linux/drivers/acpi/resource.c

770 lines
23 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
/*
* drivers/acpi/resource.c - ACPI device resources interpretation.
*
* Copyright (C) 2012, Intel Corp.
* Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
*
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*
* ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*/
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/export.h>
#include <linux/ioport.h>
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_X86
#define valid_IRQ(i) (((i) != 0) && ((i) != 2))
PCI: ACPI: IA64: fix IO port generic range check The [0 - 64k] ACPI PCI IO port resource boundary check in: acpi_dev_ioresource_flags() is currently applied blindly in the ACPI resource parsing to all architectures, but only x86 suffers from that IO space limitation. On arches (ie IA64 and ARM64) where IO space is memory mapped, the PCI root bridges IO resource windows are firstly initialized from the _CRS (in acpi_decode_space()) and contain the CPU physical address at which a root bridge decodes IO space in the CPU physical address space with the offset value representing the offset required to translate the PCI bus address into the CPU physical address. The IO resource windows are then parsed and updated in arch code before creating and enumerating PCI buses (eg IA64 add_io_space()) to map in an arch specific way the obtained CPU physical address range to a slice of virtual address space reserved to map PCI IO space, ending up with PCI bridges resource windows containing IO resources like the following on a working IA64 configuration: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x1000000-0x100ffff window] (bus address [0x0000-0xffff]) pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80004000000-0x800ffffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00] This implies that the [0 - 64K] check in acpi_dev_ioresource_flags() leaves platforms with memory mapped IO space (ie IA64) broken (ie kernel can't claim IO resources since the host bridge IO resource is disabled and discarded by ACPI core code, see log on IA64 with missing root bridge IO resource, silently filtered by current [0 - 64k] check in acpi_dev_ioresource_flags()): PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80004000000-0x800ffffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00] [...] pci 0000:00:03.0: [1002:515e] type 00 class 0x030000 pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x80000000-0x87ffffff pref] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x14: [io 0x1000-0x10ff] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x18: [mem 0x88020000-0x8802ffff] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x30: [mem 0x88000000-0x8801ffff pref] pci 0000:00:03.0: supports D1 D2 pci 0000:00:03.0: can't claim BAR 1 [io 0x1000-0x10ff]: no compatible bridge window For this reason, the IO port resources boundaries check in generic ACPI parsing code should be guarded with a CONFIG_X86 guard so that more arches (ie ARM64) can benefit from the generic ACPI resources parsing interface without incurring in unexpected resource filtering, fixing at the same time current breakage on IA64. This patch factors out IO ports boundary [0 - 64k] check in generic ACPI code and makes the IO space check X86 specific to make sure that IO space resources are usable on other arches too. Fixes: 3772aea7d6f3 (ia64/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource parsing interface for host bridge) Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-03-21 11:12:55 +00:00
static inline bool acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res)
{
/* On X86 IO space is limited to the [0 - 64K] IO port range */
return res->end < 0x10003;
}
#else
#define valid_IRQ(i) (true)
PCI: ACPI: IA64: fix IO port generic range check The [0 - 64k] ACPI PCI IO port resource boundary check in: acpi_dev_ioresource_flags() is currently applied blindly in the ACPI resource parsing to all architectures, but only x86 suffers from that IO space limitation. On arches (ie IA64 and ARM64) where IO space is memory mapped, the PCI root bridges IO resource windows are firstly initialized from the _CRS (in acpi_decode_space()) and contain the CPU physical address at which a root bridge decodes IO space in the CPU physical address space with the offset value representing the offset required to translate the PCI bus address into the CPU physical address. The IO resource windows are then parsed and updated in arch code before creating and enumerating PCI buses (eg IA64 add_io_space()) to map in an arch specific way the obtained CPU physical address range to a slice of virtual address space reserved to map PCI IO space, ending up with PCI bridges resource windows containing IO resources like the following on a working IA64 configuration: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x1000000-0x100ffff window] (bus address [0x0000-0xffff]) pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80004000000-0x800ffffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00] This implies that the [0 - 64K] check in acpi_dev_ioresource_flags() leaves platforms with memory mapped IO space (ie IA64) broken (ie kernel can't claim IO resources since the host bridge IO resource is disabled and discarded by ACPI core code, see log on IA64 with missing root bridge IO resource, silently filtered by current [0 - 64k] check in acpi_dev_ioresource_flags()): PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80004000000-0x800ffffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00] [...] pci 0000:00:03.0: [1002:515e] type 00 class 0x030000 pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x80000000-0x87ffffff pref] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x14: [io 0x1000-0x10ff] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x18: [mem 0x88020000-0x8802ffff] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x30: [mem 0x88000000-0x8801ffff pref] pci 0000:00:03.0: supports D1 D2 pci 0000:00:03.0: can't claim BAR 1 [io 0x1000-0x10ff]: no compatible bridge window For this reason, the IO port resources boundaries check in generic ACPI parsing code should be guarded with a CONFIG_X86 guard so that more arches (ie ARM64) can benefit from the generic ACPI resources parsing interface without incurring in unexpected resource filtering, fixing at the same time current breakage on IA64. This patch factors out IO ports boundary [0 - 64k] check in generic ACPI code and makes the IO space check X86 specific to make sure that IO space resources are usable on other arches too. Fixes: 3772aea7d6f3 (ia64/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource parsing interface for host bridge) Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-03-21 11:12:55 +00:00
/*
* ACPI IO descriptors on arches other than X86 contain MMIO CPU physical
* addresses mapping IO space in CPU physical address space, IO space
* resources can be placed anywhere in the 64-bit physical address space.
