mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-24 11:51:27 +00:00
timers/nohz: Last resort update jiffies on nohz_full IRQ entry
When at least one CPU runs in nohz_full mode, a dedicated timekeeper CPU is guaranteed to stay online and to never stop its tick. Meanwhile on some rare case, the dedicated timekeeper may be running with interrupts disabled for a while, such as in stop_machine. If jiffies stop being updated, a nohz_full CPU may end up endlessly programming the next tick in the past, taking the last jiffies update monotonic timestamp as a stale base, resulting in an tick storm. Here is a scenario where it matters: 0) CPU 0 is the timekeeper and CPU 1 a nohz_full CPU. 1) A stop machine callback is queued to execute somewhere. 2) CPU 0 reaches MULTI_STOP_DISABLE_IRQ while CPU 1 is still in MULTI_STOP_PREPARE. Hence CPU 0 can't do its timekeeping duty. CPU 1 can still take IRQs. 3) CPU 1 receives an IRQ which queues a timer callback one jiffy forward. 4) On IRQ exit, CPU 1 schedules the tick one jiffy forward, taking last_jiffies_update as a base. But last_jiffies_update hasn't been updated for 2 jiffies since the timekeeper has interrupts disabled. 5) clockevents_program_event(), which relies on ktime_get(), observes that the expiration is in the past and therefore programs the min delta event on the clock. 6) The tick fires immediately, goto 3) 7) Tick storm, the nohz_full CPU is drown and takes ages to reach MULTI_STOP_DISABLE_IRQ, which is the only way out of this situation. Solve this with unconditionally updating jiffies if the value is stale on nohz_full IRQ entry. IRQs and other disturbances are expected to be rare enough on nohz_full for the unconditional call to ktime_get() to actually matter. Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211026141055.57358-2-frederic@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
parent
d58071a8a7
commit
53e87e3cdc
@ -595,7 +595,8 @@ void irq_enter_rcu(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__irq_enter_raw();
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_idle_task(current) && (irq_count() == HARDIRQ_OFFSET))
|
||||
if (tick_nohz_full_cpu(smp_processor_id()) ||
|
||||
(is_idle_task(current) && (irq_count() == HARDIRQ_OFFSET)))
|
||||
tick_irq_enter();
|
||||
|
||||
account_hardirq_enter(current);
|
||||
|
@ -1375,6 +1375,13 @@ static inline void tick_nohz_irq_enter(void)
|
||||
now = ktime_get();
|
||||
if (ts->idle_active)
|
||||
tick_nohz_stop_idle(ts, now);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If all CPUs are idle. We may need to update a stale jiffies value.
|
||||
* Note nohz_full is a special case: a timekeeper is guaranteed to stay
|
||||
* alive but it might be busy looping with interrupts disabled in some
|
||||
* rare case (typically stop machine). So we must make sure we have a
|
||||
* last resort.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (ts->tick_stopped)
|
||||
tick_nohz_update_jiffies(now);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user