linux/arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c

405 lines
9.0 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* AMD CPU Microcode Update Driver for Linux
* Copyright (C) 2008-2011 Advanced Micro Devices Inc.
*
* Author: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com>
*
* Based on work by:
* Tigran Aivazian <tigran@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>
*
* Maintainers:
* Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
* Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
*
* This driver allows to upgrade microcode on F10h AMD
* CPUs and later.
*
* Licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
* License version 2. See file COPYING for details.
*/
#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
#include <linux/firmware.h>
#include <linux/pci_ids.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <asm/microcode.h>
#include <asm/processor.h>
#include <asm/msr.h>
MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AMD Microcode Update Driver");
MODULE_AUTHOR("Peter Oruba");
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
#define UCODE_MAGIC 0x00414d44
#define UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE 0x00000000
#define UCODE_UCODE_TYPE 0x00000001
struct equiv_cpu_entry {
u32 installed_cpu;
u32 fixed_errata_mask;
u32 fixed_errata_compare;
u16 equiv_cpu;
u16 res;
} __attribute__((packed));
struct microcode_header_amd {
u32 data_code;
u32 patch_id;
u16 mc_patch_data_id;
u8 mc_patch_data_len;
u8 init_flag;
u32 mc_patch_data_checksum;
u32 nb_dev_id;
u32 sb_dev_id;
u16 processor_rev_id;
u8 nb_rev_id;
u8 sb_rev_id;
u8 bios_api_rev;
u8 reserved1[3];
u32 match_reg[8];
} __attribute__((packed));
struct microcode_amd {
struct microcode_header_amd hdr;
unsigned int mpb[0];
};
#define SECTION_HDR_SIZE 8
#define CONTAINER_HDR_SZ 12
static struct equiv_cpu_entry *equiv_cpu_table;
/* page-sized ucode patch buffer */
void *patch;
static int collect_cpu_info_amd(int cpu, struct cpu_signature *csig)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
csig->sig = cpuid_eax(0x00000001);
csig->rev = c->microcode;
pr_info("CPU%d: patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, csig->rev);
return 0;
}
static unsigned int verify_ucode_size(int cpu, u32 patch_size,
unsigned int size)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
u32 max_size;
#define F1XH_MPB_MAX_SIZE 2048
#define F14H_MPB_MAX_SIZE 1824
#define F15H_MPB_MAX_SIZE 4096
switch (c->x86) {
case 0x14:
max_size = F14H_MPB_MAX_SIZE;
break;
case 0x15:
max_size = F15H_MPB_MAX_SIZE;
break;
default:
max_size = F1XH_MPB_MAX_SIZE;
break;
}
if (patch_size > min_t(u32, size, max_size)) {
pr_err("patch size mismatch\n");
return 0;
}
return patch_size;
}
static u16 find_equiv_id(unsigned int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
int i = 0;
BUG_ON(equiv_cpu_table == NULL);
while (equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu != 0) {
if (uci->cpu_sig.sig == equiv_cpu_table[i].installed_cpu)
return equiv_cpu_table[i].equiv_cpu;
i++;
}
return 0;
}
/*
* we signal a good patch is found by returning its size > 0
*/
static int get_matching_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *ucode_ptr,
unsigned int leftover_size, int rev,
unsigned int *current_size)
{
struct microcode_header_amd *mc_hdr;
unsigned int actual_size, patch_size;
u16 equiv_cpu_id;
/* size of the current patch we're staring at */
patch_size = *(u32 *)(ucode_ptr + 4);
*current_size = patch_size + SECTION_HDR_SIZE;
equiv_cpu_id = find_equiv_id(cpu);
if (!equiv_cpu_id)
return 0;
/*
* let's look at the patch header itself now
*/
mc_hdr = (struct microcode_header_amd *)(ucode_ptr + SECTION_HDR_SIZE);
if (mc_hdr->processor_rev_id != equiv_cpu_id)
return 0;
/* ucode might be chipset specific -- currently we don't support this */
if (mc_hdr->nb_dev_id || mc_hdr->sb_dev_id) {