*/
static inline bool
acpi_iospace_resource_valid(struct resource *res) { return true; }
#endif
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ACPI_GENERIC_GSI)
static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq)
{
return ext_irq->resource_source.string_length == 0 &&
ext_irq->producer_consumer == ACPI_CONSUMER;
}
#else
static inline bool is_gsi(struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq)
{
return true;
}
#endif
static bool acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(u64 start, u64 end, u64 len, bool io)
{
u64 reslen = end - start + 1;
/*
* CHECKME: len might be required to check versus a minimum
* length as well. 1 for io is fine, but for memory it does
* not make any sense at all.
* Note: some BIOSes report incorrect length for ACPI address space
* descriptor, so remove check of 'reslen == len' to avoid regression.
*/
if (len && reslen && start <= end)
return true;
pr_debug("ACPI: invalid or unassigned resource %s [%016llx - %016llx] length [%016llx]\n",
io ? "io" : "mem", start, end, len);
return false;
}
static void acpi_dev_memresource_flags(struct resource *res, u64 len,
u8 write_protect)
{
res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
if (!acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(res->start, res->end, len, false))
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET;
if (write_protect == ACPI_READ_WRITE_MEMORY)
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_MEM_WRITEABLE;
}
static void acpi_dev_get_memresource(struct resource *res, u64 start, u64 len,
u8 write_protect)
{
res->start = start;
res->end = start + len - 1;
acpi_dev_memresource_flags(res, len, write_protect);
}
/**
* acpi_dev_resource_memory - Extract ACPI memory resource information.
* @ares: Input ACPI resource object.
* @res: Output generic resource object.
*
* Check if the given ACPI resource object represents a memory resource and
* if that's the case, use the information in it to populate the generic
* resource object pointed to by @res.
*
* Return:
* 1) false with res->flags setting to zero: not the expected resource type
* 2) false with IORESOURCE_DISABLED in res->flags: valid unassigned resource
* 3) true: valid assigned resource
*/
bool acpi_dev_resource_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares, struct resource *res)
{
struct acpi_resource_memory24 *memory24;
struct acpi_resource_memory32 *memory32;
struct acpi_resource_fixed_memory32 *fixed_memory32;
switch (ares->type) {
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_MEMORY24:
memory24 = &ares->data.memory24;
acpi_dev_get_memresource(res, memory24->minimum << 8,
memory24->address_length << 8,
memory24->write_protect);
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_MEMORY32:
memory32 = &ares->data.memory32;
acpi_dev_get_memresource(res, memory32->minimum,
memory32->address_length,
memory32->write_protect);
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32:
fixed_memory32 = &ares->data.fixed_memory32;
acpi_dev_get_memresource(res, fixed_memory32->address,
fixed_memory32->address_length,
fixed_memory32->write_protect);
break;
default:
res->flags = 0;
return false;
}
return !(res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_resource_memory);
static void acpi_dev_ioresource_flags(struct resource *res, u64 len,
u8 io_decode, u8 translation_type)
{
res->flags = IORESOURCE_IO;
if (!acpi_dev_resource_len_valid(res->start, res->end, len, true))
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET;
PCI: ACPI: IA64: fix IO port generic range check The [0 - 64k] ACPI PCI IO port resource boundary check in: acpi_dev_ioresource_flags() is currently applied blindly in the ACPI resource parsing to all architectures, but only x86 suffers from that IO space limitation. On arches (ie IA64 and ARM64) where IO space is memory mapped, the PCI root bridges IO resource windows are firstly initialized from the _CRS (in acpi_decode_space()) and contain the CPU physical address at which a root bridge decodes IO space in the CPU physical address space with the offset value representing the offset required to translate the PCI bus address into the CPU physical address. The IO resource windows are then parsed and updated in arch code before creating and enumerating PCI buses (eg IA64 add_io_space()) to map in an arch specific way the obtained CPU physical address range to a slice of virtual address space reserved to map PCI IO space, ending up with PCI bridges resource windows containing IO resources like the following on a working IA64 configuration: PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [io 0x1000000-0x100ffff window] (bus address [0x0000-0xffff]) pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80004000000-0x800ffffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00] This implies that the [0 - 64K] check in acpi_dev_ioresource_flags() leaves platforms with memory mapped IO space (ie IA64) broken (ie kernel can't claim IO resources since the host bridge IO resource is disabled and discarded by ACPI core code, see log on IA64 with missing root bridge IO resource, silently filtered by current [0 - 64k] check in acpi_dev_ioresource_flags()): PCI host bridge to bus 0000:00 pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x000a0000-0x000fffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80000000-0x8fffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x80004000000-0x800ffffffff window] pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [bus 00] [...] pci 0000:00:03.0: [1002:515e] type 00 class 0x030000 pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x80000000-0x87ffffff pref] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x14: [io 0x1000-0x10ff] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x18: [mem 0x88020000-0x8802ffff] pci 0000:00:03.0: reg 0x30: [mem 0x88000000-0x8801ffff pref] pci 0000:00:03.0: supports D1 D2 pci 0000:00:03.0: can't claim BAR 1 [io 0x1000-0x10ff]: no compatible bridge window For this reason, the IO port resources boundaries check in generic ACPI parsing code should be guarded with a CONFIG_X86 guard so that more arches (ie ARM64) can benefit from the generic ACPI resources parsing interface without incurring in unexpected resource filtering, fixing at the same time current breakage on IA64. This patch factors out IO ports boundary [0 - 64k] check in generic ACPI code and makes the IO space check X86 specific to make sure that IO space resources are usable on other arches too. Fixes: 3772aea7d6f3 (ia64/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource parsing interface for host bridge) Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2016-03-21 11:12:55 +00:00
if (!acpi_iospace_resource_valid(res))
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_DISABLED | IORESOURCE_UNSET;
if (io_decode == ACPI_DECODE_16)
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_IO_16BIT_ADDR;
if (translation_type == ACPI_SPARSE_TRANSLATION)
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_IO_SPARSE;
}
static void acpi_dev_get_ioresource(struct resource *res, u64 start, u64 len,
u8 io_decode)
{
res->start = start;
res->end = start + len - 1;
acpi_dev_ioresource_flags(res, len, io_decode, 0);
}
/**
* acpi_dev_resource_io - Extract ACPI I/O resource information.
