mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 22:21:40 +00:00
[PATCH] x86-64: bitops fix for -Os
This fixes the x86-64 find_[first|next]_zero_bit() function for the end-of-range case. It didn't test for a zero size, and the "rep scas" would do entirely the wrong thing. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cfa024f4e4
commit
06024f217d
@ -5,19 +5,23 @@
|
|||||||
#undef find_first_bit
|
#undef find_first_bit
|
||||||
#undef find_next_bit
|
#undef find_next_bit
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
static inline long
|
||||||
* find_first_zero_bit - find the first zero bit in a memory region
|
__find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
||||||
* @addr: The address to start the search at
|
|
||||||
* @size: The maximum size to search
|
|
||||||
*
|
|
||||||
* Returns the bit-number of the first zero bit, not the number of the byte
|
|
||||||
* containing a bit.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
inline long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
long d0, d1, d2;
|
long d0, d1, d2;
|
||||||
long res;
|
long res;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* We must test the size in words, not in bits, because
|
||||||
|
* otherwise incoming sizes in the range -63..-1 will not run
|
||||||
|
* any scasq instructions, and then the flags used by the je
|
||||||
|
* instruction will have whatever random value was in place
|
||||||
|
* before. Nobody should call us like that, but
|
||||||
|
* find_next_zero_bit() does when offset and size are at the
|
||||||
|
* same word and it fails to find a zero itself.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
size += 63;
|
||||||
|
size >>= 6;
|
||||||
if (!size)
|
if (!size)
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
asm volatile(
|
asm volatile(
|
||||||
@ -30,11 +34,29 @@ inline long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|||||||
" shlq $3,%%rdi\n"
|
" shlq $3,%%rdi\n"
|
||||||
" addq %%rdi,%%rdx"
|
" addq %%rdi,%%rdx"
|
||||||
:"=d" (res), "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1), "=&a" (d2)
|
:"=d" (res), "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1), "=&a" (d2)
|
||||||
:"0" (0ULL), "1" ((size + 63) >> 6), "2" (addr), "3" (-1ULL),
|
:"0" (0ULL), "1" (size), "2" (addr), "3" (-1ULL),
|
||||||
[addr] "r" (addr) : "memory");
|
[addr] "S" (addr) : "memory");
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* Any register would do for [addr] above, but GCC tends to
|
||||||
|
* prefer rbx over rsi, even though rsi is readily available
|
||||||
|
* and doesn't have to be saved.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
return res;
|
return res;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/**
|
||||||
|
* find_first_zero_bit - find the first zero bit in a memory region
|
||||||
|
* @addr: The address to start the search at
|
||||||
|
* @size: The maximum size to search
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* Returns the bit-number of the first zero bit, not the number of the byte
|
||||||
|
* containing a bit.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
return __find_first_zero_bit (addr, size);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/**
|
/**
|
||||||
* find_next_zero_bit - find the first zero bit in a memory region
|
* find_next_zero_bit - find the first zero bit in a memory region
|
||||||
* @addr: The address to base the search on
|
* @addr: The address to base the search on
|
||||||
@ -43,7 +65,7 @@ inline long find_first_zero_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
long find_next_zero_bit (const unsigned long * addr, long size, long offset)
|
long find_next_zero_bit (const unsigned long * addr, long size, long offset)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
unsigned long * p = ((unsigned long *) addr) + (offset >> 6);
|
const unsigned long * p = addr + (offset >> 6);
|
||||||
unsigned long set = 0;
|
unsigned long set = 0;
|
||||||
unsigned long res, bit = offset&63;
|
unsigned long res, bit = offset&63;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -63,8 +85,8 @@ long find_next_zero_bit (const unsigned long * addr, long size, long offset)
|
|||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* No zero yet, search remaining full words for a zero
|
* No zero yet, search remaining full words for a zero
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
res = find_first_zero_bit ((const unsigned long *)p,
|
res = __find_first_zero_bit (p, size - 64 * (p - addr));
|
||||||
size - 64 * (p - (unsigned long *) addr));
|
|
||||||
return (offset + set + res);
|
return (offset + set + res);
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@ -74,6 +96,19 @@ __find_first_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|||||||
long d0, d1;
|
long d0, d1;
|
||||||
long res;
|
long res;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* We must test the size in words, not in bits, because
|
||||||
|
* otherwise incoming sizes in the range -63..-1 will not run
|
||||||
|
* any scasq instructions, and then the flags used by the jz
|
||||||
|
* instruction will have whatever random value was in place
|
||||||
|
* before. Nobody should call us like that, but
|
||||||
|
* find_next_bit() does when offset and size are at the same
|
||||||
|
* word and it fails to find a one itself.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
size += 63;
|
||||||
|
size >>= 6;
|
||||||
|
if (!size)
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
asm volatile(
|
asm volatile(
|
||||||
" repe; scasq\n"
|
" repe; scasq\n"
|
||||||
" jz 1f\n"
|
" jz 1f\n"
|
||||||
@ -83,8 +118,7 @@ __find_first_bit(const unsigned long * addr, unsigned long size)
|
|||||||
" shlq $3,%%rdi\n"
|
" shlq $3,%%rdi\n"
|
||||||
" addq %%rdi,%%rax"
|
" addq %%rdi,%%rax"
|
||||||
:"=a" (res), "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1)
|
:"=a" (res), "=&c" (d0), "=&D" (d1)
|
||||||
:"0" (0ULL),
|
:"0" (0ULL), "1" (size), "2" (addr),
|
||||||
"1" ((size + 63) >> 6), "2" (addr),
|
|
||||||
[addr] "r" (addr) : "memory");
|
[addr] "r" (addr) : "memory");
|
||||||
return res;
|
return res;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user