mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 14:11:52 +00:00
watchdog/softlockup: remove logic that tried to prevent repeated reports
The softlockup detector does some gymnastic with the variable soft_watchdog_warn. It was added by the commit58687acba5
("lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup detector"). The purpose is not completely clear. There are the following clues. They describe the situation how it looked after the above mentioned commit: 1. The variable was checked with a comment "only warn once". 2. The variable was set when softlockup was reported. It was cleared only when the CPU was not longer in the softlockup state. 3. watchdog_touch_ts was not explicitly updated when the softlockup was reported. Without this variable, the report would normally be printed again during every following watchdog_timer_fn() invocation. The logic has got even more tangled up by the commited235875e2
("kernel/watchdog.c: print traces for all cpus on lockup detection"). After this commit, soft_watchdog_warn is set only when softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace is enabled. But multiple reports from all CPUs are prevented by a new variable soft_lockup_nmi_warn. Conclusion: The variable probably never worked as intended. In each case, it has not worked last many years because the softlockup was reported repeatedly after the full period defined by watchdog_thresh. The reason is that watchdog gets touched in many known slow paths, for example, in printk_stack_address(). This code is called also when printing the softlockup report. It means that the watchdog timestamp gets updated after each report. Solution: Simply remove the logic. People want the periodic report anyway. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311122130.6788-5-pmladek@suse.com Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
fef06efc2e
commit
1bc503cb4a
@ -179,7 +179,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, watchdog_touch_ts);
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, watchdog_report_ts);
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer, watchdog_hrtimer);
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, softlockup_touch_sync);
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, soft_watchdog_warn);
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hrtimer_interrupts);
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hrtimer_interrupts_saved);
|
||||
static unsigned long soft_lockup_nmi_warn;
|
||||
@ -411,19 +410,12 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
|
||||
if (kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused())
|
||||
return HRTIMER_RESTART;
|
||||
|
||||
/* only warn once */
|
||||
if (__this_cpu_read(soft_watchdog_warn) == true)
|
||||
return HRTIMER_RESTART;
|
||||
|
||||
if (softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace) {
|
||||
/* Prevent multiple soft-lockup reports if one cpu is already
|
||||
* engaged in dumping cpu back traces
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (test_and_set_bit(0, &soft_lockup_nmi_warn)) {
|
||||
/* Someone else will report us. Let's give up */
|
||||
__this_cpu_write(soft_watchdog_warn, true);
|
||||
if (test_and_set_bit(0, &soft_lockup_nmi_warn))
|
||||
return HRTIMER_RESTART;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Start period for the next softlockup warning. */
|
||||
@ -453,9 +445,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
|
||||
add_taint(TAINT_SOFTLOCKUP, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
|
||||
if (softlockup_panic)
|
||||
panic("softlockup: hung tasks");
|
||||
__this_cpu_write(soft_watchdog_warn, true);
|
||||
} else
|
||||
__this_cpu_write(soft_watchdog_warn, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return HRTIMER_RESTART;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user