mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-30 14:52:05 +00:00
lockdep: Prepare for NMI IRQ state tracking
There is no reason not to always, accurately, track IRQ state. This change also makes IRQ state tracking ignore lockdep_off(). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200623083721.155449112@infradead.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
248591f5d2
commit
859d069ee1
@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ void lockdep_init_task(struct task_struct *task)
|
||||
|
||||
static __always_inline void lockdep_recursion_finish(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(--current->lockdep_recursion))
|
||||
if (WARN_ON_ONCE((--current->lockdep_recursion) & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK))
|
||||
current->lockdep_recursion = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -3646,7 +3646,16 @@ static void __trace_hardirqs_on_caller(void)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare(unsigned long ip)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (unlikely(!debug_locks || current->lockdep_recursion))
|
||||
if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* NMIs do not (and cannot) track lock dependencies, nothing to do.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(in_nmi()))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(current->hardirqs_enabled)) {
|
||||
@ -3692,7 +3701,27 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *curr = current;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!debug_locks || curr->lockdep_recursion))
|
||||
if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* NMIs can happen in the middle of local_irq_{en,dis}able() where the
|
||||
* tracking state and hardware state are out of sync.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NMIs must save lockdep_hardirqs_enabled() to restore IRQ state from,
|
||||
* and not rely on hardware state like normal interrupts.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(in_nmi())) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Skip:
|
||||
* - recursion check, because NMI can hit lockdep;
|
||||
* - hardware state check, because above;
|
||||
* - chain_key check, see lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
goto skip_checks;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(current->lockdep_recursion & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (curr->hardirqs_enabled) {
|
||||
@ -3720,6 +3749,7 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_on(unsigned long ip)
|
||||
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(current->hardirq_chain_key !=
|
||||
current->curr_chain_key);
|
||||
|
||||
skip_checks:
|
||||
/* we'll do an OFF -> ON transition: */
|
||||
curr->hardirqs_enabled = 1;
|
||||
curr->hardirq_enable_ip = ip;
|
||||
@ -3735,7 +3765,15 @@ void noinstr lockdep_hardirqs_off(unsigned long ip)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *curr = current;
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(!debug_locks || curr->lockdep_recursion))
|
||||
if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Matching lockdep_hardirqs_on(), allow NMIs in the middle of lockdep;
|
||||
* they will restore the software state. This ensures the software
|
||||
* state is consistent inside NMIs as well.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!in_nmi() && (current->lockdep_recursion & LOCKDEP_RECURSION_MASK)))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user