mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-16 00:52:01 +00:00
mmc: sdhci: clean up host cookie handling
Commit d31911b937
("mmc: sdhci: fix dma memory leak in sdhci_pre_req()")
added a complicated method to manage the DMA map state for the data
transfer, but this complexity is not required.
There are three states:
* Unmapped
* Mapped by sdhci_pre_req()
* Mapped by sdhci_prepare_data()
sdhci_prepare_data() needs to know when the data buffers have been
successfully mapped by sdhci_pre_req(), and if so, there is no need to
map them a second time.
When we come to tear down the mapping, we want to know whether
sdhci_post_req() will be called (which is determined by sdhci_pre_req()
having been previously called) so that we can postpone the unmap
operation.
Hence, it makes sense to simply record when the successful DMA map
happened (via COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED vs COOKIE_MAPPED) rather than having
the complex mechanics involving COOKIE_MAPPED vs COOKIE_GIVEN.
If a mapping is created by sdhci_prepare_data(), we must tear it down
ourselves, without waiting for sdhci_post_req() (hence, the new
COOKIE_MAPPED case). If the mapping is created by sdhci_pre_req()
then sdhci_post_req() is responsible for tearing the mapping down.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f48f039cd2
commit
94538e51d6
@ -431,12 +431,12 @@ static int sdhci_pre_dma_transfer(struct sdhci_host *host,
|
||||
{
|
||||
int sg_count;
|
||||
|
||||
if (data->host_cookie == COOKIE_MAPPED) {
|
||||
data->host_cookie = COOKIE_GIVEN;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the data buffers are already mapped, return the previous
|
||||
* dma_map_sg() result.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (data->host_cookie == COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED)
|
||||
return data->sg_count;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
WARN_ON(data->host_cookie == COOKIE_GIVEN);
|
||||
|
||||
sg_count = dma_map_sg(mmc_dev(host->mmc), data->sg, data->sg_len,
|
||||
data->flags & MMC_DATA_WRITE ?
|
||||
@ -2094,7 +2094,7 @@ static void sdhci_pre_req(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_request *mrq,
|
||||
mrq->data->host_cookie = COOKIE_UNMAPPED;
|
||||
|
||||
if (host->flags & SDHCI_REQ_USE_DMA)
|
||||
sdhci_pre_dma_transfer(host, mrq->data, COOKIE_MAPPED);
|
||||
sdhci_pre_dma_transfer(host, mrq->data, COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void sdhci_card_event(struct mmc_host *mmc)
|
||||
|
@ -316,8 +316,8 @@ struct sdhci_adma2_64_desc {
|
||||
|
||||
enum sdhci_cookie {
|
||||
COOKIE_UNMAPPED,
|
||||
COOKIE_MAPPED,
|
||||
COOKIE_GIVEN,
|
||||
COOKIE_PRE_MAPPED, /* mapped by sdhci_pre_req() */
|
||||
COOKIE_MAPPED, /* mapped by sdhci_prepare_data() */
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct sdhci_host {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user