linux/drivers/firmware/efivars.c

1795 lines
46 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* EFI Variables - efivars.c
*
* Copyright (C) 2001,2003,2004 Dell <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* Copyright (C) 2004 Intel Corporation <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com>
*
* This code takes all variables accessible from EFI runtime and
* exports them via sysfs
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
*
* Changelog:
*
* 17 May 2004 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* remove check for efi_enabled in exit
* add MODULE_VERSION
*
* 26 Apr 2004 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* minor bug fixes
*
* 21 Apr 2004 - Matt Tolentino <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com)
* converted driver to export variable information via sysfs
* and moved to drivers/firmware directory
* bumped revision number to v0.07 to reflect conversion & move
*
* 10 Dec 2002 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* fix locking per Peter Chubb's findings
*
* 25 Mar 2002 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* move uuid_unparse() to include/asm-ia64/efi.h:efi_guid_unparse()
*
* 12 Feb 2002 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* use list_for_each_safe when deleting vars.
* remove ifdef CONFIG_SMP around include <linux/smp.h>
* v0.04 release to linux-ia64@linuxia64.org
*
* 20 April 2001 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* Moved vars from /proc/efi to /proc/efi/vars, and made
* efi.c own the /proc/efi directory.
* v0.03 release to linux-ia64@linuxia64.org
*
* 26 March 2001 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* At the request of Stephane, moved ownership of /proc/efi
* to efi.c, and now efivars lives under /proc/efi/vars.
*
* 12 March 2001 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* Feedback received from Stephane Eranian incorporated.
* efivar_write() checks copy_from_user() return value.
* efivar_read/write() returns proper errno.
* v0.02 release to linux-ia64@linuxia64.org
*
* 26 February 2001 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
* v0.01 release to linux-ia64@linuxia64.org
*/
#include <linux/capability.h>
#include <linux/types.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/efi.h>
#include <linux/sysfs.h>
#include <linux/kobject.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
2010-03-24 08:04:11 +00:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/ramfs.h>
#include <linux/pagemap.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
#define EFIVARS_VERSION "0.08"
#define EFIVARS_DATE "2004-May-17"
MODULE_AUTHOR("Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@Dell.com>");
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("sysfs interface to EFI Variables");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
MODULE_VERSION(EFIVARS_VERSION);
LIST_HEAD(efivar_sysfs_list);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_sysfs_list);
struct efivar_attribute {
struct attribute attr;
ssize_t (*show) (struct efivar_entry *entry, char *buf);
ssize_t (*store)(struct efivar_entry *entry, const char *buf, size_t count);
};
/* Private pointer to registered efivars */
static struct efivars *__efivars;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
static struct kset *efivars_kset;
static struct bin_attribute *efivars_new_var;
static struct bin_attribute *efivars_del_var;
#define EFIVAR_ATTR(_name, _mode, _show, _store) \
struct efivar_attribute efivar_attr_##_name = { \
.attr = {.name = __stringify(_name), .mode = _mode}, \
.show = _show, \
.store = _store, \
};
#define to_efivar_attr(_attr) container_of(_attr, struct efivar_attribute, attr)
#define to_efivar_entry(obj) container_of(obj, struct efivar_entry, kobj)
/*
* Prototype for sysfs creation function
*/
static int
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivar_create_sysfs_entry(struct efivar_entry *new_var);
/*
* Prototype for workqueue functions updating sysfs entry
*/
static void efivar_update_sysfs_entries(struct work_struct *);
static DECLARE_WORK(efivar_work, efivar_update_sysfs_entries);
efivars: Handle duplicate names from get_next_variable() Some firmware exhibits a bug where the same VariableName and VendorGuid values are returned on multiple invocations of GetNextVariableName(). See, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47631 As a consequence of such a bug, Andre reports hitting the following WARN_ON() in the sysfs code after updating the BIOS on his, "Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./Z77X-UD3H, BIOS F19e 11/21/2012)" machine, [ 0.581554] EFI Variables Facility v0.08 2004-May-17 [ 0.584914] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.585639] WARNING: at /home/andre/linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100() [ 0.586381] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M. [ 0.587123] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/firmware/efi/vars/SbAslBufferPtrVar-01f33c25-764d-43ea-aeea-6b5a41f3f3e8' [ 0.588694] Modules linked in: [ 0.589484] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #7 [ 0.590280] Call Trace: [ 0.591066] [<ffffffff81208954>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.591861] [<ffffffff810587bf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 0.592650] [<ffffffff810588bc>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 [ 0.593429] [<ffffffff8134dd85>] ? strlcat+0x65/0x80 [ 0.594203] [<ffffffff81208954>] sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.594979] [<ffffffff81208b78>] create_dir+0x78/0xd0 [ 0.595753] [<ffffffff81208ec6>] sysfs_create_dir+0x86/0xe0 [ 0.596532] [<ffffffff81347e4c>] kobject_add_internal+0x9c/0x220 [ 0.597310] [<ffffffff81348307>] kobject_init_and_add+0x67/0x90 [ 0.598083] [<ffffffff81584a71>] ? efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x61/0x1c0 [ 0.598859] [<ffffffff81584b2b>] efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x11b/0x1c0 [ 0.599631] [<ffffffff8158517e>] register_efivars+0xde/0x420 [ 0.600395] [<ffffffff81d430a7>] ? edd_init+0x2f5/0x2f5 [ 0.601150] [<ffffffff81d4315f>] efivars_init+0xb8/0x104 [ 0.601903] [<ffffffff8100215a>] do_one_initcall+0x12a/0x180 [ 0.602659] [<ffffffff81d05d80>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1c6 [ 0.603418] [<ffffffff81d05586>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31 [ 0.604183] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.604936] [<ffffffff816a653e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 0.605681] [<ffffffff816ce7ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 0.606414] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.607143] ---[ end trace 1609741ab737eb29 ]--- There's not much we can do to work around and keep traversing the variable list once we hit this firmware bug. Our only solution is to terminate the loop because, as Lingzhu reports, some machines get stuck when they encounter duplicate names, > I had an IBM System x3100 M4 and x3850 X5 on which kernel would > get stuck in infinite loop creating duplicate sysfs files because, > for some reason, there are several duplicate boot entries in nvram > getting GetNextVariableName into a circle of iteration (with > period > 2). Also disable the workqueue, as efivar_update_sysfs_entries() uses GetNextVariableName() to figure out which variables have been created since the last iteration. That algorithm isn't going to work if GetNextVariableName() returns duplicates. Note that we don't disable EFI variable creation completely on the affected machines, it's just that any pstore dump-* files won't appear in sysfs until the next boot. Reported-by: Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com> Reported-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Tested-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-03-07 11:59:14 +00:00
static bool efivar_wq_enabled = true;
static bool
validate_device_path(struct efi_variable *var, int match, u8 *buffer,
unsigned long len)
{
struct efi_generic_dev_path *node;
int offset = 0;
node = (struct efi_generic_dev_path *)buffer;
if (len < sizeof(*node))
return false;
while (offset <= len - sizeof(*node) &&
node->length >= sizeof(*node) &&
node->length <= len - offset) {
offset += node->length;
if ((node->type == EFI_DEV_END_PATH ||
node->type == EFI_DEV_END_PATH2) &&
node->sub_type == EFI_DEV_END_ENTIRE)
return true;
node = (struct efi_generic_dev_path *)(buffer + offset);
}
/*
* If we're here then either node->length pointed past the end
* of the buffer or we reached the end of the buffer without
* finding a device path end node.
