linux/fs/eventpoll.c

2404 lines
65 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
* fs/eventpoll.c (Efficient event retrieval implementation)
* Copyright (C) 2001,...,2009 Davide Libenzi
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
*
*/
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
#include <linux/fs.h>
#include <linux/file.h>
#include <linux/signal.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/poll.h>
#include <linux/string.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
#include <linux/spinlock.h>
#include <linux/syscalls.h>
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
#include <linux/wait.h>
#include <linux/eventpoll.h>
#include <linux/mount.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/anon_inodes.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
#include <asm/mman.h>
#include <linux/atomic.h>
#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
#include <linux/seq_file.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
#include <linux/rculist.h>
#include <net/busy_poll.h>
/*
* LOCKING:
* There are three level of locking required by epoll :
*
* 1) epmutex (mutex)
* 2) ep->mtx (mutex)
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
* 3) ep->lock (rwlock)
*
* The acquire order is the one listed above, from 1 to 3.
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
* We need a rwlock (ep->lock) because we manipulate objects
* from inside the poll callback, that might be triggered from
* a wake_up() that in turn might be called from IRQ context.
* So we can't sleep inside the poll callback and hence we need
* a spinlock. During the event transfer loop (from kernel to
* user space) we could end up sleeping due a copy_to_user(), so
* we need a lock that will allow us to sleep. This lock is a
* mutex (ep->mtx). It is acquired during the event transfer loop,
* during epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL) and during eventpoll_release_file().
* Then we also need a global mutex to serialize eventpoll_release_file()
* and ep_free().
* This mutex is acquired by ep_free() during the epoll file
* cleanup path and it is also acquired by eventpoll_release_file()
* if a file has been pushed inside an epoll set and it is then
* close()d without a previous call to epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL).
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
* It is also acquired when inserting an epoll fd onto another epoll
* fd. We do this so that we walk the epoll tree and ensure that this
* insertion does not create a cycle of epoll file descriptors, which
* could lead to deadlock. We need a global mutex to prevent two
* simultaneous inserts (A into B and B into A) from racing and
* constructing a cycle without either insert observing that it is
* going to.
* It is necessary to acquire multiple "ep->mtx"es at once in the
* case when one epoll fd is added to another. In this case, we
* always acquire the locks in the order of nesting (i.e. after
* epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2), e1->mtx will always be acquired
* before e2->mtx). Since we disallow cycles of epoll file
* descriptors, this ensures that the mutexes are well-ordered. In
* order to communicate this nesting to lockdep, when walking a tree
* of epoll file descriptors, we use the current recursion depth as
* the lockdep subkey.
* It is possible to drop the "ep->mtx" and to use the global
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
* mutex "epmutex" (together with "ep->lock") to have it working,
* but having "ep->mtx" will make the interface more scalable.
* Events that require holding "epmutex" are very rare, while for
* normal operations the epoll private "ep->mtx" will guarantee
* a better scalability.
*/
/* Epoll private bits inside the event mask */
epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag Currently, epoll file descriptors or epfds (the fd returned from epoll_create[1]()) that are added to a shared wakeup source are always added in a non-exclusive manner. This means that when we have multiple epfds attached to a shared fd source they are all woken up. This creates thundering herd type behavior. Introduce a new 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag that can be passed as part of the 'event' argument during an epoll_ctl() EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation. This new flag allows for exclusive wakeups when there are multiple epfds attached to a shared fd event source. The implementation walks the list of exclusive waiters, and queues an event to each epfd, until it finds the first waiter that has threads blocked on it via epoll_wait(). The idea is to search for threads which are idle and ready to process the wakeup events. Thus, we queue an event to at least 1 epfd, but may still potentially queue an event to all epfds that are attached to the shared fd source. Performance testing was done by Madars Vitolins using a modified version of Enduro/X. The use of the 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag reduce the length of this particular workload from 860s down to 24s. Sample epoll_clt text: EPOLLEXCLUSIVE Sets an exclusive wakeup mode for the epfd file descriptor that is being attached to the target file descriptor, fd. Thus, when an event occurs and multiple epfd file descriptors are attached to the same target file using EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, one or more epfds will receive an event with epoll_wait(2). The default in this scenario (when EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not set) is for all epfds to receive an event. EPOLLEXCLUSIVE may only be specified with the op EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-20 22:59:24 +00:00
#define EP_PRIVATE_BITS (EPOLLWAKEUP | EPOLLONESHOT | EPOLLET | EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)
#define EPOLLINOUT_BITS (EPOLLIN | EPOLLOUT)
epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT In the current implementation of the EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag (added for 4.5-rc1), if epoll waiters create different POLL* sets and register them as exclusive against the same target fd, the current implementation will stop waking any further waiters once it finds the first idle waiter. This means that waiters could miss wakeups in certain cases. For example, when we wake up a pipe for reading we do: wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM); So if one epoll set or epfd is added to pipe p with POLLIN and a second set epfd2 is added to pipe p with POLLRDNORM, only epfd may receive the wakeup since the current implementation will stop after it finds any intersection of events with a waiter that is blocked in epoll_wait(). We could potentially address this by requiring all epoll waiters that are added to p be required to pass the same set of POLL* events. IE the first EPOLL_CTL_ADD that passes EPOLLEXCLUSIVE establishes the set POLL* flags to be used by any other epfds that are added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. However, I think it might be somewhat confusing interface as we would have to reference count the number of users for that set, and so userspace would have to keep track of that count, or we would need a more involved interface. It also adds some shared state that we'd have store somewhere. I don't think anybody will want to bloat __wait_queue_head for this. I think what we could do instead, is to simply restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE such that it can only be specified with EPOLLIN and/or EPOLLOUT. So that way if the wakeup includes 'POLLIN' and not 'POLLOUT', we can stop once we hit the first idle waiter that specifies the EPOLLIN bit, since any remaining waiters that only have 'POLLOUT' set wouldn't need to be woken. Likewise, we can do the same thing if 'POLLOUT' is in the wakeup bit set and not 'POLLIN'. If both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' are set in the wake bit set (there is at least one example of this I saw in fs/pipe.c), then we just wake the entire exclusive list. Having both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' both set should not be on any performance critical path, so I think that's ok (in fs/pipe.c its in pipe_release()). We also continue to include EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP by default in any exclusive set. Thus, the user can specify EPOLLERR and/or EPOLLHUP but is not required to do so. Since epoll waiters may be interested in other events as well besides EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP, these can still be added by doing a 'dup' call on the target fd and adding that as one normally would with EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Since I think that the POLLIN and POLLOUT events are what we are interest in balancing, I think that the 'dup' thing could perhaps be added to only one of the waiter threads. However, I think that EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP should be sufficient for the majority of use-cases. Since EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is intended to be used with a target fd shared among multiple epfds, where between 1 and n of the epfds may receive an event, it does not satisfy the semantics of EPOLLONESHOT where only 1 epfd would get an event. Thus, it is not allowed to be specified in conjunction with EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. EPOLL_CTL_MOD is also not allowed if the fd was previously added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. It seems with the limited number of flags to not be as interesting, but this could be relaxed at some further point. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-05 23:37:04 +00:00
#define EPOLLEXCLUSIVE_OK_BITS (EPOLLINOUT_BITS | EPOLLERR | EPOLLHUP | \
epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT In the current implementation of the EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag (added for 4.5-rc1), if epoll waiters create different POLL* sets and register them as exclusive against the same target fd, the current implementation will stop waking any further waiters once it finds the first idle waiter. This means that waiters could miss wakeups in certain cases. For example, when we wake up a pipe for reading we do: wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM); So if one epoll set or epfd is added to pipe p with POLLIN and a second set epfd2 is added to pipe p with POLLRDNORM, only epfd may receive the wakeup since the current implementation will stop after it finds any intersection of events with a waiter that is blocked in epoll_wait(). We could potentially address this by requiring all epoll waiters that are added to p be required to pass the same set of POLL* events. IE the first EPOLL_CTL_ADD that passes EPOLLEXCLUSIVE establishes the set POLL* flags to be used by any other epfds that are added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. However, I think it might be somewhat confusing interface as we would have to reference count the number of users for that set, and so userspace would have to keep track of that count, or we would need a more involved interface. It also adds some shared state that we'd have store somewhere. I don't think anybody will want to bloat __wait_queue_head for this. I think what we could do instead, is to simply restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE such that it can only be specified with EPOLLIN and/or EPOLLOUT. So that way if the wakeup includes 'POLLIN' and not 'POLLOUT', we can stop once we hit the first idle waiter that specifies the EPOLLIN bit, since any remaining waiters that only have 'POLLOUT' set wouldn't need to be woken. Likewise, we can do the same thing if 'POLLOUT' is in the wakeup bit set and not 'POLLIN'. If both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' are set in the wake bit set (there is at least one example of this I saw in fs/pipe.c), then we just wake the entire exclusive list. Having both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' both set should not be on any performance critical path, so I think that's ok (in fs/pipe.c its in pipe_release()). We also continue to include EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP by default in any exclusive set. Thus, the user can specify EPOLLERR and/or EPOLLHUP but is not required to do so. Since epoll waiters may be interested in other events as well besides EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP, these can still be added by doing a 'dup' call on the target fd and adding that as one normally would with EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Since I think that the POLLIN and POLLOUT events are what we are interest in balancing, I think that the 'dup' thing could perhaps be added to only one of the waiter threads. However, I think that EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP should be sufficient for the majority of use-cases. Since EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is intended to be used with a target fd shared among multiple epfds, where between 1 and n of the epfds may receive an event, it does not satisfy the semantics of EPOLLONESHOT where only 1 epfd would get an event. Thus, it is not allowed to be specified in conjunction with EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. EPOLL_CTL_MOD is also not allowed if the fd was previously added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. It seems with the limited number of flags to not be as interesting, but this could be relaxed at some further point. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-05 23:37:04 +00:00
EPOLLWAKEUP | EPOLLET | EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */
#define EP_MAX_NESTS 4
#define EP_MAX_EVENTS (INT_MAX / sizeof(struct epoll_event))
#define EP_UNACTIVE_PTR ((void *) -1L)
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
#define EP_ITEM_COST (sizeof(struct epitem) + sizeof(struct eppoll_entry))
struct epoll_filefd {
struct file *file;
int fd;
} __packed;
/*
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
* Structure used to track possible nested calls, for too deep recursions
* and loop cycles.
*/
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
struct nested_call_node {
struct list_head llink;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
void *cookie;
void *ctx;
};
/*
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
* This structure is used as collector for nested calls, to check for
* maximum recursion dept and loop cycles.
*/
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
struct nested_calls {
struct list_head tasks_call_list;
spinlock_t lock;
};
/*
* Each file descriptor added to the eventpoll interface will
* have an entry of this type linked to the "rbr" RB tree.
* Avoid increasing the size of this struct, there can be many thousands
* of these on a server and we do not want this to take another cache line.
*/
struct epitem {
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
union {
/* RB tree node links this structure to the eventpoll RB tree */
struct rb_node rbn;
/* Used to free the struct epitem */
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
/* List header used to link this structure to the eventpoll ready list */
struct list_head rdllink;
/*
* Works together "struct eventpoll"->ovflist in keeping the
* single linked chain of items.
*/
struct epitem *next;
/* The file descriptor information this item refers to */
struct epoll_filefd ffd;
/* Number of active wait queue attached to poll operations */
int nwait;
/* List containing poll wait queues */
struct list_head pwqlist;
/* The "container" of this item */
struct eventpoll *ep;
/* List header used to link this item to the "struct file" items list */
struct list_head fllink;
/* wakeup_source used when EPOLLWAKEUP is set */
struct wakeup_source __rcu *ws;
/* The structure that describe the interested events and the source fd */
struct epoll_event event;
};
/*
* This structure is stored inside the "private_data" member of the file
* structure and represents the main data structure for the eventpoll
* interface.
*/
struct eventpoll {
/*
* This mutex is used to ensure that files are not removed
* while epoll is using them. This is held during the event
* collection loop, the file cleanup path, the epoll file exit
* code and the ctl operations.
*/
struct mutex mtx;
/* Wait queue used by sys_epoll_wait() */
wait_queue_head_t wq;
/* Wait queue used by file->poll() */
wait_queue_head_t poll_wait;
/* List of ready file descriptors */
struct list_head rdllist;
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
/* Lock which protects rdllist and ovflist */
rwlock_t lock;
/* RB tree root used to store monitored fd structs */
struct rb_root_cached rbr;
/*
* This is a single linked list that chains all the "struct epitem" that
* happened while transferring ready events to userspace w/out
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
* holding ->lock.
*/
struct epitem *ovflist;
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
/* wakeup_source used when ep_scan_ready_list is running */
struct wakeup_source *ws;
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
/* The user that created the eventpoll descriptor */
struct user_struct *user;
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
struct file *file;
/* used to optimize loop detection check */
int visited;
struct list_head visited_list_link;
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
/* used to track busy poll napi_id */
unsigned int napi_id;
#endif
};
/* Wait structure used by the poll hooks */
struct eppoll_entry {
/* List header used to link this structure to the "struct epitem" */
struct list_head llink;
/* The "base" pointer is set to the container "struct epitem" */
struct epitem *base;
/*
* Wait queue item that will be linked to the target file wait
* queue head.
*/
wait_queue_entry_t wait;
/* The wait queue head that linked the "wait" wait queue item */
wait_queue_head_t *whead;
};
/* Wrapper struct used by poll queueing */
struct ep_pqueue {
poll_table pt;
struct epitem *epi;
};
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/* Used by the ep_send_events() function as callback private data */
struct ep_send_events_data {
int maxevents;
struct epoll_event __user *events;
int res;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
};
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
/*
* Configuration options available inside /proc/sys/fs/epoll/
*/
/* Maximum number of epoll watched descriptors, per user */
static long max_user_watches __read_mostly;
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
/*
* This mutex is used to serialize ep_free() and eventpoll_release_file().
*/
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
static DEFINE_MUTEX(epmutex);
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
/* Used to check for epoll file descriptor inclusion loops */
static struct nested_calls poll_loop_ncalls;
/* Slab cache used to allocate "struct epitem" */
static struct kmem_cache *epi_cache __read_mostly;
/* Slab cache used to allocate "struct eppoll_entry" */
static struct kmem_cache *pwq_cache __read_mostly;
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
/* Visited nodes during ep_loop_check(), so we can unset them when we finish */
static LIST_HEAD(visited_list);
/*
* List of files with newly added links, where we may need to limit the number
* of emanating paths. Protected by the epmutex.
