mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-16 00:52:01 +00:00
sched: fair group: fix overflow(was: fix divide by zero)
I found a bug which can be reproduced by this way:(linux-2.6.26-rc5, x86-64) (use 2^32, 2^33, ...., 2^63 as shares value) # mkdir /dev/cpuctl # mount -t cgroup -o cpu cpuctl /dev/cpuctl # cd /dev/cpuctl # mkdir sub # echo 0x8000000000000000 > sub/cpu.shares # echo $$ > sub/tasks oops here! divide by zero. This is because do_div() expects the 2th parameter to be 32 bits, but unsigned long is 64 bits in x86_64. Peter Zijstra pointed it out that the sane thing to do is limit the shares value to something smaller instead of using an even more expensive divide. Also, I found another bug about "the shares value is too large": pid1 and pid2 are set affinity to cpu#0 pid1 is attached to cg1 and pid2 is attached to cg2 if cg1/cpu.shares = 1024 cg2/cpu.shares = 2000000000 then pid2 got 100% usage of cpu, and pid1 0% if cg1/cpu.shares = 1024 cg2/cpu.shares = 20000000000 then pid2 got 0% usage of cpu, and pid1 100% And a weight of a cfs_rq is the sum of weights of which entities are queued on this cfs_rq, so the shares value should be limited to a smaller value. I think that (1UL << 18) is a good limited value: 1) it's not too large, we can create a lot of group before overflow 2) it's several times the weight value for nice=-19 (not too small) Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
16882c1e96
commit
2e084786f6
@ -312,12 +312,15 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(task_group_lock);
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* A weight of 0, 1 or ULONG_MAX can cause arithmetics problems.
|
||||
* A weight of 0 or 1 can cause arithmetics problems.
|
||||
* A weight of a cfs_rq is the sum of weights of which entities
|
||||
* are queued on this cfs_rq, so a weight of a entity should not be
|
||||
* too large, so as the shares value of a task group.
|
||||
* (The default weight is 1024 - so there's no practical
|
||||
* limitation from this.)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define MIN_SHARES 2
|
||||
#define MAX_SHARES (ULONG_MAX - 1)
|
||||
#define MAX_SHARES (1UL << 18)
|
||||
|
||||
static int init_task_group_load = INIT_TASK_GROUP_LOAD;
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user