mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 06:01:57 +00:00
sched/fair: Add trivial fair server
Use deadline servers to service fair tasks. This patch adds a fair_server deadline entity which acts as a container for fair entities and can be used to fix starvation when higher priority (wrt fair) tasks are monopolizing CPU(s). Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Tested-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/b6b0bcefaf25391bcf5b6ecdb9f1218de402d42e.1716811044.git.bristot@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
a741b82423
commit
557a6bfc66
@ -8336,6 +8336,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
||||
hrtick_rq_init(rq);
|
||||
atomic_set(&rq->nr_iowait, 0);
|
||||
fair_server_init(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
|
||||
rq->core = rq;
|
||||
|
@ -1381,6 +1381,13 @@ throttle:
|
||||
resched_curr(rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The fair server (sole dl_server) does not account for real-time
|
||||
* workload because it is running fair work.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (dl_se == &rq->fair_server)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Because -- for now -- we share the rt bandwidth, we need to
|
||||
* account our runtime there too, otherwise actual rt tasks
|
||||
@ -1414,15 +1421,31 @@ void dl_server_update(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, s64 delta_exec)
|
||||
|
||||
void dl_server_start(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rq *rq = dl_se->rq;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dl_server(dl_se)) {
|
||||
/* Disabled */
|
||||
dl_se->dl_runtime = 0;
|
||||
dl_se->dl_deadline = 1000 * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
|
||||
dl_se->dl_period = 1000 * NSEC_PER_MSEC;
|
||||
|
||||
dl_se->dl_server = 1;
|
||||
setup_new_dl_entity(dl_se);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!dl_se->dl_runtime)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se, ENQUEUE_WAKEUP);
|
||||
if (!dl_task(dl_se->rq->curr) || dl_entity_preempt(dl_se, &rq->curr->dl))
|
||||
resched_curr(dl_se->rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void dl_server_stop(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (!dl_se->dl_runtime)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
dequeue_dl_entity(dl_se, DEQUEUE_SLEEP);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -5765,6 +5765,7 @@ static bool throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
||||
struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
|
||||
struct sched_entity *se;
|
||||
long task_delta, idle_task_delta, dequeue = 1;
|
||||
long rq_h_nr_running = rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
|
||||
/* This will start the period timer if necessary */
|
||||
@ -5837,6 +5838,9 @@ static bool throttle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
||||
sub_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
|
||||
|
||||
done:
|
||||
/* Stop the fair server if throttling resulted in no runnable tasks */
|
||||
if (rq_h_nr_running && !rq->cfs.h_nr_running)
|
||||
dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note: distribution will already see us throttled via the
|
||||
* throttled-list. rq->lock protects completion.
|
||||
@ -5854,6 +5858,7 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
||||
struct cfs_bandwidth *cfs_b = tg_cfs_bandwidth(cfs_rq->tg);
|
||||
struct sched_entity *se;
|
||||
long task_delta, idle_task_delta;
|
||||
long rq_h_nr_running = rq->cfs.h_nr_running;
|
||||
|
||||
se = cfs_rq->tg->se[cpu_of(rq)];
|
||||
|
||||
@ -5929,6 +5934,10 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
||||
unthrottle_throttle:
|
||||
assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Start the fair server if un-throttling resulted in new runnable tasks */
|
||||
if (!rq_h_nr_running && rq->cfs.h_nr_running)
|
||||
dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle CPU: */
|
||||
if (rq->curr == rq->idle && rq->cfs.nr_running)
|
||||
resched_curr(rq);
|
||||
@ -6759,6 +6768,9 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
util_est_enqueue(&rq->cfs, p);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!throttled_hierarchy(task_cfs_rq(p)) && !rq->cfs.h_nr_running)
|
||||
dl_server_start(&rq->fair_server);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If in_iowait is set, the code below may not trigger any cpufreq
|
||||
* utilization updates, so do it here explicitly with the IOWAIT flag
|
||||
@ -6903,6 +6915,9 @@ static void dequeue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
|
||||
rq->next_balance = jiffies;
|
||||
|
||||
dequeue_throttle:
|
||||
if (!throttled_hierarchy(task_cfs_rq(p)) && !rq->cfs.h_nr_running)
|
||||
dl_server_stop(&rq->fair_server);
|
||||
|
||||
util_est_update(&rq->cfs, p, task_sleep);
|
||||
hrtick_update(rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -8602,6 +8617,25 @@ static struct task_struct *__pick_next_task_fair(struct rq *rq)
|
||||
return pick_next_task_fair(rq, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool fair_server_has_tasks(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return !!dl_se->rq->cfs.nr_running;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct task_struct *fair_server_pick(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return pick_next_task_fair(dl_se->rq, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void fair_server_init(struct rq *rq)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se = &rq->fair_server;
|
||||
|
||||
init_dl_entity(dl_se);
|
||||
|
||||
dl_server_init(dl_se, rq, fair_server_has_tasks, fair_server_pick);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Account for a descheduled task:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ extern void dl_server_init(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct rq *rq,
|
||||
dl_server_has_tasks_f has_tasks,
|
||||
dl_server_pick_f pick);
|
||||
|
||||
extern void fair_server_init(struct rq *rq);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED
|
||||
|
||||
extern struct list_head task_groups;
|
||||
@ -1039,6 +1041,8 @@ struct rq {
|
||||
struct rt_rq rt;
|
||||
struct dl_rq dl;
|
||||
|
||||
struct sched_dl_entity fair_server;
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
|
||||
/* list of leaf cfs_rq on this CPU: */
|
||||
struct list_head leaf_cfs_rq_list;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user