*/
static LIST_HEAD(tfile_check_list);
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
#include <linux/sysctl.h>
static long zero;
static long long_max = LONG_MAX;
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
struct ctl_table epoll_table[] = {
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
{
.procname = "max_user_watches",
.data = &max_user_watches,
.maxlen = sizeof(max_user_watches),
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
.mode = 0644,
.proc_handler = proc_doulongvec_minmax,
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
.extra1 = &zero,
.extra2 = &long_max,
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
},
{ }
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
};
#endif /* CONFIG_SYSCTL */
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
static const struct file_operations eventpoll_fops;
static inline int is_file_epoll(struct file *f)
{
return f->f_op == &eventpoll_fops;
}
/* Setup the structure that is used as key for the RB tree */
static inline void ep_set_ffd(struct epoll_filefd *ffd,
struct file *file, int fd)
{
ffd->file = file;
ffd->fd = fd;
}
/* Compare RB tree keys */
static inline int ep_cmp_ffd(struct epoll_filefd *p1,
struct epoll_filefd *p2)
{
return (p1->file > p2->file ? +1:
(p1->file < p2->file ? -1 : p1->fd - p2->fd));
}
/* Tells us if the item is currently linked */
static inline int ep_is_linked(struct epitem *epi)
{
return !list_empty(&epi->rdllink);
}
static inline struct eppoll_entry *ep_pwq_from_wait(wait_queue_entry_t *p)
{
return container_of(p, struct eppoll_entry, wait);
}
/* Get the "struct epitem" from a wait queue pointer */
static inline struct epitem *ep_item_from_wait(wait_queue_entry_t *p)
{
return container_of(p, struct eppoll_entry, wait)->base;
}
/* Get the "struct epitem" from an epoll queue wrapper */
static inline struct epitem *ep_item_from_epqueue(poll_table *p)
{
return container_of(p, struct ep_pqueue, pt)->epi;
}
/* Tells if the epoll_ctl(2) operation needs an event copy from userspace */
epoll: optimizations and cleanups Epoll is doing multiple passes over the ready set at the moment, because of the constraints over the f_op->poll() call. Looking at the code again, I noticed that we already hold the epoll semaphore in read, and this (together with other locking conditions that hold while doing an epoll_wait()) can lead to a smarter way [1] to "ship" events to userspace (in a single pass). This is a stress application that can be used to test the new code. It spwans multiple thread and call epoll_wait() and epoll_ctl() from many threads. Stress tested on my dual Opteron 254 w/out any problems. http://www.xmailserver.org/totalmess.c This is not a benchmark, just something that tries to stress and exploit possible problems with the new code. Also, I made a stupid micro-benchmark: http://www.xmailserver.org/epwbench.c [1] Considering that epoll must be thread-safe, there are five ways we can be hit during an epoll_wait() transfer loop (ep_send_events()): 1) The epoll fd going away and calling ep_free This just can't happen, since we did an fget() in sys_epoll_wait 2) An epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL) This can't happen because epoll_ctl() gets ep->sem in write, and we're holding it in read during ep_send_events() 3) An fd stored inside the epoll fd going away This can't happen because in eventpoll_release_file() we get ep->sem in write, and we're holding it in read during ep_send_events() 4) Another epoll_wait() happening on another thread They both can be inside ep_send_events() at the same time, we get (splice) the ready-list under the spinlock, so each one will get its own ready list. Note that an fd cannot be at the same time inside more than one ready list, because ep_poll_callback() will not re-queue it if it sees it already linked: if (ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink)) goto is_linked; Another case that can happen, is two concurrent epoll_wait(), coming in with a userspace event buffer of size, say, ten. Suppose there are 50 event ready in the list. The first epoll_wait() will "steal" the whole list, while the second, seeing no events, will go to sleep. But at the end of ep_send_events() in the first epoll_wait(), we will re-inject surplus ready fds, and we will trigger the proper wake_up to the second epoll_wait(). 5) ep_poll_callback() hitting us asyncronously This is the tricky part. As I said above, the ep_is_linked() test done inside ep_poll_callback(), will guarantee us that until the item will result linked to a list, ep_poll_callback() will not try to re-queue it again (read, write data on any of its members). When we do a list_del() in ep_send_events(), the item will still satisfy the ep_is_linked() test (whatever data is written in prev/next, it'll never be its own pointer), so ep_poll_callback() will still leave us alone. It's only after the eventual smp_mb()+INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epi->rdllink) that it'll become visible to ep_poll_callback(), but at the point we're already past it. [akpm@osdl.org: 80 cols] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-08 07:25:41 +00:00
static inline int ep_op_has_event(int op)
{
revert "epoll: support for disabling items, and a self-test app" Revert commit 03a7beb55b9f ("epoll: support for disabling items, and a self-test app") pending resolution of the issues identified by Michael Kerrisk, copied below. We'll revisit this for 3.8. : I've taken a look at this patch as it currently stands in 3.7-rc1, and : done a bit of testing. (By the way, the test program : tools/testing/selftests/epoll/test_epoll.c does not compile...) : : There are one or two places where the behavior seems a little strange, : so I have a question or two at the end of this mail. But other than : that, I want to check my understanding so that the interface can be : correctly documented. : : Just to go though my understanding, the problem is the following : scenario in a multithreaded application: : : 1. Multiple threads are performing epoll_wait() operations, : and maintaining a user-space cache that contains information : corresponding to each file descriptor being monitored by : epoll_wait(). : : 2. At some point, a thread wants to delete (EPOLL_CTL_DEL) : a file descriptor from the epoll interest list, and : delete the corresponding record from the user-space cache. : : 3. The problem with (2) is that some other thread may have : previously done an epoll_wait() that retrieved information : about the fd in question, and may be in the middle of using : information in the cache that relates to that fd. Thus, : there is a potential race. : : 4. The race can't solved purely in user space, because doing : so would require applying a mutex across the epoll_wait() : call, which would of course blow thread concurrency. : : Right? : : Your solution is the EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE operation. I want to : confirm my understanding about how to use this flag, since : the description that has accompanied the patches so far : has been a bit sparse : : 0. In the scenario you're concerned about, deleting a file : descriptor means (safely) doing the following: : (a) Deleting the file descriptor from the epoll interest list : using EPOLL_CTL_DEL : (b) Deleting the corresponding record in the user-space cache : : 1. It's only meaningful to use this EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE in : conjunction with EPOLLONESHOT. : : 2. Using EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE without using EPOLLONESHOT in : conjunction is a logical error. : : 3. The correct way to code multithreaded applications using : EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE and EPOLLONESHOT is as follows: : : a. All EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_MOD operations should : should EPOLLONESHOT. : : b. When a thread wants to delete a file descriptor, it : should do the following: : : [1] Call epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) : [2] If the return status from epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) : was zero, then the file descriptor can be safely : deleted by the thread that made this call. : [3] If the epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) fails with EBUSY, : then the descriptor is in use. In this case, the calling : thread should set a flag in the user-space cache to : indicate that the thread that is using the descriptor : should perform the deletion operation. : : Is all of the above correct? : : The implementation depends on checking on whether : (events & ~EP_PRIVATE_BITS) == 0 : This replies on the fact that EPOLL_CTL_AD and EPOLL_CTL_MOD always : set EPOLLHUP and EPOLLERR in the 'events' mask, and EPOLLONESHOT : causes those flags (as well as all others in ~EP_PRIVATE_BITS) to be : cleared. : : A corollary to the previous paragraph is that using EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE : is only useful in conjunction with EPOLLONESHOT. However, as things : stand, one can use EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE on a file descriptor that does : not have EPOLLONESHOT set in 'events' This results in the following : (slightly surprising) behavior: : : (a) The first call to epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) returns 0 : (the indicator that the file descriptor can be safely deleted). : (b) The next call to epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) fails with EBUSY. : : This doesn't seem particularly useful, and in fact is probably an : indication that the user made a logic error: they should only be using : epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) on a file descriptor for which : EPOLLONESHOT was set in 'events'. If that is correct, then would it : not make sense to return an error to user space for this case? Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: "Paton J. Lewis" <palewis@adobe.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-11-08 23:53:35 +00:00
return op != EPOLL_CTL_DEL;
}
/* Initialize the poll safe wake up structure */
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
static void ep_nested_calls_init(struct nested_calls *ncalls)
{
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ncalls->tasks_call_list);
spin_lock_init(&ncalls->lock);
}
/**
* ep_events_available - Checks if ready events might be available.
*
* @ep: Pointer to the eventpoll context.
*
* Returns: Returns a value different than zero if ready events are available,
* or zero otherwise.
*/
static inline int ep_events_available(struct eventpoll *ep)
{
return !list_empty_careful(&ep->rdllist) ||
READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist) != EP_UNACTIVE_PTR;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL
static bool ep_busy_loop_end(void *p, unsigned long start_time)
{
struct eventpoll *ep = p;
return ep_events_available(ep) || busy_loop_timeout(start_time);
}
/*
* Busy poll if globally on and supporting sockets found && no events,
* busy loop will return if need_resched or ep_events_available.
*
* we must do our busy polling with irqs enabled
*/
static void ep_busy_loop(struct eventpoll *ep, int nonblock)
{
unsigned int napi_id = READ_ONCE(ep->napi_id);
if ((napi_id >= MIN_NAPI_ID) && net_busy_loop_on())
napi_busy_loop(napi_id, nonblock ? NULL : ep_busy_loop_end, ep);
}
static inline void ep_reset_busy_poll_napi_id(struct eventpoll *ep)
{
if (ep->napi_id)
ep->napi_id = 0;
}
/*
* Set epoll busy poll NAPI ID from sk.
*/
static inline void ep_set_busy_poll_napi_id(struct epitem *epi)
{
struct eventpoll *ep;
unsigned int napi_id;
struct socket *sock;
struct sock *sk;
int err;
if (!net_busy_loop_on())
return;
sock = sock_from_file(epi->ffd.file, &err);
if (!sock)
return;
sk = sock->sk;
if (!sk)
return;
napi_id = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_napi_id);
ep = epi->ep;
/* Non-NAPI IDs can be rejected
* or
* Nothing to do if we already have this ID
*/
if (napi_id < MIN_NAPI_ID || napi_id == ep->napi_id)
return;
/* record NAPI ID for use in next busy poll */
ep->napi_id = napi_id;
}
#else
static inline void ep_busy_loop(struct eventpoll *ep, int nonblock)
{
}
static inline void ep_reset_busy_poll_napi_id(struct eventpoll *ep)
{
}
static inline void ep_set_busy_poll_napi_id(struct epitem *epi)
{
}
#endif /* CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL */
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/**
* ep_call_nested - Perform a bound (possibly) nested call, by checking
* that the recursion limit is not exceeded, and that
* the same nested call (by the meaning of same cookie) is
* no re-entered.
*
* @ncalls: Pointer to the nested_calls structure to be used for this call.
* @nproc: Nested call core function pointer.
* @priv: Opaque data to be passed to the @nproc callback.
* @cookie: Cookie to be used to identify this nested call.
* @ctx: This instance context.
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
*
* Returns: Returns the code returned by the @nproc callback, or -1 if
* the maximum recursion limit has been exceeded.
*/
static int ep_call_nested(struct nested_calls *ncalls,
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
int (*nproc)(void *, void *, int), void *priv,
void *cookie, void *ctx)
{
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
int error, call_nests = 0;
unsigned long flags;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
struct list_head *lsthead = &ncalls->tasks_call_list;
struct nested_call_node *tncur;
struct nested_call_node tnode;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
spin_lock_irqsave(&ncalls->lock, flags);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/*
* Try to see if the current task is already inside this wakeup call.
* We use a list here, since the population inside this set is always
* very much limited.
*/
list_for_each_entry(tncur, lsthead, llink) {
if (tncur->ctx == ctx &&
(tncur->cookie == cookie || ++call_nests > EP_MAX_NESTS)) {
/*
* Ops ... loop detected or maximum nest level reached.
* We abort this wake by breaking the cycle itself.
*/
error = -1;
goto out_unlock;
}
}
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/* Add the current task and cookie to the list */
tnode.ctx = ctx;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
tnode.cookie = cookie;
list_add(&tnode.llink, lsthead);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ncalls->lock, flags);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/* Call the nested function */
error = (*nproc)(priv, cookie, call_nests);
/* Remove the current task from the list */
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
spin_lock_irqsave(&ncalls->lock, flags);
list_del(&tnode.llink);
out_unlock:
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ncalls->lock, flags);
return error;
}
epoll: comment the funky #ifdef Looking for a bug in -rt, I stumbled across this code here from: commit 2dfa4eeab0fc ("epoll keyed wakeups: teach epoll about hints coming with the wakeup key"), specifically: #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC static inline void ep_wake_up_nested(wait_queue_head_t *wqueue, unsigned long events, int subclass) { unsigned long flags; spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&wqueue->lock, flags, subclass); wake_up_locked_poll(wqueue, events); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqueue->lock, flags); } #else static inline void ep_wake_up_nested(wait_queue_head_t *wqueue, unsigned long events, int subclass) { wake_up_poll(wqueue, events); } #endif You change the function of ep_wake_up_nested() depending on whether CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is set or not. This looks awfully suspicious, and there's no comment to explain why. I initially thought that this was trying to fool lockdep, and hiding a real bug. Investigating it, I found the creation of wake_up_nested() (which no longer exists) but was created for the sole purpose of epoll and its strange wake ups, as explained in commit 0ccf831cbee9 ("lockdep: annotate epoll") Although the commit message says "annotate epoll" the change log is much better at explaining what is happening than what is in the actual code. Thus a comment is really necessary here. And to save the time of other developers from having to go trudging through the git logs trying to figure out why this code exists. I took parts of the change log and placed it into a comment above the affected code. This will make the description of what is happening more visible to new developers that have to look at this code for the first time. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-03-23 22:02:27 +00:00
/*
* As described in commit 0ccf831cb lockdep: annotate epoll
* the use of wait queues used by epoll is done in a very controlled
* manner. Wake ups can nest inside each other, but are never done
* with the same locking. For example:
*
* dfd = socket(...);
* efd1 = epoll_create();
* efd2 = epoll_create();
* epoll_ctl(efd1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, dfd, ...);
* epoll_ctl(efd2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, efd1, ...);
*
* When a packet arrives to the device underneath "dfd", the net code will
* issue a wake_up() on its poll wake list. Epoll (efd1) has installed a
* callback wakeup entry on that queue, and the wake_up() performed by the
* "dfd" net code will end up in ep_poll_callback(). At this point epoll
* (efd1) notices that it may have some event ready, so it needs to wake up
* the waiters on its poll wait list (efd2). So it calls ep_poll_safewake()
* that ends up in another wake_up(), after having checked about the
* recursion constraints. That are, no more than EP_MAX_POLLWAKE_NESTS, to
* avoid stack blasting.
*
* When CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is enabled, make sure lockdep can handle
* this special case of epoll.
*/
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
epoll: avoid calling ep_call_nested() from ep_poll_safewake() ep_poll_safewake() is used to wakeup potentially nested epoll file descriptors. The function uses ep_call_nested() to prevent entering the same wake up queue more than once, and to prevent excessively deep wakeup paths (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS). However, this is not necessary since we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. This saves extra function calls, and avoids taking a global lock during the ep_call_nested() calls. I have, however, left ep_call_nested() for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case, since ep_call_nested() keeps track of the nesting level, and this is required by the call to spin_lock_irqsave_nested(). It would be nice to remove the ep_call_nested() calls for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case as well, however its not clear how to simply pass the nesting level through multiple wake_up() levels without more surgery. In any case, I don't think CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is generally used for production. This patch, also apparently fixes a workload at Google that Salman Qazi reported by completely removing the poll_safewake_ncalls->lock from wakeup paths. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507920533-8812-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:02 +00:00
static struct nested_calls poll_safewake_ncalls;
static int ep_poll_wakeup_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
{
unsigned long flags;
epoll: avoid calling ep_call_nested() from ep_poll_safewake() ep_poll_safewake() is used to wakeup potentially nested epoll file descriptors. The function uses ep_call_nested() to prevent entering the same wake up queue more than once, and to prevent excessively deep wakeup paths (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS). However, this is not necessary since we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. This saves extra function calls, and avoids taking a global lock during the ep_call_nested() calls. I have, however, left ep_call_nested() for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case, since ep_call_nested() keeps track of the nesting level, and this is required by the call to spin_lock_irqsave_nested(). It would be nice to remove the ep_call_nested() calls for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case as well, however its not clear how to simply pass the nesting level through multiple wake_up() levels without more surgery. In any case, I don't think CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is generally used for production. This patch, also apparently fixes a workload at Google that Salman Qazi reported by completely removing the poll_safewake_ncalls->lock from wakeup paths. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507920533-8812-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:02 +00:00
wait_queue_head_t *wqueue = (wait_queue_head_t *)cookie;
epoll: avoid calling ep_call_nested() from ep_poll_safewake() ep_poll_safewake() is used to wakeup potentially nested epoll file descriptors. The function uses ep_call_nested() to prevent entering the same wake up queue more than once, and to prevent excessively deep wakeup paths (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS). However, this is not necessary since we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. This saves extra function calls, and avoids taking a global lock during the ep_call_nested() calls. I have, however, left ep_call_nested() for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case, since ep_call_nested() keeps track of the nesting level, and this is required by the call to spin_lock_irqsave_nested(). It would be nice to remove the ep_call_nested() calls for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case as well, however its not clear how to simply pass the nesting level through multiple wake_up() levels without more surgery. In any case, I don't think CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is generally used for production. This patch, also apparently fixes a workload at Google that Salman Qazi reported by completely removing the poll_safewake_ncalls->lock from wakeup paths. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507920533-8812-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:02 +00:00
spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&wqueue->lock, flags, call_nests + 1);
wake_up_locked_poll(wqueue, EPOLLIN);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wqueue->lock, flags);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
return 0;
}
static void ep_poll_safewake(wait_queue_head_t *wq)
{
int this_cpu = get_cpu();
ep_call_nested(&poll_safewake_ncalls,
ep_poll_wakeup_proc, NULL, wq, (void *) (long) this_cpu);
put_cpu();
}
epoll: avoid calling ep_call_nested() from ep_poll_safewake() ep_poll_safewake() is used to wakeup potentially nested epoll file descriptors. The function uses ep_call_nested() to prevent entering the same wake up queue more than once, and to prevent excessively deep wakeup paths (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS). However, this is not necessary since we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. This saves extra function calls, and avoids taking a global lock during the ep_call_nested() calls. I have, however, left ep_call_nested() for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case, since ep_call_nested() keeps track of the nesting level, and this is required by the call to spin_lock_irqsave_nested(). It would be nice to remove the ep_call_nested() calls for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case as well, however its not clear how to simply pass the nesting level through multiple wake_up() levels without more surgery. In any case, I don't think CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is generally used for production. This patch, also apparently fixes a workload at Google that Salman Qazi reported by completely removing the poll_safewake_ncalls->lock from wakeup paths. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507920533-8812-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:02 +00:00
#else
static void ep_poll_safewake(wait_queue_head_t *wq)
{
wake_up_poll(wq, EPOLLIN);
epoll: avoid calling ep_call_nested() from ep_poll_safewake() ep_poll_safewake() is used to wakeup potentially nested epoll file descriptors. The function uses ep_call_nested() to prevent entering the same wake up queue more than once, and to prevent excessively deep wakeup paths (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS). However, this is not necessary since we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. This saves extra function calls, and avoids taking a global lock during the ep_call_nested() calls. I have, however, left ep_call_nested() for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case, since ep_call_nested() keeps track of the nesting level, and this is required by the call to spin_lock_irqsave_nested(). It would be nice to remove the ep_call_nested() calls for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case as well, however its not clear how to simply pass the nesting level through multiple wake_up() levels without more surgery. In any case, I don't think CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is generally used for production. This patch, also apparently fixes a workload at Google that Salman Qazi reported by completely removing the poll_safewake_ncalls->lock from wakeup paths. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507920533-8812-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:02 +00:00
}
#endif
static void ep_remove_wait_queue(struct eppoll_entry *pwq)
{
wait_queue_head_t *whead;
rcu_read_lock();
/*
* If it is cleared by POLLFREE, it should be rcu-safe.
