mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-11 06:31:49 +00:00
[UDP]: Avoid repeated counting of checksum errors due to peeking
Currently it is possible for two processes to peek on the same socket and end up incrementing the error counter twice for the same packet. This patch fixes it by making skb_kill_datagram return whether it succeeded in unlinking the packet and only incrementing the counter if it did. Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c8fecf2242
commit
27ab256864
@ -1549,7 +1549,7 @@ extern int skb_copy_and_csum_datagram_iovec(struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
int hlen,
|
||||
struct iovec *iov);
|
||||
extern void skb_free_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb);
|
||||
extern void skb_kill_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
extern int skb_kill_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
|
||||
unsigned int flags);
|
||||
extern __wsum skb_checksum(const struct sk_buff *skb, int offset,
|
||||
int len, __wsum csum);
|
||||
|
@ -217,20 +217,27 @@ void skb_free_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
|
||||
* This function currently only disables BH when acquiring the
|
||||
* sk_receive_queue lock. Therefore it must not be used in a
|
||||
* context where that lock is acquired in an IRQ context.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* It returns 0 if the packet was removed by us.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
void skb_kill_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int flags)
|
||||
int skb_kill_datagram(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, unsigned int flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int err = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & MSG_PEEK) {
|
||||
err = -ENOENT;
|
||||
spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
|
||||
if (skb == skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) {
|
||||
__skb_unlink(skb, &sk->sk_receive_queue);
|
||||
atomic_dec(&skb->users);
|
||||
err = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
kfree_skb(skb);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(skb_kill_datagram);
|
||||
|
@ -899,10 +899,9 @@ out:
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
csum_copy_err:
|
||||
if (!skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags))
|
||||
UDP_INC_STATS_USER(UDP_MIB_INERRORS, is_udplite);
|
||||
|
||||
skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (noblock)
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
goto try_again;
|
||||
|
@ -207,8 +207,8 @@ out:
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
csum_copy_err:
|
||||
if (!skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags))
|
||||
UDP6_INC_STATS_USER(UDP_MIB_INERRORS, is_udplite);
|
||||
skb_kill_datagram(sk, skb, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & MSG_DONTWAIT)
|
||||
return -EAGAIN;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user