linux/io_uring/kbuf.c

804 lines
19 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/namei.h>
#include <linux/poll.h>
#include <linux/io_uring.h>
#include <uapi/linux/io_uring.h>
#include "io_uring.h"
#include "opdef.h"
#include "kbuf.h"
#define IO_BUFFER_LIST_BUF_PER_PAGE (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct io_uring_buf))
#define BGID_ARRAY 64
/* BIDs are addressed by a 16-bit field in a CQE */
#define MAX_BIDS_PER_BGID (1 << 16)
struct kmem_cache *io_buf_cachep;
struct io_provide_buf {
struct file *file;
__u64 addr;
__u32 len;
__u32 bgid;
__u32 nbufs;
__u16 bid;
};
struct io_buf_free {
struct hlist_node list;
void *mem;
size_t size;
int inuse;
};
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
static struct io_buffer_list *__io_buffer_get_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_buffer_list *bl,
unsigned int bgid)
{
if (bl && bgid < BGID_ARRAY)
return &bl[bgid];
return xa_load(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bgid);
}
static inline struct io_buffer_list *io_buffer_get_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
unsigned int bgid)
{
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
return __io_buffer_get_list(ctx, ctx->io_bl, bgid);
}
static int io_buffer_add_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_buffer_list *bl, unsigned int bgid)
{
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
/*
* Store buffer group ID and finally mark the list as visible.
* The normal lookup doesn't care about the visibility as we're
* always under the ->uring_lock, but the RCU lookup from mmap does.
*/
bl->bgid = bgid;
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
smp_store_release(&bl->is_ready, 1);
if (bgid < BGID_ARRAY)
return 0;
return xa_err(xa_store(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bgid, bl, GFP_KERNEL));
}
bool io_kbuf_recycle_legacy(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
struct io_buffer *buf;
io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
buf = req->kbuf;
bl = io_buffer_get_list(ctx, buf->bgid);
list_add(&buf->list, &bl->buf_list);
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED;
req->buf_index = buf->bgid;
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
return true;
}
void __io_put_kbuf(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
{
/*
* We can add this buffer back to two lists:
*
* 1) The io_buffers_cache list. This one is protected by the
* ctx->uring_lock. If we already hold this lock, add back to this
* list as we can grab it from issue as well.
* 2) The io_buffers_comp list. This one is protected by the
* ctx->completion_lock.
*
* We migrate buffers from the comp_list to the issue cache list
* when we need one.
*/
if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED) {
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
__io_put_kbuf_list(req, &ctx->io_buffers_comp);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
} else {
lockdep_assert_held(&req->ctx->uring_lock);
__io_put_kbuf_list(req, &req->ctx->io_buffers_cache);
}
}
static void __user *io_provided_buffer_select(struct io_kiocb *req, size_t *len,
struct io_buffer_list *bl)
{
if (!list_empty(&bl->buf_list)) {
struct io_buffer *kbuf;
kbuf = list_first_entry(&bl->buf_list, struct io_buffer, list);
list_del(&kbuf->list);
if (*len == 0 || *len > kbuf->len)
*len = kbuf->len;
if (list_empty(&bl->buf_list))
req->flags |= REQ_F_BL_EMPTY;
req->flags |= REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED;
req->kbuf = kbuf;
req->buf_index = kbuf->bid;
return u64_to_user_ptr(kbuf->addr);
}
return NULL;
}
static void __user *io_ring_buffer_select(struct io_kiocb *req, size_t *len,
struct io_buffer_list *bl,
unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_uring_buf_ring *br = bl->buf_ring;
__u16 tail, head = bl->head;
struct io_uring_buf *buf;
tail = smp_load_acquire(&br->tail);
if (unlikely(tail == head))
return NULL;
if (head + 1 == tail)
req->flags |= REQ_F_BL_EMPTY;
head &= bl->mask;
/* mmaped buffers are always contig */
if (bl->is_mmap || head < IO_BUFFER_LIST_BUF_PER_PAGE) {
buf = &br->bufs[head];
} else {
int off = head & (IO_BUFFER_LIST_BUF_PER_PAGE - 1);
int index = head / IO_BUFFER_LIST_BUF_PER_PAGE;
buf = page_address(bl->buf_pages[index]);
buf += off;
}
if (*len == 0 || *len > buf->len)
*len = buf->len;
req->flags |= REQ_F_BUFFER_RING;
req->buf_list = bl;
req->buf_index = buf->bid;
if (issue_flags & IO_URING_F_UNLOCKED || !io_file_can_poll(req)) {
/*
* If we came in unlocked, we have no choice but to consume the
* buffer here, otherwise nothing ensures that the buffer won't
* get used by others. This does mean it'll be pinned until the
* IO completes, coming in unlocked means we're being called from
* io-wq context and there may be further retries in async hybrid
* mode. For the locked case, the caller must call commit when
* the transfer completes (or if we get -EAGAIN and must poll of
* retry).