* If we read NULL we need a barrier paired with
* smp_store_release() in ep_poll_callback(), otherwise
* we rely on whead->lock.
*/
whead = smp_load_acquire(&pwq->whead);
if (whead)
remove_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
/*
* This function unregisters poll callbacks from the associated file
* descriptor. Must be called with "mtx" held (or "epmutex" if called from
* ep_free).
*/
static void ep_unregister_pollwait(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
{
struct list_head *lsthead = &epi->pwqlist;
struct eppoll_entry *pwq;
while (!list_empty(lsthead)) {
pwq = list_first_entry(lsthead, struct eppoll_entry, llink);
list_del(&pwq->llink);
ep_remove_wait_queue(pwq);
kmem_cache_free(pwq_cache, pwq);
}
}
/* call only when ep->mtx is held */
static inline struct wakeup_source *ep_wakeup_source(struct epitem *epi)
{
return rcu_dereference_check(epi->ws, lockdep_is_held(&epi->ep->mtx));
}
/* call only when ep->mtx is held */
static inline void ep_pm_stay_awake(struct epitem *epi)
{
struct wakeup_source *ws = ep_wakeup_source(epi);
if (ws)
__pm_stay_awake(ws);
}
static inline bool ep_has_wakeup_source(struct epitem *epi)
{
return rcu_access_pointer(epi->ws) ? true : false;
}
/* call when ep->mtx cannot be held (ep_poll_callback) */
static inline void ep_pm_stay_awake_rcu(struct epitem *epi)
{
struct wakeup_source *ws;
rcu_read_lock();
ws = rcu_dereference(epi->ws);
if (ws)
__pm_stay_awake(ws);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/**
* ep_scan_ready_list - Scans the ready list in a way that makes possible for
* the scan code, to call f_op->poll(). Also allows for
* O(NumReady) performance.
*
* @ep: Pointer to the epoll private data structure.
* @sproc: Pointer to the scan callback.
* @priv: Private opaque data passed to the @sproc callback.
* @depth: The current depth of recursive f_op->poll calls.
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
* @ep_locked: caller already holds ep->mtx
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
*
* Returns: The same integer error code returned by the @sproc callback.
*/
static __poll_t ep_scan_ready_list(struct eventpoll *ep,
__poll_t (*sproc)(struct eventpoll *,
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
struct list_head *, void *),
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
void *priv, int depth, bool ep_locked)
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
{
__poll_t res;
int pwake = 0;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
struct epitem *epi, *nepi;
LIST_HEAD(txlist);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/*
* We need to lock this because we could be hit by
* eventpoll_release_file() and epoll_ctl().
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
*/
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
if (!ep_locked)
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, depth);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/*
* Steal the ready list, and re-init the original one to the
* empty list. Also, set ep->ovflist to NULL so that events
* happening while looping w/out locks, are not lost. We cannot
* have the poll callback to queue directly on ep->rdllist,
* because we want the "sproc" callback to be able to do it
* in a lockless way.
*/
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
list_splice_init(&ep->rdllist, &txlist);
WRITE_ONCE(ep->ovflist, NULL);
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/*
* Now call the callback function.
*/
res = (*sproc)(ep, &txlist, priv);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/*
* During the time we spent inside the "sproc" callback, some
* other events might have been queued by the poll callback.
* We re-insert them inside the main ready-list here.
*/
for (nepi = READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist); (epi = nepi) != NULL;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
nepi = epi->next, epi->next = EP_UNACTIVE_PTR) {
/*
* We need to check if the item is already in the list.
* During the "sproc" callback execution time, items are
* queued into ->ovflist but the "txlist" might already
* contain them, and the list_splice() below takes care of them.
*/
if (!ep_is_linked(epi)) {
epoll: make sure all elements in ready list are in FIFO order Patch series "use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention", v3. The last patch targets the contention problem in ep_poll_callback(), which can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch (of 4): All coming events are stored in FIFO order and this is also should be applicable to ->ovflist, which originally is stack, i.e. LIFO. Thus to keep correct FIFO order ->ovflist should reversed by adding elements to the head of the read list but not to the tail. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-2-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:46 +00:00
/*
* ->ovflist is LIFO, so we have to reverse it in order
* to keep in FIFO.
*/
list_add(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
ep_pm_stay_awake(epi);
}
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
}
/*
* We need to set back ep->ovflist to EP_UNACTIVE_PTR, so that after
* releasing the lock, events will be queued in the normal way inside
* ep->rdllist.
*/
WRITE_ONCE(ep->ovflist, EP_UNACTIVE_PTR);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/*
* Quickly re-inject items left on "txlist".
*/
list_splice(&txlist, &ep->rdllist);
__pm_relax(ep->ws);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
if (!list_empty(&ep->rdllist)) {
/*
* Wake up (if active) both the eventpoll wait list and
* the ->poll() wait list (delayed after we release the lock).
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
*/
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->wq))
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
wake_up(&ep->wq);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->poll_wait))
pwake++;
}
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
if (!ep_locked)
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/* We have to call this outside the lock */
if (pwake)
ep_poll_safewake(&ep->poll_wait);
return res;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
}
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
static void epi_rcu_free(struct rcu_head *head)
{
struct epitem *epi = container_of(head, struct epitem, rcu);
kmem_cache_free(epi_cache, epi);
}
/*
* Removes a "struct epitem" from the eventpoll RB tree and deallocates
* all the associated resources. Must be called with "mtx" held.
*/
static int ep_remove(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
{
struct file *file = epi->ffd.file;
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
/*
epoll: use the waitqueue lock to protect ep->wq Patch series "waitqueue lockdep annotation", v3. This series adds a strategic lockdep_assert_held to __wake_up_common to ensure callers really do hold the wait_queue_head lock when calling the unlocked wake_up variants. It turns out epoll did not do this for a fairly common path (hit all the time by systemd during bootup), so the second patch fixed this instance as well. This patch (of 3): The epoll code currently uses the unlocked waitqueue helpers for managing ep->wq, but instead of holding the waitqueue lock around these calls, it uses its own ep->lock spinlock. Given that the waitqueue is not exposed to the rest of the kernel this actually works ok at the moment, but prevents the epoll locking rules from being enforced using lockdep. Remove ep->lock and use the waitqueue lock to not only reduce the size of struct eventpoll but also to make sure we can assert locking invariants in the waitqueue code. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171214152344.6880-2-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2018-08-22 04:56:26 +00:00
* Removes poll wait queue hooks.
*/
ep_unregister_pollwait(ep, epi);
/* Remove the current item from the list of epoll hooks */
spin_lock(&file->f_lock);
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
list_del_rcu(&epi->fllink);
spin_unlock(&file->f_lock);
rb_erase_cached(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr);
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
if (ep_is_linked(epi))
list_del_init(&epi->rdllink);
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
wakeup_source_unregister(ep_wakeup_source(epi));
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
/*
* At this point it is safe to free the eventpoll item. Use the union
* field epi->rcu, since we are trying to minimize the size of
* 'struct epitem'. The 'rbn' field is no longer in use. Protected by
* ep->mtx. The rcu read side, reverse_path_check_proc(), does not make
* use of the rbn field.
*/
call_rcu(&epi->rcu, epi_rcu_free);
atomic_long_dec(&ep->user->epoll_watches);
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
return 0;
}
static void ep_free(struct eventpoll *ep)
{
struct rb_node *rbp;
struct epitem *epi;
/* We need to release all tasks waiting for these file */
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->poll_wait))
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
ep_poll_safewake(&ep->poll_wait);
/*
* We need to lock this because we could be hit by
* eventpoll_release_file() while we're freeing the "struct eventpoll".
* We do not need to hold "ep->mtx" here because the epoll file
* is on the way to be removed and no one has references to it
* anymore. The only hit might come from eventpoll_release_file() but
* holding "epmutex" is sufficient here.
*/
mutex_lock(&epmutex);
/*
* Walks through the whole tree by unregistering poll callbacks.
*/
for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_unregister_pollwait(ep, epi);
cond_resched();
}
/*
* Walks through the whole tree by freeing each "struct epitem". At this
* point we are sure no poll callbacks will be lingering around, and also by
* holding "epmutex" we can be sure that no file cleanup code will hit
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
* us during this operation. So we can avoid the lock on "ep->lock".
* We do not need to lock ep->mtx, either, we only do it to prevent
* a lockdep warning.
*/
mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
while ((rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr)) != NULL) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
ep_remove(ep, epi);
cond_resched();
}
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
mutex_unlock(&epmutex);
mutex_destroy(&ep->mtx);
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
free_uid(ep->user);
wakeup_source_unregister(ep->ws);
kfree(ep);
}
static int ep_eventpoll_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
struct eventpoll *ep = file->private_data;
if (ep)
ep_free(ep);
return 0;
}
static __poll_t ep_read_events_proc(struct eventpoll *ep, struct list_head *head,
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
void *priv);
static void ep_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *whead,
poll_table *pt);
/*
* Differs from ep_eventpoll_poll() in that internal callers already have
* the ep->mtx so we need to start from depth=1, such that mutex_lock_nested()
* is correctly annotated.
*/
static __poll_t ep_item_poll(const struct epitem *epi, poll_table *pt,
int depth)
{
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
struct eventpoll *ep;
bool locked;
pt->_key = epi->event.events;
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
if (!is_file_epoll(epi->ffd.file))
return vfs_poll(epi->ffd.file, pt) & epi->event.events;
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
ep = epi->ffd.file->private_data;
poll_wait(epi->ffd.file, &ep->poll_wait, pt);
locked = pt && (pt->_qproc == ep_ptable_queue_proc);
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
return ep_scan_ready_list(epi->ffd.file->private_data,
ep_read_events_proc, &depth, depth,
locked) & epi->event.events;
}
static __poll_t ep_read_events_proc(struct eventpoll *ep, struct list_head *head,
void *priv)
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
{
struct epitem *epi, *tmp;
poll: add poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() functions In some cases the poll() implementation in a driver has to do different things depending on the events the caller wants to poll for. An example is when a driver needs to start a DMA engine if the caller polls for POLLIN, but doesn't want to do that if POLLIN is not requested but instead only POLLOUT or POLLPRI is requested. This is something that can happen in the video4linux subsystem among others. Unfortunately, the current epoll/poll/select implementation doesn't provide that information reliably. The poll_table_struct does have it: it has a key field with the event mask. But once a poll() call matches one or more bits of that mask any following poll() calls are passed a NULL poll_table pointer. Also, the eventpoll implementation always left the key field at ~0 instead of using the requested events mask. This was changed in eventpoll.c so the key field now contains the actual events that should be polled for as set by the caller. The solution to the NULL poll_table pointer is to set the qproc field to NULL in poll_table once poll() matches the events, not the poll_table pointer itself. That way drivers can obtain the mask through a new poll_requested_events inline. The poll_table_struct can still be NULL since some kernel code calls it internally (netfs_state_poll() in ./drivers/staging/pohmelfs/netfs.h). In that case poll_requested_events() returns ~0 (i.e. all events). Very rarely drivers might want to know whether poll_wait will actually wait. If another earlier file descriptor in the set already matched the events the caller wanted to wait for, then the kernel will return from the select() call without waiting. This might be useful information in order to avoid doing expensive work. A new helper function poll_does_not_wait() is added that drivers can use to detect this situation. This is now used in sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h. This was the only place in the kernel that needed this information. Drivers should no longer access any of the poll_table internals, but use the poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() access functions instead. In order to enforce that the poll_table fields are now prepended with an underscore and a comment was added warning against using them directly. This required a change in unix_dgram_poll() in unix/af_unix.c which used the key field to get the requested events. It's been replaced by a call to poll_requested_events(). For qproc it was especially important to change its name since the behavior of that field changes with this patch since this function pointer can now be NULL when that wasn't possible in the past. Any driver accessing the qproc or key fields directly will now fail to compile. Some notes regarding the correctness of this patch: the driver's poll() function is called with a 'struct poll_table_struct *wait' argument. This pointer may or may not be NULL, drivers can never rely on it being one or the other as that depends on whether or not an earlier file descriptor in the select()'s fdset matched the requested events. There are only three things a driver can do with the wait argument: 1) obtain the key field: events = wait ? wait->key : ~0; This will still work although it should be replaced with the new poll_requested_events() function (which does exactly the same). This will now even work better, since wait is no longer set to NULL unnecessarily. 2) use the qproc callback. This could be deadly since qproc can now be NULL. Renaming qproc should prevent this from happening. There are no kernel drivers that actually access this callback directly, BTW. 3) test whether wait == NULL to determine whether poll would return without waiting. This is no longer sufficient as the correct test is now wait == NULL || wait->_qproc == NULL. However, the worst that can happen here is a slight performance hit in the case where wait != NULL and wait->_qproc == NULL. In that case the driver will assume that poll_wait() will actually add the fd to the set of waiting file descriptors. Of course, poll_wait() will not do that since it tests for wait->_qproc. This will not break anything, though. There is only one place in the whole kernel where this happens (sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h) and that code will be replaced by a call to poll_does_not_wait() in the next patch. Note that even if wait->_qproc != NULL drivers cannot rely on poll_wait() actually waiting. The next file descriptor from the set might match the event mask and thus any possible waits will never happen. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Reviewed-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-03-23 22:02:27 +00:00
poll_table pt;
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
int depth = *(int *)priv;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
poll: add poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() functions In some cases the poll() implementation in a driver has to do different things depending on the events the caller wants to poll for. An example is when a driver needs to start a DMA engine if the caller polls for POLLIN, but doesn't want to do that if POLLIN is not requested but instead only POLLOUT or POLLPRI is requested. This is something that can happen in the video4linux subsystem among others. Unfortunately, the current epoll/poll/select implementation doesn't provide that information reliably. The poll_table_struct does have it: it has a key field with the event mask. But once a poll() call matches one or more bits of that mask any following poll() calls are passed a NULL poll_table pointer. Also, the eventpoll implementation always left the key field at ~0 instead of using the requested events mask. This was changed in eventpoll.c so the key field now contains the actual events that should be polled for as set by the caller. The solution to the NULL poll_table pointer is to set the qproc field to NULL in poll_table once poll() matches the events, not the poll_table pointer itself. That way drivers can obtain the mask through a new poll_requested_events inline. The poll_table_struct can still be NULL since some kernel code calls it internally (netfs_state_poll() in ./drivers/staging/pohmelfs/netfs.h). In that case poll_requested_events() returns ~0 (i.e. all events). Very rarely drivers might want to know whether poll_wait will actually wait. If another earlier file descriptor in the set already matched the events the caller wanted to wait for, then the kernel will return from the select() call without waiting. This might be useful information in order to avoid doing expensive work. A new helper function poll_does_not_wait() is added that drivers can use to detect this situation. This is now used in sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h. This was the only place in the kernel that needed this information. Drivers should no longer access any of the poll_table internals, but use the poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() access functions instead. In order to enforce that the poll_table fields are now prepended with an underscore and a comment was added warning against using them directly. This required a change in unix_dgram_poll() in unix/af_unix.c which used the key field to get the requested events. It's been replaced by a call to poll_requested_events(). For qproc it was especially important to change its name since the behavior of that field changes with this patch since this function pointer can now be NULL when that wasn't possible in the past. Any driver accessing the qproc or key fields directly will now fail to compile. Some notes regarding the correctness of this patch: the driver's poll() function is called with a 'struct poll_table_struct *wait' argument. This pointer may or may not be NULL, drivers can never rely on it being one or the other as that depends on whether or not an earlier file descriptor in the select()'s fdset matched the requested events. There are only three things a driver can do with the wait argument: 1) obtain the key field: events = wait ? wait->key : ~0; This will still work although it should be replaced with the new poll_requested_events() function (which does exactly the same). This will now even work better, since wait is no longer set to NULL unnecessarily. 2) use the qproc callback. This could be deadly since qproc can now be NULL. Renaming qproc should prevent this from happening. There are no kernel drivers that actually access this callback directly, BTW. 3) test whether wait == NULL to determine whether poll would return without waiting. This is no longer sufficient as the correct test is now wait == NULL || wait->_qproc == NULL. However, the worst that can happen here is a slight performance hit in the case where wait != NULL and wait->_qproc == NULL. In that case the driver will assume that poll_wait() will actually add the fd to the set of waiting file descriptors. Of course, poll_wait() will not do that since it tests for wait->_qproc. This will not break anything, though. There is only one place in the whole kernel where this happens (sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h) and that code will be replaced by a call to poll_does_not_wait() in the next patch. Note that even if wait->_qproc != NULL drivers cannot rely on poll_wait() actually waiting. The next file descriptor from the set might match the event mask and thus any possible waits will never happen. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Reviewed-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-03-23 22:02:27 +00:00
init_poll_funcptr(&pt, NULL);
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
depth++;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
list_for_each_entry_safe(epi, tmp, head, rdllink) {
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
if (ep_item_poll(epi, &pt, depth)) {
return EPOLLIN | EPOLLRDNORM;
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
} else {
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/*
* Item has been dropped into the ready list by the poll
* callback, but it's not actually ready, as far as
* caller requested events goes. We can remove it here.
*/
__pm_relax(ep_wakeup_source(epi));
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
list_del_init(&epi->rdllink);
}
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
}
return 0;
}
static __poll_t ep_eventpoll_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
{
struct eventpoll *ep = file->private_data;
int depth = 0;
/* Insert inside our poll wait queue */
poll_wait(file, &ep->poll_wait, wait);
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
/*
* Proceed to find out if wanted events are really available inside
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
* the ready list.
