arm64: cpufeature: Fix feature comparison for CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG}

If CTR_EL0.{CWG,ERG} are 0b0000 then they must be interpreted to have
their architecturally maximum values, which defeats the use of
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE when sanitising CPU ID registers on heterogeneous
machines.

Introduce FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE so that these fields effectively
saturate at zero.

Fixes: 3c739b5710 ("arm64: Keep track of CPU feature registers")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4.x-
Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Will Deacon 2019-07-30 15:40:20 +01:00 committed by Catalin Marinas
parent a22c5cf5d3
commit 147b9635e6
2 changed files with 10 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -35,9 +35,10 @@
*/
enum ftr_type {
FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */
FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE,/* Bigger value is safe */
FTR_EXACT, /* Use a predefined safe value */
FTR_LOWER_SAFE, /* Smaller value is safe */
FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe */
FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, /* Bigger value is safe, but 0 is biggest */
};
#define FTR_STRICT true /* SANITY check strict matching required */

View File

@ -225,8 +225,8 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_ctr[] = {
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_EXACT, 31, 1, 1), /* RES1 */
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_DIC_SHIFT, 1, 1),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_IDC_SHIFT, 1, 1),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, CTR_CWG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_SAFE, CTR_ERG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, CTR_CWG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE, CTR_ERG_SHIFT, 4, 0),
ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_VISIBLE, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, CTR_DMINLINE_SHIFT, 4, 1),
/*
* Linux can handle differing I-cache policies. Userspace JITs will
@ -468,6 +468,10 @@ static s64 arm64_ftr_safe_value(const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp, s64 new,
case FTR_LOWER_SAFE:
ret = new < cur ? new : cur;
break;
case FTR_HIGHER_OR_ZERO_SAFE:
if (!cur || !new)
break;
/* Fallthrough */
case FTR_HIGHER_SAFE:
ret = new > cur ? new : cur;
break;