*/
req->buf_list = NULL;
bl->head++;
}
return u64_to_user_ptr(buf->addr);
}
void __user *io_buffer_select(struct io_kiocb *req, size_t *len,
unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
void __user *ret = NULL;
io_ring_submit_lock(req->ctx, issue_flags);
bl = io_buffer_get_list(ctx, req->buf_index);
if (likely(bl)) {
if (bl->is_buf_ring)
ret = io_ring_buffer_select(req, len, bl, issue_flags);
else
ret = io_provided_buffer_select(req, len, bl);
}
io_ring_submit_unlock(req->ctx, issue_flags);
return ret;
}
static __cold int io_init_bl_list(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
int i;
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
bl = kcalloc(BGID_ARRAY, sizeof(struct io_buffer_list), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bl)
return -ENOMEM;
for (i = 0; i < BGID_ARRAY; i++) {
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bl[i].buf_list);
bl[i].bgid = i;
}
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
smp_store_release(&ctx->io_bl, bl);
return 0;
}
/*
* Mark the given mapped range as free for reuse
*/
static void io_kbuf_mark_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_buffer_list *bl)
{
struct io_buf_free *ibf;
hlist_for_each_entry(ibf, &ctx->io_buf_list, list) {
if (bl->buf_ring == ibf->mem) {
ibf->inuse = 0;
return;
}
}
/* can't happen... */
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
}
static int __io_remove_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_buffer_list *bl, unsigned nbufs)
{
unsigned i = 0;
/* shouldn't happen */
if (!nbufs)
return 0;
if (bl->is_buf_ring) {
i = bl->buf_ring->tail - bl->head;
if (bl->is_mmap) {
/*
* io_kbuf_list_free() will free the page(s) at
* ->release() time.
*/
io_kbuf_mark_free(ctx, bl);
bl->buf_ring = NULL;
bl->is_mmap = 0;
} else if (bl->buf_nr_pages) {
int j;
for (j = 0; j < bl->buf_nr_pages; j++)
unpin_user_page(bl->buf_pages[j]);
kvfree(bl->buf_pages);
bl->buf_pages = NULL;
bl->buf_nr_pages = 0;
}
/* make sure it's seen as empty */
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bl->buf_list);
bl->is_buf_ring = 0;
return i;
}
/* protects io_buffers_cache */
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
while (!list_empty(&bl->buf_list)) {
struct io_buffer *nxt;
nxt = list_first_entry(&bl->buf_list, struct io_buffer, list);
list_move(&nxt->list, &ctx->io_buffers_cache);
if (++i == nbufs)
return i;
cond_resched();
}
return i;
}
void io_destroy_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
struct list_head *item, *tmp;
struct io_buffer *buf;
unsigned long index;
int i;
for (i = 0; i < BGID_ARRAY; i++) {
if (!ctx->io_bl)
break;
__io_remove_buffers(ctx, &ctx->io_bl[i], -1U);
}
xa_for_each(&ctx->io_bl_xa, index, bl) {
xa_erase(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bl->bgid);
__io_remove_buffers(ctx, bl, -1U);
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
}
/*
* Move deferred locked entries to cache before pruning
*/
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
if (!list_empty(&ctx->io_buffers_comp))
list_splice_init(&ctx->io_buffers_comp, &ctx->io_buffers_cache);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
list_for_each_safe(item, tmp, &ctx->io_buffers_cache) {
buf = list_entry(item, struct io_buffer, list);
kmem_cache_free(io_buf_cachep, buf);
}
}
int io_remove_buffers_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
{
struct io_provide_buf *p = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_provide_buf);
u64 tmp;
if (sqe->rw_flags || sqe->addr || sqe->len || sqe->off ||
sqe->splice_fd_in)
return -EINVAL;
tmp = READ_ONCE(sqe->fd);
if (!tmp || tmp > MAX_BIDS_PER_BGID)
return -EINVAL;
memset(p, 0, sizeof(*p));
p->nbufs = tmp;
p->bgid = READ_ONCE(sqe->buf_group);
return 0;
}
int io_remove_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_provide_buf *p = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_provide_buf);
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
int ret = 0;
io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
ret = -ENOENT;
bl = io_buffer_get_list(ctx, p->bgid);
if (bl) {
ret = -EINVAL;