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
*/
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
return ep_scan_ready_list(ep, ep_read_events_proc,
&depth, depth, false);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
static void ep_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *f)
{
struct eventpoll *ep = f->private_data;
struct rb_node *rbp;
mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
struct epitem *epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
struct inode *inode = file_inode(epi->ffd.file);
seq_printf(m, "tfd: %8d events: %8x data: %16llx "
" pos:%lli ino:%lx sdev:%x\n",
epi->ffd.fd, epi->event.events,
(long long)epi->event.data,
(long long)epi->ffd.file->f_pos,
inode->i_ino, inode->i_sb->s_dev);
if (seq_has_overflowed(m))
break;
}
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
}
#endif
/* File callbacks that implement the eventpoll file behaviour */
static const struct file_operations eventpoll_fops = {
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
.show_fdinfo = ep_show_fdinfo,
#endif
.release = ep_eventpoll_release,
.poll = ep_eventpoll_poll,
llseek: automatically add .llseek fop All file_operations should get a .llseek operation so we can make nonseekable_open the default for future file operations without a .llseek pointer. The three cases that we can automatically detect are no_llseek, seq_lseek and default_llseek. For cases where we can we can automatically prove that the file offset is always ignored, we use noop_llseek, which maintains the current behavior of not returning an error from a seek. New drivers should normally not use noop_llseek but instead use no_llseek and call nonseekable_open at open time. Existing drivers can be converted to do the same when the maintainer knows for certain that no user code relies on calling seek on the device file. The generated code is often incorrectly indented and right now contains comments that clarify for each added line why a specific variant was chosen. In the version that gets submitted upstream, the comments will be gone and I will manually fix the indentation, because there does not seem to be a way to do that using coccinelle. Some amount of new code is currently sitting in linux-next that should get the same modifications, which I will do at the end of the merge window. Many thanks to Julia Lawall for helping me learn to write a semantic patch that does all this. ===== begin semantic patch ===== // This adds an llseek= method to all file operations, // as a preparation for making no_llseek the default. // // The rules are // - use no_llseek explicitly if we do nonseekable_open // - use seq_lseek for sequential files // - use default_llseek if we know we access f_pos // - use noop_llseek if we know we don't access f_pos, // but we still want to allow users to call lseek // @ open1 exists @ identifier nested_open; @@ nested_open(...) { <+... nonseekable_open(...) ...+> } @ open exists@ identifier open_f; identifier i, f; identifier open1.nested_open; @@ int open_f(struct inode *i, struct file *f) { <+... ( nonseekable_open(...) | nested_open(...) ) ...+> } @ read disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ read_no_fpos disable optional_qualifier exists @ identifier read_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t read_f(struct file *f, char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ write @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; expression E; identifier func; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { <+... ( *off = E | *off += E | func(..., off, ...) | E = *off ) ...+> } @ write_no_fpos @ identifier write_f; identifier f, p, s, off; type ssize_t, size_t, loff_t; @@ ssize_t write_f(struct file *f, const char *p, size_t s, loff_t *off) { ... when != off } @ fops0 @ identifier fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... }; @ has_llseek depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier llseek_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .llseek = llseek_f, ... }; @ has_read depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... }; @ has_write depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... }; @ has_open depends on fops0 @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... }; // use no_llseek if we call nonseekable_open //////////////////////////////////////////// @ nonseekable1 depends on !has_llseek && has_open @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier nso ~= "nonseekable_open"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = nso, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* nonseekable */ }; @ nonseekable2 depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier open.open_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .open = open_f, ... +.llseek = no_llseek, /* open uses nonseekable */ }; // use seq_lseek for sequential files ///////////////////////////////////// @ seq depends on !has_llseek @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier sr ~= "seq_read"; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = sr, ... +.llseek = seq_lseek, /* we have seq_read */ }; // use default_llseek if there is a readdir /////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops1 depends on !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier readdir_e; @@ // any other fop is used that changes pos struct file_operations fops = { ... .readdir = readdir_e, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* readdir is present */ }; // use default_llseek if at least one of read/write touches f_pos ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops2 depends on !fops1 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read.read_f; @@ // read fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = default_llseek, /* read accesses f_pos */ }; @ fops3 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... + .llseek = default_llseek, /* write accesses f_pos */ }; // Use noop_llseek if neither read nor write accesses f_pos /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// @ fops4 depends on !fops1 && !fops2 && !fops3 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ // write fops use offset struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read and write both use no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_write && !has_read && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier write_no_fpos.write_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .write = write_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* write uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; identifier read_no_fpos.read_f; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... .read = read_f, ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* read uses no f_pos */ }; @ depends on !has_read && !has_write && !fops1 && !fops2 && !has_llseek && !nonseekable1 && !nonseekable2 && !seq @ identifier fops0.fops; @@ struct file_operations fops = { ... +.llseek = noop_llseek, /* no read or write fn */ }; ===== End semantic patch ===== Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
2010-08-15 16:52:59 +00:00
.llseek = noop_llseek,
};
/*
* This is called from eventpoll_release() to unlink files from the eventpoll
* interface. We need to have this facility to cleanup correctly files that are
* closed without being removed from the eventpoll interface.
*/
void eventpoll_release_file(struct file *file)
{
struct eventpoll *ep;
struct epitem *epi, *next;
/*
* We don't want to get "file->f_lock" because it is not
* necessary. It is not necessary because we're in the "struct file"
* cleanup path, and this means that no one is using this file anymore.
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
* So, for example, epoll_ctl() cannot hit here since if we reach this
* point, the file counter already went to zero and fget() would fail.
* The only hit might come from ep_free() but by holding the mutex
* will correctly serialize the operation. We do need to acquire
* "ep->mtx" after "epmutex" because ep_remove() requires it when called
* from anywhere but ep_free().
*
* Besides, ep_remove() acquires the lock, so we can't hold it here.
*/
mutex_lock(&epmutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(epi, next, &file->f_ep_links, fllink) {
ep = epi->ep;
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, 0);
ep_remove(ep, epi);
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
}
mutex_unlock(&epmutex);
}
static int ep_alloc(struct eventpoll **pep)
{
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
int error;
struct user_struct *user;
struct eventpoll *ep;
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
user = get_current_user();
error = -ENOMEM;
ep = kzalloc(sizeof(*ep), GFP_KERNEL);
if (unlikely(!ep))
goto free_uid;
mutex_init(&ep->mtx);
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
rwlock_init(&ep->lock);
init_waitqueue_head(&ep->wq);
init_waitqueue_head(&ep->poll_wait);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->rdllist);
ep->rbr = RB_ROOT_CACHED;
ep->ovflist = EP_UNACTIVE_PTR;
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
ep->user = user;
*pep = ep;
return 0;
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
free_uid:
free_uid(user);
return error;
}
/*
* Search the file inside the eventpoll tree. The RB tree operations
* are protected by the "mtx" mutex, and ep_find() must be called with
* "mtx" held.
*/
static struct epitem *ep_find(struct eventpoll *ep, struct file *file, int fd)
{
int kcmp;
struct rb_node *rbp;
struct epitem *epi, *epir = NULL;
struct epoll_filefd ffd;
ep_set_ffd(&ffd, file, fd);
for (rbp = ep->rbr.rb_root.rb_node; rbp; ) {
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
kcmp = ep_cmp_ffd(&ffd, &epi->ffd);
if (kcmp > 0)
rbp = rbp->rb_right;
else if (kcmp < 0)
rbp = rbp->rb_left;
else {
epir = epi;
break;
}
}
return epir;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE
kcmp: add KCMP_EPOLL_TFD mode to compare epoll target files With current epoll architecture target files are addressed with file_struct and file descriptor number, where the last is not unique. Moreover files can be transferred from another process via unix socket, added into queue and closed then so we won't find this descriptor in the task fdinfo list. Thus to checkpoint and restore such processes CRIU needs to find out where exactly the target file is present to add it into epoll queue. For this sake one can use kcmp call where some particular target file from the queue is compared with arbitrary file passed as an argument. Because epoll target files can have same file descriptor number but different file_struct a caller should explicitly specify the offset within. To test if some particular file is matching entry inside epoll one have to - fill kcmp_epoll_slot structure with epoll file descriptor, target file number and target file offset (in case if only one target is present then it should be 0) - call kcmp as kcmp(pid1, pid2, KCMP_EPOLL_TFD, fd, &kcmp_epoll_slot) - the kernel fetch file pointer matching file descriptor @fd of pid1 - lookups for file struct in epoll queue of pid2 and returns traditional 0,1,2 result for sorting purpose Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170424154423.511592110@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Acked-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-07-12 21:34:28 +00:00
static struct epitem *ep_find_tfd(struct eventpoll *ep, int tfd, unsigned long toff)
{
struct rb_node *rbp;
struct epitem *epi;
for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
kcmp: add KCMP_EPOLL_TFD mode to compare epoll target files With current epoll architecture target files are addressed with file_struct and file descriptor number, where the last is not unique. Moreover files can be transferred from another process via unix socket, added into queue and closed then so we won't find this descriptor in the task fdinfo list. Thus to checkpoint and restore such processes CRIU needs to find out where exactly the target file is present to add it into epoll queue. For this sake one can use kcmp call where some particular target file from the queue is compared with arbitrary file passed as an argument. Because epoll target files can have same file descriptor number but different file_struct a caller should explicitly specify the offset within. To test if some particular file is matching entry inside epoll one have to - fill kcmp_epoll_slot structure with epoll file descriptor, target file number and target file offset (in case if only one target is present then it should be 0) - call kcmp as kcmp(pid1, pid2, KCMP_EPOLL_TFD, fd, &kcmp_epoll_slot) - the kernel fetch file pointer matching file descriptor @fd of pid1 - lookups for file struct in epoll queue of pid2 and returns traditional 0,1,2 result for sorting purpose Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170424154423.511592110@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Acked-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-07-12 21:34:28 +00:00
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
if (epi->ffd.fd == tfd) {
if (toff == 0)
return epi;
else
toff--;
}
cond_resched();
}
return NULL;
}
struct file *get_epoll_tfile_raw_ptr(struct file *file, int tfd,
unsigned long toff)
{
struct file *file_raw;
struct eventpoll *ep;
struct epitem *epi;
if (!is_file_epoll(file))
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
ep = file->private_data;
mutex_lock(&ep->mtx);
epi = ep_find_tfd(ep, tfd, toff);
if (epi)
file_raw = epi->ffd.file;
else
file_raw = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
return file_raw;
}
#endif /* CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE */
kcmp: add KCMP_EPOLL_TFD mode to compare epoll target files With current epoll architecture target files are addressed with file_struct and file descriptor number, where the last is not unique. Moreover files can be transferred from another process via unix socket, added into queue and closed then so we won't find this descriptor in the task fdinfo list. Thus to checkpoint and restore such processes CRIU needs to find out where exactly the target file is present to add it into epoll queue. For this sake one can use kcmp call where some particular target file from the queue is compared with arbitrary file passed as an argument. Because epoll target files can have same file descriptor number but different file_struct a caller should explicitly specify the offset within. To test if some particular file is matching entry inside epoll one have to - fill kcmp_epoll_slot structure with epoll file descriptor, target file number and target file offset (in case if only one target is present then it should be 0) - call kcmp as kcmp(pid1, pid2, KCMP_EPOLL_TFD, fd, &kcmp_epoll_slot) - the kernel fetch file pointer matching file descriptor @fd of pid1 - lookups for file struct in epoll queue of pid2 and returns traditional 0,1,2 result for sorting purpose Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170424154423.511592110@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Acked-by: Andrey Vagin <avagin@openvz.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-07-12 21:34:28 +00:00
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
/**
* Adds a new entry to the tail of the list in a lockless way, i.e.
* multiple CPUs are allowed to call this function concurrently.
*
* Beware: it is necessary to prevent any other modifications of the
* existing list until all changes are completed, in other words
* concurrent list_add_tail_lockless() calls should be protected
* with a read lock, where write lock acts as a barrier which
* makes sure all list_add_tail_lockless() calls are fully
* completed.
*
* Also an element can be locklessly added to the list only in one
* direction i.e. either to the tail either to the head, otherwise
* concurrent access will corrupt the list.
*
* Returns %false if element has been already added to the list, %true
* otherwise.
*/
static inline bool list_add_tail_lockless(struct list_head *new,
struct list_head *head)
{
struct list_head *prev;
/*
* This is simple 'new->next = head' operation, but cmpxchg()
* is used in order to detect that same element has been just
* added to the list from another CPU: the winner observes
* new->next == new.
*/
if (cmpxchg(&new->next, new, head) != new)
return false;
/*
* Initially ->next of a new element must be updated with the head
* (we are inserting to the tail) and only then pointers are atomically
* exchanged. XCHG guarantees memory ordering, thus ->next should be
* updated before pointers are actually swapped and pointers are
* swapped before prev->next is updated.
*/
prev = xchg(&head->prev, new);
/*
* It is safe to modify prev->next and new->prev, because a new element
* is added only to the tail and new->next is updated before XCHG.
*/
prev->next = new;
new->prev = prev;
return true;
}
/**
* Chains a new epi entry to the tail of the ep->ovflist in a lockless way,
* i.e. multiple CPUs are allowed to call this function concurrently.
*
* Returns %false if epi element has been already chained, %true otherwise.
*/
static inline bool chain_epi_lockless(struct epitem *epi)
{
struct eventpoll *ep = epi->ep;
/* Check that the same epi has not been just chained from another CPU */
if (cmpxchg(&epi->next, EP_UNACTIVE_PTR, NULL) != EP_UNACTIVE_PTR)
return false;
/* Atomically exchange tail */
epi->next = xchg(&ep->ovflist, epi);
return true;
}
/*
* This is the callback that is passed to the wait queue wakeup
* mechanism. It is called by the stored file descriptors when they
* have events to report.
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
*
* This callback takes a read lock in order not to content with concurrent
* events from another file descriptors, thus all modifications to ->rdllist
* or ->ovflist are lockless. Read lock is paired with the write lock from
* ep_scan_ready_list(), which stops all list modifications and guarantees
* that lists state is seen correctly.
*
* Another thing worth to mention is that ep_poll_callback() can be called
* concurrently for the same @epi from different CPUs if poll table was inited
* with several wait queues entries. Plural wakeup from different CPUs of a
* single wait queue is serialized by wq.lock, but the case when multiple wait
* queues are used should be detected accordingly. This is detected using
* cmpxchg() operation.
*/
static int ep_poll_callback(wait_queue_entry_t *wait, unsigned mode, int sync, void *key)
{
int pwake = 0;
struct epitem *epi = ep_item_from_wait(wait);
struct eventpoll *ep = epi->ep;
__poll_t pollflags = key_to_poll(key);
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
unsigned long flags;
epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag Currently, epoll file descriptors or epfds (the fd returned from epoll_create[1]()) that are added to a shared wakeup source are always added in a non-exclusive manner. This means that when we have multiple epfds attached to a shared fd source they are all woken up. This creates thundering herd type behavior. Introduce a new 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag that can be passed as part of the 'event' argument during an epoll_ctl() EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation. This new flag allows for exclusive wakeups when there are multiple epfds attached to a shared fd event source. The implementation walks the list of exclusive waiters, and queues an event to each epfd, until it finds the first waiter that has threads blocked on it via epoll_wait(). The idea is to search for threads which are idle and ready to process the wakeup events. Thus, we queue an event to at least 1 epfd, but may still potentially queue an event to all epfds that are attached to the shared fd source. Performance testing was done by Madars Vitolins using a modified version of Enduro/X. The use of the 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag reduce the length of this particular workload from 860s down to 24s. Sample epoll_clt text: EPOLLEXCLUSIVE Sets an exclusive wakeup mode for the epfd file descriptor that is being attached to the target file descriptor, fd. Thus, when an event occurs and multiple epfd file descriptors are attached to the same target file using EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, one or more epfds will receive an event with epoll_wait(2). The default in this scenario (when EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not set) is for all epfds to receive an event. EPOLLEXCLUSIVE may only be specified with the op EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-20 22:59:24 +00:00
int ewake = 0;
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
read_lock_irqsave(&ep->lock, flags);
ep_set_busy_poll_napi_id(epi);
/*
* If the event mask does not contain any poll(2) event, we consider the
* descriptor to be disabled. This condition is likely the effect of the
* EPOLLONESHOT bit that disables the descriptor when an event is received,
* until the next EPOLL_CTL_MOD will be issued.
*/
if (!(epi->event.events & ~EP_PRIVATE_BITS))
goto out_unlock;
/*
* Check the events coming with the callback. At this stage, not
* every device reports the events in the "key" parameter of the
* callback. We need to be able to handle both cases here, hence the
* test for "key" != NULL before the event match test.
*/
if (pollflags && !(pollflags & epi->event.events))
goto out_unlock;
/*
* If we are transferring events to userspace, we can hold no locks
* (because we're accessing user memory, and because of linux f_op->poll()
* semantics). All the events that happen during that period of time are
* chained in ep->ovflist and requeued later on.
