From 385de0ef387dc7f33fc5b828136cbc9516b3ec1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christoph Hellwig Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2022 06:43:11 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: use a normal workqueue for rmw_workers rmw_workers doesn't need ordered execution or thread disabling threshold (as the thresh parameter is less than DFT_THRESHOLD). Just switch to the normal workqueues that use a lot less resources, especially in the work_struct vs btrfs_work structures. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/ctree.h | 2 +- fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 6 +++--- fs/btrfs/raid56.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------------- 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h index 6097166e39b6..f55b15437602 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h +++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h @@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info { struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_meta_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_raid56_workers; - struct btrfs_workqueue *rmw_workers; + struct workqueue_struct *rmw_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_meta_write_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_write_workers; struct btrfs_workqueue *endio_freespace_worker; diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c index 807e7b272896..7ce945db1243 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c @@ -2283,7 +2283,8 @@ static void btrfs_stop_all_workers(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->workers); btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_workers); btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_raid56_workers); - btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->rmw_workers); + if (fs_info->rmw_workers) + destroy_workqueue(fs_info->rmw_workers); btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_write_workers); btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->endio_freespace_worker); btrfs_destroy_workqueue(fs_info->delayed_workers); @@ -2492,8 +2493,7 @@ static int btrfs_init_workqueues(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) fs_info->endio_raid56_workers = btrfs_alloc_workqueue(fs_info, "endio-raid56", flags, max_active, 4); - fs_info->rmw_workers = - btrfs_alloc_workqueue(fs_info, "rmw", flags, max_active, 2); + fs_info->rmw_workers = alloc_workqueue("btrfs-rmw", flags, max_active); fs_info->endio_write_workers = btrfs_alloc_workqueue(fs_info, "endio-write", flags, max_active, 2); diff --git a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c index 31f16f86081b..a5b623ee6fac 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/raid56.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/raid56.c @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ struct btrfs_raid_bio { /* * for scheduling work in the helper threads */ - struct btrfs_work work; + struct work_struct work; /* * bio list and bio_list_lock are used @@ -196,8 +196,8 @@ struct btrfs_raid_bio { static int __raid56_parity_recover(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio); static noinline void finish_rmw(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio); -static void rmw_work(struct btrfs_work *work); -static void read_rebuild_work(struct btrfs_work *work); +static void rmw_work(struct work_struct *work); +static void read_rebuild_work(struct work_struct *work); static int fail_bio_stripe(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, struct bio *bio); static int fail_rbio_index(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, int failed); static void __free_raid_bio(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio); @@ -206,12 +206,12 @@ static int alloc_rbio_pages(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio); static noinline void finish_parity_scrub(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, int need_check); -static void scrub_parity_work(struct btrfs_work *work); +static void scrub_parity_work(struct work_struct *work); -static void start_async_work(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, btrfs_func_t work_func) +static void start_async_work(struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio, work_func_t work_func) { - btrfs_init_work(&rbio->work, work_func, NULL, NULL); - btrfs_queue_work(rbio->bioc->fs_info->rmw_workers, &rbio->work); + INIT_WORK(&rbio->work, work_func); + queue_work(rbio->bioc->fs_info->rmw_workers, &rbio->work); } /* @@ -1745,7 +1745,7 @@ struct btrfs_plug_cb { struct blk_plug_cb cb; struct btrfs_fs_info *info; struct list_head rbio_list; - struct btrfs_work work; + struct work_struct work; }; /* @@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ static void run_plug(struct btrfs_plug_cb *plug) * if the unplug comes from schedule, we have to push the * work off to a helper thread */ -static void unplug_work(struct btrfs_work *work) +static void unplug_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct btrfs_plug_cb *plug; plug = container_of(work, struct btrfs_plug_cb, work); @@ -1826,9 +1826,8 @@ static void btrfs_raid_unplug(struct blk_plug_cb *cb, bool from_schedule) plug = container_of(cb, struct btrfs_plug_cb, cb); if (from_schedule) { - btrfs_init_work(&plug->work, unplug_work, NULL, NULL); - btrfs_queue_work(plug->info->rmw_workers, - &plug->work); + INIT_WORK(&plug->work, unplug_work); + queue_work(plug->info->rmw_workers, &plug->work); return; } run_plug(plug); @@ -2316,7 +2315,7 @@ int raid56_parity_recover(struct bio *bio, struct btrfs_io_context *bioc, } -static void rmw_work(struct btrfs_work *work) +static void rmw_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio; @@ -2324,7 +2323,7 @@ static void rmw_work(struct btrfs_work *work) raid56_rmw_stripe(rbio); } -static void read_rebuild_work(struct btrfs_work *work) +static void read_rebuild_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio; @@ -2781,7 +2780,7 @@ finish: validate_rbio_for_parity_scrub(rbio); } -static void scrub_parity_work(struct btrfs_work *work) +static void scrub_parity_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct btrfs_raid_bio *rbio;