mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-25 12:21:37 +00:00
fsnotify: turn fsnotify reaper thread into a workqueue job
We don't require a dedicated thread for fsnotify cleanup. Switch it over to a workqueue job instead that runs on the system_unbound_wq. In the interest of not thrashing the queued job too often when there are a lot of marks being removed, we delay the reaper job slightly when queueing it, to allow several to gather on the list. Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jeff.layton@primarydata.com> Tested-by: Eryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
13d34ac6e5
commit
0918f1c309
@ -91,10 +91,14 @@
|
||||
#include <linux/fsnotify_backend.h>
|
||||
#include "fsnotify.h"
|
||||
|
||||
#define FSNOTIFY_REAPER_DELAY (1) /* 1 jiffy */
|
||||
|
||||
struct srcu_struct fsnotify_mark_srcu;
|
||||
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(destroy_lock);
|
||||
static LIST_HEAD(destroy_list);
|
||||
static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(destroy_waitq);
|
||||
|
||||
static void fsnotify_mark_destroy(struct work_struct *work);
|
||||
static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(reaper_work, fsnotify_mark_destroy);
|
||||
|
||||
void fsnotify_get_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -189,7 +193,8 @@ void fsnotify_free_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)
|
||||
spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
|
||||
list_add(&mark->g_list, &destroy_list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
|
||||
wake_up(&destroy_waitq);
|
||||
queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &reaper_work,
|
||||
FSNOTIFY_REAPER_DELAY);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Some groups like to know that marks are being freed. This is a
|
||||
@ -388,7 +393,8 @@ err:
|
||||
spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
|
||||
list_add(&mark->g_list, &destroy_list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
|
||||
wake_up(&destroy_waitq);
|
||||
queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &reaper_work,
|
||||
FSNOTIFY_REAPER_DELAY);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -493,39 +499,20 @@ void fsnotify_init_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark,
|
||||
mark->free_mark = free_mark;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int fsnotify_mark_destroy(void *ignored)
|
||||
static void fsnotify_mark_destroy(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct fsnotify_mark *mark, *next;
|
||||
struct list_head private_destroy_list;
|
||||
|
||||
for (;;) {
|
||||
spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
|
||||
/* exchange the list head */
|
||||
list_replace_init(&destroy_list, &private_destroy_list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&destroy_lock);
|
||||
/* exchange the list head */
|
||||
list_replace_init(&destroy_list, &private_destroy_list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&destroy_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
synchronize_srcu(&fsnotify_mark_srcu);
|
||||
synchronize_srcu(&fsnotify_mark_srcu);
|
||||
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(mark, next, &private_destroy_list, g_list) {
|
||||
list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
|
||||
fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
wait_event_interruptible(destroy_waitq, !list_empty(&destroy_list));
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(mark, next, &private_destroy_list, g_list) {
|
||||
list_del_init(&mark->g_list);
|
||||
fsnotify_put_mark(mark);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int __init fsnotify_mark_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *thread;
|
||||
|
||||
thread = kthread_run(fsnotify_mark_destroy, NULL,
|
||||
"fsnotify_mark");
|
||||
if (IS_ERR(thread))
|
||||
panic("unable to start fsnotify mark destruction thread.");
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
device_initcall(fsnotify_mark_init);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user