*/
if (READ_ONCE(ep->ovflist) != EP_UNACTIVE_PTR) {
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
if (epi->next == EP_UNACTIVE_PTR &&
chain_epi_lockless(epi))
ep_pm_stay_awake_rcu(epi);
goto out_unlock;
}
/* If this file is already in the ready list we exit soon */
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
if (!ep_is_linked(epi) &&
list_add_tail_lockless(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist)) {
ep_pm_stay_awake_rcu(epi);
}
/*
* Wake up ( if active ) both the eventpoll wait list and the ->poll()
* wait list.
*/
epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag Currently, epoll file descriptors or epfds (the fd returned from epoll_create[1]()) that are added to a shared wakeup source are always added in a non-exclusive manner. This means that when we have multiple epfds attached to a shared fd source they are all woken up. This creates thundering herd type behavior. Introduce a new 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag that can be passed as part of the 'event' argument during an epoll_ctl() EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation. This new flag allows for exclusive wakeups when there are multiple epfds attached to a shared fd event source. The implementation walks the list of exclusive waiters, and queues an event to each epfd, until it finds the first waiter that has threads blocked on it via epoll_wait(). The idea is to search for threads which are idle and ready to process the wakeup events. Thus, we queue an event to at least 1 epfd, but may still potentially queue an event to all epfds that are attached to the shared fd source. Performance testing was done by Madars Vitolins using a modified version of Enduro/X. The use of the 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag reduce the length of this particular workload from 860s down to 24s. Sample epoll_clt text: EPOLLEXCLUSIVE Sets an exclusive wakeup mode for the epfd file descriptor that is being attached to the target file descriptor, fd. Thus, when an event occurs and multiple epfd file descriptors are attached to the same target file using EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, one or more epfds will receive an event with epoll_wait(2). The default in this scenario (when EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not set) is for all epfds to receive an event. EPOLLEXCLUSIVE may only be specified with the op EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-20 22:59:24 +00:00
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->wq)) {
epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT In the current implementation of the EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag (added for 4.5-rc1), if epoll waiters create different POLL* sets and register them as exclusive against the same target fd, the current implementation will stop waking any further waiters once it finds the first idle waiter. This means that waiters could miss wakeups in certain cases. For example, when we wake up a pipe for reading we do: wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM); So if one epoll set or epfd is added to pipe p with POLLIN and a second set epfd2 is added to pipe p with POLLRDNORM, only epfd may receive the wakeup since the current implementation will stop after it finds any intersection of events with a waiter that is blocked in epoll_wait(). We could potentially address this by requiring all epoll waiters that are added to p be required to pass the same set of POLL* events. IE the first EPOLL_CTL_ADD that passes EPOLLEXCLUSIVE establishes the set POLL* flags to be used by any other epfds that are added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. However, I think it might be somewhat confusing interface as we would have to reference count the number of users for that set, and so userspace would have to keep track of that count, or we would need a more involved interface. It also adds some shared state that we'd have store somewhere. I don't think anybody will want to bloat __wait_queue_head for this. I think what we could do instead, is to simply restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE such that it can only be specified with EPOLLIN and/or EPOLLOUT. So that way if the wakeup includes 'POLLIN' and not 'POLLOUT', we can stop once we hit the first idle waiter that specifies the EPOLLIN bit, since any remaining waiters that only have 'POLLOUT' set wouldn't need to be woken. Likewise, we can do the same thing if 'POLLOUT' is in the wakeup bit set and not 'POLLIN'. If both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' are set in the wake bit set (there is at least one example of this I saw in fs/pipe.c), then we just wake the entire exclusive list. Having both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' both set should not be on any performance critical path, so I think that's ok (in fs/pipe.c its in pipe_release()). We also continue to include EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP by default in any exclusive set. Thus, the user can specify EPOLLERR and/or EPOLLHUP but is not required to do so. Since epoll waiters may be interested in other events as well besides EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP, these can still be added by doing a 'dup' call on the target fd and adding that as one normally would with EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Since I think that the POLLIN and POLLOUT events are what we are interest in balancing, I think that the 'dup' thing could perhaps be added to only one of the waiter threads. However, I think that EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP should be sufficient for the majority of use-cases. Since EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is intended to be used with a target fd shared among multiple epfds, where between 1 and n of the epfds may receive an event, it does not satisfy the semantics of EPOLLONESHOT where only 1 epfd would get an event. Thus, it is not allowed to be specified in conjunction with EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. EPOLL_CTL_MOD is also not allowed if the fd was previously added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. It seems with the limited number of flags to not be as interesting, but this could be relaxed at some further point. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-05 23:37:04 +00:00
if ((epi->event.events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE) &&
!(pollflags & POLLFREE)) {
switch (pollflags & EPOLLINOUT_BITS) {
case EPOLLIN:
if (epi->event.events & EPOLLIN)
epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT In the current implementation of the EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag (added for 4.5-rc1), if epoll waiters create different POLL* sets and register them as exclusive against the same target fd, the current implementation will stop waking any further waiters once it finds the first idle waiter. This means that waiters could miss wakeups in certain cases. For example, when we wake up a pipe for reading we do: wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM); So if one epoll set or epfd is added to pipe p with POLLIN and a second set epfd2 is added to pipe p with POLLRDNORM, only epfd may receive the wakeup since the current implementation will stop after it finds any intersection of events with a waiter that is blocked in epoll_wait(). We could potentially address this by requiring all epoll waiters that are added to p be required to pass the same set of POLL* events. IE the first EPOLL_CTL_ADD that passes EPOLLEXCLUSIVE establishes the set POLL* flags to be used by any other epfds that are added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. However, I think it might be somewhat confusing interface as we would have to reference count the number of users for that set, and so userspace would have to keep track of that count, or we would need a more involved interface. It also adds some shared state that we'd have store somewhere. I don't think anybody will want to bloat __wait_queue_head for this. I think what we could do instead, is to simply restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE such that it can only be specified with EPOLLIN and/or EPOLLOUT. So that way if the wakeup includes 'POLLIN' and not 'POLLOUT', we can stop once we hit the first idle waiter that specifies the EPOLLIN bit, since any remaining waiters that only have 'POLLOUT' set wouldn't need to be woken. Likewise, we can do the same thing if 'POLLOUT' is in the wakeup bit set and not 'POLLIN'. If both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' are set in the wake bit set (there is at least one example of this I saw in fs/pipe.c), then we just wake the entire exclusive list. Having both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' both set should not be on any performance critical path, so I think that's ok (in fs/pipe.c its in pipe_release()). We also continue to include EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP by default in any exclusive set. Thus, the user can specify EPOLLERR and/or EPOLLHUP but is not required to do so. Since epoll waiters may be interested in other events as well besides EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP, these can still be added by doing a 'dup' call on the target fd and adding that as one normally would with EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Since I think that the POLLIN and POLLOUT events are what we are interest in balancing, I think that the 'dup' thing could perhaps be added to only one of the waiter threads. However, I think that EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP should be sufficient for the majority of use-cases. Since EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is intended to be used with a target fd shared among multiple epfds, where between 1 and n of the epfds may receive an event, it does not satisfy the semantics of EPOLLONESHOT where only 1 epfd would get an event. Thus, it is not allowed to be specified in conjunction with EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. EPOLL_CTL_MOD is also not allowed if the fd was previously added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. It seems with the limited number of flags to not be as interesting, but this could be relaxed at some further point. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-05 23:37:04 +00:00
ewake = 1;
break;
case EPOLLOUT:
if (epi->event.events & EPOLLOUT)
epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT In the current implementation of the EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag (added for 4.5-rc1), if epoll waiters create different POLL* sets and register them as exclusive against the same target fd, the current implementation will stop waking any further waiters once it finds the first idle waiter. This means that waiters could miss wakeups in certain cases. For example, when we wake up a pipe for reading we do: wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM); So if one epoll set or epfd is added to pipe p with POLLIN and a second set epfd2 is added to pipe p with POLLRDNORM, only epfd may receive the wakeup since the current implementation will stop after it finds any intersection of events with a waiter that is blocked in epoll_wait(). We could potentially address this by requiring all epoll waiters that are added to p be required to pass the same set of POLL* events. IE the first EPOLL_CTL_ADD that passes EPOLLEXCLUSIVE establishes the set POLL* flags to be used by any other epfds that are added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. However, I think it might be somewhat confusing interface as we would have to reference count the number of users for that set, and so userspace would have to keep track of that count, or we would need a more involved interface. It also adds some shared state that we'd have store somewhere. I don't think anybody will want to bloat __wait_queue_head for this. I think what we could do instead, is to simply restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE such that it can only be specified with EPOLLIN and/or EPOLLOUT. So that way if the wakeup includes 'POLLIN' and not 'POLLOUT', we can stop once we hit the first idle waiter that specifies the EPOLLIN bit, since any remaining waiters that only have 'POLLOUT' set wouldn't need to be woken. Likewise, we can do the same thing if 'POLLOUT' is in the wakeup bit set and not 'POLLIN'. If both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' are set in the wake bit set (there is at least one example of this I saw in fs/pipe.c), then we just wake the entire exclusive list. Having both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' both set should not be on any performance critical path, so I think that's ok (in fs/pipe.c its in pipe_release()). We also continue to include EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP by default in any exclusive set. Thus, the user can specify EPOLLERR and/or EPOLLHUP but is not required to do so. Since epoll waiters may be interested in other events as well besides EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP, these can still be added by doing a 'dup' call on the target fd and adding that as one normally would with EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Since I think that the POLLIN and POLLOUT events are what we are interest in balancing, I think that the 'dup' thing could perhaps be added to only one of the waiter threads. However, I think that EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP should be sufficient for the majority of use-cases. Since EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is intended to be used with a target fd shared among multiple epfds, where between 1 and n of the epfds may receive an event, it does not satisfy the semantics of EPOLLONESHOT where only 1 epfd would get an event. Thus, it is not allowed to be specified in conjunction with EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. EPOLL_CTL_MOD is also not allowed if the fd was previously added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. It seems with the limited number of flags to not be as interesting, but this could be relaxed at some further point. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-05 23:37:04 +00:00
ewake = 1;
break;
case 0:
ewake = 1;
break;
}
}
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
wake_up(&ep->wq);
epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag Currently, epoll file descriptors or epfds (the fd returned from epoll_create[1]()) that are added to a shared wakeup source are always added in a non-exclusive manner. This means that when we have multiple epfds attached to a shared fd source they are all woken up. This creates thundering herd type behavior. Introduce a new 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag that can be passed as part of the 'event' argument during an epoll_ctl() EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation. This new flag allows for exclusive wakeups when there are multiple epfds attached to a shared fd event source. The implementation walks the list of exclusive waiters, and queues an event to each epfd, until it finds the first waiter that has threads blocked on it via epoll_wait(). The idea is to search for threads which are idle and ready to process the wakeup events. Thus, we queue an event to at least 1 epfd, but may still potentially queue an event to all epfds that are attached to the shared fd source. Performance testing was done by Madars Vitolins using a modified version of Enduro/X. The use of the 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag reduce the length of this particular workload from 860s down to 24s. Sample epoll_clt text: EPOLLEXCLUSIVE Sets an exclusive wakeup mode for the epfd file descriptor that is being attached to the target file descriptor, fd. Thus, when an event occurs and multiple epfd file descriptors are attached to the same target file using EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, one or more epfds will receive an event with epoll_wait(2). The default in this scenario (when EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not set) is for all epfds to receive an event. EPOLLEXCLUSIVE may only be specified with the op EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-20 22:59:24 +00:00
}
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->poll_wait))
pwake++;
out_unlock:
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
read_unlock_irqrestore(&ep->lock, flags);
/* We have to call this outside the lock */
if (pwake)
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
ep_poll_safewake(&ep->poll_wait);
if (!(epi->event.events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE))
ewake = 1;
if (pollflags & POLLFREE) {
/*
* If we race with ep_remove_wait_queue() it can miss
* ->whead = NULL and do another remove_wait_queue() after
* us, so we can't use __remove_wait_queue().
*/
list_del_init(&wait->entry);
/*
* ->whead != NULL protects us from the race with ep_free()
* or ep_remove(), ep_remove_wait_queue() takes whead->lock
* held by the caller. Once we nullify it, nothing protects
* ep/epi or even wait.
*/
smp_store_release(&ep_pwq_from_wait(wait)->whead, NULL);
}
epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag Currently, epoll file descriptors or epfds (the fd returned from epoll_create[1]()) that are added to a shared wakeup source are always added in a non-exclusive manner. This means that when we have multiple epfds attached to a shared fd source they are all woken up. This creates thundering herd type behavior. Introduce a new 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag that can be passed as part of the 'event' argument during an epoll_ctl() EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation. This new flag allows for exclusive wakeups when there are multiple epfds attached to a shared fd event source. The implementation walks the list of exclusive waiters, and queues an event to each epfd, until it finds the first waiter that has threads blocked on it via epoll_wait(). The idea is to search for threads which are idle and ready to process the wakeup events. Thus, we queue an event to at least 1 epfd, but may still potentially queue an event to all epfds that are attached to the shared fd source. Performance testing was done by Madars Vitolins using a modified version of Enduro/X. The use of the 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag reduce the length of this particular workload from 860s down to 24s. Sample epoll_clt text: EPOLLEXCLUSIVE Sets an exclusive wakeup mode for the epfd file descriptor that is being attached to the target file descriptor, fd. Thus, when an event occurs and multiple epfd file descriptors are attached to the same target file using EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, one or more epfds will receive an event with epoll_wait(2). The default in this scenario (when EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not set) is for all epfds to receive an event. EPOLLEXCLUSIVE may only be specified with the op EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-20 22:59:24 +00:00
return ewake;
}
/*
* This is the callback that is used to add our wait queue to the
* target file wakeup lists.
*/
static void ep_ptable_queue_proc(struct file *file, wait_queue_head_t *whead,
poll_table *pt)
{
struct epitem *epi = ep_item_from_epqueue(pt);
struct eppoll_entry *pwq;
if (epi->nwait >= 0 && (pwq = kmem_cache_alloc(pwq_cache, GFP_KERNEL))) {
init_waitqueue_func_entry(&pwq->wait, ep_poll_callback);
pwq->whead = whead;
pwq->base = epi;
epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag Currently, epoll file descriptors or epfds (the fd returned from epoll_create[1]()) that are added to a shared wakeup source are always added in a non-exclusive manner. This means that when we have multiple epfds attached to a shared fd source they are all woken up. This creates thundering herd type behavior. Introduce a new 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag that can be passed as part of the 'event' argument during an epoll_ctl() EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation. This new flag allows for exclusive wakeups when there are multiple epfds attached to a shared fd event source. The implementation walks the list of exclusive waiters, and queues an event to each epfd, until it finds the first waiter that has threads blocked on it via epoll_wait(). The idea is to search for threads which are idle and ready to process the wakeup events. Thus, we queue an event to at least 1 epfd, but may still potentially queue an event to all epfds that are attached to the shared fd source. Performance testing was done by Madars Vitolins using a modified version of Enduro/X. The use of the 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag reduce the length of this particular workload from 860s down to 24s. Sample epoll_clt text: EPOLLEXCLUSIVE Sets an exclusive wakeup mode for the epfd file descriptor that is being attached to the target file descriptor, fd. Thus, when an event occurs and multiple epfd file descriptors are attached to the same target file using EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, one or more epfds will receive an event with epoll_wait(2). The default in this scenario (when EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not set) is for all epfds to receive an event. EPOLLEXCLUSIVE may only be specified with the op EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-20 22:59:24 +00:00
if (epi->event.events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)
add_wait_queue_exclusive(whead, &pwq->wait);
else
add_wait_queue(whead, &pwq->wait);
list_add_tail(&pwq->llink, &epi->pwqlist);
epi->nwait++;
} else {
/* We have to signal that an error occurred */
epi->nwait = -1;
}
}
static void ep_rbtree_insert(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi)
{
int kcmp;
struct rb_node **p = &ep->rbr.rb_root.rb_node, *parent = NULL;
struct epitem *epic;
bool leftmost = true;
while (*p) {
parent = *p;
epic = rb_entry(parent, struct epitem, rbn);
kcmp = ep_cmp_ffd(&epi->ffd, &epic->ffd);
if (kcmp > 0) {
p = &parent->rb_right;
leftmost = false;
} else
p = &parent->rb_left;
}
rb_link_node(&epi->rbn, parent, p);
rb_insert_color_cached(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr, leftmost);
}
revert "epoll: support for disabling items, and a self-test app" Revert commit 03a7beb55b9f ("epoll: support for disabling items, and a self-test app") pending resolution of the issues identified by Michael Kerrisk, copied below. We'll revisit this for 3.8. : I've taken a look at this patch as it currently stands in 3.7-rc1, and : done a bit of testing. (By the way, the test program : tools/testing/selftests/epoll/test_epoll.c does not compile...) : : There are one or two places where the behavior seems a little strange, : so I have a question or two at the end of this mail. But other than : that, I want to check my understanding so that the interface can be : correctly documented. : : Just to go though my understanding, the problem is the following : scenario in a multithreaded application: : : 1. Multiple threads are performing epoll_wait() operations, : and maintaining a user-space cache that contains information : corresponding to each file descriptor being monitored by : epoll_wait(). : : 2. At some point, a thread wants to delete (EPOLL_CTL_DEL) : a file descriptor from the epoll interest list, and : delete the corresponding record from the user-space cache. : : 3. The problem with (2) is that some other thread may have : previously done an epoll_wait() that retrieved information : about the fd in question, and may be in the middle of using : information in the cache that relates to that fd. Thus, : there is a potential race. : : 4. The race can't solved purely in user space, because doing : so would require applying a mutex across the epoll_wait() : call, which would of course blow thread concurrency. : : Right? : : Your solution is the EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE operation. I want to : confirm my understanding about how to use this flag, since : the description that has accompanied the patches so far : has been a bit sparse : : 0. In the scenario you're concerned about, deleting a file : descriptor means (safely) doing the following: : (a) Deleting the file descriptor from the epoll interest list : using EPOLL_CTL_DEL : (b) Deleting the corresponding record in the user-space cache : : 1. It's only meaningful to use this EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE in : conjunction with EPOLLONESHOT. : : 2. Using EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE without using EPOLLONESHOT in : conjunction is a logical error. : : 3. The correct way to code multithreaded applications using : EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE and EPOLLONESHOT is as follows: : : a. All EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_MOD operations should : should EPOLLONESHOT. : : b. When a thread wants to delete a file descriptor, it : should do the following: : : [1] Call epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) : [2] If the return status from epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) : was zero, then the file descriptor can be safely : deleted by the thread that made this call. : [3] If the epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) fails with EBUSY, : then the descriptor is in use. In this case, the calling : thread should set a flag in the user-space cache to : indicate that the thread that is using the descriptor : should perform the deletion operation. : : Is all of the above correct? : : The implementation depends on checking on whether : (events & ~EP_PRIVATE_BITS) == 0 : This replies on the fact that EPOLL_CTL_AD and EPOLL_CTL_MOD always : set EPOLLHUP and EPOLLERR in the 'events' mask, and EPOLLONESHOT : causes those flags (as well as all others in ~EP_PRIVATE_BITS) to be : cleared. : : A corollary to the previous paragraph is that using EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE : is only useful in conjunction with EPOLLONESHOT. However, as things : stand, one can use EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE on a file descriptor that does : not have EPOLLONESHOT set in 'events' This results in the following : (slightly surprising) behavior: : : (a) The first call to epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) returns 0 : (the indicator that the file descriptor can be safely deleted). : (b) The next call to epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) fails with EBUSY. : : This doesn't seem particularly useful, and in fact is probably an : indication that the user made a logic error: they should only be using : epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DISABLE) on a file descriptor for which : EPOLLONESHOT was set in 'events'. If that is correct, then would it : not make sense to return an error to user space for this case? Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: "Paton J. Lewis" <palewis@adobe.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-11-08 23:53:35 +00:00
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
#define PATH_ARR_SIZE 5
/*
* These are the number paths of length 1 to 5, that we are allowing to emanate
* from a single file of interest. For example, we allow 1000 paths of length
* 1, to emanate from each file of interest. This essentially represents the
* potential wakeup paths, which need to be limited in order to avoid massive
* uncontrolled wakeup storms. The common use case should be a single ep which
* is connected to n file sources. In this case each file source has 1 path
* of length 1. Thus, the numbers below should be more than sufficient. These
* path limits are enforced during an EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation, since a modify
* and delete can't add additional paths. Protected by the epmutex.