/* can't use provide/remove buffers command on mapped buffers */
if (!bl->is_buf_ring)
ret = __io_remove_buffers(ctx, bl, p->nbufs);
}
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
if (ret < 0)
req_set_fail(req);
io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
return IOU_OK;
}
int io_provide_buffers_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe)
{
unsigned long size, tmp_check;
struct io_provide_buf *p = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_provide_buf);
u64 tmp;
if (sqe->rw_flags || sqe->splice_fd_in)
return -EINVAL;
tmp = READ_ONCE(sqe->fd);
if (!tmp || tmp > MAX_BIDS_PER_BGID)
return -E2BIG;
p->nbufs = tmp;
p->addr = READ_ONCE(sqe->addr);
p->len = READ_ONCE(sqe->len);
if (check_mul_overflow((unsigned long)p->len, (unsigned long)p->nbufs,
&size))
return -EOVERFLOW;
if (check_add_overflow((unsigned long)p->addr, size, &tmp_check))
return -EOVERFLOW;
size = (unsigned long)p->len * p->nbufs;
if (!access_ok(u64_to_user_ptr(p->addr), size))
return -EFAULT;
p->bgid = READ_ONCE(sqe->buf_group);
tmp = READ_ONCE(sqe->off);
if (tmp > USHRT_MAX)
return -E2BIG;
if (tmp + p->nbufs > MAX_BIDS_PER_BGID)
return -EINVAL;
p->bid = tmp;
return 0;
}
#define IO_BUFFER_ALLOC_BATCH 64
static int io_refill_buffer_cache(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
struct io_buffer *bufs[IO_BUFFER_ALLOC_BATCH];
int allocated;
/*
* Completions that don't happen inline (eg not under uring_lock) will
* add to ->io_buffers_comp. If we don't have any free buffers, check
* the completion list and splice those entries first.
*/
if (!list_empty_careful(&ctx->io_buffers_comp)) {
spin_lock(&ctx->completion_lock);
if (!list_empty(&ctx->io_buffers_comp)) {
list_splice_init(&ctx->io_buffers_comp,
&ctx->io_buffers_cache);
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
return 0;
}
spin_unlock(&ctx->completion_lock);
}
/*
* No free buffers and no completion entries either. Allocate a new
* batch of buffer entries and add those to our freelist.
*/
allocated = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(io_buf_cachep, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT,
ARRAY_SIZE(bufs), (void **) bufs);
if (unlikely(!allocated)) {
/*
* Bulk alloc is all-or-nothing. If we fail to get a batch,
* retry single alloc to be on the safe side.
*/
bufs[0] = kmem_cache_alloc(io_buf_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bufs[0])
return -ENOMEM;
allocated = 1;
}
while (allocated)
list_add_tail(&bufs[--allocated]->list, &ctx->io_buffers_cache);
return 0;
}
static int io_add_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_provide_buf *pbuf,
struct io_buffer_list *bl)
{
struct io_buffer *buf;
u64 addr = pbuf->addr;
int i, bid = pbuf->bid;
for (i = 0; i < pbuf->nbufs; i++) {
if (list_empty(&ctx->io_buffers_cache) &&
io_refill_buffer_cache(ctx))
break;
buf = list_first_entry(&ctx->io_buffers_cache, struct io_buffer,
list);
list_move_tail(&buf->list, &bl->buf_list);
buf->addr = addr;
buf->len = min_t(__u32, pbuf->len, MAX_RW_COUNT);
buf->bid = bid;
buf->bgid = pbuf->bgid;
addr += pbuf->len;
bid++;
cond_resched();
}
return i ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
}
int io_provide_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags)
{
struct io_provide_buf *p = io_kiocb_to_cmd(req, struct io_provide_buf);
struct io_ring_ctx *ctx = req->ctx;
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
int ret = 0;
io_ring_submit_lock(ctx, issue_flags);
if (unlikely(p->bgid < BGID_ARRAY && !ctx->io_bl)) {
ret = io_init_bl_list(ctx);
if (ret)
goto err;
}
bl = io_buffer_get_list(ctx, p->bgid);
if (unlikely(!bl)) {
bl = kzalloc(sizeof(*bl), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!bl) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err;
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bl->buf_list);
ret = io_buffer_add_list(ctx, bl, p->bgid);
if (ret) {
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
/*
* Doesn't need rcu free as it was never visible, but
* let's keep it consistent throughout. Also can't
* be a lower indexed array group, as adding one
* where lookup failed cannot happen.
