mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-17 09:31:50 +00:00
x86, intr-remap: fix eoi for interrupt remapping without x2apic
To simplify level irq migration in the presence of interrupt-remapping,
Suresh used a virtual vector (io-apic pin number) to eliminate io-apic
RTE modification. Level triggered interrupt will appear as an edge to
the local apic cpu but still as level to the IO-APIC. So in addition to
do the local apic EOI, it still needs to do IO-APIC directed EOI to clear
the remote IRR bit in the IO-APIC RTE. Pls refer to Suresh's patch for
more details (commit 0280f7c416
).
Now interrupt remapping is decoupled from x2apic, it also needs to do the
directed EOI for apic. Otherwise, apic interrupts won't work correctly.
Signed-off-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Weidong Han <weidong.han@intel.com>
Cc: suresh.b.siddha@intel.com
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org
Cc: allen.m.kay@intel.com
LKML-Reference: <1239355037-22856-1-git-send-email-weidong.han@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f20ab9c38f
commit
746cddd37d
@ -2524,7 +2524,6 @@ static void irq_complete_move(struct irq_desc **descp)
|
||||
static inline void irq_complete_move(struct irq_desc **descp) {}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X2APIC
|
||||
static void __eoi_ioapic_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq_cfg *cfg)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int apic, pin;
|
||||
@ -2558,6 +2557,7 @@ eoi_ioapic_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ioapic_lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_X2APIC
|
||||
static void ack_x2apic_level(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
|
||||
@ -2634,6 +2634,9 @@ static void ack_apic_level(unsigned int irq)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ack_APIC_irq();
|
||||
|
||||
if (irq_remapped(irq))
|
||||
eoi_ioapic_irq(desc);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Now we can move and renable the irq */
|
||||
if (unlikely(do_unmask_irq)) {
|
||||
/* Only migrate the irq if the ack has been received.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user