*/
static const int path_limits[PATH_ARR_SIZE] = { 1000, 500, 100, 50, 10 };
static int path_count[PATH_ARR_SIZE];
static int path_count_inc(int nests)
{
/* Allow an arbitrary number of depth 1 paths */
if (nests == 0)
return 0;
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
if (++path_count[nests] > path_limits[nests])
return -1;
return 0;
}
static void path_count_init(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < PATH_ARR_SIZE; i++)
path_count[i] = 0;
}
static int reverse_path_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
{
int error = 0;
struct file *file = priv;
struct file *child_file;
struct epitem *epi;
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
/* CTL_DEL can remove links here, but that can't increase our count */
rcu_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(epi, &file->f_ep_links, fllink) {
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
child_file = epi->ep->file;
if (is_file_epoll(child_file)) {
if (list_empty(&child_file->f_ep_links)) {
if (path_count_inc(call_nests)) {
error = -1;
break;
}
} else {
error = ep_call_nested(&poll_loop_ncalls,
reverse_path_check_proc,
child_file, child_file,
current);
}
if (error != 0)
break;
} else {
printk(KERN_ERR "reverse_path_check_proc: "
"file is not an ep!\n");
}
}
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
rcu_read_unlock();
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
return error;
}
/**
* reverse_path_check - The tfile_check_list is list of file *, which have
* links that are proposed to be newly added. We need to
* make sure that those added links don't add too many
* paths such that we will spend all our time waking up
* eventpoll objects.
*
* Returns: Returns zero if the proposed links don't create too many paths,
* -1 otherwise.
*/
static int reverse_path_check(void)
{
int error = 0;
struct file *current_file;
/* let's call this for all tfiles */
list_for_each_entry(current_file, &tfile_check_list, f_tfile_llink) {
path_count_init();
error = ep_call_nested(&poll_loop_ncalls,
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
reverse_path_check_proc, current_file,
current_file, current);
if (error)
break;
}
return error;
}
static int ep_create_wakeup_source(struct epitem *epi)
{
const char *name;
struct wakeup_source *ws;
if (!epi->ep->ws) {
epi->ep->ws = wakeup_source_register("eventpoll");
if (!epi->ep->ws)
return -ENOMEM;
}
name = epi->ffd.file->f_path.dentry->d_name.name;
ws = wakeup_source_register(name);
if (!ws)
return -ENOMEM;
rcu_assign_pointer(epi->ws, ws);
return 0;
}
/* rare code path, only used when EPOLL_CTL_MOD removes a wakeup source */
static noinline void ep_destroy_wakeup_source(struct epitem *epi)
{
struct wakeup_source *ws = ep_wakeup_source(epi);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(epi->ws, NULL);
/*
* wait for ep_pm_stay_awake_rcu to finish, synchronize_rcu is
* used internally by wakeup_source_remove, too (called by
* wakeup_source_unregister), so we cannot use call_rcu
*/
synchronize_rcu();
wakeup_source_unregister(ws);
}
/*
* Must be called with "mtx" held.
*/
static int ep_insert(struct eventpoll *ep, const struct epoll_event *event,
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
struct file *tfile, int fd, int full_check)
{
int error, pwake = 0;
__poll_t revents;
long user_watches;
struct epitem *epi;
struct ep_pqueue epq;
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
user_watches = atomic_long_read(&ep->user->epoll_watches);
if (unlikely(user_watches >= max_user_watches))
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
return -ENOSPC;
if (!(epi = kmem_cache_alloc(epi_cache, GFP_KERNEL)))
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
return -ENOMEM;
/* Item initialization follow here ... */
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epi->rdllink);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epi->fllink);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epi->pwqlist);
epi->ep = ep;
ep_set_ffd(&epi->ffd, tfile, fd);
epi->event = *event;
epi->nwait = 0;
epi->next = EP_UNACTIVE_PTR;
if (epi->event.events & EPOLLWAKEUP) {
error = ep_create_wakeup_source(epi);
if (error)
goto error_create_wakeup_source;
} else {
RCU_INIT_POINTER(epi->ws, NULL);
}
/* Initialize the poll table using the queue callback */
epq.epi = epi;
init_poll_funcptr(&epq.pt, ep_ptable_queue_proc);
/*
* Attach the item to the poll hooks and get current event bits.
* We can safely use the file* here because its usage count has
* been increased by the caller of this function. Note that after
* this operation completes, the poll callback can start hitting
* the new item.
*/
epoll: remove ep_call_nested() from ep_eventpoll_poll() The use of ep_call_nested() in ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is the .poll routine for an epoll fd, is used to prevent excessively deep epoll nesting, and to prevent circular paths. However, we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. In terms of too deep epoll chains, we do in fact allow deep nesting of the epoll fds themselves (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS), however we don't allow more than EP_MAX_NESTS when an epoll file descriptor is actually connected to a wakeup source. Thus, we do not require the use of ep_call_nested(), since ep_eventpoll_poll(), which is called via ep_scan_ready_list() only continues nesting if there are events available. Since ep_call_nested() is implemented using a global lock, applications that make use of nested epoll can see large performance improvements with this change. Davidlohr said: : Improvements are quite obscene actually, such as for the following : epoll_wait() benchmark with 2 level nesting on a 80 core IvyBridge: : : ncpus vanilla dirty delta : 1 2447092 3028315 +23.75% : 4 231265 2986954 +1191.57% : 8 121631 2898796 +2283.27% : 16 59749 2902056 +4757.07% : 32 26837 2326314 +8568.30% : 64 12926 1341281 +10276.61% : : (http://linux-scalability.org/epoll/epoll-test.c) Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509430214-5599-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:06 +00:00
revents = ep_item_poll(epi, &epq.pt, 1);
/*
* We have to check if something went wrong during the poll wait queue
* install process. Namely an allocation for a wait queue failed due
* high memory pressure.
*/
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
error = -ENOMEM;
if (epi->nwait < 0)
goto error_unregister;
/* Add the current item to the list of active epoll hook for this file */
spin_lock(&tfile->f_lock);
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
list_add_tail_rcu(&epi->fllink, &tfile->f_ep_links);
spin_unlock(&tfile->f_lock);
/*
* Add the current item to the RB tree. All RB tree operations are
* protected by "mtx", and ep_insert() is called with "mtx" held.
*/
ep_rbtree_insert(ep, epi);
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
/* now check if we've created too many backpaths */
error = -EINVAL;
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
if (full_check && reverse_path_check())
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
goto error_remove_epi;
/* We have to drop the new item inside our item list to keep track of it */
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
/* record NAPI ID of new item if present */
ep_set_busy_poll_napi_id(epi);
/* If the file is already "ready" we drop it inside the ready list */
if (revents && !ep_is_linked(epi)) {
list_add_tail(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
ep_pm_stay_awake(epi);
/* Notify waiting tasks that events are available */
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->wq))
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
wake_up(&ep->wq);
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->poll_wait))
pwake++;
}
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
atomic_long_inc(&ep->user->epoll_watches);
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
/* We have to call this outside the lock */
if (pwake)
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
ep_poll_safewake(&ep->poll_wait);
return 0;
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
error_remove_epi:
spin_lock(&tfile->f_lock);
epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu Nathan Zimmer found that once we get over 10+ cpus, the scalability of SPECjbb falls over due to the contention on the global 'epmutex', which is taken in on EPOLL_CTL_ADD and EPOLL_CTL_DEL operations. Patch #1 removes the 'epmutex' lock completely from the EPOLL_CTL_DEL path by using rcu to guard against any concurrent traversals. Patch #2 remove the 'epmutex' lock from EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations for simple topologies. IE when adding a link from an epoll file descriptor to a wakeup source, where the epoll file descriptor is not nested. This patch (of 2): Optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL such that it does not require the 'epmutex' by converting the file->f_ep_links list into an rcu one. In this way, we can traverse the epoll network on the add path in parallel with deletes. Since deletes can't create loops or worse wakeup paths, this is safe. This patch in combination with the patch "epoll: Do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies", shows a dramatic performance improvement in scalability for SPECjbb. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> CC: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:16 +00:00
list_del_rcu(&epi->fllink);
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
spin_unlock(&tfile->f_lock);
rb_erase_cached(&epi->rbn, &ep->rbr);
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
error_unregister:
ep_unregister_pollwait(ep, epi);
/*
* We need to do this because an event could have been arrived on some
* allocated wait queue. Note that we don't care about the ep->ovflist
* list, since that is used/cleaned only inside a section bound by "mtx".
* And ep_insert() is called with "mtx" held.
*/
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
if (ep_is_linked(epi))
epoll: optimizations and cleanups Epoll is doing multiple passes over the ready set at the moment, because of the constraints over the f_op->poll() call. Looking at the code again, I noticed that we already hold the epoll semaphore in read, and this (together with other locking conditions that hold while doing an epoll_wait()) can lead to a smarter way [1] to "ship" events to userspace (in a single pass). This is a stress application that can be used to test the new code. It spwans multiple thread and call epoll_wait() and epoll_ctl() from many threads. Stress tested on my dual Opteron 254 w/out any problems. http://www.xmailserver.org/totalmess.c This is not a benchmark, just something that tries to stress and exploit possible problems with the new code. Also, I made a stupid micro-benchmark: http://www.xmailserver.org/epwbench.c [1] Considering that epoll must be thread-safe, there are five ways we can be hit during an epoll_wait() transfer loop (ep_send_events()): 1) The epoll fd going away and calling ep_free This just can't happen, since we did an fget() in sys_epoll_wait 2) An epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL) This can't happen because epoll_ctl() gets ep->sem in write, and we're holding it in read during ep_send_events() 3) An fd stored inside the epoll fd going away This can't happen because in eventpoll_release_file() we get ep->sem in write, and we're holding it in read during ep_send_events() 4) Another epoll_wait() happening on another thread They both can be inside ep_send_events() at the same time, we get (splice) the ready-list under the spinlock, so each one will get its own ready list. Note that an fd cannot be at the same time inside more than one ready list, because ep_poll_callback() will not re-queue it if it sees it already linked: if (ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink)) goto is_linked; Another case that can happen, is two concurrent epoll_wait(), coming in with a userspace event buffer of size, say, ten. Suppose there are 50 event ready in the list. The first epoll_wait() will "steal" the whole list, while the second, seeing no events, will go to sleep. But at the end of ep_send_events() in the first epoll_wait(), we will re-inject surplus ready fds, and we will trigger the proper wake_up to the second epoll_wait(). 5) ep_poll_callback() hitting us asyncronously This is the tricky part. As I said above, the ep_is_linked() test done inside ep_poll_callback(), will guarantee us that until the item will result linked to a list, ep_poll_callback() will not try to re-queue it again (read, write data on any of its members). When we do a list_del() in ep_send_events(), the item will still satisfy the ep_is_linked() test (whatever data is written in prev/next, it'll never be its own pointer), so ep_poll_callback() will still leave us alone. It's only after the eventual smp_mb()+INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epi->rdllink) that it'll become visible to ep_poll_callback(), but at the point we're already past it. [akpm@osdl.org: 80 cols] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-08 07:25:41 +00:00
list_del_init(&epi->rdllink);
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
wakeup_source_unregister(ep_wakeup_source(epi));
error_create_wakeup_source:
kmem_cache_free(epi_cache, epi);
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
return error;
}
/*
* Modify the interest event mask by dropping an event if the new mask
* has a match in the current file status. Must be called with "mtx" held.