pr_err("CPU%d: chipset specific code not yet supported\n",
cpu);
return 0;
}
if (mc_hdr->patch_id <= rev)
return 0;
/*
* now that the header looks sane, verify its size
*/
actual_size = verify_ucode_size(cpu, patch_size, leftover_size);
if (!actual_size)
return 0;
/* clear the patch buffer */
memset(patch, 0, PAGE_SIZE);
/* all looks ok, get the binary patch */
memcpy(patch, ucode_ptr + SECTION_HDR_SIZE, actual_size);
return actual_size;
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
static int apply_microcode_amd(int cpu)
{
u32 rev, dummy;
int cpu_num = raw_smp_processor_id();
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu_num;
struct microcode_amd *mc_amd = uci->mc;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
BUG_ON(cpu_num != cpu);
if (mc_amd == NULL)
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return 0;
rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy);
/* need to apply patch? */
if (rev >= mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) {
c->microcode = rev;
return 0;
}
wrmsrl(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LOADER, (u64)(long)&mc_amd->hdr.data_code);
/* verify patch application was successful */
rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_PATCH_LEVEL, rev, dummy);
if (rev != mc_amd->hdr.patch_id) {
pr_err("CPU%d: update failed for patch_level=0x%08x\n",
cpu, mc_amd->hdr.patch_id);
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return -1;
}
pr_info("CPU%d: new patch_level=0x%08x\n", cpu, rev);
uci->cpu_sig.rev = rev;
c->microcode = rev;
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return 0;
}
static int install_equiv_cpu_table(const u8 *buf)
{
unsigned int *ibuf = (unsigned int *)buf;
unsigned int type = ibuf[1];
unsigned int size = ibuf[2];
if (type != UCODE_EQUIV_CPU_TABLE_TYPE || !size) {
pr_err("empty section/"
"invalid type field in container file section header\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
equiv_cpu_table = vmalloc(size);
if (!equiv_cpu_table) {
pr_err("failed to allocate equivalent CPU table\n");
return -ENOMEM;
}
memcpy(equiv_cpu_table, buf + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ, size);
/* add header length */
return size + CONTAINER_HDR_SZ;
}
static void free_equiv_cpu_table(void)
{
vfree(equiv_cpu_table);
equiv_cpu_table = NULL;
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
static enum ucode_state
generic_load_microcode(int cpu, const u8 *data, size_t size)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
struct microcode_header_amd *mc_hdr = NULL;
unsigned int mc_size, leftover, current_size = 0;
int offset;
const u8 *ucode_ptr = data;
void *new_mc = NULL;
unsigned int new_rev = uci->cpu_sig.rev;
enum ucode_state state = UCODE_ERROR;
offset = install_equiv_cpu_table(ucode_ptr);
if (offset < 0) {
pr_err("failed to create equivalent cpu table\n");
goto out;
}
ucode_ptr += offset;
leftover = size - offset;
if (*(u32 *)ucode_ptr != UCODE_UCODE_TYPE) {
pr_err("invalid type field in container file section header\n");
goto free_table;
}
while (leftover) {
mc_size = get_matching_microcode(cpu, ucode_ptr, leftover,
new_rev, &current_size);
if (mc_size) {
mc_hdr = patch;
new_mc = patch;
new_rev = mc_hdr->patch_id;
goto out_ok;
}
ucode_ptr += current_size;
leftover -= current_size;
}
if (!new_mc) {
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
state = UCODE_NFOUND;
goto free_table;
}
out_ok:
uci->mc = new_mc;
state = UCODE_OK;
pr_debug("CPU%d update ucode (0x%08x -> 0x%08x)\n",
cpu, uci->cpu_sig.rev, new_rev);
free_table:
free_equiv_cpu_table();
out:
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return state;
}
/*
* AMD microcode firmware naming convention, up to family 15h they are in
* the legacy file:
*
* amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin
*
* This legacy file is always smaller than 2K in size.
