mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 14:11:52 +00:00
mm: don't return 0 too early from find_get_pages()
Callers of find_get_pages(), or its wrapper pagevec_lookup() - notably truncate_inode_pages_range() - stop looking further when it returns 0. But if an interrupt comes just after its radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot(), especially if we have preemptible RCU enabled, isn't it conceivable that all 14 pages returned could be removed from the page cache by shrink_page_list(), before find_get_pages() gets to process them? So causing it to return 0 although there may be plenty more pages beyond. Make find_get_pages() and find_get_pages_tag() check for this unlikely case, and restart should it occur; but callers of find_get_pages_contig() have no such expectation, it's okay for that to return 0 early. I have not seen this in practice, just worried by the possibility. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9d8aa4ea85
commit
5b280c0cc7
14
mm/filemap.c
14
mm/filemap.c
@ -885,6 +885,13 @@ repeat:
|
||||
pages[ret] = page;
|
||||
ret++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If all entries were removed before we could secure them,
|
||||
* try again, because callers stop trying once 0 is returned.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!ret && nr_found))
|
||||
goto restart;
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1004,6 +1011,13 @@ repeat:
|
||||
pages[ret] = page;
|
||||
ret++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If all entries were removed before we could secure them,
|
||||
* try again, because callers stop trying once 0 is returned.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (unlikely(!ret && nr_found))
|
||||
goto restart;
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user