*/
static int ep_modify(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi,
const struct epoll_event *event)
{
int pwake = 0;
poll: add poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() functions In some cases the poll() implementation in a driver has to do different things depending on the events the caller wants to poll for. An example is when a driver needs to start a DMA engine if the caller polls for POLLIN, but doesn't want to do that if POLLIN is not requested but instead only POLLOUT or POLLPRI is requested. This is something that can happen in the video4linux subsystem among others. Unfortunately, the current epoll/poll/select implementation doesn't provide that information reliably. The poll_table_struct does have it: it has a key field with the event mask. But once a poll() call matches one or more bits of that mask any following poll() calls are passed a NULL poll_table pointer. Also, the eventpoll implementation always left the key field at ~0 instead of using the requested events mask. This was changed in eventpoll.c so the key field now contains the actual events that should be polled for as set by the caller. The solution to the NULL poll_table pointer is to set the qproc field to NULL in poll_table once poll() matches the events, not the poll_table pointer itself. That way drivers can obtain the mask through a new poll_requested_events inline. The poll_table_struct can still be NULL since some kernel code calls it internally (netfs_state_poll() in ./drivers/staging/pohmelfs/netfs.h). In that case poll_requested_events() returns ~0 (i.e. all events). Very rarely drivers might want to know whether poll_wait will actually wait. If another earlier file descriptor in the set already matched the events the caller wanted to wait for, then the kernel will return from the select() call without waiting. This might be useful information in order to avoid doing expensive work. A new helper function poll_does_not_wait() is added that drivers can use to detect this situation. This is now used in sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h. This was the only place in the kernel that needed this information. Drivers should no longer access any of the poll_table internals, but use the poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() access functions instead. In order to enforce that the poll_table fields are now prepended with an underscore and a comment was added warning against using them directly. This required a change in unix_dgram_poll() in unix/af_unix.c which used the key field to get the requested events. It's been replaced by a call to poll_requested_events(). For qproc it was especially important to change its name since the behavior of that field changes with this patch since this function pointer can now be NULL when that wasn't possible in the past. Any driver accessing the qproc or key fields directly will now fail to compile. Some notes regarding the correctness of this patch: the driver's poll() function is called with a 'struct poll_table_struct *wait' argument. This pointer may or may not be NULL, drivers can never rely on it being one or the other as that depends on whether or not an earlier file descriptor in the select()'s fdset matched the requested events. There are only three things a driver can do with the wait argument: 1) obtain the key field: events = wait ? wait->key : ~0; This will still work although it should be replaced with the new poll_requested_events() function (which does exactly the same). This will now even work better, since wait is no longer set to NULL unnecessarily. 2) use the qproc callback. This could be deadly since qproc can now be NULL. Renaming qproc should prevent this from happening. There are no kernel drivers that actually access this callback directly, BTW. 3) test whether wait == NULL to determine whether poll would return without waiting. This is no longer sufficient as the correct test is now wait == NULL || wait->_qproc == NULL. However, the worst that can happen here is a slight performance hit in the case where wait != NULL and wait->_qproc == NULL. In that case the driver will assume that poll_wait() will actually add the fd to the set of waiting file descriptors. Of course, poll_wait() will not do that since it tests for wait->_qproc. This will not break anything, though. There is only one place in the whole kernel where this happens (sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h) and that code will be replaced by a call to poll_does_not_wait() in the next patch. Note that even if wait->_qproc != NULL drivers cannot rely on poll_wait() actually waiting. The next file descriptor from the set might match the event mask and thus any possible waits will never happen. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Reviewed-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-03-23 22:02:27 +00:00
poll_table pt;
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
poll: add poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() functions In some cases the poll() implementation in a driver has to do different things depending on the events the caller wants to poll for. An example is when a driver needs to start a DMA engine if the caller polls for POLLIN, but doesn't want to do that if POLLIN is not requested but instead only POLLOUT or POLLPRI is requested. This is something that can happen in the video4linux subsystem among others. Unfortunately, the current epoll/poll/select implementation doesn't provide that information reliably. The poll_table_struct does have it: it has a key field with the event mask. But once a poll() call matches one or more bits of that mask any following poll() calls are passed a NULL poll_table pointer. Also, the eventpoll implementation always left the key field at ~0 instead of using the requested events mask. This was changed in eventpoll.c so the key field now contains the actual events that should be polled for as set by the caller. The solution to the NULL poll_table pointer is to set the qproc field to NULL in poll_table once poll() matches the events, not the poll_table pointer itself. That way drivers can obtain the mask through a new poll_requested_events inline. The poll_table_struct can still be NULL since some kernel code calls it internally (netfs_state_poll() in ./drivers/staging/pohmelfs/netfs.h). In that case poll_requested_events() returns ~0 (i.e. all events). Very rarely drivers might want to know whether poll_wait will actually wait. If another earlier file descriptor in the set already matched the events the caller wanted to wait for, then the kernel will return from the select() call without waiting. This might be useful information in order to avoid doing expensive work. A new helper function poll_does_not_wait() is added that drivers can use to detect this situation. This is now used in sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h. This was the only place in the kernel that needed this information. Drivers should no longer access any of the poll_table internals, but use the poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() access functions instead. In order to enforce that the poll_table fields are now prepended with an underscore and a comment was added warning against using them directly. This required a change in unix_dgram_poll() in unix/af_unix.c which used the key field to get the requested events. It's been replaced by a call to poll_requested_events(). For qproc it was especially important to change its name since the behavior of that field changes with this patch since this function pointer can now be NULL when that wasn't possible in the past. Any driver accessing the qproc or key fields directly will now fail to compile. Some notes regarding the correctness of this patch: the driver's poll() function is called with a 'struct poll_table_struct *wait' argument. This pointer may or may not be NULL, drivers can never rely on it being one or the other as that depends on whether or not an earlier file descriptor in the select()'s fdset matched the requested events. There are only three things a driver can do with the wait argument: 1) obtain the key field: events = wait ? wait->key : ~0; This will still work although it should be replaced with the new poll_requested_events() function (which does exactly the same). This will now even work better, since wait is no longer set to NULL unnecessarily. 2) use the qproc callback. This could be deadly since qproc can now be NULL. Renaming qproc should prevent this from happening. There are no kernel drivers that actually access this callback directly, BTW. 3) test whether wait == NULL to determine whether poll would return without waiting. This is no longer sufficient as the correct test is now wait == NULL || wait->_qproc == NULL. However, the worst that can happen here is a slight performance hit in the case where wait != NULL and wait->_qproc == NULL. In that case the driver will assume that poll_wait() will actually add the fd to the set of waiting file descriptors. Of course, poll_wait() will not do that since it tests for wait->_qproc. This will not break anything, though. There is only one place in the whole kernel where this happens (sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h) and that code will be replaced by a call to poll_does_not_wait() in the next patch. Note that even if wait->_qproc != NULL drivers cannot rely on poll_wait() actually waiting. The next file descriptor from the set might match the event mask and thus any possible waits will never happen. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Reviewed-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-03-23 22:02:27 +00:00
init_poll_funcptr(&pt, NULL);
/*
* Set the new event interest mask before calling f_op->poll();
* otherwise we might miss an event that happens between the
* f_op->poll() call and the new event set registering.
*/
epi->event.events = event->events; /* need barrier below */
epi->event.data = event->data; /* protected by mtx */
if (epi->event.events & EPOLLWAKEUP) {
if (!ep_has_wakeup_source(epi))
ep_create_wakeup_source(epi);
} else if (ep_has_wakeup_source(epi)) {
ep_destroy_wakeup_source(epi);
}
/*
* The following barrier has two effects:
*
* 1) Flush epi changes above to other CPUs. This ensures
* we do not miss events from ep_poll_callback if an
* event occurs immediately after we call f_op->poll().
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
* We need this because we did not take ep->lock while
* changing epi above (but ep_poll_callback does take
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
* ep->lock).
*
* 2) We also need to ensure we do not miss _past_ events
* when calling f_op->poll(). This barrier also
* pairs with the barrier in wq_has_sleeper (see
* comments for wq_has_sleeper).
*
* This barrier will now guarantee ep_poll_callback or f_op->poll
* (or both) will notice the readiness of an item.
*/
smp_mb();
/*
* Get current event bits. We can safely use the file* here because
* its usage count has been increased by the caller of this function.
* If the item is "hot" and it is not registered inside the ready
* list, push it inside.
*/
if (ep_item_poll(epi, &pt, 1)) {
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
if (!ep_is_linked(epi)) {
list_add_tail(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
ep_pm_stay_awake(epi);
/* Notify waiting tasks that events are available */
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->wq))
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
wake_up(&ep->wq);
if (waitqueue_active(&ep->poll_wait))
pwake++;
}
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
}
/* We have to call this outside the lock */
if (pwake)
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
ep_poll_safewake(&ep->poll_wait);
return 0;
}
static __poll_t ep_send_events_proc(struct eventpoll *ep, struct list_head *head,
void *priv)
{
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
struct ep_send_events_data *esed = priv;
__poll_t revents;
struct epitem *epi, *tmp;
struct epoll_event __user *uevent = esed->events;
struct wakeup_source *ws;
poll: add poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() functions In some cases the poll() implementation in a driver has to do different things depending on the events the caller wants to poll for. An example is when a driver needs to start a DMA engine if the caller polls for POLLIN, but doesn't want to do that if POLLIN is not requested but instead only POLLOUT or POLLPRI is requested. This is something that can happen in the video4linux subsystem among others. Unfortunately, the current epoll/poll/select implementation doesn't provide that information reliably. The poll_table_struct does have it: it has a key field with the event mask. But once a poll() call matches one or more bits of that mask any following poll() calls are passed a NULL poll_table pointer. Also, the eventpoll implementation always left the key field at ~0 instead of using the requested events mask. This was changed in eventpoll.c so the key field now contains the actual events that should be polled for as set by the caller. The solution to the NULL poll_table pointer is to set the qproc field to NULL in poll_table once poll() matches the events, not the poll_table pointer itself. That way drivers can obtain the mask through a new poll_requested_events inline. The poll_table_struct can still be NULL since some kernel code calls it internally (netfs_state_poll() in ./drivers/staging/pohmelfs/netfs.h). In that case poll_requested_events() returns ~0 (i.e. all events). Very rarely drivers might want to know whether poll_wait will actually wait. If another earlier file descriptor in the set already matched the events the caller wanted to wait for, then the kernel will return from the select() call without waiting. This might be useful information in order to avoid doing expensive work. A new helper function poll_does_not_wait() is added that drivers can use to detect this situation. This is now used in sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h. This was the only place in the kernel that needed this information. Drivers should no longer access any of the poll_table internals, but use the poll_requested_events() and poll_does_not_wait() access functions instead. In order to enforce that the poll_table fields are now prepended with an underscore and a comment was added warning against using them directly. This required a change in unix_dgram_poll() in unix/af_unix.c which used the key field to get the requested events. It's been replaced by a call to poll_requested_events(). For qproc it was especially important to change its name since the behavior of that field changes with this patch since this function pointer can now be NULL when that wasn't possible in the past. Any driver accessing the qproc or key fields directly will now fail to compile. Some notes regarding the correctness of this patch: the driver's poll() function is called with a 'struct poll_table_struct *wait' argument. This pointer may or may not be NULL, drivers can never rely on it being one or the other as that depends on whether or not an earlier file descriptor in the select()'s fdset matched the requested events. There are only three things a driver can do with the wait argument: 1) obtain the key field: events = wait ? wait->key : ~0; This will still work although it should be replaced with the new poll_requested_events() function (which does exactly the same). This will now even work better, since wait is no longer set to NULL unnecessarily. 2) use the qproc callback. This could be deadly since qproc can now be NULL. Renaming qproc should prevent this from happening. There are no kernel drivers that actually access this callback directly, BTW. 3) test whether wait == NULL to determine whether poll would return without waiting. This is no longer sufficient as the correct test is now wait == NULL || wait->_qproc == NULL. However, the worst that can happen here is a slight performance hit in the case where wait != NULL and wait->_qproc == NULL. In that case the driver will assume that poll_wait() will actually add the fd to the set of waiting file descriptors. Of course, poll_wait() will not do that since it tests for wait->_qproc. This will not break anything, though. There is only one place in the whole kernel where this happens (sock_poll_wait() in include/net/sock.h) and that code will be replaced by a call to poll_does_not_wait() in the next patch. Note that even if wait->_qproc != NULL drivers cannot rely on poll_wait() actually waiting. The next file descriptor from the set might match the event mask and thus any possible waits will never happen. Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@cisco.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Reviewed-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-03-23 22:02:27 +00:00
poll_table pt;
init_poll_funcptr(&pt, NULL);
esed->res = 0;
/*
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
* We can loop without lock because we are passed a task private list.
* Items cannot vanish during the loop because ep_scan_ready_list() is
* holding "mtx" during this call.
*/
lockdep_assert_held(&ep->mtx);
list_for_each_entry_safe(epi, tmp, head, rdllink) {
if (esed->res >= esed->maxevents)
break;
/*
* Activate ep->ws before deactivating epi->ws to prevent
* triggering auto-suspend here (in case we reactive epi->ws
* below).
*
* This could be rearranged to delay the deactivation of epi->ws
* instead, but then epi->ws would temporarily be out of sync
* with ep_is_linked().
*/
ws = ep_wakeup_source(epi);
if (ws) {
if (ws->active)
__pm_stay_awake(ep->ws);
__pm_relax(ws);
}
list_del_init(&epi->rdllink);
/*
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
* If the event mask intersect the caller-requested one,
* deliver the event to userspace. Again, ep_scan_ready_list()
* is holding ep->mtx, so no operations coming from userspace
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
* can change the item.
*/
revents = ep_item_poll(epi, &pt, 1);
if (!revents)
continue;
if (__put_user(revents, &uevent->events) ||
__put_user(epi->event.data, &uevent->data)) {
list_add(&epi->rdllink, head);
ep_pm_stay_awake(epi);
if (!esed->res)
esed->res = -EFAULT;
return 0;
}
esed->res++;
uevent++;
if (epi->event.events & EPOLLONESHOT)
epi->event.events &= EP_PRIVATE_BITS;
else if (!(epi->event.events & EPOLLET)) {
/*
* If this file has been added with Level
* Trigger mode, we need to insert back inside
* the ready list, so that the next call to
* epoll_wait() will check again the events
* availability. At this point, no one can insert
* into ep->rdllist besides us. The epoll_ctl()
* callers are locked out by
* ep_scan_ready_list() holding "mtx" and the
* poll callback will queue them in ep->ovflist.
*/
list_add_tail(&epi->rdllink, &ep->rdllist);
ep_pm_stay_awake(epi);
}
}
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
return 0;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
}
static int ep_send_events(struct eventpoll *ep,
struct epoll_event __user *events, int maxevents)
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
{
struct ep_send_events_data esed;
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
esed.maxevents = maxevents;
esed.events = events;
epoll: optimizations and cleanups Epoll is doing multiple passes over the ready set at the moment, because of the constraints over the f_op->poll() call. Looking at the code again, I noticed that we already hold the epoll semaphore in read, and this (together with other locking conditions that hold while doing an epoll_wait()) can lead to a smarter way [1] to "ship" events to userspace (in a single pass). This is a stress application that can be used to test the new code. It spwans multiple thread and call epoll_wait() and epoll_ctl() from many threads. Stress tested on my dual Opteron 254 w/out any problems. http://www.xmailserver.org/totalmess.c This is not a benchmark, just something that tries to stress and exploit possible problems with the new code. Also, I made a stupid micro-benchmark: http://www.xmailserver.org/epwbench.c [1] Considering that epoll must be thread-safe, there are five ways we can be hit during an epoll_wait() transfer loop (ep_send_events()): 1) The epoll fd going away and calling ep_free This just can't happen, since we did an fget() in sys_epoll_wait 2) An epoll_ctl(EPOLL_CTL_DEL) This can't happen because epoll_ctl() gets ep->sem in write, and we're holding it in read during ep_send_events() 3) An fd stored inside the epoll fd going away This can't happen because in eventpoll_release_file() we get ep->sem in write, and we're holding it in read during ep_send_events() 4) Another epoll_wait() happening on another thread They both can be inside ep_send_events() at the same time, we get (splice) the ready-list under the spinlock, so each one will get its own ready list. Note that an fd cannot be at the same time inside more than one ready list, because ep_poll_callback() will not re-queue it if it sees it already linked: if (ep_is_linked(&epi->rdllink)) goto is_linked; Another case that can happen, is two concurrent epoll_wait(), coming in with a userspace event buffer of size, say, ten. Suppose there are 50 event ready in the list. The first epoll_wait() will "steal" the whole list, while the second, seeing no events, will go to sleep. But at the end of ep_send_events() in the first epoll_wait(), we will re-inject surplus ready fds, and we will trigger the proper wake_up to the second epoll_wait(). 5) ep_poll_callback() hitting us asyncronously This is the tricky part. As I said above, the ep_is_linked() test done inside ep_poll_callback(), will guarantee us that until the item will result linked to a list, ep_poll_callback() will not try to re-queue it again (read, write data on any of its members). When we do a list_del() in ep_send_events(), the item will still satisfy the ep_is_linked() test (whatever data is written in prev/next, it'll never be its own pointer), so ep_poll_callback() will still leave us alone. It's only after the eventual smp_mb()+INIT_LIST_HEAD(&epi->rdllink) that it'll become visible to ep_poll_callback(), but at the point we're already past it. [akpm@osdl.org: 80 cols] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2007-05-08 07:25:41 +00:00
ep_scan_ready_list(ep, ep_send_events_proc, &esed, 0, false);
return esed.res;
}
static inline struct timespec64 ep_set_mstimeout(long ms)
{
struct timespec64 now, ts = {
.tv_sec = ms / MSEC_PER_SEC,
.tv_nsec = NSEC_PER_MSEC * (ms % MSEC_PER_SEC),
};
ktime_get_ts64(&now);
return timespec64_add_safe(now, ts);
}
/**
* ep_poll - Retrieves ready events, and delivers them to the caller supplied
* event buffer.
*
* @ep: Pointer to the eventpoll context.
* @events: Pointer to the userspace buffer where the ready events should be
* stored.
* @maxevents: Size (in terms of number of events) of the caller event buffer.
* @timeout: Maximum timeout for the ready events fetch operation, in
* milliseconds. If the @timeout is zero, the function will not block,
* while if the @timeout is less than zero, the function will block
* until at least one event has been retrieved (or an error
* occurred).
*
* Returns: Returns the number of ready events which have been fetched, or an
* error code, in case of error.
*/
static int ep_poll(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epoll_event __user *events,
int maxevents, long timeout)
{
int res = 0, eavail, timed_out = 0;
timer: convert timer_slack_ns from unsigned long to u64 This patchset introduces a /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface which would allow controlling processes to be able to set the timerslack value on other processes in order to save power by avoiding wakeups (Something Android currently does via out-of-tree patches). The first patch tries to fix the internal timer_slack_ns usage which was defined as a long, which limits the slack range to ~4 seconds on 32bit systems. It converts it to a u64, which provides the same basically unlimited slack (500 years) on both 32bit and 64bit machines. The second patch introduces the /proc/<pid>/timerslack_ns interface which allows the full 64bit slack range for a task to be read or set on both 32bit and 64bit machines. With these two patches, on a 32bit machine, after setting the slack on bash to 10 seconds: $ time sleep 1 real 0m10.747s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.005s The first patch is a little ugly, since I had to chase the slack delta arguments through a number of functions converting them to u64s. Let me know if it makes sense to break that up more or not. Other than that things are fairly straightforward. This patch (of 2): The timer_slack_ns value in the task struct is currently a unsigned long. This means that on 32bit applications, the maximum slack is just over 4 seconds. However, on 64bit machines, its much much larger (~500 years). This disparity could make application development a little (as well as the default_slack) to a u64. This means both 32bit and 64bit systems have the same effective internal slack range. Now the existing ABI via PR_GET_TIMERSLACK and PR_SET_TIMERSLACK specify the interface as a unsigned long, so we preserve that limitation on 32bit systems, where SET_TIMERSLACK can only set the slack to a unsigned long value, and GET_TIMERSLACK will return ULONG_MAX if the slack is actually larger then what can be stored by an unsigned long. This patch also modifies hrtimer functions which specified the slack delta as a unsigned long. Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Oren Laadan <orenl@cellrox.com> Cc: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com> Cc: Rom Lemarchand <romlem@android.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-03-17 21:20:51 +00:00
u64 slack = 0;
bool waiter = false;
wait_queue_entry_t wait;
ktime_t expires, *to = NULL;
lockdep_assert_irqs_enabled();
if (timeout > 0) {
struct timespec64 end_time = ep_set_mstimeout(timeout);
slack = select_estimate_accuracy(&end_time);
to = &expires;
*to = timespec64_to_ktime(end_time);
} else if (timeout == 0) {
/*
* Avoid the unnecessary trip to the wait queue loop, if the
* caller specified a non blocking operation. We still need
* lock because we could race and not see an epi being added
* to the ready list while in irq callback. Thus incorrectly
* returning 0 back to userspace.