*/
if (p->bgid >= BGID_ARRAY)
kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
else
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
goto err;
}
}
/* can't add buffers via this command for a mapped buffer ring */
if (bl->is_buf_ring) {
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err;
}
ret = io_add_buffers(ctx, p, bl);
err:
io_ring_submit_unlock(ctx, issue_flags);
if (ret < 0)
req_set_fail(req);
io_req_set_res(req, ret, 0);
return IOU_OK;
}
static int io_pin_pbuf_ring(struct io_uring_buf_reg *reg,
struct io_buffer_list *bl)
{
struct io_uring_buf_ring *br;
struct page **pages;
int i, nr_pages;
pages = io_pin_pages(reg->ring_addr,
flex_array_size(br, bufs, reg->ring_entries),
&nr_pages);
if (IS_ERR(pages))
return PTR_ERR(pages);
/*
* Apparently some 32-bit boxes (ARM) will return highmem pages,
* which then need to be mapped. We could support that, but it'd
* complicate the code and slowdown the common cases quite a bit.
* So just error out, returning -EINVAL just like we did on kernels
* that didn't support mapped buffer rings.
*/
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
if (PageHighMem(pages[i]))
goto error_unpin;
br = page_address(pages[0]);
#ifdef SHM_COLOUR
/*
* On platforms that have specific aliasing requirements, SHM_COLOUR
* is set and we must guarantee that the kernel and user side align
* nicely. We cannot do that if IOU_PBUF_RING_MMAP isn't set and
* the application mmap's the provided ring buffer. Fail the request
* if we, by chance, don't end up with aligned addresses. The app
* should use IOU_PBUF_RING_MMAP instead, and liburing will handle
* this transparently.
*/
if ((reg->ring_addr | (unsigned long) br) & (SHM_COLOUR - 1))
goto error_unpin;
#endif
bl->buf_pages = pages;
bl->buf_nr_pages = nr_pages;
bl->buf_ring = br;
bl->is_buf_ring = 1;
bl->is_mmap = 0;
return 0;
error_unpin:
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
unpin_user_page(pages[i]);
kvfree(pages);
return -EINVAL;
}
/*
* See if we have a suitable region that we can reuse, rather than allocate
* both a new io_buf_free and mem region again. We leave it on the list as
* even a reused entry will need freeing at ring release.
*/
static struct io_buf_free *io_lookup_buf_free_entry(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
size_t ring_size)
{
struct io_buf_free *ibf, *best = NULL;
size_t best_dist;
hlist_for_each_entry(ibf, &ctx->io_buf_list, list) {
size_t dist;
if (ibf->inuse || ibf->size < ring_size)
continue;
dist = ibf->size - ring_size;
if (!best || dist < best_dist) {
best = ibf;
if (!dist)
break;
best_dist = dist;
}
}
return best;
}
static int io_alloc_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
struct io_uring_buf_reg *reg,
struct io_buffer_list *bl)
{
struct io_buf_free *ibf;
size_t ring_size;
void *ptr;
ring_size = reg->ring_entries * sizeof(struct io_uring_buf_ring);
/* Reuse existing entry, if we can */
ibf = io_lookup_buf_free_entry(ctx, ring_size);
if (!ibf) {
ptr = io_mem_alloc(ring_size);
if (IS_ERR(ptr))
return PTR_ERR(ptr);
/* Allocate and store deferred free entry */
ibf = kmalloc(sizeof(*ibf), GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT);
if (!ibf) {
io_mem_free(ptr);
return -ENOMEM;
}
ibf->mem = ptr;
ibf->size = ring_size;
hlist_add_head(&ibf->list, &ctx->io_buf_list);
}
ibf->inuse = 1;
bl->buf_ring = ibf->mem;
bl->is_buf_ring = 1;
bl->is_mmap = 1;
return 0;
}
int io_register_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
{
struct io_uring_buf_reg reg;
struct io_buffer_list *bl, *free_bl = NULL;
int ret;
