mirror of
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git
synced 2024-11-10 22:21:40 +00:00
KEYS: Simplify KEYRING_SEARCH_{NO,DO}_STATE_CHECK flags
Simplify KEYRING_SEARCH_{NO,DO}_STATE_CHECK flags to be two variations of the same flag. They are effectively mutually exclusive and one or the other should be provided, but not both. Keyring cycle detection and key possession determination are the only things that set NO_STATE_CHECK, except that neither flag really does anything there because neither purpose makes use of the keyring_search_iterator() function, but rather provides their own. For cycle detection we definitely want to check inside of expired keyrings, just so that we don't create a cycle we can't get rid of. Revoked keyrings are cleared at revocation time and can't then be reused, so shouldn't be a problem either way. For possession determination, we *might* want to validate each keyring before searching it: do you possess a key that's hidden behind an expired or just plain inaccessible keyring? Currently, the answer is yes. Note that you cannot, however, possess a key behind a revoked keyring because they are cleared on revocation. keyring_search() sets DO_STATE_CHECK, which is correct. request_key_and_link() currently doesn't specify whether to check the key state or not - but it should set DO_STATE_CHECK. key_get_instantiation_authkey() also currently doesn't specify whether to check the key state or not - but it probably should also set DO_STATE_CHECK. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Tested-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
aa9d443789
commit
054f6180d8
@ -628,6 +628,10 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,
|
||||
ctx->index_key.type->name,
|
||||
ctx->index_key.description);
|
||||
|
||||
#define STATE_CHECKS (KEYRING_SEARCH_NO_STATE_CHECK | KEYRING_SEARCH_DO_STATE_CHECK)
|
||||
BUG_ON((ctx->flags & STATE_CHECKS) == 0 ||
|
||||
(ctx->flags & STATE_CHECKS) == STATE_CHECKS);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ctx->index_key.description)
|
||||
ctx->index_key.desc_len = strlen(ctx->index_key.description);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -637,7 +641,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,
|
||||
if (ctx->match_data.lookup_type == KEYRING_SEARCH_LOOKUP_ITERATE ||
|
||||
keyring_compare_object(keyring, &ctx->index_key)) {
|
||||
ctx->skipped_ret = 2;
|
||||
ctx->flags |= KEYRING_SEARCH_DO_STATE_CHECK;
|
||||
switch (ctx->iterator(keyring_key_to_ptr(keyring), ctx)) {
|
||||
case 1:
|
||||
goto found;
|
||||
@ -649,8 +652,6 @@ static bool search_nested_keyrings(struct key *keyring,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ctx->skipped_ret = 0;
|
||||
if (ctx->flags & KEYRING_SEARCH_NO_STATE_CHECK)
|
||||
ctx->flags &= ~KEYRING_SEARCH_DO_STATE_CHECK;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Start processing a new keyring */
|
||||
descend_to_keyring:
|
||||
|
@ -516,6 +516,7 @@ struct key *request_key_and_link(struct key_type *type,
|
||||
.match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp,
|
||||
.match_data.raw_data = description,
|
||||
.match_data.lookup_type = KEYRING_SEARCH_LOOKUP_DIRECT,
|
||||
.flags = KEYRING_SEARCH_DO_STATE_CHECK,
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct key *key;
|
||||
key_ref_t key_ref;
|
||||
|
@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct key *key_get_instantiation_authkey(key_serial_t target_id)
|
||||
.match_data.cmp = key_default_cmp,
|
||||
.match_data.raw_data = description,
|
||||
.match_data.lookup_type = KEYRING_SEARCH_LOOKUP_DIRECT,
|
||||
.flags = KEYRING_SEARCH_DO_STATE_CHECK,
|
||||
};
|
||||
struct key *authkey;
|
||||
key_ref_t authkey_ref;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user