in futex_waitv()

 - A preempt-RT mutex locking fix, adding the proper acquire semantics

* tag 'locking_urgent_for_v6.2_rc2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
  futex: Fix futex_waitv() hrtimer debug object leak on kcalloc error
  rtmutex: Add acquire semantics for rtmutex lock acquisition slow path

kernel/futex/syscalls.c

@@ -286,19 +286,22 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(futex_waitv, struct futex_waitv __user *, waiters,
 	}
 
 	futexv = kcalloc(nr_futexes, sizeof(*futexv), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!futexv)
-		return -ENOMEM;
+	if (!futexv) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto destroy_timer;
+	}
 
 	ret = futex_parse_waitv(futexv, waiters, nr_futexes);
 	if (!ret)
 		ret = futex_wait_multiple(futexv, nr_futexes, timeout ? &to : NULL);
 
+	kfree(futexv);
+
+destroy_timer:
 	if (timeout) {
 		hrtimer_cancel(&to.timer);
 		destroy_hrtimer_on_stack(&to.timer);
 	}
-
-	kfree(futexv);
 	return ret;
 }
 

kernel/locking/rtmutex.c

@@ -89,15 +89,31 @@ static inline int __ww_mutex_check_kill(struct rt_mutex *lock,
  * set this bit before looking at the lock.
  */
 
-static __always_inline void
-rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
+static __always_inline struct task_struct *
+rt_mutex_owner_encode(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
 {
 	unsigned long val = (unsigned long)owner;
 
 	if (rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock))
 		val |= RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
 
-	WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, (struct task_struct *)val);
+	return (struct task_struct *)val;
+}
+
+static __always_inline void
+rt_mutex_set_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, struct task_struct *owner)
+{
+	/*
+	 * lock->wait_lock is held but explicit acquire semantics are needed
+	 * for a new lock owner so WRITE_ONCE is insufficient.
+	 */
+	xchg_acquire(&lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, owner));
+}
+
+static __always_inline void rt_mutex_clear_owner(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+{
+	/* lock->wait_lock is held so the unlock provides release semantics. */
+	WRITE_ONCE(lock->owner, rt_mutex_owner_encode(lock, NULL));
 }
 
 static __always_inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
@@ -106,7 +122,8 @@ static __always_inline void clear_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
 			((unsigned long)lock->owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
 }
 
-static __always_inline void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
+static __always_inline void
+fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock, bool acquire_lock)
 {
 	unsigned long owner, *p = (unsigned long *) &lock->owner;
 
@@ -172,8 +189,21 @@ static __always_inline void fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
 	 * still set.
 	 */
 	owner = READ_ONCE(*p);
-	if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS)
-		WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
+	if (owner & RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) {
+		/*
+		 * See rt_mutex_set_owner() and rt_mutex_clear_owner() on
+		 * why xchg_acquire() is used for updating owner for
+		 * locking and WRITE_ONCE() for unlocking.
+		 *
+		 * WRITE_ONCE() would work for the acquire case too, but
+		 * in case that the lock acquisition failed it might
+		 * force other lockers into the slow path unnecessarily.
+		 */
+		if (acquire_lock)
+			xchg_acquire(p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
+		else
+			WRITE_ONCE(*p, owner & ~RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
+	}
 }
 
 /*
@@ -208,6 +238,13 @@ static __always_inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
 		owner = *p;
 	} while (cmpxchg_relaxed(p, owner,
 				 owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
+
+	/*
+	 * The cmpxchg loop above is relaxed to avoid back-to-back ACQUIRE
+	 * operations in the event of contention. Ensure the successful
+	 * cmpxchg is visible.
+	 */
+	smp_mb__after_atomic();
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1243,7 +1280,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowtrylock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
 	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the lock waiters bit
 	 * unconditionally. Clean this up.
 	 */
-	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1604,7 +1641,7 @@ static int __sched __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit
 	 * unconditionally. We might have to fix that up.
 	 */
-	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true);
 
 	trace_contention_end(lock, ret);
 
@@ -1719,7 +1756,7 @@ static void __sched rtlock_slowlock_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
 	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally.
 	 * We might have to fix that up:
 	 */
-	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true);
 	debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
 
 	trace_contention_end(lock, 0);

kernel/locking/rtmutex_api.c

@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ void __sched rt_mutex_init_proxy_locked(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 void __sched rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock)
 {
 	debug_rt_mutex_proxy_unlock(lock);
-	rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
+	rt_mutex_clear_owner(lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int __sched rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
 	 * have to fix that up.
 	 */
-	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, true);
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -438,7 +438,7 @@ bool __sched rt_mutex_cleanup_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
 	 * try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit unconditionally. We might
 	 * have to fix that up.
 	 */
-	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
+	fixup_rt_mutex_waiters(lock, false);
 
 	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&lock->wait_lock);