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
if (copy_from_user(&reg, arg, sizeof(reg)))
return -EFAULT;
if (reg.resv[0] || reg.resv[1] || reg.resv[2])
return -EINVAL;
if (reg.flags & ~IOU_PBUF_RING_MMAP)
return -EINVAL;
if (!(reg.flags & IOU_PBUF_RING_MMAP)) {
if (!reg.ring_addr)
return -EFAULT;
if (reg.ring_addr & ~PAGE_MASK)
return -EINVAL;
} else {
if (reg.ring_addr)
return -EINVAL;
}
if (!is_power_of_2(reg.ring_entries))
return -EINVAL;
/* cannot disambiguate full vs empty due to head/tail size */
if (reg.ring_entries >= 65536)
return -EINVAL;
if (unlikely(reg.bgid < BGID_ARRAY && !ctx->io_bl)) {
int ret = io_init_bl_list(ctx);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
bl = io_buffer_get_list(ctx, reg.bgid);
if (bl) {
/* if mapped buffer ring OR classic exists, don't allow */
if (bl->is_buf_ring || !list_empty(&bl->buf_list))
return -EEXIST;
} else {
free_bl = bl = kzalloc(sizeof(*bl), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!bl)
return -ENOMEM;
}
if (!(reg.flags & IOU_PBUF_RING_MMAP))
ret = io_pin_pbuf_ring(&reg, bl);
else
ret = io_alloc_pbuf_ring(ctx, &reg, bl);
if (!ret) {
bl->nr_entries = reg.ring_entries;
bl->mask = reg.ring_entries - 1;
io_buffer_add_list(ctx, bl, reg.bgid);
return 0;
}
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
kfree_rcu(free_bl, rcu);
return ret;
}
int io_unregister_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
{
struct io_uring_buf_reg reg;
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
lockdep_assert_held(&ctx->uring_lock);
if (copy_from_user(&reg, arg, sizeof(reg)))
return -EFAULT;
if (reg.resv[0] || reg.resv[1] || reg.resv[2])
return -EINVAL;
if (reg.flags)
return -EINVAL;
bl = io_buffer_get_list(ctx, reg.bgid);
if (!bl)
return -ENOENT;
if (!bl->is_buf_ring)
return -EINVAL;
__io_remove_buffers(ctx, bl, -1U);
if (bl->bgid >= BGID_ARRAY) {
xa_erase(&ctx->io_bl_xa, bl->bgid);
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
kfree_rcu(bl, rcu);
}
return 0;
}
int io_register_pbuf_status(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg)
{
struct io_uring_buf_status buf_status;
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
int i;
if (copy_from_user(&buf_status, arg, sizeof(buf_status)))
return -EFAULT;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(buf_status.resv); i++)
if (buf_status.resv[i])
return -EINVAL;
bl = io_buffer_get_list(ctx, buf_status.buf_group);
if (!bl)
return -ENOENT;
if (!bl->is_buf_ring)
return -EINVAL;
buf_status.head = bl->head;
if (copy_to_user(arg, &buf_status, sizeof(buf_status)))
return -EFAULT;
return 0;
}
void *io_pbuf_get_address(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, unsigned long bgid)
{
struct io_buffer_list *bl;
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
bl = __io_buffer_get_list(ctx, smp_load_acquire(&ctx->io_bl), bgid);
if (!bl || !bl->is_mmap)
return NULL;
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
/*
* Ensure the list is fully setup. Only strictly needed for RCU lookup
* via mmap, and in that case only for the array indexed groups. For
* the xarray lookups, it's either visible and ready, or not at all.
*/
if (!smp_load_acquire(&bl->is_ready))
return NULL;
return bl->buf_ring;
}
/*
* Called at or after ->release(), free the mmap'ed buffers that we used
* for memory mapped provided buffer rings.
*/
void io_kbuf_mmap_list_free(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
{
struct io_buf_free *ibf;
struct hlist_node *tmp;
hlist_for_each_entry_safe(ibf, tmp, &ctx->io_buf_list, list) {
hlist_del(&ibf->list);
io_mem_free(ibf->mem);
kfree(ibf);
}
}