* @ares: Input ACPI resource object.
* @res: Output generic resource object.
*
* Check if the given ACPI resource object represents an I/O resource and
* if that's the case, use the information in it to populate the generic
* resource object pointed to by @res.
*
* Return:
* 1) false with res->flags setting to zero: not the expected resource type
* 2) false with IORESOURCE_DISABLED in res->flags: valid unassigned resource
* 3) true: valid assigned resource
*/
bool acpi_dev_resource_io(struct acpi_resource *ares, struct resource *res)
{
struct acpi_resource_io *io;
struct acpi_resource_fixed_io *fixed_io;
switch (ares->type) {
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IO:
io = &ares->data.io;
acpi_dev_get_ioresource(res, io->minimum,
io->address_length,
io->io_decode);
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_IO:
fixed_io = &ares->data.fixed_io;
acpi_dev_get_ioresource(res, fixed_io->address,
fixed_io->address_length,
ACPI_DECODE_10);
break;
default:
res->flags = 0;
return false;
}
return !(res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_resource_io);
static bool acpi_decode_space(struct resource_win *win,
struct acpi_resource_address *addr,
struct acpi_address64_attribute *attr)
{
u8 iodec = attr->granularity == 0xfff ? ACPI_DECODE_10 : ACPI_DECODE_16;
bool wp = addr->info.mem.write_protect;
u64 len = attr->address_length;
ACPI / PCI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel Zoltan Boszormenyi reported this regression: "There's a Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 (PCI ID 10ec:8168, Subsystem ID 1565:230e) network chip on the mainboard. After the r8169 driver loaded the IRQs in the machine went berserk. Keyboard keypressed arrived with considerable latency and duplicated, so no real work was possible. The machine responded to the power button but didn't actually power down. It just stuck at the powering down message. I had to press the power button for 4 seconds to power it down. The computer is a POS machine with a big battery inside. Because of this, either ACPI or the Realtek chip kept the bad state and after rebooting, the network chip didn't even show up in lspci. Not even the PXE ROM announced itself during boot. I had to disconnect the battery to beat some sense back to the computer. The regression happens with 4.0.5, 4.1.0-rc8 and 4.1.0-final. 3.18.16 was good." The regression is caused by commit 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation). Since commit 593669c2ac0f, x86 PCI ACPI host bridge driver validates ACPI resources by first converting an ACPI resource to a 'struct resource' structure and then applying checks against the converted resource structure. The 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource' are defined to be type of resource_size_t, which may be 32 bits or 64 bits depending on CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. This may cause incorrect resource validation results with 32-bit kernels because 64-bit ACPI resource descriptors may get truncated when converting to 32-bit 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource'. It eventually affects PCI resource allocation subsystem and makes some PCI devices and the system behave abnormally due to incorrect resource assignment. So enhance the ACPI resource parsing interfaces to ignore ACPI resource descriptors with address/offset above 4G when running in 32-bit mode. With the fix applied, the behavior of the machine was restored to how 3.18.16 worked, i.e. the memory range that is over 4GB is ignored again, and lspci -vvxxx shows that everything is at the same memory window as they were with 3.18.16. Reported-and-tested-by: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu> Fixes: 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation) Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-08 07:26:39 +00:00
u64 start, end, offset = 0;
struct resource *res = &win->res;
/*
* Filter out invalid descriptor according to ACPI Spec 5.0, section
* 6.4.3.5 Address Space Resource Descriptors.
*/
if ((addr->min_address_fixed != addr->max_address_fixed && len) ||
(addr->min_address_fixed && addr->max_address_fixed && !len))
pr_debug("ACPI: Invalid address space min_addr_fix %d, max_addr_fix %d, len %llx\n",
addr->min_address_fixed, addr->max_address_fixed, len);
/*
* For bridges that translate addresses across the bridge,
* translation_offset is the offset that must be added to the
* address on the secondary side to obtain the address on the
* primary side. Non-bridge devices must list 0 for all Address
* Translation offset bits.