*/
return false;
}
static bool
validate_boot_order(struct efi_variable *var, int match, u8 *buffer,
unsigned long len)
{
/* An array of 16-bit integers */
if ((len % 2) != 0)
return false;
return true;
}
static bool
validate_load_option(struct efi_variable *var, int match, u8 *buffer,
unsigned long len)
{
u16 filepathlength;
int i, desclength = 0, namelen;
namelen = utf16_strnlen(var->VariableName, sizeof(var->VariableName));
/* Either "Boot" or "Driver" followed by four digits of hex */
for (i = match; i < match+4; i++) {
if (var->VariableName[i] > 127 ||
hex_to_bin(var->VariableName[i] & 0xff) < 0)
return true;
}
/* Reject it if there's 4 digits of hex and then further content */
if (namelen > match + 4)
return false;
/* A valid entry must be at least 8 bytes */
if (len < 8)
return false;
filepathlength = buffer[4] | buffer[5] << 8;
/*
* There's no stored length for the description, so it has to be
* found by hand
*/
desclength = utf16_strsize((efi_char16_t *)(buffer + 6), len - 6) + 2;
/* Each boot entry must have a descriptor */
if (!desclength)
return false;
/*
* If the sum of the length of the description, the claimed filepath
* length and the original header are greater than the length of the
* variable, it's malformed
*/
if ((desclength + filepathlength + 6) > len)
return false;
/*
* And, finally, check the filepath
*/
return validate_device_path(var, match, buffer + desclength + 6,
filepathlength);
}
static bool
validate_uint16(struct efi_variable *var, int match, u8 *buffer,
unsigned long len)
{
/* A single 16-bit integer */
if (len != 2)
return false;
return true;
}
static bool
validate_ascii_string(struct efi_variable *var, int match, u8 *buffer,
unsigned long len)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
if (buffer[i] > 127)
return false;
if (buffer[i] == 0)
return true;
}
return false;
}
struct variable_validate {
char *name;
bool (*validate)(struct efi_variable *var, int match, u8 *data,
unsigned long len);
};
static const struct variable_validate variable_validate[] = {
{ "BootNext", validate_uint16 },
{ "BootOrder", validate_boot_order },
{ "DriverOrder", validate_boot_order },
{ "Boot*", validate_load_option },
{ "Driver*", validate_load_option },
{ "ConIn", validate_device_path },
{ "ConInDev", validate_device_path },
{ "ConOut", validate_device_path },
{ "ConOutDev", validate_device_path },
{ "ErrOut", validate_device_path },
{ "ErrOutDev", validate_device_path },
{ "Timeout", validate_uint16 },
{ "Lang", validate_ascii_string },
{ "PlatformLang", validate_ascii_string },
{ "", NULL },
};
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
bool
efivar_validate(struct efi_variable *var, u8 *data, unsigned long len)
{
int i;
u16 *unicode_name = var->VariableName;
for (i = 0; variable_validate[i].validate != NULL; i++) {
const char *name = variable_validate[i].name;
int match;
for (match = 0; ; match++) {
char c = name[match];
u16 u = unicode_name[match];
/* All special variables are plain ascii */
if (u > 127)
return true;
/* Wildcard in the matching name means we've matched */
if (c == '*')
return variable_validate[i].validate(var,
match, data, len);
/* Case sensitive match */
if (c != u)
break;
/* Reached the end of the string while matching */
if (!c)
return variable_validate[i].validate(var,
match, data, len);
}
}
return true;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_validate);
static efi_status_t
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
check_var_size(u32 attributes, unsigned long size)
{
u64 storage_size, remaining_size, max_size;
efi_status_t status;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
const struct efivar_operations *fops = __efivars->ops;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
if (!fops->query_variable_info)
return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
status = fops->query_variable_info(attributes, &storage_size,
&remaining_size, &max_size);
if (status != EFI_SUCCESS)
return status;
if (!storage_size || size > remaining_size || size > max_size ||
(remaining_size - size) < (storage_size / 2))
return EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
return status;
}
static ssize_t
efivar_guid_read(struct efivar_entry *entry, char *buf)
{
struct efi_variable *var = &entry->var;
char *str = buf;
if (!entry || !buf)
return 0;
efi_guid_unparse(&var->VendorGuid, str);
str += strlen(str);
str += sprintf(str, "\n");
return str - buf;
}
static ssize_t
efivar_attr_read(struct efivar_entry *entry, char *buf)
{
struct efi_variable *var = &entry->var;
char *str = buf;
if (!entry || !buf)
return -EINVAL;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
var->DataSize = 1024;
if (efivar_entry_get(entry, &var->Attributes, &var->DataSize, var->Data))
return -EIO;
if (var->Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE)
str += sprintf(str, "EFI_VARIABLE_NON_VOLATILE\n");
if (var->Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS)
str += sprintf(str, "EFI_VARIABLE_BOOTSERVICE_ACCESS\n");
if (var->Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS)
str += sprintf(str, "EFI_VARIABLE_RUNTIME_ACCESS\n");
if (var->Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_HARDWARE_ERROR_RECORD)
str += sprintf(str, "EFI_VARIABLE_HARDWARE_ERROR_RECORD\n");
if (var->Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS)
str += sprintf(str,
"EFI_VARIABLE_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS\n");
if (var->Attributes &
EFI_VARIABLE_TIME_BASED_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS)
str += sprintf(str,
"EFI_VARIABLE_TIME_BASED_AUTHENTICATED_WRITE_ACCESS\n");
if (var->Attributes & EFI_VARIABLE_APPEND_WRITE)
str += sprintf(str, "EFI_VARIABLE_APPEND_WRITE\n");
return str - buf;
}
static ssize_t
efivar_size_read(struct efivar_entry *entry, char *buf)
{
struct efi_variable *var = &entry->var;
char *str = buf;
if (!entry || !buf)
return -EINVAL;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
var->DataSize = 1024;
if (efivar_entry_get(entry, &var->Attributes, &var->DataSize, var->Data))
return -EIO;
str += sprintf(str, "0x%lx\n", var->DataSize);
return str - buf;
}
static ssize_t
efivar_data_read(struct efivar_entry *entry, char *buf)
{
struct efi_variable *var = &entry->var;
if (!entry || !buf)
return -EINVAL;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
var->DataSize = 1024;
if (efivar_entry_get(entry, &var->Attributes, &var->DataSize, var->Data))
return -EIO;
memcpy(buf, var->Data, var->DataSize);
return var->DataSize;
}
/*
* We allow each variable to be edited via rewriting the
* entire efi variable structure.
*/
static ssize_t
efivar_store_raw(struct efivar_entry *entry, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct efi_variable *new_var, *var = &entry->var;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
int err;
if (count != sizeof(struct efi_variable))
return -EINVAL;
new_var = (struct efi_variable *)buf;
/*
* If only updating the variable data, then the name
* and guid should remain the same
*/
if (memcmp(new_var->VariableName, var->VariableName, sizeof(var->VariableName)) ||
efi_guidcmp(new_var->VendorGuid, var->VendorGuid)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: Cannot edit the wrong variable!\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if ((new_var->DataSize <= 0) || (new_var->Attributes == 0)){
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: DataSize & Attributes must be valid!\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
if ((new_var->Attributes & ~EFI_VARIABLE_MASK) != 0 ||
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivar_validate(new_var, new_var->Data, new_var->DataSize) == false) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: Malformed variable content\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
memcpy(&entry->var, new_var, count);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
err = efivar_entry_set(entry, new_var->Attributes,
new_var->DataSize, new_var->Data, false);
if (err) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "efivars: set_variable() failed: status=%d\n", err);
return -EIO;
}
return count;
}
static ssize_t
efivar_show_raw(struct efivar_entry *entry, char *buf)
{
struct efi_variable *var = &entry->var;
if (!entry || !buf)
return 0;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
var->DataSize = 1024;
if (efivar_entry_get(entry, &entry->var.Attributes,
&entry->var.DataSize, entry->var.Data))
return -EIO;
memcpy(buf, var, sizeof(*var));
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
return sizeof(*var);
}
/*
* Generic read/write functions that call the specific functions of
* the attributes...
