mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-28 13:51:44 +00:00
intel_idle: allow sparse sub-state numbering, for Bay Trail
Like acpi_idle, intel_idle compared sub-state numbers to the number of supported sub-states -- discarding sub-states numbers that were numbered >= the number of states. But some Bay Trail SOCs use sparse sub-state numbers, so we can't make such a comparison if we are going to access those states. So now we simply check that _some_ sub-states are supported for the given state, and assume that the sub-state number in our driver is valid. In practice, the driver is correct, and even if it were not, the hardware clips invalid sub-state requests to valid ones. No entries in the driver require this change, but Bay Trail will need it. Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2194324d8b
commit
24bfa950f1
@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int __init intel_idle_cpuidle_driver_init(void)
|
||||
drv->state_count = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
for (cstate = 0; cstate < CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX; ++cstate) {
|
||||
int num_substates, mwait_hint, mwait_cstate, mwait_substate;
|
||||
int num_substates, mwait_hint, mwait_cstate;
|
||||
|
||||
if (cpuidle_state_table[cstate].enter == NULL)
|
||||
break;
|
||||
@ -597,14 +597,13 @@ static int __init intel_idle_cpuidle_driver_init(void)
|
||||
|
||||
mwait_hint = flg2MWAIT(cpuidle_state_table[cstate].flags);
|
||||
mwait_cstate = MWAIT_HINT2CSTATE(mwait_hint);
|
||||
mwait_substate = MWAIT_HINT2SUBSTATE(mwait_hint);
|
||||
|
||||
/* does the state exist in CPUID.MWAIT? */
|
||||
/* number of sub-states for this state in CPUID.MWAIT */
|
||||
num_substates = (mwait_substates >> ((mwait_cstate + 1) * 4))
|
||||
& MWAIT_SUBSTATE_MASK;
|
||||
|
||||
/* if sub-state in table is not enumerated by CPUID */
|
||||
if ((mwait_substate + 1) > num_substates)
|
||||
/* if NO sub-states for this state in CPUID, skip it */
|
||||
if (num_substates == 0)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (((mwait_cstate + 1) > 2) &&
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user