ovl: fix spelling mistakes

fix follow spelling misktakes:
	decendant  ==> descendant
	indentify  ==> identify
	underlaying ==> underlying

Reported-by: Hacash Robot <hacashRobot@santino.com>
Signed-off-by: William Dean <williamsukatube@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
William Dean 2022-07-29 09:57:26 +08:00 committed by Miklos Szeredi
parent dd524b7f31
commit 4f1196288d
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static int ovl_check_redirect(struct path *path, struct ovl_lookup_data *d,
* One of the ancestor path elements in an absolute path
* lookup in ovl_lookup_layer() could have been opaque and
* that will stop further lookup in lower layers (d->stop=true)
* But we have found an absolute redirect in decendant path
* But we have found an absolute redirect in descendant path
* element and that should force continue lookup in lower
* layers (reset d->stop).
*/
@ -648,7 +648,7 @@ static int ovl_get_index_name_fh(struct ovl_fh *fh, struct qstr *name)
* If the index dentry for a copy up origin inode is positive, but points
* to an inode different than the upper inode, then either the upper inode
* has been copied up and not indexed or it was indexed, but since then
* index dir was cleared. Either way, that index cannot be used to indentify
* index dir was cleared. Either way, that index cannot be used to identify
* the overlay inode.
*/
int ovl_get_index_name(struct ovl_fs *ofs, struct dentry *origin,

View File

@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ static int ovl_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent)
sb->s_stack_depth = 0;
sb->s_maxbytes = MAX_LFS_FILESIZE;
atomic_long_set(&ofs->last_ino, 1);
/* Assume underlaying fs uses 32bit inodes unless proven otherwise */
/* Assume underlying fs uses 32bit inodes unless proven otherwise */
if (ofs->config.xino != OVL_XINO_OFF) {
ofs->xino_mode = BITS_PER_LONG - 32;
if (!ofs->xino_mode) {