mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-17 17:41:44 +00:00
sctp: implement memory accounting on tx path
Now when sending packets, sk_mem_charge() and sk_mem_uncharge() have been used to set sk_forward_alloc. We just need to call sk_wmem_schedule() to check if the allocated should be raised, and call sk_mem_reclaim() to check if the allocated should be reduced when it's under memory pressure. If sk_wmem_schedule() returns false, which means no memory is allowed to allocate, it will block and wait for memory to become available. Note different from tcp, sctp wait_for_buf happens before allocating any skb, so memory accounting check is done with the whole msg_len before it too. Reported-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com> Tested-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com> Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
93144b0ecd
commit
1033990ac5
@ -1913,7 +1913,10 @@ static int sctp_sendmsg_to_asoc(struct sctp_association *asoc,
|
||||
if (sctp_wspace(asoc) < (int)msg_len)
|
||||
sctp_prsctp_prune(asoc, sinfo, msg_len - sctp_wspace(asoc));
|
||||
|
||||
if (sctp_wspace(asoc) <= 0) {
|
||||
if (sk_under_memory_pressure(sk))
|
||||
sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
if (sctp_wspace(asoc) <= 0 || !sk_wmem_schedule(sk, msg_len)) {
|
||||
timeo = sock_sndtimeo(sk, msg->msg_flags & MSG_DONTWAIT);
|
||||
err = sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(asoc, &timeo, msg_len);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
@ -8930,7 +8933,10 @@ static int sctp_wait_for_sndbuf(struct sctp_association *asoc, long *timeo_p,
|
||||
goto do_error;
|
||||
if (signal_pending(current))
|
||||
goto do_interrupted;
|
||||
if ((int)msg_len <= sctp_wspace(asoc))
|
||||
if (sk_under_memory_pressure(sk))
|
||||
sk_mem_reclaim(sk);
|
||||
if ((int)msg_len <= sctp_wspace(asoc) &&
|
||||
sk_wmem_schedule(sk, msg_len))
|
||||
break;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Let another process have a go. Since we are going
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user