*
* Starting at family 15h they are in family specific firmware files:
*
* amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam15h.bin
* amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam16h.bin
* ...
*
* These might be larger than 2K.
*/
static enum ucode_state request_microcode_amd(int cpu, struct device *device,
bool refresh_fw)
{
char fw_name[36] = "amd-ucode/microcode_amd.bin";
const struct firmware *fw;
enum ucode_state ret = UCODE_NFOUND;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
if (c->x86 >= 0x15)
snprintf(fw_name, sizeof(fw_name), "amd-ucode/microcode_amd_fam%.2xh.bin", c->x86);
if (request_firmware(&fw, (const char *)fw_name, device)) {
pr_err("failed to load file %s\n", fw_name);
goto out;
}
ret = UCODE_ERROR;
if (*(u32 *)fw->data != UCODE_MAGIC) {
pr_err("invalid magic value (0x%08x)\n", *(u32 *)fw->data);
goto fw_release;
}
ret = generic_load_microcode(cpu, fw->data, fw->size);
fw_release:
release_firmware(fw);
out:
return ret;
}
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
static enum ucode_state
request_microcode_user(int cpu, const void __user *buf, size_t size)
{
x86: microcode: use smp_call_function_single instead of set_cpus_allowed, cleanup of synchronization logic * Solve issues described in 6f66cbc63081fd70e3191b4dbb796746780e5ae1 in a way that doesn't resort to set_cpus_allowed(); * in fact, only collect_cpu_info and apply_microcode callbacks must run on a target cpu, others will do just fine on any other. smp_call_function_single() (as suggested by Ingo) is used to run these callbacks on a target cpu. * cleanup of synchronization logic of the 'microcode_core' part The generic 'microcode_core' part guarantees that only a single cpu (be it a full-fledged cpu, one of the cores or HT) is being updated at any particular moment of time. In general, there is no need for any additional sync. mechanism in arch-specific parts (the patch removes existing spinlocks). See also the "Synchronization" section in microcode_core.c. * return -EINVAL instead of -1 (which is translated into -EPERM) in microcode_write(), reload_cpu() and mc_sysdev_add(). Other suggestions for an error code? * use 'enum ucode_state' as return value of request_microcode_{fw, user} to gain more flexibility by distinguishing between real error cases and situations when an appropriate ucode was not found (which is not an error per-se). * some minor cleanups Thanks a lot to Hugh Dickins for review/suggestions/testing! Reference: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124025889012541&w=2 [ Impact: refactor and clean up microcode driver locking code ] Signed-off-by: Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> Cc: Andreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com> Cc: Peter Oruba <peter.oruba@amd.com> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> LKML-Reference: <1242078507.5560.9.camel@earth> [ did some more cleanups ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> arch/x86/include/asm/microcode.h | 25 ++ arch/x86/kernel/microcode_amd.c | 58 ++---- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c | 326 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- arch/x86/kernel/microcode_intel.c | 92 +++------- 4 files changed, 261 insertions(+), 240 deletions(-) (~20 new comment lines)
2009-05-11 21:48:27 +00:00
return UCODE_ERROR;
}
static void microcode_fini_cpu_amd(int cpu)
{
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci = ucode_cpu_info + cpu;
uci->mc = NULL;
}
static struct microcode_ops microcode_amd_ops = {
.request_microcode_user = request_microcode_user,
.request_microcode_fw = request_microcode_amd,
.collect_cpu_info = collect_cpu_info_amd,
.apply_microcode = apply_microcode_amd,
.microcode_fini_cpu = microcode_fini_cpu_amd,
};
struct microcode_ops * __init init_amd_microcode(void)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD || c->x86 < 0x10) {
pr_warning("AMD CPU family 0x%x not supported\n", c->x86);
return NULL;
}
patch = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
if (!patch)
return NULL;
return &microcode_amd_ops;
}
void __exit exit_amd_microcode(void)
{
free_page((unsigned long)patch);
}