*/
ACPI / PCI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel Zoltan Boszormenyi reported this regression: "There's a Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 (PCI ID 10ec:8168, Subsystem ID 1565:230e) network chip on the mainboard. After the r8169 driver loaded the IRQs in the machine went berserk. Keyboard keypressed arrived with considerable latency and duplicated, so no real work was possible. The machine responded to the power button but didn't actually power down. It just stuck at the powering down message. I had to press the power button for 4 seconds to power it down. The computer is a POS machine with a big battery inside. Because of this, either ACPI or the Realtek chip kept the bad state and after rebooting, the network chip didn't even show up in lspci. Not even the PXE ROM announced itself during boot. I had to disconnect the battery to beat some sense back to the computer. The regression happens with 4.0.5, 4.1.0-rc8 and 4.1.0-final. 3.18.16 was good." The regression is caused by commit 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation). Since commit 593669c2ac0f, x86 PCI ACPI host bridge driver validates ACPI resources by first converting an ACPI resource to a 'struct resource' structure and then applying checks against the converted resource structure. The 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource' are defined to be type of resource_size_t, which may be 32 bits or 64 bits depending on CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. This may cause incorrect resource validation results with 32-bit kernels because 64-bit ACPI resource descriptors may get truncated when converting to 32-bit 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource'. It eventually affects PCI resource allocation subsystem and makes some PCI devices and the system behave abnormally due to incorrect resource assignment. So enhance the ACPI resource parsing interfaces to ignore ACPI resource descriptors with address/offset above 4G when running in 32-bit mode. With the fix applied, the behavior of the machine was restored to how 3.18.16 worked, i.e. the memory range that is over 4GB is ignored again, and lspci -vvxxx shows that everything is at the same memory window as they were with 3.18.16. Reported-and-tested-by: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu> Fixes: 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation) Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-08 07:26:39 +00:00
if (addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)
offset = attr->translation_offset;
else if (attr->translation_offset)
pr_debug("ACPI: translation_offset(%lld) is invalid for non-bridge device.\n",
attr->translation_offset);
ACPI / PCI: Fix regressions caused by resource_size_t overflow with 32-bit kernel Zoltan Boszormenyi reported this regression: "There's a Realtek RTL8111/8168/8411 (PCI ID 10ec:8168, Subsystem ID 1565:230e) network chip on the mainboard. After the r8169 driver loaded the IRQs in the machine went berserk. Keyboard keypressed arrived with considerable latency and duplicated, so no real work was possible. The machine responded to the power button but didn't actually power down. It just stuck at the powering down message. I had to press the power button for 4 seconds to power it down. The computer is a POS machine with a big battery inside. Because of this, either ACPI or the Realtek chip kept the bad state and after rebooting, the network chip didn't even show up in lspci. Not even the PXE ROM announced itself during boot. I had to disconnect the battery to beat some sense back to the computer. The regression happens with 4.0.5, 4.1.0-rc8 and 4.1.0-final. 3.18.16 was good." The regression is caused by commit 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation). Since commit 593669c2ac0f, x86 PCI ACPI host bridge driver validates ACPI resources by first converting an ACPI resource to a 'struct resource' structure and then applying checks against the converted resource structure. The 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource' are defined to be type of resource_size_t, which may be 32 bits or 64 bits depending on CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT. This may cause incorrect resource validation results with 32-bit kernels because 64-bit ACPI resource descriptors may get truncated when converting to 32-bit 'start' and 'end' fields in 'struct resource'. It eventually affects PCI resource allocation subsystem and makes some PCI devices and the system behave abnormally due to incorrect resource assignment. So enhance the ACPI resource parsing interfaces to ignore ACPI resource descriptors with address/offset above 4G when running in 32-bit mode. With the fix applied, the behavior of the machine was restored to how 3.18.16 worked, i.e. the memory range that is over 4GB is ignored again, and lspci -vvxxx shows that everything is at the same memory window as they were with 3.18.16. Reported-and-tested-by: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zboszor@pr.hu> Fixes: 593669c2ac0f (x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation) Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-07-08 07:26:39 +00:00
start = attr->minimum + offset;
end = attr->maximum + offset;
win->offset = offset;
res->start = start;
res->end = end;
if (sizeof(resource_size_t) < sizeof(u64) &&
(offset != win->offset || start != res->start || end != res->end)) {
pr_warn("acpi resource window ([%#llx-%#llx] ignored, not CPU addressable)\n",
attr->minimum, attr->maximum);
return false;
}
switch (addr->resource_type) {
case ACPI_MEMORY_RANGE:
acpi_dev_memresource_flags(res, len, wp);
break;
case ACPI_IO_RANGE:
acpi_dev_ioresource_flags(res, len, iodec,
addr->info.io.translation_type);
break;
case ACPI_BUS_NUMBER_RANGE:
res->flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
break;
default:
return false;
}
if (addr->producer_consumer == ACPI_PRODUCER)
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_WINDOW;
if (addr->info.mem.caching == ACPI_PREFETCHABLE_MEMORY)
res->flags |= IORESOURCE_PREFETCH;
return !(res->flags & IORESOURCE_DISABLED);
}
/**
* acpi_dev_resource_address_space - Extract ACPI address space information.
* @ares: Input ACPI resource object.
* @win: Output generic resource object.
