mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 22:21:40 +00:00
tasks, sched/core: With a grace period after finish_task_switch(), remove unnecessary code
Remove work arounds that were written before there was a grace period after tasks left the runqueue in finish_task_switch(). In particular now that there tasks exiting the runqueue exprience a RCU grace period none of the work performed by task_rcu_dereference() excpet the rcu_dereference() is necessary so replace task_rcu_dereference() with rcu_dereference(). Remove the code in rcuwait_wait_event() that checks to ensure the current task has not exited. It is no longer necessary as it is guaranteed that any running task will experience a RCU grace period after it leaves the run queueue. Remove the comment in rcuwait_wake_up() as it is no longer relevant. Ref:8f95c90ceb
("sched/wait, RCU: Introduce rcuwait machinery") Ref:150593bf86
("sched/api: Introduce task_rcu_dereference() and try_get_task_struct()") Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <tkhai@yandex.ru> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87lfurdpk9.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0ff7b2cfba
commit
154abafc68
@ -6,16 +6,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* rcuwait provides a way of blocking and waking up a single
|
||||
* task in an rcu-safe manner; where it is forbidden to use
|
||||
* after exit_notify(). task_struct is not properly rcu protected,
|
||||
* unless dealing with rcu-aware lists, ie: find_task_by_*().
|
||||
* task in an rcu-safe manner.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Alternatively we have task_rcu_dereference(), but the return
|
||||
* semantics have different implications which would break the
|
||||
* wakeup side. The only time @task is non-nil is when a user is
|
||||
* blocked (or checking if it needs to) on a condition, and reset
|
||||
* as soon as we know that the condition has succeeded and are
|
||||
* awoken.
|
||||
* The only time @task is non-nil is when a user is blocked (or
|
||||
* checking if it needs to) on a condition, and reset as soon as we
|
||||
* know that the condition has succeeded and are awoken.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct rcuwait {
|
||||
struct task_struct __rcu *task;
|
||||
@ -37,13 +32,6 @@ extern void rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define rcuwait_wait_event(w, condition) \
|
||||
({ \
|
||||
/* \
|
||||
* Complain if we are called after do_exit()/exit_notify(), \
|
||||
* as we cannot rely on the rcu critical region for the \
|
||||
* wakeup side. \
|
||||
*/ \
|
||||
WARN_ON(current->exit_state); \
|
||||
\
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer((w)->task, current); \
|
||||
for (;;) { \
|
||||
/* \
|
||||
|
@ -119,7 +119,6 @@ static inline void put_task_struct(struct task_struct *t)
|
||||
__put_task_struct(t);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
struct task_struct *task_rcu_dereference(struct task_struct **ptask);
|
||||
void put_task_struct_rcu_user(struct task_struct *task);
|
||||
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_DYNAMIC_TASK_STRUCT
|
||||
|
@ -234,69 +234,6 @@ repeat:
|
||||
goto repeat;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note that if this function returns a valid task_struct pointer (!NULL)
|
||||
* task->usage must remain >0 for the duration of the RCU critical section.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
struct task_struct *task_rcu_dereference(struct task_struct **ptask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sighand_struct *sighand;
|
||||
struct task_struct *task;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need to verify that release_task() was not called and thus
|
||||
* delayed_put_task_struct() can't run and drop the last reference
|
||||
* before rcu_read_unlock(). We check task->sighand != NULL,
|
||||
* but we can read the already freed and reused memory.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
retry:
|
||||
task = rcu_dereference(*ptask);
|
||||
if (!task)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
probe_kernel_address(&task->sighand, sighand);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Pairs with atomic_dec_and_test() in put_task_struct(). If this task
|
||||
* was already freed we can not miss the preceding update of this
|
||||
* pointer.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_rmb();
|
||||
if (unlikely(task != READ_ONCE(*ptask)))
|
||||
goto retry;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've re-checked that "task == *ptask", now we have two different
|
||||
* cases:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 1. This is actually the same task/task_struct. In this case
|
||||
* sighand != NULL tells us it is still alive.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* 2. This is another task which got the same memory for task_struct.
|
||||
* We can't know this of course, and we can not trust
|
||||
* sighand != NULL.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* In this case we actually return a random value, but this is
|
||||
* correct.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If we return NULL - we can pretend that we actually noticed that
|
||||
* *ptask was updated when the previous task has exited. Or pretend
|
||||
* that probe_slab_address(&sighand) reads NULL.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If we return the new task (because sighand is not NULL for any
|
||||
* reason) - this is fine too. This (new) task can't go away before
|
||||
* another gp pass.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* And note: We could even eliminate the false positive if re-read
|
||||
* task->sighand once again to avoid the falsely NULL. But this case
|
||||
* is very unlikely so we don't care.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!sighand)
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
return task;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *task;
|
||||
@ -316,10 +253,6 @@ void rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
smp_mb(); /* (B) */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Avoid using task_rcu_dereference() magic as long as we are careful,
|
||||
* see comment in rcuwait_wait_event() regarding ->exit_state.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
task = rcu_dereference(w->task);
|
||||
if (task)
|
||||
wake_up_process(task);
|
||||
|
@ -1602,7 +1602,7 @@ static void task_numa_compare(struct task_numa_env *env,
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
cur = task_rcu_dereference(&dst_rq->curr);
|
||||
cur = rcu_dereference(dst_rq->curr);
|
||||
if (cur && ((cur->flags & PF_EXITING) || is_idle_task(cur)))
|
||||
cur = NULL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int membarrier_global_expedited(void)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
p = task_rcu_dereference(&cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
|
||||
p = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
|
||||
if (p && p->mm && (atomic_read(&p->mm->membarrier_state) &
|
||||
MEMBARRIER_STATE_GLOBAL_EXPEDITED)) {
|
||||
if (!fallback)
|
||||
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(int flags)
|
||||
if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
p = task_rcu_dereference(&cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
|
||||
p = rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
|
||||
if (p && p->mm == current->mm) {
|
||||
if (!fallback)
|
||||
__cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tmpmask);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user