mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 22:21:40 +00:00
ncpfs: don't allow negative timeouts
This code causes a static checker warning because it's a user controlled variable where we cap the upper bound but not the lower bound. Let's return an -EINVAL for negative timeouts. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove unneeded `else'] Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5cf6a51e60
commit
1491e30ed1
@ -525,6 +525,8 @@ static long __ncp_ioctl(struct inode *inode, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg
|
||||
switch (rqdata.cmd) {
|
||||
case NCP_LOCK_EX:
|
||||
case NCP_LOCK_SH:
|
||||
if (rqdata.timeout < 0)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
if (rqdata.timeout == 0)
|
||||
rqdata.timeout = NCP_LOCK_DEFAULT_TIMEOUT;
|
||||
else if (rqdata.timeout > NCP_LOCK_MAX_TIMEOUT)
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user