*/
static ssize_t efivar_attr_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
char *buf)
{
struct efivar_entry *var = to_efivar_entry(kobj);
struct efivar_attribute *efivar_attr = to_efivar_attr(attr);
ssize_t ret = -EIO;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
if (efivar_attr->show) {
ret = efivar_attr->show(var, buf);
}
return ret;
}
static ssize_t efivar_attr_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
const char *buf, size_t count)
{
struct efivar_entry *var = to_efivar_entry(kobj);
struct efivar_attribute *efivar_attr = to_efivar_attr(attr);
ssize_t ret = -EIO;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
if (efivar_attr->store)
ret = efivar_attr->store(var, buf, count);
return ret;
}
static const struct sysfs_ops efivar_attr_ops = {
.show = efivar_attr_show,
.store = efivar_attr_store,
};
static void efivar_release(struct kobject *kobj)
{
struct efivar_entry *var = container_of(kobj, struct efivar_entry, kobj);
kfree(var);
}
static EFIVAR_ATTR(guid, 0400, efivar_guid_read, NULL);
static EFIVAR_ATTR(attributes, 0400, efivar_attr_read, NULL);
static EFIVAR_ATTR(size, 0400, efivar_size_read, NULL);
static EFIVAR_ATTR(data, 0400, efivar_data_read, NULL);
static EFIVAR_ATTR(raw_var, 0600, efivar_show_raw, efivar_store_raw);
static struct attribute *def_attrs[] = {
&efivar_attr_guid.attr,
&efivar_attr_size.attr,
&efivar_attr_attributes.attr,
&efivar_attr_data.attr,
&efivar_attr_raw_var.attr,
NULL,
};
static struct kobj_type efivar_ktype = {
.release = efivar_release,
.sysfs_ops = &efivar_attr_ops,
.default_attrs = def_attrs,
};
static int efi_status_to_err(efi_status_t status)
{
int err;
switch (status) {
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
case EFI_SUCCESS:
err = 0;
break;
case EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER:
err = -EINVAL;
break;
case EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES:
err = -ENOSPC;
break;
case EFI_DEVICE_ERROR:
err = -EIO;
break;
case EFI_WRITE_PROTECTED:
err = -EROFS;
break;
case EFI_SECURITY_VIOLATION:
err = -EACCES;
break;
case EFI_NOT_FOUND:
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
err = -ENOENT;
break;
default:
err = -EINVAL;
}
return err;
}
static ssize_t efivar_create(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
{
struct efi_variable *new_var = (struct efi_variable *)buf;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
struct efivar_entry *new_entry;
int err;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
if ((new_var->Attributes & ~EFI_VARIABLE_MASK) != 0 ||
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivar_validate(new_var, new_var->Data, new_var->DataSize) == false) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: Malformed variable content\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
new_entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!new_entry)
return -ENOMEM;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
memcpy(&new_entry->var, new_var, sizeof(*new_var));
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
err = efivar_entry_set(new_entry, new_var->Attributes, new_var->DataSize,
new_var->Data, &efivar_sysfs_list);
if (err) {
if (err == -EEXIST)
err = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
if (efivar_create_sysfs_entry(new_entry)) {
printk(KERN_WARNING "efivars: failed to create sysfs entry.\n");
kfree(new_entry);
}
return count;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
out:
kfree(new_entry);
return err;
}
static ssize_t efivar_delete(struct file *filp, struct kobject *kobj,
struct bin_attribute *bin_attr,
char *buf, loff_t pos, size_t count)
{
struct efi_variable *del_var = (struct efi_variable *)buf;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
struct efivar_entry *entry;
int err = 0;
if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return -EACCES;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivar_entry_iter_begin();
entry = efivar_entry_find(del_var->VariableName, del_var->VendorGuid,
&efivar_sysfs_list, true);
if (!entry)
err = -EINVAL;
else if (__efivar_entry_delete(entry))
err = -EIO;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivar_entry_iter_end();
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
if (err)
return err;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivar_unregister(entry);
/* It's dead Jim.... */
return count;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
static bool variable_is_present(efi_char16_t *variable_name, efi_guid_t *vendor,
struct list_head *head)
{
struct efivar_entry *entry, *n;
unsigned long strsize1, strsize2;
bool found = false;
strsize1 = utf16_strsize(variable_name, 1024);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, n, head, list) {
strsize2 = utf16_strsize(entry->var.VariableName, 1024);
if (strsize1 == strsize2 &&
!memcmp(variable_name, &(entry->var.VariableName),
strsize2) &&
!efi_guidcmp(entry->var.VendorGuid,
*vendor)) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
return found;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
static int efivar_update_sysfs_entry(efi_char16_t *name, efi_guid_t vendor,
unsigned long name_size, void *data)
{
struct efivar_entry *entry = data;
if (efivar_entry_find(name, vendor, &efivar_sysfs_list, false))
return 0;
memcpy(entry->var.VariableName, name, name_size);
memcpy(&(entry->var.VendorGuid), &vendor, sizeof(efi_guid_t));
return 1;
}
efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName It's not wise to assume VariableNameSize represents the length of VariableName, as not all firmware updates VariableNameSize in the same way (some don't update it at all if EFI_SUCCESS is returned). There are even implementations out there that update VariableNameSize with values that are both larger than the string returned in VariableName and smaller than the buffer passed to GetNextVariableName(), which resulted in the following bug report from Michael Schroeder, > On HP z220 system (firmware version 1.54), some EFI variables are > incorrectly named : > > ls -d /sys/firmware/efi/vars/*8be4d* | grep -v -- -8be returns > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/dbxDefault-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/KEKDefault-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/SecureBoot-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/SetupMode-Information8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c The issue here is that because we blindly use VariableNameSize without verifying its value, we can potentially read garbage values from the buffer containing VariableName if VariableNameSize is larger than the length of VariableName. Since VariableName is a string, we can calculate its size by searching for the terminating NULL character. Reported-by: Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com> Cc: Michael Schroeder <mls@suse.com> Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com> Cc: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-03-01 14:49:12 +00:00
/*
* Returns the size of variable_name, in bytes, including the
* terminating NULL character, or variable_name_size if no NULL
* character is found among the first variable_name_size bytes.
*/
static unsigned long var_name_strnsize(efi_char16_t *variable_name,
unsigned long variable_name_size)
{
unsigned long len;
efi_char16_t c;
/*
* The variable name is, by definition, a NULL-terminated
* string, so make absolutely sure that variable_name_size is
* the value we expect it to be. If not, return the real size.
*/
for (len = 2; len <= variable_name_size; len += sizeof(c)) {
c = variable_name[(len / sizeof(c)) - 1];
if (!c)
break;
}
return min(len, variable_name_size);
}
static void efivar_update_sysfs_entries(struct work_struct *work)
{
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
struct efivar_entry *entry;
int err;
entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!entry)
return;
/* Add new sysfs entries */
while (1) {
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry));
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
err = efivar_init(efivar_update_sysfs_entry, entry,
true, false, &efivar_sysfs_list);
if (!err)
break;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivar_create_sysfs_entry(entry);
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
kfree(entry);
}
/*
* Let's not leave out systab information that snuck into
* the efivars driver
*/
static ssize_t systab_show(struct kobject *kobj,
struct kobj_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
char *str = buf;
if (!kobj || !buf)
return -EINVAL;
if (efi.mps != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
str += sprintf(str, "MPS=0x%lx\n", efi.mps);
if (efi.acpi20 != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
str += sprintf(str, "ACPI20=0x%lx\n", efi.acpi20);
if (efi.acpi != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
str += sprintf(str, "ACPI=0x%lx\n", efi.acpi);
if (efi.smbios != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
str += sprintf(str, "SMBIOS=0x%lx\n", efi.smbios);
if (efi.hcdp != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
str += sprintf(str, "HCDP=0x%lx\n", efi.hcdp);
if (efi.boot_info != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
str += sprintf(str, "BOOTINFO=0x%lx\n", efi.boot_info);
if (efi.uga != EFI_INVALID_TABLE_ADDR)
str += sprintf(str, "UGA=0x%lx\n", efi.uga);
return str - buf;
}
static struct kobj_attribute efi_attr_systab =
__ATTR(systab, 0400, systab_show, NULL);
static struct attribute *efi_subsys_attrs[] = {
&efi_attr_systab.attr,
NULL, /* maybe more in the future? */
};
static struct attribute_group efi_subsys_attr_group = {
.attrs = efi_subsys_attrs,
};
static struct kobject *efi_kobj;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
/**
* efivar_create_sysfs_entry - create a new entry in sysfs
* @new_var: efivar entry to create
*
* Returns 1 on failure, 0 on success
*/
static int
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivar_create_sysfs_entry(struct efivar_entry *new_var)
{
int i, short_name_size;
char *short_name;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
unsigned long variable_name_size;
efi_char16_t *variable_name;
variable_name = new_var->var.VariableName;
variable_name_size = utf16_strlen(variable_name) * sizeof(efi_char16_t);
/*
* Length of the variable bytes in ASCII, plus the '-' separator,
* plus the GUID, plus trailing NUL
*/
short_name_size = variable_name_size / sizeof(efi_char16_t)
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
+ 1 + EFI_VARIABLE_GUID_LEN + 1;
short_name = kzalloc(short_name_size, GFP_KERNEL);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
if (!short_name) {
kfree(short_name);
return 1;
}
/* Convert Unicode to normal chars (assume top bits are 0),
