From 8926cc8302819be9e67f70409ed001ecb2c924a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Trond Myklebust Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2021 15:09:41 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] NFSv4.x: Don't return NFS4ERR_NOMATCHING_LAYOUT if we're unmounting If the NFS super block is being unmounted, then we currently may end up telling the server that we've forgotten the layout while it is actually still in use by the client. In that case, just assume that the client will soon return the layout anyway, and so return NFS4ERR_DELAY in response to the layout recall. Fixes: 58ac3e59235f ("NFSv4/pnfs: Clean up nfs_layout_find_inode()") Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust --- fs/nfs/callback_proc.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c index f7786e00a6a7..ed9d580826f5 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/callback_proc.c @@ -137,12 +137,12 @@ static struct inode *nfs_layout_find_inode_by_stateid(struct nfs_client *clp, list_for_each_entry_rcu(lo, &server->layouts, plh_layouts) { if (!pnfs_layout_is_valid(lo)) continue; - if (stateid != NULL && - !nfs4_stateid_match_other(stateid, &lo->plh_stateid)) + if (!nfs4_stateid_match_other(stateid, &lo->plh_stateid)) continue; - if (!nfs_sb_active(server->super)) - continue; - inode = igrab(lo->plh_inode); + if (nfs_sb_active(server->super)) + inode = igrab(lo->plh_inode); + else + inode = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN); rcu_read_unlock(); if (inode) return inode; @@ -176,9 +176,10 @@ static struct inode *nfs_layout_find_inode_by_fh(struct nfs_client *clp, continue; if (nfsi->layout != lo) continue; - if (!nfs_sb_active(server->super)) - continue; - inode = igrab(lo->plh_inode); + if (nfs_sb_active(server->super)) + inode = igrab(lo->plh_inode); + else + inode = ERR_PTR(-EAGAIN); rcu_read_unlock(); if (inode) return inode;