From 9415983599413f847ec9f081e9f9e5ed6cdeb342 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Suren Baghdasaryan Date: Fri, 31 May 2024 13:53:50 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] mm: fix xyz_noprof functions calling profiled functions Grepping /proc/allocinfo for "noprof" reveals several xyz_noprof functions, which means internally they are calling profiled functions. This should never happen as such calls move allocation charge from a higher level location where it should be accounted for into these lower level helpers. Fix this by replacing profiled function calls with noprof ones. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20240531205350.3973009-1-surenb@google.com Fixes: b951aaff5035 ("mm: enable page allocation tagging") Fixes: e26d8769da6d ("mempool: hook up to memory allocation profiling") Fixes: 88ae5fb755b0 ("mm: vmalloc: enable memory allocation profiling") Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan Cc: Kent Overstreet Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Pasha Tatashin Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton --- mm/filemap.c | 2 +- mm/mempool.c | 2 +- mm/util.c | 10 +++++----- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/filemap.c b/mm/filemap.c index 382c3d06bfb1..876cc64aadd7 100644 --- a/mm/filemap.c +++ b/mm/filemap.c @@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ struct folio *filemap_alloc_folio_noprof(gfp_t gfp, unsigned int order) do { cpuset_mems_cookie = read_mems_allowed_begin(); n = cpuset_mem_spread_node(); - folio = __folio_alloc_node(gfp, order, n); + folio = __folio_alloc_node_noprof(gfp, order, n); } while (!folio && read_mems_allowed_retry(cpuset_mems_cookie)); return folio; diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c index 6ece63a00acf..3223337135d0 100644 --- a/mm/mempool.c +++ b/mm/mempool.c @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ mempool_t *mempool_create_node_noprof(int min_nr, mempool_alloc_t *alloc_fn, { mempool_t *pool; - pool = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*pool), gfp_mask, node_id); + pool = kmalloc_node_noprof(sizeof(*pool), gfp_mask | __GFP_ZERO, node_id); if (!pool) return NULL; diff --git a/mm/util.c b/mm/util.c index c9e519e6811f..6c3e6710e4de 100644 --- a/mm/util.c +++ b/mm/util.c @@ -705,7 +705,7 @@ void *kvrealloc_noprof(const void *p, size_t oldsize, size_t newsize, gfp_t flag if (oldsize >= newsize) return (void *)p; - newp = kvmalloc(newsize, flags); + newp = kvmalloc_noprof(newsize, flags); if (!newp) return NULL; memcpy(newp, p, oldsize); @@ -726,7 +726,7 @@ void *__vmalloc_array_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags) if (unlikely(check_mul_overflow(n, size, &bytes))) return NULL; - return __vmalloc(bytes, flags); + return __vmalloc_noprof(bytes, flags); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc_array_noprof); @@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vmalloc_array_noprof); */ void *vmalloc_array_noprof(size_t n, size_t size) { - return __vmalloc_array(n, size, GFP_KERNEL); + return __vmalloc_array_noprof(n, size, GFP_KERNEL); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_array_noprof); @@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vmalloc_array_noprof); */ void *__vcalloc_noprof(size_t n, size_t size, gfp_t flags) { - return __vmalloc_array(n, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO); + return __vmalloc_array_noprof(n, size, flags | __GFP_ZERO); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vcalloc_noprof); @@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__vcalloc_noprof); */ void *vcalloc_noprof(size_t n, size_t size) { - return __vmalloc_array(n, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO); + return __vmalloc_array_noprof(n, size, GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(vcalloc_noprof);