ala UTF-8 */
for (i=0; i < (int)(variable_name_size / sizeof(efi_char16_t)); i++) {
short_name[i] = variable_name[i] & 0xFF;
}
/* This is ugly, but necessary to separate one vendor's
private variables from another's. */
*(short_name + strlen(short_name)) = '-';
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efi_guid_unparse(&new_var->var.VendorGuid,
short_name + strlen(short_name));
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
new_var->kobj.kset = efivars_kset;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
i = kobject_init_and_add(&new_var->kobj, &efivar_ktype,
NULL, "%s", short_name);
kfree(short_name);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
if (i)
return 1;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
kobject_uevent(&new_var->kobj, KOBJ_ADD);
efivar_entry_add(new_var, &efivar_sysfs_list);
return 0;
}
static int
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
create_efivars_bin_attributes(void)
{
struct bin_attribute *attr;
int error;
/* new_var */
attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*attr), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!attr)
return -ENOMEM;
attr->attr.name = "new_var";
attr->attr.mode = 0200;
attr->write = efivar_create;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivars_new_var = attr;
/* del_var */
attr = kzalloc(sizeof(*attr), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!attr) {
error = -ENOMEM;
goto out_free;
}
attr->attr.name = "del_var";
attr->attr.mode = 0200;
attr->write = efivar_delete;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivars_del_var = attr;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
sysfs_bin_attr_init(efivars_new_var);
sysfs_bin_attr_init(efivars_del_var);
/* Register */
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
error = sysfs_create_bin_file(&efivars_kset->kobj, efivars_new_var);
if (error) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: unable to create new_var sysfs file"
" due to error %d\n", error);
goto out_free;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
error = sysfs_create_bin_file(&efivars_kset->kobj, efivars_del_var);
if (error) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: unable to create del_var sysfs file"
" due to error %d\n", error);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
sysfs_remove_bin_file(&efivars_kset->kobj, efivars_new_var);
goto out_free;
}
return 0;
out_free:
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
kfree(efivars_del_var);
efivars_del_var = NULL;
kfree(efivars_new_var);
efivars_new_var = NULL;
return error;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
static int efivars_sysfs_callback(efi_char16_t *name, efi_guid_t vendor,
unsigned long name_size, void *data)
{
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
struct efivar_entry *entry;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!entry)
return -ENOMEM;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
memcpy(entry->var.VariableName, name, name_size);
memcpy(&(entry->var.VendorGuid), &vendor, sizeof(efi_guid_t));
efivar_create_sysfs_entry(entry);
return 0;
}
static int efivar_sysfs_destroy(struct efivar_entry *entry, void *data)
{
efivar_entry_remove(entry);
efivar_unregister(entry);
return 0;
}
efivars: Handle duplicate names from get_next_variable() Some firmware exhibits a bug where the same VariableName and VendorGuid values are returned on multiple invocations of GetNextVariableName(). See, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47631 As a consequence of such a bug, Andre reports hitting the following WARN_ON() in the sysfs code after updating the BIOS on his, "Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./Z77X-UD3H, BIOS F19e 11/21/2012)" machine, [ 0.581554] EFI Variables Facility v0.08 2004-May-17 [ 0.584914] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.585639] WARNING: at /home/andre/linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100() [ 0.586381] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M. [ 0.587123] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/firmware/efi/vars/SbAslBufferPtrVar-01f33c25-764d-43ea-aeea-6b5a41f3f3e8' [ 0.588694] Modules linked in: [ 0.589484] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #7 [ 0.590280] Call Trace: [ 0.591066] [<ffffffff81208954>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.591861] [<ffffffff810587bf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 0.592650] [<ffffffff810588bc>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 [ 0.593429] [<ffffffff8134dd85>] ? strlcat+0x65/0x80 [ 0.594203] [<ffffffff81208954>] sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.594979] [<ffffffff81208b78>] create_dir+0x78/0xd0 [ 0.595753] [<ffffffff81208ec6>] sysfs_create_dir+0x86/0xe0 [ 0.596532] [<ffffffff81347e4c>] kobject_add_internal+0x9c/0x220 [ 0.597310] [<ffffffff81348307>] kobject_init_and_add+0x67/0x90 [ 0.598083] [<ffffffff81584a71>] ? efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x61/0x1c0 [ 0.598859] [<ffffffff81584b2b>] efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x11b/0x1c0 [ 0.599631] [<ffffffff8158517e>] register_efivars+0xde/0x420 [ 0.600395] [<ffffffff81d430a7>] ? edd_init+0x2f5/0x2f5 [ 0.601150] [<ffffffff81d4315f>] efivars_init+0xb8/0x104 [ 0.601903] [<ffffffff8100215a>] do_one_initcall+0x12a/0x180 [ 0.602659] [<ffffffff81d05d80>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1c6 [ 0.603418] [<ffffffff81d05586>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31 [ 0.604183] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.604936] [<ffffffff816a653e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 0.605681] [<ffffffff816ce7ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 0.606414] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.607143] ---[ end trace 1609741ab737eb29 ]--- There's not much we can do to work around and keep traversing the variable list once we hit this firmware bug. Our only solution is to terminate the loop because, as Lingzhu reports, some machines get stuck when they encounter duplicate names, > I had an IBM System x3100 M4 and x3850 X5 on which kernel would > get stuck in infinite loop creating duplicate sysfs files because, > for some reason, there are several duplicate boot entries in nvram > getting GetNextVariableName into a circle of iteration (with > period > 2). Also disable the workqueue, as efivar_update_sysfs_entries() uses GetNextVariableName() to figure out which variables have been created since the last iteration. That algorithm isn't going to work if GetNextVariableName() returns duplicates. Note that we don't disable EFI variable creation completely on the affected machines, it's just that any pstore dump-* files won't appear in sysfs until the next boot. Reported-by: Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com> Reported-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Tested-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-03-07 11:59:14 +00:00
/*
* Print a warning when duplicate EFI variables are encountered and
* disable the sysfs workqueue since the firmware is buggy.
*/
static void dup_variable_bug(efi_char16_t *s16, efi_guid_t *vendor_guid,
unsigned long len16)
{
size_t i, len8 = len16 / sizeof(efi_char16_t);
char *s8;
/*
* Disable the workqueue since the algorithm it uses for
* detecting new variables won't work with this buggy
* implementation of GetNextVariableName().
*/
efivar_wq_enabled = false;
s8 = kzalloc(len8, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!s8)
return;
for (i = 0; i < len8; i++)
s8[i] = s16[i];
printk(KERN_WARNING "efivars: duplicate variable: %s-%pUl\n",
s8, vendor_guid);
kfree(s8);
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
static struct kobject *efivars_kobj;
void efivars_sysfs_exit(void)
{
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
/* Remove all entries and destroy */
__efivar_entry_iter(efivar_sysfs_destroy, &efivar_sysfs_list, NULL, NULL);
if (efivars_new_var)
sysfs_remove_bin_file(&efivars_kset->kobj, efivars_new_var);
if (efivars_del_var)
sysfs_remove_bin_file(&efivars_kset->kobj, efivars_del_var);
kfree(efivars_new_var);
kfree(efivars_del_var);
kobject_put(efivars_kobj);
kset_unregister(efivars_kset);
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
int efivars_sysfs_init(void)
{
struct kobject *parent_kobj = efivars_kobject();
int error = 0;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
/* No efivars has been registered yet */
if (!parent_kobj)
return 0;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
printk(KERN_INFO "EFI Variables Facility v%s %s\n", EFIVARS_VERSION,
EFIVARS_DATE);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivars_kset = kset_create_and_add("vars", NULL, parent_kobj);
if (!efivars_kset) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: Subsystem registration failed.\n");
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
return -ENOMEM;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivars_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("efivars", parent_kobj);
if (!efivars_kobj) {
pr_err("efivars: Subsystem registration failed.\n");
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
kset_unregister(efivars_kset);
return -ENOMEM;
}
efivar_init(efivars_sysfs_callback, NULL, false,
true, &efivar_sysfs_list);
error = create_efivars_bin_attributes();
if (error)
efivars_sysfs_exit();
return error;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivars_sysfs_init);
/**
* efivar_init - build the initial list of EFI variables
* @func: callback function to invoke for every variable
* @data: function-specific data to pass to @func
* @atomic: do we need to execute the @func-loop atomically?
* @duplicates: error if we encounter duplicates on @head?
* @head: initialised head of variable list
*
* Get every EFI variable from the firmware and invoke @func. @func
* should call efivar_entry_add() to build the list of variables.
*
* Returns 0 on success, or a kernel error code on failure.
*/
int efivar_init(int (*func)(efi_char16_t *, efi_guid_t, unsigned long, void *),
void *data, bool atomic, bool duplicates,
struct list_head *head)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
unsigned long variable_name_size = 1024;
efi_char16_t *variable_name;
efi_status_t status;
efi_guid_t vendor_guid;
int err = 0;
variable_name = kzalloc(variable_name_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!variable_name) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: Memory allocation failed.\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
/*
* Per EFI spec, the maximum storage allocated for both
* the variable name and variable data is 1024 bytes.
