Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-11-11 14:42:24 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

x86: don't save unreliable stack trace entries

Browse Source 
Currently, there is no way for print_stack_trace() to determine whether
a given stack trace entry was deemed reliable or not, simply because
save_stack_trace() does not record this information. (Perhaps needless
to say, this makes the saved stack traces A LOT harder to read, and
probably with no other benefits, since debugging features that use
save_stack_trace() most likely also require frame pointers, etc.)

This patch reverts to the old behaviour of only recording the reliable trace
entries for saved stack traces.

Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no>
Acked-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
Vegard Nossum 2008-02-22 19:23:58 +01:00 committed by Ingo Molnar
parent ed2b7e2b1d
commit 1650743cdc
1 changed files with 4 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
View File

@ -25,6 +25,8 @@ static int save_stack_stack(void *data, char *name)
static void save_stack_address(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
{
struct stack_trace *trace = data;
if (!reliable)
return;
if (trace->skip > 0) {
trace->skip--;
return;
@ -37,6 +39,8 @@ static void
save_stack_address_nosched(void *data, unsigned long addr, int reliable)
{
struct stack_trace *trace = (struct stack_trace *)data;
if (!reliable)
return;
if (in_sched_functions(addr))
return;
if (trace->skip > 0) {