linux/Documentation/networking/x25-iface.txt

			X.25 Device Driver Interface 1.1

			   Jonathan Naylor 26.12.96

This is a description of the messages to be passed between the X.25 Packet
Layer and the X.25 device driver. They are designed to allow for the easy
setting of the LAPB mode from within the Packet Layer.

The X.25 device driver will be coded normally as per the Linux device driver
standards. Most X.25 device drivers will be moderately similar to the
already existing Ethernet device drivers. However unlike those drivers, the
X.25 device driver has a state associated with it, and this information
needs to be passed to and from the Packet Layer for proper operation.

All messages are held in sk_buff's just like real data to be transmitted
over the LAPB link. The first byte of the skbuff indicates the meaning of
the rest of the skbuff, if any more information does exist.


Packet Layer to Device Driver
-----------------------------

First Byte = 0x00

This indicates that the rest of the skbuff contains data to be transmitted
over the LAPB link. The LAPB link should already exist before any data is
passed down.

First Byte = 0x01

Establish the LAPB link. If the link is already established then the connect
confirmation message should be returned as soon as possible.

First Byte = 0x02

Terminate the LAPB link. If it is already disconnected then the disconnect
confirmation message should be returned as soon as possible.

First Byte = 0x03

LAPB parameters. To be defined.


Device Driver to Packet Layer
-----------------------------

First Byte = 0x00

This indicates that the rest of the skbuff contains data that has been
received over the LAPB link.

First Byte = 0x01

LAPB link has been established. The same message is used for both a LAPB
link connect_confirmation and a connect_indication.

First Byte = 0x02

LAPB link has been terminated. This same message is used for both a LAPB
link disconnect_confirmation and a disconnect_indication.

First Byte = 0x03

LAPB parameters. To be defined.



Possible Problems
=================

(Henner Eisen, 2000-10-28)

The X.25 packet layer protocol depends on a reliable datalink service.
The LAPB protocol provides such reliable service. But this reliability
is not preserved by the Linux network device driver interface:

- With Linux 2.4.x (and above) SMP kernels, packet ordering is not
  preserved. Even if a device driver calls netif_rx(skb1) and later
  netif_rx(skb2), skb2 might be delivered to the network layer
  earlier that skb1.
- Data passed upstream by means of netif_rx() might be dropped by the
  kernel if the backlog queue is congested.

The X.25 packet layer protocol will detect this and reset the virtual
call in question. But many upper layer protocols are not designed to
handle such N-Reset events gracefully. And frequent N-Reset events
will always degrade performance.

Thus, driver authors should make netif_rx() as reliable as possible:

SMP re-ordering will not occur if the driver's interrupt handler is
always executed on the same CPU. Thus,

- Driver authors should use irq affinity for the interrupt handler.

The probability of packet loss due to backlog congestion can be
reduced by the following measures or a combination thereof:

(1) Drivers for kernel versions 2.4.x and above should always check the
    return value of netif_rx(). If it returns NET_RX_DROP, the
    driver's LAPB protocol must not confirm reception of the frame
    to the peer. 
    This will reliably suppress packet loss. The LAPB protocol will
    automatically cause the peer to re-transmit the dropped packet
    later.
    The lapb module interface was modified to support this. Its
    data_indication() method should now transparently pass the
    netif_rx() return value to the (lapb mopdule) caller.
(2) Drivers for kernel versions 2.2.x should always check the global
    variable netdev_dropping when a new frame is received. The driver
    should only call netif_rx() if netdev_dropping is zero. Otherwise
    the driver should not confirm delivery of the frame and drop it.
    Alternatively, the driver can queue the frame internally and call
    netif_rx() later when netif_dropping is 0 again. In that case, delivery
    confirmation should also be deferred such that the internal queue
    cannot grow to much.
    This will not reliably avoid packet loss, but the probability
    of packet loss in netif_rx() path will be significantly reduced.
(3) Additionally, driver authors might consider to support
    CONFIG_NET_HW_FLOWCONTROL. This allows the driver to be woken up
    when a previously congested backlog queue becomes empty again.
    The driver could uses this for flow-controlling the peer by means
    of the LAPB protocol's flow-control service.