*/
do {
variable_name_size = 1024;
status = ops->get_next_variable(&variable_name_size,
variable_name,
&vendor_guid);
switch (status) {
case EFI_SUCCESS:
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
if (!atomic)
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
efivars: explicitly calculate length of VariableName It's not wise to assume VariableNameSize represents the length of VariableName, as not all firmware updates VariableNameSize in the same way (some don't update it at all if EFI_SUCCESS is returned). There are even implementations out there that update VariableNameSize with values that are both larger than the string returned in VariableName and smaller than the buffer passed to GetNextVariableName(), which resulted in the following bug report from Michael Schroeder, > On HP z220 system (firmware version 1.54), some EFI variables are > incorrectly named : > > ls -d /sys/firmware/efi/vars/*8be4d* | grep -v -- -8be returns > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/dbxDefault-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/KEKDefault-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/SecureBoot-pport8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c > /sys/firmware/efi/vars/SetupMode-Information8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c The issue here is that because we blindly use VariableNameSize without verifying its value, we can potentially read garbage values from the buffer containing VariableName if VariableNameSize is larger than the length of VariableName. Since VariableName is a string, we can calculate its size by searching for the terminating NULL character. Reported-by: Frederic Crozat <fcrozat@suse.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com> Cc: Michael Schroeder <mls@suse.com> Cc: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com> Cc: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-03-01 14:49:12 +00:00
variable_name_size = var_name_strnsize(variable_name,
variable_name_size);
efivars: Handle duplicate names from get_next_variable() Some firmware exhibits a bug where the same VariableName and VendorGuid values are returned on multiple invocations of GetNextVariableName(). See, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47631 As a consequence of such a bug, Andre reports hitting the following WARN_ON() in the sysfs code after updating the BIOS on his, "Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./Z77X-UD3H, BIOS F19e 11/21/2012)" machine, [ 0.581554] EFI Variables Facility v0.08 2004-May-17 [ 0.584914] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.585639] WARNING: at /home/andre/linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100() [ 0.586381] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M. [ 0.587123] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/firmware/efi/vars/SbAslBufferPtrVar-01f33c25-764d-43ea-aeea-6b5a41f3f3e8' [ 0.588694] Modules linked in: [ 0.589484] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #7 [ 0.590280] Call Trace: [ 0.591066] [<ffffffff81208954>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.591861] [<ffffffff810587bf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 0.592650] [<ffffffff810588bc>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 [ 0.593429] [<ffffffff8134dd85>] ? strlcat+0x65/0x80 [ 0.594203] [<ffffffff81208954>] sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.594979] [<ffffffff81208b78>] create_dir+0x78/0xd0 [ 0.595753] [<ffffffff81208ec6>] sysfs_create_dir+0x86/0xe0 [ 0.596532] [<ffffffff81347e4c>] kobject_add_internal+0x9c/0x220 [ 0.597310] [<ffffffff81348307>] kobject_init_and_add+0x67/0x90 [ 0.598083] [<ffffffff81584a71>] ? efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x61/0x1c0 [ 0.598859] [<ffffffff81584b2b>] efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x11b/0x1c0 [ 0.599631] [<ffffffff8158517e>] register_efivars+0xde/0x420 [ 0.600395] [<ffffffff81d430a7>] ? edd_init+0x2f5/0x2f5 [ 0.601150] [<ffffffff81d4315f>] efivars_init+0xb8/0x104 [ 0.601903] [<ffffffff8100215a>] do_one_initcall+0x12a/0x180 [ 0.602659] [<ffffffff81d05d80>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1c6 [ 0.603418] [<ffffffff81d05586>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31 [ 0.604183] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.604936] [<ffffffff816a653e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 0.605681] [<ffffffff816ce7ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 0.606414] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.607143] ---[ end trace 1609741ab737eb29 ]--- There's not much we can do to work around and keep traversing the variable list once we hit this firmware bug. Our only solution is to terminate the loop because, as Lingzhu reports, some machines get stuck when they encounter duplicate names, > I had an IBM System x3100 M4 and x3850 X5 on which kernel would > get stuck in infinite loop creating duplicate sysfs files because, > for some reason, there are several duplicate boot entries in nvram > getting GetNextVariableName into a circle of iteration (with > period > 2). Also disable the workqueue, as efivar_update_sysfs_entries() uses GetNextVariableName() to figure out which variables have been created since the last iteration. That algorithm isn't going to work if GetNextVariableName() returns duplicates. Note that we don't disable EFI variable creation completely on the affected machines, it's just that any pstore dump-* files won't appear in sysfs until the next boot. Reported-by: Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com> Reported-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Tested-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-03-07 11:59:14 +00:00
/*
* Some firmware implementations return the
* same variable name on multiple calls to
* get_next_variable(). Terminate the loop
* immediately as there is no guarantee that
* we'll ever see a different variable name,
* and may end up looping here forever.
*/
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
if (duplicates &&
variable_is_present(variable_name, &vendor_guid, head)) {
efivars: Handle duplicate names from get_next_variable() Some firmware exhibits a bug where the same VariableName and VendorGuid values are returned on multiple invocations of GetNextVariableName(). See, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47631 As a consequence of such a bug, Andre reports hitting the following WARN_ON() in the sysfs code after updating the BIOS on his, "Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./Z77X-UD3H, BIOS F19e 11/21/2012)" machine, [ 0.581554] EFI Variables Facility v0.08 2004-May-17 [ 0.584914] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.585639] WARNING: at /home/andre/linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100() [ 0.586381] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M. [ 0.587123] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/firmware/efi/vars/SbAslBufferPtrVar-01f33c25-764d-43ea-aeea-6b5a41f3f3e8' [ 0.588694] Modules linked in: [ 0.589484] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #7 [ 0.590280] Call Trace: [ 0.591066] [<ffffffff81208954>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.591861] [<ffffffff810587bf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 0.592650] [<ffffffff810588bc>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 [ 0.593429] [<ffffffff8134dd85>] ? strlcat+0x65/0x80 [ 0.594203] [<ffffffff81208954>] sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.594979] [<ffffffff81208b78>] create_dir+0x78/0xd0 [ 0.595753] [<ffffffff81208ec6>] sysfs_create_dir+0x86/0xe0 [ 0.596532] [<ffffffff81347e4c>] kobject_add_internal+0x9c/0x220 [ 0.597310] [<ffffffff81348307>] kobject_init_and_add+0x67/0x90 [ 0.598083] [<ffffffff81584a71>] ? efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x61/0x1c0 [ 0.598859] [<ffffffff81584b2b>] efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x11b/0x1c0 [ 0.599631] [<ffffffff8158517e>] register_efivars+0xde/0x420 [ 0.600395] [<ffffffff81d430a7>] ? edd_init+0x2f5/0x2f5 [ 0.601150] [<ffffffff81d4315f>] efivars_init+0xb8/0x104 [ 0.601903] [<ffffffff8100215a>] do_one_initcall+0x12a/0x180 [ 0.602659] [<ffffffff81d05d80>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1c6 [ 0.603418] [<ffffffff81d05586>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31 [ 0.604183] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.604936] [<ffffffff816a653e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 0.605681] [<ffffffff816ce7ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 0.606414] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.607143] ---[ end trace 1609741ab737eb29 ]--- There's not much we can do to work around and keep traversing the variable list once we hit this firmware bug. Our only solution is to terminate the loop because, as Lingzhu reports, some machines get stuck when they encounter duplicate names, > I had an IBM System x3100 M4 and x3850 X5 on which kernel would > get stuck in infinite loop creating duplicate sysfs files because, > for some reason, there are several duplicate boot entries in nvram > getting GetNextVariableName into a circle of iteration (with > period > 2). Also disable the workqueue, as efivar_update_sysfs_entries() uses GetNextVariableName() to figure out which variables have been created since the last iteration. That algorithm isn't going to work if GetNextVariableName() returns duplicates. Note that we don't disable EFI variable creation completely on the affected machines, it's just that any pstore dump-* files won't appear in sysfs until the next boot. Reported-by: Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com> Reported-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Tested-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-03-07 11:59:14 +00:00
dup_variable_bug(variable_name, &vendor_guid,
variable_name_size);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
if (!atomic)
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
