2019-05-19 12:08:20 +00:00
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <kunit/test.h>
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/list_sort.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/list.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/printk.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/slab.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/random.h>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* The pattern of set bits in the list length determines which cases
|
|
|
|
* are hit in list_sort().
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#define TEST_LIST_LEN (512+128+2) /* not including head */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define TEST_POISON1 0xDEADBEEF
|
|
|
|
#define TEST_POISON2 0xA324354C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct debug_el {
|
|
|
|
unsigned int poison1;
|
|
|
|
struct list_head list;
|
|
|
|
unsigned int poison2;
|
|
|
|
int value;
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
unsigned int serial;
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
static void check(struct kunit *test, struct debug_el *ela, struct debug_el *elb)
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
struct debug_el **elts = test->priv;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG(test, ela->serial, (unsigned int)TEST_LIST_LEN, "incorrect serial");
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_LT_MSG(test, elb->serial, (unsigned int)TEST_LIST_LEN, "incorrect serial");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, elts[ela->serial], ela, "phantom element");
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, elts[elb->serial], elb, "phantom element");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ela->poison1, TEST_POISON1, "bad poison");
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, ela->poison2, TEST_POISON2, "bad poison");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, elb->poison1, TEST_POISON1, "bad poison");
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, elb->poison2, TEST_POISON2, "bad poison");
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
/* `priv` is the test pointer so check() can fail the test if the list is invalid. */
|
|
|
|
static int cmp(void *priv, const struct list_head *a, const struct list_head *b)
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
struct debug_el *ela, *elb;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ela = container_of(a, struct debug_el, list);
|
|
|
|
elb = container_of(b, struct debug_el, list);
|
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
check(priv, ela, elb);
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
return ela->value - elb->value;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
static void list_sort_test(struct kunit *test)
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
int i, count = 1;
|
|
|
|
struct debug_el *el, **elts;
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
struct list_head *cur;
|
|
|
|
LIST_HEAD(head);
|
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
elts = kunit_kcalloc(test, TEST_LIST_LEN, sizeof(*elts), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, elts);
|
|
|
|
test->priv = elts;
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < TEST_LIST_LEN; i++) {
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
el = kunit_kmalloc(test, sizeof(*el), GFP_KERNEL);
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, el);
|
2017-11-17 23:28:00 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
/* force some equivalencies */
|
2022-10-10 02:44:02 +00:00
|
|
|
el->value = get_random_u32_below(TEST_LIST_LEN / 3);
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
el->serial = i;
|
|
|
|
el->poison1 = TEST_POISON1;
|
|
|
|
el->poison2 = TEST_POISON2;
|
|
|
|
elts[i] = el;
|
|
|
|
list_add_tail(&el->list, &head);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
list_sort(test, &head, cmp);
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (cur = head.next; cur->next != &head; cur = cur->next) {
|
|
|
|
struct debug_el *el1;
|
|
|
|
int cmp_result;
|
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, cur->next->prev, cur,
|
|
|
|
"list is corrupted");
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
cmp_result = cmp(test, cur, cur->next);
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, cmp_result, 0, "list is not sorted");
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
el = container_of(cur, struct debug_el, list);
|
|
|
|
el1 = container_of(cur->next, struct debug_el, list);
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
if (cmp_result == 0) {
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_ASSERT_LE_MSG(test, el->serial, el1->serial,
|
|
|
|
"order of equivalent elements not preserved");
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
check(test, el, el1);
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
count++;
|
|
|
|
}
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ_MSG(test, head.prev, cur, "list is corrupted");
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, count, TEST_LIST_LEN,
|
|
|
|
"list length changed after sorting!");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
lib/test: convert lib/test_list_sort.c to use KUnit
Functionally, this just means that the test output will be slightly
changed and it'll now depend on CONFIG_KUNIT=y/m.
It'll still run at boot time and can still be built as a loadable
module.
There was a pre-existing patch to convert this test that I found later,
here [1]. Compared to [1], this patch doesn't rename files and uses
KUnit features more heavily (i.e. does more than converting pr_err()
calls to KUNIT_FAIL()).
What this conversion gives us:
* a shorter test thanks to KUnit's macros
* a way to run this a bit more easily via kunit.py (and
CONFIG_KUNIT_ALL_TESTS=y) [2]
* a structured way of reporting pass/fail
* uses kunit-managed allocations to avoid the risk of memory leaks
* more descriptive error messages:
* i.e. it prints out which fields are invalid, what the expected
values are, etc.
What this conversion does not do:
* change the name of the file (and thus the name of the module)
* change the name of the config option
Leaving these as-is for now to minimize the impact to people wanting to
run this test. IMO, that concern trumps following KUnit's style guide
for both names, at least for now.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20201015014616.309000-1-vitor@massaru.org/
[2] Can be run via
$ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig /dev/stdin <<EOF
CONFIG_KUNIT=y
CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT=y
EOF
[16:55:56] Configuring KUnit Kernel ...
[16:55:56] Building KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:29] Starting KUnit Kernel ...
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] ======== [PASSED] list_sort ========
[16:56:32] [PASSED] list_sort_test
[16:56:32] ============================================================
[16:56:32] Testing complete. 1 tests run. 0 failed. 0 crashed.
[16:56:32] Elapsed time: 35.668s total, 0.001s configuring, 32.725s building, 0.000s running
Note: the build time is as after a `make mrproper`.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Tested-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
Acked-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
2021-05-03 20:58:35 +00:00
|
|
|
static struct kunit_case list_sort_cases[] = {
|
|
|
|
KUNIT_CASE(list_sort_test),
|
|
|
|
{}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static struct kunit_suite list_sort_suite = {
|
|
|
|
.name = "list_sort",
|
|
|
|
.test_cases = list_sort_cases,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
kunit_test_suites(&list_sort_suite);
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2024-06-19 20:59:15 +00:00
|
|
|
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("list_sort() KUnit test suite");
|
2017-05-08 22:55:26 +00:00
|
|
|
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
|