*
* Check if the given ACPI resource object represents an address space resource
* and if that's the case, use the information in it to populate the generic
* resource object pointed to by @win.
*
* Return:
* 1) false with win->res.flags setting to zero: not the expected resource type
* 2) false with IORESOURCE_DISABLED in win->res.flags: valid unassigned
* resource
* 3) true: valid assigned resource
*/
bool acpi_dev_resource_address_space(struct acpi_resource *ares,
struct resource_win *win)
{
struct acpi_resource_address64 addr;
win->res.flags = 0;
if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_resource_to_address64(ares, &addr)))
return false;
return acpi_decode_space(win, (struct acpi_resource_address *)&addr,
&addr.address);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_resource_address_space);
/**
* acpi_dev_resource_ext_address_space - Extract ACPI address space information.
* @ares: Input ACPI resource object.
* @win: Output generic resource object.
*
* Check if the given ACPI resource object represents an extended address space
* resource and if that's the case, use the information in it to populate the
* generic resource object pointed to by @win.
*
* Return:
* 1) false with win->res.flags setting to zero: not the expected resource type
* 2) false with IORESOURCE_DISABLED in win->res.flags: valid unassigned
* resource
* 3) true: valid assigned resource
*/
bool acpi_dev_resource_ext_address_space(struct acpi_resource *ares,
struct resource_win *win)
{
struct acpi_resource_extended_address64 *ext_addr;
win->res.flags = 0;
if (ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_ADDRESS64)
return false;
ext_addr = &ares->data.ext_address64;
return acpi_decode_space(win, (struct acpi_resource_address *)ext_addr,
&ext_addr->address);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_resource_ext_address_space);
/**
* acpi_dev_irq_flags - Determine IRQ resource flags.
* @triggering: Triggering type as provided by ACPI.
* @polarity: Interrupt polarity as provided by ACPI.
* @shareable: Whether or not the interrupt is shareable.
*/
unsigned long acpi_dev_irq_flags(u8 triggering, u8 polarity, u8 shareable)
{
unsigned long flags;
if (triggering == ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE)
flags = polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW ?
IORESOURCE_IRQ_LOWLEVEL : IORESOURCE_IRQ_HIGHLEVEL;
else
flags = polarity == ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW ?
IORESOURCE_IRQ_LOWEDGE : IORESOURCE_IRQ_HIGHEDGE;
if (shareable == ACPI_SHARED)
flags |= IORESOURCE_IRQ_SHAREABLE;
return flags | IORESOURCE_IRQ;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_irq_flags);
/**
* acpi_dev_get_irq_type - Determine irq type.
* @triggering: Triggering type as provided by ACPI.
* @polarity: Interrupt polarity as provided by ACPI.
*/
unsigned int acpi_dev_get_irq_type(int triggering, int polarity)
{
switch (polarity) {
case ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW:
return triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ?
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING :
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW;
case ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH:
return triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE ?
IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING :
IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH;
case ACPI_ACTIVE_BOTH:
if (triggering == ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE)
return IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_BOTH;
fallthrough;
default:
return IRQ_TYPE_NONE;
}
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_get_irq_type);
static void acpi_dev_get_irqresource(struct resource *res, u32 gsi,
ACPI / resources: call acpi_get_override_irq() only for legacy IRQ resources acpi_get_override_irq() was added because there was a problem with buggy BIOSes passing wrong IRQ() resource for the RTC IRQ. The commit that added the workaround was 61fd47e0c8476 (ACPI: fix two IRQ8 issues in IOAPIC mode). With ACPI 5 enumerated devices there are typically one or more extended IRQ resources per device (and these IRQs can be shared). However, the acpi_get_override_irq() workaround forces all IRQs in range 0 - 15 (the legacy ISA IRQs) to be edge triggered, active high as can be seen from the dmesg below: ACPI: IRQ 6 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 13 override to edge, high Also /proc/interrupts for the I2C controllers (INT33C2 and INT33C3) shows the same thing: 7: 4 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge INT33C2:00, INT33C3:00 The _CSR method for INT33C2 (and INT33C3) device returns following resource: Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Shared,,, ) { 0x00000007, } which states that this is supposed to be level triggered, active low, shared IRQ instead. Fix this by making sure that acpi_get_override_irq() gets only called when we are dealing with legacy IRQ() or IRQNoFlags() descriptors. While we are there, correct pr_warning() to print the right triggering value. This change turns out to be necessary to make DMA work correctly on systems based on the Intel Lynxpoint PCH (Platform Controller Hub). [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-20 15:41:45 +00:00
u8 triggering, u8 polarity, u8 shareable,
bool legacy)
{
int irq, p, t;
if (!valid_IRQ(gsi)) {
irqresource_disabled(res, gsi);
return;
}
/*
* In IO-APIC mode, use overridden attribute. Two reasons:
* 1. BIOS bug in DSDT
* 2. BIOS uses IO-APIC mode Interrupt Source Override
ACPI / resources: call acpi_get_override_irq() only for legacy IRQ resources acpi_get_override_irq() was added because there was a problem with buggy BIOSes passing wrong IRQ() resource for the RTC IRQ. The commit that added the workaround was 61fd47e0c8476 (ACPI: fix two IRQ8 issues in IOAPIC mode). With ACPI 5 enumerated devices there are typically one or more extended IRQ resources per device (and these IRQs can be shared). However, the acpi_get_override_irq() workaround forces all IRQs in range 0 - 15 (the legacy ISA IRQs) to be edge triggered, active high as can be seen from the dmesg below: ACPI: IRQ 6 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 13 override to edge, high Also /proc/interrupts for the I2C controllers (INT33C2 and INT33C3) shows the same thing: 7: 4 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge INT33C2:00, INT33C3:00 The _CSR method for INT33C2 (and INT33C3) device returns following resource: Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Shared,,, ) { 0x00000007, } which states that this is supposed to be level triggered, active low, shared IRQ instead. Fix this by making sure that acpi_get_override_irq() gets only called when we are dealing with legacy IRQ() or IRQNoFlags() descriptors. While we are there, correct pr_warning() to print the right triggering value. This change turns out to be necessary to make DMA work correctly on systems based on the Intel Lynxpoint PCH (Platform Controller Hub). [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-20 15:41:45 +00:00
*
* We do this only if we are dealing with IRQ() or IRQNoFlags()
* resource (the legacy ISA resources). With modern ACPI 5 devices
* using extended IRQ descriptors we take the IRQ configuration
* from _CRS directly.