efivars: Handle duplicate names from get_next_variable() Some firmware exhibits a bug where the same VariableName and VendorGuid values are returned on multiple invocations of GetNextVariableName(). See, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47631 As a consequence of such a bug, Andre reports hitting the following WARN_ON() in the sysfs code after updating the BIOS on his, "Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. To be filled by O.E.M./Z77X-UD3H, BIOS F19e 11/21/2012)" machine, [ 0.581554] EFI Variables Facility v0.08 2004-May-17 [ 0.584914] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 0.585639] WARNING: at /home/andre/linux/fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100() [ 0.586381] Hardware name: To be filled by O.E.M. [ 0.587123] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/firmware/efi/vars/SbAslBufferPtrVar-01f33c25-764d-43ea-aeea-6b5a41f3f3e8' [ 0.588694] Modules linked in: [ 0.589484] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #7 [ 0.590280] Call Trace: [ 0.591066] [<ffffffff81208954>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.591861] [<ffffffff810587bf>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 0.592650] [<ffffffff810588bc>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4c/0x50 [ 0.593429] [<ffffffff8134dd85>] ? strlcat+0x65/0x80 [ 0.594203] [<ffffffff81208954>] sysfs_add_one+0xd4/0x100 [ 0.594979] [<ffffffff81208b78>] create_dir+0x78/0xd0 [ 0.595753] [<ffffffff81208ec6>] sysfs_create_dir+0x86/0xe0 [ 0.596532] [<ffffffff81347e4c>] kobject_add_internal+0x9c/0x220 [ 0.597310] [<ffffffff81348307>] kobject_init_and_add+0x67/0x90 [ 0.598083] [<ffffffff81584a71>] ? efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x61/0x1c0 [ 0.598859] [<ffffffff81584b2b>] efivar_create_sysfs_entry+0x11b/0x1c0 [ 0.599631] [<ffffffff8158517e>] register_efivars+0xde/0x420 [ 0.600395] [<ffffffff81d430a7>] ? edd_init+0x2f5/0x2f5 [ 0.601150] [<ffffffff81d4315f>] efivars_init+0xb8/0x104 [ 0.601903] [<ffffffff8100215a>] do_one_initcall+0x12a/0x180 [ 0.602659] [<ffffffff81d05d80>] kernel_init_freeable+0x13e/0x1c6 [ 0.603418] [<ffffffff81d05586>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31 [ 0.604183] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.604936] [<ffffffff816a653e>] kernel_init+0xe/0xf0 [ 0.605681] [<ffffffff816ce7ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 0.606414] [<ffffffff816a6530>] ? rest_init+0x80/0x80 [ 0.607143] ---[ end trace 1609741ab737eb29 ]--- There's not much we can do to work around and keep traversing the variable list once we hit this firmware bug. Our only solution is to terminate the loop because, as Lingzhu reports, some machines get stuck when they encounter duplicate names, > I had an IBM System x3100 M4 and x3850 X5 on which kernel would > get stuck in infinite loop creating duplicate sysfs files because, > for some reason, there are several duplicate boot entries in nvram > getting GetNextVariableName into a circle of iteration (with > period > 2). Also disable the workqueue, as efivar_update_sysfs_entries() uses GetNextVariableName() to figure out which variables have been created since the last iteration. That algorithm isn't going to work if GetNextVariableName() returns duplicates. Note that we don't disable EFI variable creation completely on the affected machines, it's just that any pstore dump-* files won't appear in sysfs until the next boot. Reported-by: Andre Heider <a.heider@gmail.com> Reported-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Tested-by: Lingzhu Xiang <lxiang@redhat.com> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-03-07 11:59:14 +00:00
status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
break;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
err = func(variable_name, vendor_guid, variable_name_size, data);
if (err)
status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
if (!atomic)
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
break;
case EFI_NOT_FOUND:
break;
default:
printk(KERN_WARNING "efivars: get_next_variable: status=%lx\n",
status);
status = EFI_NOT_FOUND;
break;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
} while (status != EFI_NOT_FOUND);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
kfree(variable_name);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_init);
/**
* efivar_entry_add - add entry to variable list
* @entry: entry to add to list
* @head: list head
*/
void efivar_entry_add(struct efivar_entry *entry, struct list_head *head)
{
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
list_add(&entry->list, head);
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_add);
/**
* efivar_entry_remove - remove entry from variable list
* @entry: entry to remove from list
*/
void efivar_entry_remove(struct efivar_entry *entry)
{
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
list_del(&entry->list);
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_remove);
/*
* efivar_entry_list_del_unlock - remove entry from variable list
* @entry: entry to remove
*
* Remove @entry from the variable list and release the list lock.
*
* NOTE: slightly weird locking semantics here - we expect to be
* called with the efivars lock already held, and we release it before
* returning. This is because this function is usually called after
* set_variable() while the lock is still held.
*/
static void efivar_entry_list_del_unlock(struct efivar_entry *entry)
{
WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&__efivars->lock));
list_del(&entry->list);
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
}
/**
* __efivar_entry_delete - delete an EFI variable
* @entry: entry containing EFI variable to delete
*
* Delete the variable from the firmware and remove @entry from the
* variable list. It is the caller's responsibility to free @entry
* once we return.
*
* This function differs from efivar_entry_delete() because it is
* safe to be called from within a efivar_entry_iter_begin() and
* efivar_entry_iter_end() region, unlike efivar_entry_delete().
*
* Returns 0 on success, or a converted EFI status code if
* set_variable() fails. If set_variable() fails the entry remains
* on the list.
*/
int __efivar_entry_delete(struct efivar_entry *entry)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
efi_status_t status;
WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&__efivars->lock));
status = ops->set_variable(entry->var.VariableName,
&entry->var.VendorGuid,
0, 0, NULL);
if (status)
return efi_status_to_err(status);
list_del(&entry->list);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__efivar_entry_delete);
/**
* efivar_entry_delete - delete variable and remove entry from list
* @entry: entry containing variable to delete
*
* Delete the variable from the firmware and remove @entry from the
* variable list. It is the caller's responsibility to free @entry
* once we return.
*
* Returns 0 on success, or a converted EFI status code if
* set_variable() fails.
*/
int efivar_entry_delete(struct efivar_entry *entry)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
efi_status_t status;
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
status = ops->set_variable(entry->var.VariableName,
&entry->var.VendorGuid,
0, 0, NULL);
if (!(status == EFI_SUCCESS || status == EFI_NOT_FOUND)) {
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
return efi_status_to_err(status);
}
efivar_entry_list_del_unlock(entry);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_delete);
/**
* efivar_entry_set - call set_variable()
* @entry: entry containing the EFI variable to write
* @attributes: variable attributes
* @size: size of @data buffer
* @data: buffer containing variable data
* @head: head of variable list
*
* Calls set_variable() for an EFI variable. If creating a new EFI
* variable, this function is usually followed by efivar_entry_add().
*
* Before writing the variable, the remaining EFI variable storage
* space is checked to ensure there is enough room available.
*
* If @head is not NULL a lookup is performed to determine whether
* the entry is already on the list.
*
* Returns 0 on success, -EEXIST if a lookup is performed and the entry
* already exists on the list, or a converted EFI status code if
* set_variable() fails.
*/
int efivar_entry_set(struct efivar_entry *entry, u32 attributes,
unsigned long size, void *data, struct list_head *head)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
efi_status_t status;
efi_char16_t *name = entry->var.VariableName;
efi_guid_t vendor = entry->var.VendorGuid;
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
if (head && efivar_entry_find(name, vendor, head, false)) {
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
return -EEXIST;
}
status = check_var_size(attributes, size + utf16_strsize(name, 1024));
if (status == EFI_SUCCESS || status == EFI_UNSUPPORTED)
status = ops->set_variable(name, &vendor,
attributes, size, data);
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
return efi_status_to_err(status);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_set);
/**
* efivar_entry_set_safe - call set_variable() if enough space in firmware
* @name: buffer containing the variable name
* @vendor: variable vendor guid
* @attributes: variable attributes
* @block: can we block in this context?
* @size: size of @data buffer
* @data: buffer containing variable data
*
* Ensures there is enough free storage in the firmware for this variable, and
* if so, calls set_variable(). If creating a new EFI variable, this function
* is usually followed by efivar_entry_add().
*
* Returns 0 on success, -ENOSPC if the firmware does not have enough
* space for set_variable() to succeed, or a converted EFI status code
* if set_variable() fails.
*/
int efivar_entry_set_safe(efi_char16_t *name, efi_guid_t vendor, u32 attributes,
bool block, unsigned long size, void *data)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
unsigned long flags;
efi_status_t status;
if (!ops->query_variable_info)
return -ENOSYS;
if (!block && !spin_trylock_irqsave(&__efivars->lock, flags))
return -EBUSY;
else
spin_lock_irqsave(&__efivars->lock, flags);
status = check_var_size(attributes, size + utf16_strsize(name, 1024));
if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&__efivars->lock, flags);
return -ENOSPC;
}
status = ops->set_variable(name, &vendor, attributes, size, data);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&__efivars->lock, flags);
return efi_status_to_err(status);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_set_safe);
/**
* efivar_entry_find - search for an entry
* @name: the EFI variable name
* @guid: the EFI variable vendor's guid
* @head: head of the variable list
* @remove: should we remove the entry from the list?
*
* Search for an entry on the variable list that has the EFI variable
* name @name and vendor guid @guid. If an entry is found on the list
* and @remove is true, the entry is removed from the list.
*
* The caller MUST call efivar_entry_iter_begin() and
* efivar_entry_iter_end() before and after the invocation of this
* function, respectively.
*
* Returns the entry if found on the list, %NULL otherwise.
*/
struct efivar_entry *efivar_entry_find(efi_char16_t *name, efi_guid_t guid,
struct list_head *head, bool remove)
{
struct efivar_entry *entry, *n;
int strsize1, strsize2;
bool found = false;
WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&__efivars->lock));
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, n, head, list) {
strsize1 = utf16_strsize(name, 1024);
strsize2 = utf16_strsize(entry->var.VariableName, 1024);
if (strsize1 == strsize2 &&
!memcmp(name, &(entry->var.VariableName), strsize1) &&
!efi_guidcmp(guid, entry->var.VendorGuid)) {
found = true;
break;
}
}
if (!found)
return NULL;
if (remove)
list_del(&entry->list);
return entry;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_find);
/**
* __efivar_entry_size - obtain the size of a variable
* @entry: entry for this variable
* @size: location to store the variable's size
*
* The caller MUST call efivar_entry_iter_begin() and
* efivar_entry_iter_end() before and after the invocation of this
* function, respectively.
