mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-12-27 05:11:48 +00:00
powerpc/powernv: Move opal_power_control_init() call in opal_init().
opal_power_control_init() depends on opal message notifier to be initialized, which is done in opal_init()->opal_message_init(). But both these initialization are called through machine initcalls and it all depends on in which order they being called. So far these are called in correct order (may be we got lucky) and never saw any issue. But it is clearer to control initialization order explicitly by moving opal_power_control_init() into opal_init(). Signed-off-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mahesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ae6263cc33
commit
08fb726df1
@ -347,6 +347,7 @@ extern int opal_async_comp_init(void);
|
||||
extern int opal_sensor_init(void);
|
||||
extern int opal_hmi_handler_init(void);
|
||||
extern int opal_event_init(void);
|
||||
int opal_power_control_init(void);
|
||||
|
||||
extern int opal_machine_check(struct pt_regs *regs);
|
||||
extern bool opal_mce_check_early_recovery(struct pt_regs *regs);
|
||||
|
@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static struct notifier_block opal_power_control_nb = {
|
||||
.priority = 0,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static int __init opal_power_control_init(void)
|
||||
int __init opal_power_control_init(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret, supported = 0;
|
||||
struct device_node *np;
|
||||
@ -176,4 +176,3 @@ static int __init opal_power_control_init(void)
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
machine_subsys_initcall(powernv, opal_power_control_init);
|
||||
|
@ -960,6 +960,9 @@ static int __init opal_init(void)
|
||||
/* Initialise OPAL sensor groups */
|
||||
opal_sensor_groups_init();
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialise OPAL Power control interface */
|
||||
opal_power_control_init();
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
machine_subsys_initcall(powernv, opal_init);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user