rxrpc: Don't assume transport address family and size when using it

Don't assume transport address family and size when using the peer address
to send a packet.  Instead, use the start of the transport address rather
than any particular element of the union and use the transport address
length noted inside the sockaddr_rxrpc struct.

This will be necessary when IPv6 support is introduced.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
David Howells 2016-04-07 17:23:44 +01:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 843099cac0
commit 6dd050f88d
2 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -833,8 +833,8 @@ void rxrpc_process_call(struct work_struct *work)
/* there's a good chance we're going to have to send a message, so set
* one up in advance */
msg.msg_name = &call->conn->trans->peer->srx.transport.sin;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(call->conn->trans->peer->srx.transport.sin);
msg.msg_name = &call->conn->trans->peer->srx.transport;
msg.msg_namelen = call->conn->trans->peer->srx.transport_len;
msg.msg_control = NULL;
msg.msg_controllen = 0;
msg.msg_flags = 0;

View File

@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ static int rxrpc_abort_connection(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
rxrpc_abort_calls(conn, RXRPC_CALL_LOCALLY_ABORTED, abort_code);
msg.msg_name = &conn->trans->peer->srx.transport.sin;
msg.msg_namelen = sizeof(conn->trans->peer->srx.transport.sin);
msg.msg_name = &conn->trans->peer->srx.transport;
msg.msg_namelen = conn->trans->peer->srx.transport_len;
msg.msg_control = NULL;
msg.msg_controllen = 0;
msg.msg_flags = 0;