*/
int __efivar_entry_size(struct efivar_entry *entry, unsigned long *size)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
efi_status_t status;
WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&__efivars->lock));
*size = 0;
status = ops->get_variable(entry->var.VariableName,
&entry->var.VendorGuid, NULL, size, NULL);
if (status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL)
return efi_status_to_err(status);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__efivar_entry_size);
/**
* efivar_entry_size - obtain the size of a variable
* @entry: entry for this variable
* @size: location to store the variable's size
*/
int efivar_entry_size(struct efivar_entry *entry, unsigned long *size)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
efi_status_t status;
*size = 0;
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
status = ops->get_variable(entry->var.VariableName,
&entry->var.VendorGuid, NULL, size, NULL);
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
if (status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL)
return efi_status_to_err(status);
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_size);
/**
* efivar_entry_get - call get_variable()
* @entry: read data for this variable
* @attributes: variable attributes
* @size: size of @data buffer
* @data: buffer to store variable data
*/
int efivar_entry_get(struct efivar_entry *entry, u32 *attributes,
unsigned long *size, void *data)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
efi_status_t status;
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
status = ops->get_variable(entry->var.VariableName,
&entry->var.VendorGuid,
attributes, size, data);
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
return efi_status_to_err(status);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_get);
/**
* efivar_entry_set_get_size - call set_variable() and get new size (atomic)
* @entry: entry containing variable to set and get
* @attributes: attributes of variable to be written
* @size: size of data buffer
* @data: buffer containing data to write
* @set: did the set_variable() call succeed?
*
* This is a pretty special (complex) function. See efivarfs_file_write().
*
* Atomically call set_variable() for @entry and if the call is
* successful, return the new size of the variable from get_variable()
* in @size. The success of set_variable() is indicated by @set.
*
* Returns 0 on success, -EINVAL if the variable data is invalid,
* -ENOSPC if the firmware does not have enough available space, or a
* converted EFI status code if either of set_variable() or
* get_variable() fail.
*
* If the EFI variable does not exist when calling set_variable()
* (EFI_NOT_FOUND), @entry is removed from the variable list.
*/
int efivar_entry_set_get_size(struct efivar_entry *entry, u32 attributes,
unsigned long *size, void *data, bool *set)
{
const struct efivar_operations *ops = __efivars->ops;
efi_char16_t *name = entry->var.VariableName;
efi_guid_t *vendor = &entry->var.VendorGuid;
efi_status_t status;
int err;
*set = false;
if (efivar_validate(&entry->var, data, *size) == false)
return -EINVAL;
/*
* The lock here protects the get_variable call, the conditional
* set_variable call, and removal of the variable from the efivars
* list (in the case of an authenticated delete).
*/
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
/*
* Ensure that the available space hasn't shrunk below the safe level
*/
status = check_var_size(attributes, *size + utf16_strsize(name, 1024));
if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
if (status != EFI_UNSUPPORTED) {
err = efi_status_to_err(status);
goto out;
}
if (*size > 65536) {
err = -ENOSPC;
goto out;
}
}
status = ops->set_variable(name, vendor, attributes, *size, data);
if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
err = efi_status_to_err(status);
goto out;
}
*set = true;
/*
* Writing to the variable may have caused a change in size (which
* could either be an append or an overwrite), or the variable to be
* deleted. Perform a GetVariable() so we can tell what actually
* happened.
*/
*size = 0;
status = ops->get_variable(entry->var.VariableName,
&entry->var.VendorGuid,
NULL, size, NULL);
if (status == EFI_NOT_FOUND)
efivar_entry_list_del_unlock(entry);
else
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
if (status && status != EFI_BUFFER_TOO_SMALL)
return efi_status_to_err(status);
return 0;
out:
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_set_get_size);
/**
* efivar_entry_iter_begin - begin iterating the variable list
*
* Lock the variable list to prevent entry insertion and removal until
* efivar_entry_iter_end() is called. This function is usually used in
* conjunction with __efivar_entry_iter() or efivar_entry_iter().
*/
void efivar_entry_iter_begin(void)
{
spin_lock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_iter_begin);
/**
* efivar_entry_iter_end - finish iterating the variable list
*
* Unlock the variable list and allow modifications to the list again.
*/
void efivar_entry_iter_end(void)
{
spin_unlock_irq(&__efivars->lock);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_iter_end);
/**
* __efivar_entry_iter - iterate over variable list
* @func: callback function
* @head: head of the variable list
* @data: function-specific data to pass to callback
* @prev: entry to begin iterating from
*
* Iterate over the list of EFI variables and call @func with every
* entry on the list. It is safe for @func to remove entries in the
* list via efivar_entry_delete().
*
* You MUST call efivar_enter_iter_begin() before this function, and
* efivar_entry_iter_end() afterwards.
*
* It is possible to begin iteration from an arbitrary entry within
* the list by passing @prev. @prev is updated on return to point to
* the last entry passed to @func. To begin iterating from the
* beginning of the list @prev must be %NULL.
*
* The restrictions for @func are the same as documented for
* efivar_entry_iter().
*/
int __efivar_entry_iter(int (*func)(struct efivar_entry *, void *),
struct list_head *head, void *data,
struct efivar_entry **prev)
{
struct efivar_entry *entry, *n;
int err = 0;
if (!prev || !*prev) {
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, n, head, list) {
err = func(entry, data);
if (err)
break;
}
if (prev)
*prev = entry;
return err;
}
list_for_each_entry_safe_continue((*prev), n, head, list) {
err = func(*prev, data);
if (err)
break;
}
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__efivar_entry_iter);
/**
* efivar_entry_iter - iterate over variable list
* @func: callback function
* @head: head of variable list
* @data: function-specific data to pass to callback
*
* Iterate over the list of EFI variables and call @func with every
* entry on the list. It is safe for @func to remove entries in the
* list via efivar_entry_delete() while iterating.
*
* Some notes for the callback function:
* - a non-zero return value indicates an error and terminates the loop
* - @func is called from atomic context
*/
int efivar_entry_iter(int (*func)(struct efivar_entry *, void *),
struct list_head *head, void *data)
{
int err = 0;
efivar_entry_iter_begin();
err = __efivar_entry_iter(func, head, data, NULL);
efivar_entry_iter_end();
return err;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_entry_iter);
/**
* efivars_kobject - get the kobject for the registered efivars
*
* If efivars_register() has not been called we return NULL,
* otherwise return the kobject used at registration time.
*/
struct kobject *efivars_kobject(void)
{
if (!__efivars)
return NULL;
return __efivars->kobject;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivars_kobject);
/**
* efivar_run_worker - schedule the efivar worker thread
*/
void efivar_run_worker(void)
{
if (efivar_wq_enabled)
schedule_work(&efivar_work);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivar_run_worker);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
/**
* efivars_register - register an efivars
* @efivars: efivars to register
* @ops: efivars operations
* @kobject: @efivars-specific kobject
*
* Only a single efivars can be registered at any time.
*/
int efivars_register(struct efivars *efivars,
const struct efivar_operations *ops,
struct kobject *kobject)
{
spin_lock_init(&efivars->lock);
efivars->ops = ops;
efivars->kobject = kobject;
__efivars = efivars;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivars_register);
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
/**
* efivars_unregister - unregister an efivars
* @efivars: efivars to unregister
*
* The caller must have already removed every entry from the list,
* failure to do so is an error.
*/
int efivars_unregister(struct efivars *efivars)
{
int rv;
if (!__efivars) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars not registered\n");
rv = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
if (__efivars != efivars) {
rv = -EINVAL;
goto out;
}
__efivars = NULL;
rv = 0;
out:
return rv;
}
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(efivars_unregister);
static struct efivars generic_efivars;
static struct efivar_operations generic_ops;
static int generic_ops_register(void)
{
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
int error;
generic_ops.get_variable = efi.get_variable;
generic_ops.set_variable = efi.set_variable;
generic_ops.get_next_variable = efi.get_next_variable;
generic_ops.query_variable_info = efi.query_variable_info;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
error = efivars_register(&generic_efivars, &generic_ops, efi_kobj);
if (error)
return error;
error = efivars_sysfs_init();
if (error)
efivars_unregister(&generic_efivars);
return error;
}
static void generic_ops_unregister(void)
{
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
efivars_sysfs_exit();
efivars_unregister(&generic_efivars);
}
/*
* For now we register the efi subsystem with the firmware subsystem
* and the vars subsystem with the efi subsystem. In the future, it
* might make sense to split off the efi subsystem into its own
* driver, but for now only efivars will register with it, so just
* include it here.