*/
ACPI / resources: call acpi_get_override_irq() only for legacy IRQ resources acpi_get_override_irq() was added because there was a problem with buggy BIOSes passing wrong IRQ() resource for the RTC IRQ. The commit that added the workaround was 61fd47e0c8476 (ACPI: fix two IRQ8 issues in IOAPIC mode). With ACPI 5 enumerated devices there are typically one or more extended IRQ resources per device (and these IRQs can be shared). However, the acpi_get_override_irq() workaround forces all IRQs in range 0 - 15 (the legacy ISA IRQs) to be edge triggered, active high as can be seen from the dmesg below: ACPI: IRQ 6 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 7 override to edge, high ACPI: IRQ 13 override to edge, high Also /proc/interrupts for the I2C controllers (INT33C2 and INT33C3) shows the same thing: 7: 4 0 0 0 IO-APIC-edge INT33C2:00, INT33C3:00 The _CSR method for INT33C2 (and INT33C3) device returns following resource: Interrupt (ResourceConsumer, Level, ActiveLow, Shared,,, ) { 0x00000007, } which states that this is supposed to be level triggered, active low, shared IRQ instead. Fix this by making sure that acpi_get_override_irq() gets only called when we are dealing with legacy IRQ() or IRQNoFlags() descriptors. While we are there, correct pr_warning() to print the right triggering value. This change turns out to be necessary to make DMA work correctly on systems based on the Intel Lynxpoint PCH (Platform Controller Hub). [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Cc: 3.9+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2013-05-20 15:41:45 +00:00
if (legacy && !acpi_get_override_irq(gsi, &t, &p)) {
u8 trig = t ? ACPI_LEVEL_SENSITIVE : ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE;
u8 pol = p ? ACPI_ACTIVE_LOW : ACPI_ACTIVE_HIGH;
if (triggering != trig || polarity != pol) {
pr_warn("ACPI: IRQ %d override to %s, %s\n", gsi,
t ? "level" : "edge", p ? "low" : "high");
triggering = trig;
polarity = pol;
}
}
res->flags = acpi_dev_irq_flags(triggering, polarity, shareable);
irq = acpi_register_gsi(NULL, gsi, triggering, polarity);
if (irq >= 0) {
res->start = irq;
res->end = irq;
} else {
irqresource_disabled(res, gsi);
}
}
/**
* acpi_dev_resource_interrupt - Extract ACPI interrupt resource information.
* @ares: Input ACPI resource object.
* @index: Index into the array of GSIs represented by the resource.
* @res: Output generic resource object.
*
* Check if the given ACPI resource object represents an interrupt resource
* and @index does not exceed the resource's interrupt count (true is returned
* in that case regardless of the results of the other checks)). If that's the
* case, register the GSI corresponding to @index from the array of interrupts
* represented by the resource and populate the generic resource object pointed
* to by @res accordingly. If the registration of the GSI is not successful,
* IORESOURCE_DISABLED will be set it that object's flags.
*
* Return:
* 1) false with res->flags setting to zero: not the expected resource type
* 2) false with IORESOURCE_DISABLED in res->flags: valid unassigned resource
* 3) true: valid assigned resource
*/
bool acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(struct acpi_resource *ares, int index,
struct resource *res)
{
struct acpi_resource_irq *irq;
struct acpi_resource_extended_irq *ext_irq;
switch (ares->type) {
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
/*
* Per spec, only one interrupt per descriptor is allowed in
* _CRS, but some firmware violates this, so parse them all.
*/
irq = &ares->data.irq;
if (index >= irq->interrupt_count) {
irqresource_disabled(res, 0);
return false;
}
acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, irq->interrupts[index],
irq->triggering, irq->polarity,
irq->shareable, true);
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
ext_irq = &ares->data.extended_irq;
if (index >= ext_irq->interrupt_count) {
irqresource_disabled(res, 0);
return false;
}
if (is_gsi(ext_irq))
acpi_dev_get_irqresource(res, ext_irq->interrupts[index],
ext_irq->triggering, ext_irq->polarity,
ext_irq->shareable, false);
else
irqresource_disabled(res, 0);
break;
default:
res->flags = 0;
return false;
}
return true;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_resource_interrupt);
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
/**
* acpi_dev_free_resource_list - Free resource from %acpi_dev_get_resources().
