mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-15 00:21:59 +00:00
sched/fair: Optimize and simplify rq leaf_cfs_rq_list
We notice the rq leaf_cfs_rq_list has two problems when do bugfix backports and some test profiling. 1. cfs_rqs under throttled subtree could be added to the list, and make their fully decayed ancestors on the list, even though not needed. 2. #1 also make the leaf_cfs_rq_list management complex and error prone, this is the list of related bugfix so far: commit31bc6aeaab
("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()") commitfe61468b2c
("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair warning") commitb34cb07dde
("sched/fair: Fix enqueue_task_fair() warning some more") commit39f23ce07b
("sched/fair: Fix unthrottle_cfs_rq() for leaf_cfs_rq list") commit0258bdfaff
("sched/fair: Fix unfairness caused by missing load decay") commita7b359fc6a
("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle") commitfdaba61ef8
("sched/fair: Ensure that the CFS parent is added after unthrottling") commit2630cde267
("sched/fair: Add ancestors of unthrottled undecayed cfs_rq") commit31bc6aeaab
("sched/fair: Optimize update_blocked_averages()") delete every cfs_rq under throttled subtree from rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list, and delete the throttled_hierarchy() test in update_blocked_averages(), which optimized update_blocked_averages(). But those later bugfix add cfs_rqs under throttled subtree back to rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list again, with their fully decayed ancestors, for the integrity of rq->leaf_cfs_rq_list. This patch takes another method, skip all cfs_rqs under throttled hierarchy when list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(), to completely make cfs_rqs under throttled subtree off the leaf_cfs_rq_list. So we don't need to consider throttled related things in enqueue_entity(), unthrottle_cfs_rq() and enqueue_task_fair(), which simplify the code a lot. Also optimize update_blocked_averages() since cfs_rqs under throttled hierarchy and their ancestors won't be on the leaf_cfs_rq_list. Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220601021848.76943-1-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
f5b2eeb499
commit
51bf903b64
@ -3179,6 +3179,8 @@ void reweight_task(struct task_struct *p, int prio)
|
||||
load->inv_weight = sched_prio_to_wmult[prio];
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -3289,8 +3291,6 @@ static long calc_group_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int throttled_hierarchy(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Recomputes the group entity based on the current state of its group
|
||||
* runqueue.
|
||||
@ -4403,16 +4403,11 @@ enqueue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se, int flags)
|
||||
__enqueue_entity(cfs_rq, se);
|
||||
se->on_rq = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When bandwidth control is enabled, cfs might have been removed
|
||||
* because of a parent been throttled but cfs->nr_running > 1. Try to
|
||||
* add it unconditionally.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1 || cfs_bandwidth_used())
|
||||
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1)
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->nr_running == 1) {
|
||||
check_enqueue_throttle(cfs_rq);
|
||||
if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
|
||||
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __clear_buddies_last(struct sched_entity *se)
|
||||
@ -5027,11 +5022,18 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
||||
/* update hierarchical throttle state */
|
||||
walk_tg_tree_from(cfs_rq->tg, tg_nop, tg_unthrottle_up, (void *)rq);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Nothing to run but something to decay (on_list)? Complete the branch */
|
||||
if (!cfs_rq->load.weight) {
|
||||
if (cfs_rq->on_list)
|
||||
goto unthrottle_throttle;
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (!cfs_rq->on_list)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Nothing to run but something to decay (on_list)?
|
||||
* Complete the branch.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
|
||||
if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq_of(se)))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
goto unthrottle_throttle;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
task_delta = cfs_rq->h_nr_running;
|
||||
@ -5069,31 +5071,12 @@ void unthrottle_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
|
||||
/* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
|
||||
if (cfs_rq_throttled(qcfs_rq))
|
||||
goto unthrottle_throttle;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the
|
||||
* list. Add it back to not break the leaf list.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (throttled_hierarchy(qcfs_rq))
|
||||
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(qcfs_rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/
|
||||
add_nr_running(rq, task_delta);
|
||||
|
||||
unthrottle_throttle:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The cfs_rq_throttled() breaks in the above iteration can result in
|
||||
* incomplete leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the
|
||||
* assertion below.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
|
||||
struct cfs_rq *qcfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
|
||||
|
||||
if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(qcfs_rq))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Determine whether we need to wake up potentially idle CPU: */
|
||||
@ -5748,13 +5731,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
|
||||
/* end evaluation on encountering a throttled cfs_rq */
|
||||
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
|
||||
goto enqueue_throttle;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* One parent has been throttled and cfs_rq removed from the
|
||||
* list. Add it back to not break the leaf list.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
|
||||
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* At this point se is NULL and we are at root level*/
|
||||
@ -5778,21 +5754,6 @@ enqueue_task_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
|
||||
update_overutilized_status(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
enqueue_throttle:
|
||||
if (cfs_bandwidth_used()) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* When bandwidth control is enabled; the cfs_rq_throttled()
|
||||
* breaks in the above iteration can result in incomplete
|
||||
* leaf list maintenance, resulting in triggering the assertion
|
||||
* below.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
|
||||
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
|
||||
|
||||
if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
assert_list_leaf_cfs_rq(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
hrtick_update(rq);
|
||||
@ -11316,9 +11277,13 @@ static inline bool vruntime_normalized(struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
|
||||
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
|
||||
|
||||
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq_of(se));
|
||||
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
|
||||
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Start to propagate at parent */
|
||||
se = se->parent;
|
||||
@ -11326,14 +11291,13 @@ static void propagate_entity_cfs_rq(struct sched_entity *se)
|
||||
for_each_sched_entity(se) {
|
||||
cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq)){
|
||||
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
|
||||
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
update_load_avg(cfs_rq, se, UPDATE_TG);
|
||||
|
||||
if (list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq))
|
||||
if (cfs_rq_throttled(cfs_rq))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!throttled_hierarchy(cfs_rq))
|
||||
list_add_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user