*/
static int __init
efivars_init(void)
{
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
int error;
efi: Make 'efi_enabled' a function to query EFI facilities Originally 'efi_enabled' indicated whether a kernel was booted from EFI firmware. Over time its semantics have changed, and it now indicates whether or not we are booted on an EFI machine with bit-native firmware, e.g. 64-bit kernel with 64-bit firmware. The immediate motivation for this patch is the bug report at, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1040557 which details how running a platform driver on an EFI machine that is designed to run under BIOS can cause the machine to become bricked. Also, the following report, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47121 details how running said driver can also cause Machine Check Exceptions. Drivers need a new means of detecting whether they're running on an EFI machine, as sadly the expression, if (!efi_enabled) hasn't been a sufficient condition for quite some time. Users actually want to query 'efi_enabled' for different reasons - what they really want access to is the list of available EFI facilities. For instance, the x86 reboot code needs to know whether it can invoke the ResetSystem() function provided by the EFI runtime services, while the ACPI OSL code wants to know whether the EFI config tables were mapped successfully. There are also checks in some of the platform driver code to simply see if they're running on an EFI machine (which would make it a bad idea to do BIOS-y things). This patch is a prereq for the samsung-laptop fix patch. Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@canonical.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 09:42:35 +00:00
if (!efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES))
return 0;
efivars: efivar_entry API There isn't really a formal interface for dealing with EFI variables or struct efivar_entry. Historically, this has led to various bits of code directly accessing the generic EFI variable ops, which inherently ties it to specific EFI variable operations instead of indirectly using whatever ops were registered with register_efivars(). This lead to the efivarfs code only working with the generic EFI variable ops and not CONFIG_GOOGLE_SMI. Encapsulate everything that needs to access '__efivars' inside an efivar_entry_* API and use the new API in the pstore, sysfs and efivarfs code. Much of the efivars code had to be rewritten to use this new API. For instance, it is now up to the users of the API to build the initial list of EFI variables in their efivar_init() callback function. The variable list needs to be passed to efivar_init() which allows us to keep work arounds for things like implementation bugs in GetNextVariable() in a central location. Allowing users of the API to use a callback function to build the list greatly benefits the efivarfs code which needs to allocate inodes and dentries for every variable. It previously did this in a racy way because the code ran without holding the variable spinlock. Both the sysfs and efivarfs code maintain their own lists which means the two interfaces can be running simultaneously without interference, though it should be noted that because no synchronisation is performed it is very easy to create inconsistencies. efibootmgr doesn't currently use efivarfs and users are likely to also require the old sysfs interface, so it makes sense to allow both to be built. Reviewed-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Tested-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@jklm.no> Cc: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@hds.com> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Jeremy Kerr <jk@ozlabs.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
2013-02-03 20:16:40 +00:00
/* Register the efi directory at /sys/firmware/efi */
efi_kobj = kobject_create_and_add("efi", firmware_kobj);
if (!efi_kobj) {
printk(KERN_ERR "efivars: Firmware registration failed.\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
error = generic_ops_register();
if (error)
goto err_put;
/* Don't forget the systab entry */
error = sysfs_create_group(efi_kobj, &efi_subsys_attr_group);
if (error) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"efivars: Sysfs attribute export failed with error %d.\n",
error);
goto err_unregister;
}
return 0;
err_unregister:
generic_ops_unregister();
err_put:
kobject_put(efi_kobj);
return error;
}
static void __exit
efivars_exit(void)
{
cancel_work_sync(&efivar_work);
efi: Make 'efi_enabled' a function to query EFI facilities Originally 'efi_enabled' indicated whether a kernel was booted from EFI firmware. Over time its semantics have changed, and it now indicates whether or not we are booted on an EFI machine with bit-native firmware, e.g. 64-bit kernel with 64-bit firmware. The immediate motivation for this patch is the bug report at, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cdimage/+bug/1040557 which details how running a platform driver on an EFI machine that is designed to run under BIOS can cause the machine to become bricked. Also, the following report, https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47121 details how running said driver can also cause Machine Check Exceptions. Drivers need a new means of detecting whether they're running on an EFI machine, as sadly the expression, if (!efi_enabled) hasn't been a sufficient condition for quite some time. Users actually want to query 'efi_enabled' for different reasons - what they really want access to is the list of available EFI facilities. For instance, the x86 reboot code needs to know whether it can invoke the ResetSystem() function provided by the EFI runtime services, while the ACPI OSL code wants to know whether the EFI config tables were mapped successfully. There are also checks in some of the platform driver code to simply see if they're running on an EFI machine (which would make it a bad idea to do BIOS-y things). This patch is a prereq for the samsung-laptop fix patch. Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net> Cc: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com> Cc: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Cc: Steve Langasek <steve.langasek@canonical.com> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@kernel.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 09:42:35 +00:00
if (efi_enabled(EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES)) {
generic_ops_unregister();
efivars: prevent oops on unload when efi is not enabled efivars_exit() should check for efi_enabled and not undo allocations when efi is not enabled. Otherwise there is an Oops during module unload: calling efivars_init+0x0/0x1000 [efivars] @ 2810 EFI Variables Facility v0.08 2004-May-17 initcall efivars_init+0x0/0x1000 [efivars] returned 0 after 5120 usecs Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC last sysfs file: /sys/module/firmware_class/initstate CPU 1 Modules linked in: efivars(-) af_packet tun nfsd lockd nfs_acl auth_rpcgss sunrpc ipt_REJECT nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 iptable_filter ip_tables ip6t_REJECT xt_tcpudp nf_conntrack_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv6 xt_state nf_conntrack ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables ipv6 cpufreq_ondemand acpi_cpufreq freq_table mperf binfmt_misc dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_multipath scsi_dh dm_mod snd_hda_codec_analog snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep mousedev snd_seq joydev snd_seq_device mac_hid evdev snd_pcm usbkbd usbmouse usbhid snd_timer hid tg3 snd sr_mod pcspkr rtc_cmos soundcore cdrom iTCO_wdt processor sg dcdbas i2c_i801 rtc_core iTCO_vendor_support intel_agp snd_page_alloc thermal_sys rtc_lib intel_gtt 8250_pnp button hwmon unix ide_pci_generic ide_core ata_generic pata_acpi ata_piix sd_mod crc_t10dif ext3 jbd mbcache uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ssb mmc_core pcmcia pcmcia_core firmware_class ehci_hcd usbcore [last unloaded: dell_rbu] Pid: 2812, comm: rmmod Not tainted 2.6.39-rc6 #1 Dell Inc. OptiPlex 745 /0TY565 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa06a17f6>] [<ffffffffa06a17f6>] unregister_efivars+0x28/0x12c [efivars] RSP: 0018:ffff88005eedde98 EFLAGS: 00010283 RAX: ffffffffa06a23fc RBX: ffffffffa06a44c0 RCX: ffff88007c227a50 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 00000055ac13db78 RDI: ffffffffa06a44c0 RBP: ffff88005eeddec8 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffff88005eeddd78 R10: ffffffffa06a4220 R11: ffff88005eeddd78 R12: fffffffffffff7d0 R13: 00007fff5a3aaec0 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffffffffa06a4508 FS: 00007fa8dcc4a6f0(0000) GS:ffff88007c200000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 000000005d148000 CR4: 00000000000006e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process rmmod (pid: 2812, threadinfo ffff88005eedc000, task ffff88006754b000) Stack: ffff88005eeddec8 ffffffffa06a4220 0000000000000000 00007fff5a3aaec0 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 ffff88005eedded8 ffffffffa06a2418 ffff88005eeddf78 ffffffff810d3598 ffffffffa06a4220 0000000000000880 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa06a2418>] efivars_exit+0x1c/0xc04 [efivars] [<ffffffff810d3598>] sys_delete_module+0x2d6/0x368 [<ffffffff812d1db9>] ? lockdep_sys_exit_thunk+0x35/0x67 [<ffffffff810fcba1>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x172/0x1a5 [<ffffffff81575082>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Code: 5c c9 c3 55 48 89 e5 41 57 41 56 41 55 41 54 53 48 83 ec 08 0f 1f 44 00 00 4c 8b 67 48 48 89 fb 4c 8d 7f 48 49 81 ec 30 08 00 00 <4d> 8b ac 24 30 08 00 00 49 81 ed 30 08 00 00 eb 59 48 89 df 48 RIP [<ffffffffa06a17f6>] unregister_efivars+0x28/0x12c [efivars] RSP <ffff88005eedde98> CR2: 0000000000000000 ---[ end trace aa99b99090f70baa ]--- Matt apparently removed such a check in 2004 (with no reason given): * 17 May 2004 - Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> * remove check for efi_enabled in exit but there have been several changes since then. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Mike Waychison <mikew@google.com> Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com> Cc: <matthew.e.tolentino@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2011-05-06 20:27:41 +00:00
kobject_put(efi_kobj);
}
}
module_init(efivars_init);
module_exit(efivars_exit);