* @list: The head of the resource list to free.
*/
void acpi_dev_free_resource_list(struct list_head *list)
{
resource_list_free(list);
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_free_resource_list);
struct res_proc_context {
struct list_head *list;
int (*preproc)(struct acpi_resource *, void *);
void *preproc_data;
int count;
int error;
};
static acpi_status acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(struct resource_win *win,
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
struct res_proc_context *c)
{
struct resource_entry *rentry;
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
rentry = resource_list_create_entry(NULL, 0);
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
if (!rentry) {
c->error = -ENOMEM;
return AE_NO_MEMORY;
}
*rentry->res = win->res;
rentry->offset = win->offset;
resource_list_add_tail(rentry, c->list);
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
c->count++;
return AE_OK;
}
static acpi_status acpi_dev_process_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares,
void *context)
{
struct res_proc_context *c = context;
struct resource_win win;
struct resource *res = &win.res;
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
int i;
if (c->preproc) {
int ret;
ret = c->preproc(ares, c->preproc_data);
if (ret < 0) {
c->error = ret;
return AE_ABORT_METHOD;
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
} else if (ret > 0) {
return AE_OK;
}
}
memset(&win, 0, sizeof(win));
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
if (acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res)
|| acpi_dev_resource_io(ares, res)
|| acpi_dev_resource_address_space(ares, &win)
|| acpi_dev_resource_ext_address_space(ares, &win))
return acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(&win, c);
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
for (i = 0; acpi_dev_resource_interrupt(ares, i, res); i++) {
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
acpi_status status;
status = acpi_dev_new_resource_entry(&win, c);
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
return status;
}
return AE_OK;
}
static int __acpi_dev_get_resources(struct acpi_device *adev,
struct list_head *list,
int (*preproc)(struct acpi_resource *, void *),
void *preproc_data, char *method)
{
struct res_proc_context c;
acpi_status status;
if (!adev || !adev->handle || !list_empty(list))
return -EINVAL;
if (!acpi_has_method(adev->handle, method))
return 0;
c.list = list;
c.preproc = preproc;
c.preproc_data = preproc_data;
c.count = 0;
c.error = 0;
status = acpi_walk_resources(adev->handle, method,
acpi_dev_process_resource, &c);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
acpi_dev_free_resource_list(list);
return c.error ? c.error : -EIO;
}
return c.count;
}
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
/**
* acpi_dev_get_resources - Get current resources of a device.
* @adev: ACPI device node to get the resources for.
* @list: Head of the resultant list of resources (must be empty).
* @preproc: The caller's preprocessing routine.
* @preproc_data: Pointer passed to the caller's preprocessing routine.
*
* Evaluate the _CRS method for the given device node and process its output by
* (1) executing the @preproc() routine provided by the caller, passing the
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
* resource pointer and @preproc_data to it as arguments, for each ACPI resource
* returned and (2) converting all of the returned ACPI resources into struct
* resource objects if possible. If the return value of @preproc() in step (1)
* is different from 0, step (2) is not applied to the given ACPI resource and
* if that value is negative, the whole processing is aborted and that value is
* returned as the final error code.
*
* The resultant struct resource objects are put on the list pointed to by
* @list, that must be empty initially, as members of struct resource_entry
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
* objects. Callers of this routine should use %acpi_dev_free_resource_list() to
* free that list.
*
* The number of resources in the output list is returned on success, an error
* code reflecting the error condition is returned otherwise.
*/
int acpi_dev_get_resources(struct acpi_device *adev, struct list_head *list,
int (*preproc)(struct acpi_resource *, void *),
void *preproc_data)
{
return __acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, list, preproc, preproc_data,
METHOD_NAME__CRS);
ACPI: Centralized processing of ACPI device resources Currently, whoever wants to use ACPI device resources has to call acpi_walk_resources() to browse the buffer returned by the _CRS method for the given device and create filters passed to that routine to apply to the individual resource items. This generally is cumbersome, time-consuming and inefficient. Moreover, it may be problematic if resource conflicts need to be resolved, because the different users of _CRS will need to do that in a consistent way. However, if there are resource conflicts, the ACPI core should be able to resolve them centrally instead of relying on various users of acpi_walk_resources() to handle them correctly together. For this reason, introduce a new function, acpi_dev_get_resources(), that can be used by subsystems to obtain a list of struct resource objects corresponding to the ACPI device resources returned by _CRS and, if necessary, to apply additional preprocessing routine to the ACPI resources before converting them to the struct resource format. Make the ACPI code that creates platform device objects use acpi_dev_get_resources() for resource processing instead of executing acpi_walk_resources() twice by itself, which causes it to be much more straightforward and easier to follow. In the future, acpi_dev_get_resources() can be extended to meet the needs of the ACPI PNP subsystem and other users of _CRS in the kernel. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
2012-11-14 23:30:21 +00:00
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_get_resources);
static int is_memory(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *not_used)
{
struct resource_win win;
struct resource *res = &win.res;
memset(&win, 0, sizeof(win));
return !(acpi_dev_resource_memory(ares, res)
|| acpi_dev_resource_address_space(ares, &win)
|| acpi_dev_resource_ext_address_space(ares, &win));
}
/**
* acpi_dev_get_dma_resources - Get current DMA resources of a device.
