mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-14 08:02:07 +00:00
RDMA/uverbs: Remove needs_kfree_rcu from uverbs_obj_type_class
After device disassociation the uapi_objects are destroyed and freed, however it is still possible that core code can be holding a kref on the uobject. When it finally goes to uverbs_uobject_free() via the kref_put() it can trigger a use-after-free on the uapi_object. Since needs_kfree_rcu is a micro optimization that only benefits file uobjects, just get rid of it. There is no harm in using kfree_rcu even if it isn't required, and the number of involved objects is small. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200113143306.GA28717@ziepe.ca Signed-off-by: Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@mellanox.com> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f59b6c3e6
commit
8bdf9dd984
@ -49,13 +49,7 @@ void uverbs_uobject_get(struct ib_uobject *uobject)
|
||||
|
||||
static void uverbs_uobject_free(struct kref *ref)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct ib_uobject *uobj =
|
||||
container_of(ref, struct ib_uobject, ref);
|
||||
|
||||
if (uobj->uapi_object->type_class->needs_kfree_rcu)
|
||||
kfree_rcu(uobj, rcu);
|
||||
else
|
||||
kfree(uobj);
|
||||
kfree_rcu(container_of(ref, struct ib_uobject, ref), rcu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void uverbs_uobject_put(struct ib_uobject *uobject)
|
||||
@ -744,20 +738,6 @@ const struct uverbs_obj_type_class uverbs_idr_class = {
|
||||
.lookup_put = lookup_put_idr_uobject,
|
||||
.destroy_hw = destroy_hw_idr_uobject,
|
||||
.remove_handle = remove_handle_idr_uobject,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When we destroy an object, we first just lock it for WRITE and
|
||||
* actually DESTROY it in the finalize stage. So, the problematic
|
||||
* scenario is when we just started the finalize stage of the
|
||||
* destruction (nothing was executed yet). Now, the other thread
|
||||
* fetched the object for READ access, but it didn't lock it yet.
|
||||
* The DESTROY thread continues and starts destroying the object.
|
||||
* When the other thread continue - without the RCU, it would
|
||||
* access freed memory. However, the rcu_read_lock delays the free
|
||||
* until the rcu_read_lock of the READ operation quits. Since the
|
||||
* exclusive lock of the object is still taken by the DESTROY flow, the
|
||||
* READ operation will get -EBUSY and it'll just bail out.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
.needs_kfree_rcu = true,
|
||||
};
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(uverbs_idr_class);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -920,7 +900,6 @@ const struct uverbs_obj_type_class uverbs_fd_class = {
|
||||
.lookup_put = lookup_put_fd_uobject,
|
||||
.destroy_hw = destroy_hw_fd_uobject,
|
||||
.remove_handle = remove_handle_fd_uobject,
|
||||
.needs_kfree_rcu = false,
|
||||
};
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(uverbs_fd_class);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -98,7 +98,6 @@ struct uverbs_obj_type_class {
|
||||
enum rdma_remove_reason why,
|
||||
struct uverbs_attr_bundle *attrs);
|
||||
void (*remove_handle)(struct ib_uobject *uobj);
|
||||
u8 needs_kfree_rcu;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct uverbs_obj_type {
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user