* @adev: ACPI device node to get the resources for.
* @list: Head of the resultant list of resources (must be empty).
*
* Evaluate the _DMA method for the given device node and process its
* output.
*
* The resultant struct resource objects are put on the list pointed to
* by @list, that must be empty initially, as members of struct
* resource_entry objects. Callers of this routine should use
* %acpi_dev_free_resource_list() to free that list.
*
* The number of resources in the output list is returned on success,
* an error code reflecting the error condition is returned otherwise.
*/
int acpi_dev_get_dma_resources(struct acpi_device *adev, struct list_head *list)
{
return __acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, list, is_memory, NULL,
METHOD_NAME__DMA);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_get_dma_resources);
/**
* acpi_dev_filter_resource_type - Filter ACPI resource according to resource
* types
* @ares: Input ACPI resource object.
* @types: Valid resource types of IORESOURCE_XXX
*
x86/PCI/ACPI: Make all resources except [io 0xcf8-0xcff] available on PCI bus An IO port or MMIO resource assigned to a PCI host bridge may be consumed by the host bridge itself or available to its child bus/devices. The ACPI specification defines a bit (Producer/Consumer) to tell whether the resource is consumed by the host bridge itself, but firmware hasn't used that bit consistently, so we can't rely on it. Before commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation"), arch/x86/pci/acpi.c ignored all IO port resources defined by acpi_resource_io and acpi_resource_fixed_io to filter out IO ports consumed by the host bridge itself. Commit 593669c2ac0f ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Use common ACPI resource interfaces to simplify implementation") started accepting all IO port and MMIO resources, which caused a regression that IO port resources consumed by the host bridge itself became available to its child devices. Then commit 63f1789ec716 ("x86/PCI/ACPI: Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself") ignored resources consumed by the host bridge itself by checking the IORESOURCE_WINDOW flag, which accidently removed MMIO resources defined by acpi_resource_memory24, acpi_resource_memory32 and acpi_resource_fixed_memory32. On x86 and IA64 platforms, all IO port and MMIO resources are assumed to be available to child bus/devices except one special case: IO port [0xCF8-0xCFF] is consumed by the host bridge itself to access PCI configuration space. So explicitly filter out PCI CFG IO ports[0xCF8-0xCFF]. This solution will also ease the way to consolidate ACPI PCI host bridge common code from x86, ia64 and ARM64. Related ACPI table are archived at: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94221 Related discussions at: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/461633/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/3/29/304 Fixes: 63f1789ec716 (Ignore resources consumed by host bridge itself) Reported-by: Bernhard Thaler <bernhard.thaler@wvnet.at> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Cc: 4.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.0+ Reviewed-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2015-04-30 04:41:28 +00:00
* This is a helper function to support acpi_dev_get_resources(), which filters
* ACPI resource objects according to resource types.
*/
int acpi_dev_filter_resource_type(struct acpi_resource *ares,
unsigned long types)
{
unsigned long type = 0;
switch (ares->type) {
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_MEMORY24:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_MEMORY32:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_MEMORY32:
type = IORESOURCE_MEM;
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IO:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_IO:
type = IORESOURCE_IO;
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_IRQ:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_IRQ:
type = IORESOURCE_IRQ;
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_DMA:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_FIXED_DMA:
type = IORESOURCE_DMA;
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_GENERIC_REGISTER:
type = IORESOURCE_REG;
break;
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS16:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS32:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_ADDRESS64:
case ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_EXTENDED_ADDRESS64:
if (ares->data.address.resource_type == ACPI_MEMORY_RANGE)
type = IORESOURCE_MEM;
else if (ares->data.address.resource_type == ACPI_IO_RANGE)
type = IORESOURCE_IO;
else if (ares->data.address.resource_type ==
ACPI_BUS_NUMBER_RANGE)
type = IORESOURCE_BUS;
break;
default:
break;
}
return (type & types) ? 0 : 1;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_filter_resource_type);
static int acpi_dev_consumes_res(struct acpi_device *adev, struct resource *res)
{
struct list_head resource_list;
struct resource_entry *rentry;
int ret, found = 0;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list, NULL, NULL);
if (ret < 0)
return 0;
list_for_each_entry(rentry, &resource_list, node) {
if (resource_contains(rentry->res, res)) {
found = 1;
break;
}
}
acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
return found;
}
static acpi_status acpi_res_consumer_cb(acpi_handle handle, u32 depth,
void *context, void **ret)
{
struct resource *res = context;
struct acpi_device **consumer = (struct acpi_device **) ret;
struct acpi_device *adev;
if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &adev))
return AE_OK;
if (acpi_dev_consumes_res(adev, res)) {
*consumer = adev;
return AE_CTRL_TERMINATE;
}
return AE_OK;
}
/**
* acpi_resource_consumer - Find the ACPI device that consumes @res.
* @res: Resource to search for.
*
* Search the current resource settings (_CRS) of every ACPI device node
* for @res. If we find an ACPI device whose _CRS includes @res, return
* it. Otherwise, return NULL.
*/
struct acpi_device *acpi_resource_consumer(struct resource *res)
{
struct acpi_device *consumer = NULL;
acpi_get_devices(NULL, acpi_res_consumer_cb, res, (void **) &consumer);
return consumer;
}