*/
timed_out = 1;
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_lock_irq(&ep->lock);
eavail = ep_events_available(ep);
epoll: use rwlock in order to reduce ep_poll_callback() contention The goal of this patch is to reduce contention of ep_poll_callback() which can be called concurrently from different CPUs in case of high events rates and many fds per epoll. Problem can be very well reproduced by generating events (write to pipe or eventfd) from many threads, while consumer thread does polling. In other words this patch increases the bandwidth of events which can be delivered from sources to the poller by adding poll items in a lockless way to the list. The main change is in replacement of the spinlock with a rwlock, which is taken on read in ep_poll_callback(), and then by adding poll items to the tail of the list using xchg atomic instruction. Write lock is taken everywhere else in order to stop list modifications and guarantee that list updates are fully completed (I assume that write side of a rwlock does not starve, it seems qrwlock implementation has these guarantees). The following are some microbenchmark results based on the test [1] which starts threads which generate N events each. The test ends when all events are successfully fetched by the poller thread: spinlock ======== threads events/ms run-time ms 8 6402 12495 16 7045 22709 32 7395 43268 rwlock + xchg ============= threads events/ms run-time ms 8 10038 7969 16 12178 13138 32 13223 24199 According to the results bandwidth of delivered events is significantly increased, thus execution time is reduced. This patch was tested with different sort of microbenchmarks and artificial delays (e.g. "udelay(get_random_int() & 0xff)") introduced in kernel on paths where items are added to lists. [1] https://github.com/rouming/test-tools/blob/master/stress-epoll.c Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190103150104.17128-5-rpenyaev@suse.de Signed-off-by: Roman Penyaev <rpenyaev@suse.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-03-08 00:28:53 +00:00
write_unlock_irq(&ep->lock);
goto send_events;
}
fetch_events:
if (!ep_events_available(ep))
ep_busy_loop(ep, timed_out);
eavail = ep_events_available(ep);
if (eavail)
goto send_events;
/*
* Busy poll timed out. Drop NAPI ID for now, we can add
* it back in when we have moved a socket with a valid NAPI
* ID onto the ready list.
*/
ep_reset_busy_poll_napi_id(ep);
/*
* We don't have any available event to return to the caller. We need
* to sleep here, and we will be woken by ep_poll_callback() when events
* become available.
*/
if (!waiter) {
waiter = true;
init_waitqueue_entry(&wait, current);
spin_lock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
__add_wait_queue_exclusive(&ep->wq, &wait);
spin_unlock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
}
for (;;) {
/*
* We don't want to sleep if the ep_poll_callback() sends us
* a wakeup in between. That's why we set the task state
* to TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE before doing the checks.
*/
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
/*
* Always short-circuit for fatal signals to allow
* threads to make a timely exit without the chance of
* finding more events available and fetching
* repeatedly.
*/
if (fatal_signal_pending(current)) {
res = -EINTR;
break;
}
eavail = ep_events_available(ep);
if (eavail)
break;
if (signal_pending(current)) {
res = -EINTR;
break;
}
if (!schedule_hrtimeout_range(to, slack, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS)) {
timed_out = 1;
break;
}
}
__set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
send_events:
/*
* Try to transfer events to user space. In case we get 0 events and
* there's still timeout left over, we go trying again in search of
* more luck.
*/
if (!res && eavail &&
!(res = ep_send_events(ep, events, maxevents)) && !timed_out)
goto fetch_events;
if (waiter) {
spin_lock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
__remove_wait_queue(&ep->wq, &wait);
spin_unlock_irq(&ep->wq.lock);
}
return res;
}
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
/**
* ep_loop_check_proc - Callback function to be passed to the @ep_call_nested()
* API, to verify that adding an epoll file inside another
* epoll structure, does not violate the constraints, in
* terms of closed loops, or too deep chains (which can
* result in excessive stack usage).
*
* @priv: Pointer to the epoll file to be currently checked.
* @cookie: Original cookie for this call. This is the top-of-the-chain epoll
* data structure pointer.
* @call_nests: Current dept of the @ep_call_nested() call stack.
*
* Returns: Returns zero if adding the epoll @file inside current epoll
* structure @ep does not violate the constraints, or -1 otherwise.
*/
static int ep_loop_check_proc(void *priv, void *cookie, int call_nests)
{
int error = 0;
struct file *file = priv;
struct eventpoll *ep = file->private_data;
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
struct eventpoll *ep_tovisit;
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
struct rb_node *rbp;
struct epitem *epi;
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, call_nests + 1);
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
ep->visited = 1;
list_add(&ep->visited_list_link, &visited_list);
for (rbp = rb_first_cached(&ep->rbr); rbp; rbp = rb_next(rbp)) {
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
epi = rb_entry(rbp, struct epitem, rbn);
if (unlikely(is_file_epoll(epi->ffd.file))) {
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
ep_tovisit = epi->ffd.file->private_data;
if (ep_tovisit->visited)
continue;
error = ep_call_nested(&poll_loop_ncalls,
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
ep_loop_check_proc, epi->ffd.file,
ep_tovisit, current);
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
if (error != 0)
break;
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
} else {
/*
* If we've reached a file that is not associated with
* an ep, then we need to check if the newly added
* links are going to add too many wakeup paths. We do
* this by adding it to the tfile_check_list, if it's
* not already there, and calling reverse_path_check()
* during ep_insert().
*/
if (list_empty(&epi->ffd.file->f_tfile_llink))
list_add(&epi->ffd.file->f_tfile_llink,
&tfile_check_list);
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
}
}
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
return error;
}
/**
* ep_loop_check - Performs a check to verify that adding an epoll file (@file)
* another epoll file (represented by @ep) does not create
* closed loops or too deep chains.
*
* @ep: Pointer to the epoll private data structure.
* @file: Pointer to the epoll file to be checked.
*
* Returns: Returns zero if adding the epoll @file inside current epoll
* structure @ep does not violate the constraints, or -1 otherwise.
*/
static int ep_loop_check(struct eventpoll *ep, struct file *file)
{
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
int ret;
struct eventpoll *ep_cur, *ep_next;
ret = ep_call_nested(&poll_loop_ncalls,
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
ep_loop_check_proc, file, ep, current);
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
/* clear visited list */
list_for_each_entry_safe(ep_cur, ep_next, &visited_list,
visited_list_link) {
ep_cur->visited = 0;
list_del(&ep_cur->visited_list_link);
}
return ret;
}
static void clear_tfile_check_list(void)
{
struct file *file;
/* first clear the tfile_check_list */
while (!list_empty(&tfile_check_list)) {
file = list_first_entry(&tfile_check_list, struct file,
f_tfile_llink);
list_del_init(&file->f_tfile_llink);
}
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tfile_check_list);
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
}
/*
* Open an eventpoll file descriptor.
*/
static int do_epoll_create(int flags)
{
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
int error, fd;
struct eventpoll *ep = NULL;
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
struct file *file;
/* Check the EPOLL_* constant for consistency. */
BUILD_BUG_ON(EPOLL_CLOEXEC != O_CLOEXEC);
if (flags & ~EPOLL_CLOEXEC)
return -EINVAL;
/*
* Create the internal data structure ("struct eventpoll").
*/
flag parameters add-on: remove epoll_create size param Remove the size parameter from the new epoll_create syscall and renames the syscall itself. The updated test program follows. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef __NR_epoll_create2 # ifdef __x86_64__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 291 # elif defined __i386__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 329 # else # error "need __NR_epoll_create2" # endif #endif #define EPOLL_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC int main (void) { int fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 0); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) failed"); return 1; } int coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if (coe & FD_CLOEXEC) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, EPOLL_CLOEXEC); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) failed"); return 1; } coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if ((coe & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); puts ("OK"); return 0; } ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Acked-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-24 04:29:43 +00:00
error = ep_alloc(&ep);
if (error < 0)
return error;
/*
* Creates all the items needed to setup an eventpoll file. That is,
* a file structure and a free file descriptor.
*/
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
fd = get_unused_fd_flags(O_RDWR | (flags & O_CLOEXEC));
if (fd < 0) {
error = fd;
goto out_free_ep;
}
file = anon_inode_getfile("[eventpoll]", &eventpoll_fops, ep,
O_RDWR | (flags & O_CLOEXEC));
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
if (IS_ERR(file)) {
error = PTR_ERR(file);
goto out_free_fd;
}
ep->file = file;
fd_install(fd, file);
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
return fd;
out_free_fd:
put_unused_fd(fd);
out_free_ep:
ep_free(ep);
return error;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE1(epoll_create1, int, flags)
{
return do_epoll_create(flags);
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE1(epoll_create, int, size)
flag parameters: epoll_create This patch adds the new epoll_create2 syscall. It extends the old epoll_create syscall by one parameter which is meant to hold a flag value. In this patch the only flag support is EPOLL_CLOEXEC which causes the close-on-exec flag for the returned file descriptor to be set. A new name EPOLL_CLOEXEC is introduced which in this implementation must have the same value as O_CLOEXEC. The following test must be adjusted for architectures other than x86 and x86-64 and in case the syscall numbers changed. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef __NR_epoll_create2 # ifdef __x86_64__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 291 # elif defined __i386__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 329 # else # error "need __NR_epoll_create2" # endif #endif #define EPOLL_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC int main (void) { int fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 1, 0); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) failed"); return 1; } int coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if (coe & FD_CLOEXEC) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 1, EPOLL_CLOEXEC); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) failed"); return 1; } coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if ((coe & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); puts ("OK"); return 0; } ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Acked-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-24 04:29:27 +00:00
{
if (size <= 0)
flag parameters add-on: remove epoll_create size param Remove the size parameter from the new epoll_create syscall and renames the syscall itself. The updated test program follows. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef __NR_epoll_create2 # ifdef __x86_64__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 291 # elif defined __i386__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 329 # else # error "need __NR_epoll_create2" # endif #endif #define EPOLL_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC int main (void) { int fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 0); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) failed"); return 1; } int coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if (coe & FD_CLOEXEC) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, EPOLL_CLOEXEC); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) failed"); return 1; } coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if ((coe & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); puts ("OK"); return 0; } ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Acked-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-24 04:29:43 +00:00
return -EINVAL;
return do_epoll_create(0);
flag parameters: epoll_create This patch adds the new epoll_create2 syscall. It extends the old epoll_create syscall by one parameter which is meant to hold a flag value. In this patch the only flag support is EPOLL_CLOEXEC which causes the close-on-exec flag for the returned file descriptor to be set. A new name EPOLL_CLOEXEC is introduced which in this implementation must have the same value as O_CLOEXEC. The following test must be adjusted for architectures other than x86 and x86-64 and in case the syscall numbers changed. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ #include <fcntl.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <time.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #ifndef __NR_epoll_create2 # ifdef __x86_64__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 291 # elif defined __i386__ # define __NR_epoll_create2 329 # else # error "need __NR_epoll_create2" # endif #endif #define EPOLL_CLOEXEC O_CLOEXEC int main (void) { int fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 1, 0); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) failed"); return 1; } int coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if (coe & FD_CLOEXEC) { puts ("epoll_create2(0) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); fd = syscall (__NR_epoll_create2, 1, EPOLL_CLOEXEC); if (fd == -1) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) failed"); return 1; } coe = fcntl (fd, F_GETFD); if (coe == -1) { puts ("fcntl failed"); return 1; } if ((coe & FD_CLOEXEC) == 0) { puts ("epoll_create2(EPOLL_CLOEXEC) set close-on-exec flag"); return 1; } close (fd); puts ("OK"); return 0; } ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Signed-off-by: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> Acked-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@googlemail.com> Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-07-24 04:29:27 +00:00
}
/*
* The following function implements the controller interface for
* the eventpoll file that enables the insertion/removal/change of
* file descriptors inside the interest set.
*/
SYSCALL_DEFINE4(epoll_ctl, int, epfd, int, op, int, fd,
struct epoll_event __user *, event)
{
int error;
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
int full_check = 0;
struct fd f, tf;
struct eventpoll *ep;
struct epitem *epi;
struct epoll_event epds;
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
struct eventpoll *tep = NULL;
error = -EFAULT;
if (ep_op_has_event(op) &&
copy_from_user(&epds, event, sizeof(struct epoll_event)))
goto error_return;
error = -EBADF;
f = fdget(epfd);
if (!f.file)
goto error_return;
/* Get the "struct file *" for the target file */
tf = fdget(fd);
if (!tf.file)
goto error_fput;
/* The target file descriptor must support poll */
error = -EPERM;
if (!file_can_poll(tf.file))
goto error_tgt_fput;
/* Check if EPOLLWAKEUP is allowed */
eventpoll: fix uninitialized variable in epoll_ctl When calling epoll_ctl with operation EPOLL_CTL_DEL, structure epds is not initialized but ep_take_care_of_epollwakeup reads its event field. When this unintialized field has EPOLLWAKEUP bit set, a capability check is done for CAP_BLOCK_SUSPEND in ep_take_care_of_epollwakeup. This produces unexpected messages in the audit log, such as (on a system running SELinux): type=AVC msg=audit(1408212798.866:410): avc: denied { block_suspend } for pid=7754 comm="dbus-daemon" capability=36 scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t tclass=capability2 permissive=1 type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1408212798.866:410): arch=c000003e syscall=233 success=yes exit=0 a0=3 a1=2 a2=9 a3=7fffd4d66ec0 items=0 ppid=1 pid=7754 auid=1000 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0 sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none) ses=3 comm="dbus-daemon" exe="/usr/bin/dbus-daemon" subj=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t key=(null) ("arch=c000003e syscall=233 a1=2" means "epoll_ctl(op=EPOLL_CTL_DEL)") Remove use of epds in epoll_ctl when op == EPOLL_CTL_DEL. Fixes: 4d7e30d98939 ("epoll: Add a flag, EPOLLWAKEUP, to prevent suspend while epoll events are ready") Signed-off-by: Nicolas Iooss <nicolas.iooss_linux@m4x.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2014-09-09 21:50:51 +00:00
if (ep_op_has_event(op))
ep_take_care_of_epollwakeup(&epds);
/*
* We have to check that the file structure underneath the file descriptor
* the user passed to us _is_ an eventpoll file. And also we do not permit
* adding an epoll file descriptor inside itself.
*/
error = -EINVAL;
if (f.file == tf.file || !is_file_epoll(f.file))
goto error_tgt_fput;
epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag Currently, epoll file descriptors or epfds (the fd returned from epoll_create[1]()) that are added to a shared wakeup source are always added in a non-exclusive manner. This means that when we have multiple epfds attached to a shared fd source they are all woken up. This creates thundering herd type behavior. Introduce a new 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag that can be passed as part of the 'event' argument during an epoll_ctl() EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation. This new flag allows for exclusive wakeups when there are multiple epfds attached to a shared fd event source. The implementation walks the list of exclusive waiters, and queues an event to each epfd, until it finds the first waiter that has threads blocked on it via epoll_wait(). The idea is to search for threads which are idle and ready to process the wakeup events. Thus, we queue an event to at least 1 epfd, but may still potentially queue an event to all epfds that are attached to the shared fd source. Performance testing was done by Madars Vitolins using a modified version of Enduro/X. The use of the 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag reduce the length of this particular workload from 860s down to 24s. Sample epoll_clt text: EPOLLEXCLUSIVE Sets an exclusive wakeup mode for the epfd file descriptor that is being attached to the target file descriptor, fd. Thus, when an event occurs and multiple epfd file descriptors are attached to the same target file using EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, one or more epfds will receive an event with epoll_wait(2). The default in this scenario (when EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not set) is for all epfds to receive an event. EPOLLEXCLUSIVE may only be specified with the op EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-20 22:59:24 +00:00
/*
* epoll adds to the wakeup queue at EPOLL_CTL_ADD time only,
* so EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not allowed for a EPOLL_CTL_MOD operation.
* Also, we do not currently supported nested exclusive wakeups.
*/
if (ep_op_has_event(op) && (epds.events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)) {
epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT In the current implementation of the EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag (added for 4.5-rc1), if epoll waiters create different POLL* sets and register them as exclusive against the same target fd, the current implementation will stop waking any further waiters once it finds the first idle waiter. This means that waiters could miss wakeups in certain cases. For example, when we wake up a pipe for reading we do: wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM); So if one epoll set or epfd is added to pipe p with POLLIN and a second set epfd2 is added to pipe p with POLLRDNORM, only epfd may receive the wakeup since the current implementation will stop after it finds any intersection of events with a waiter that is blocked in epoll_wait(). We could potentially address this by requiring all epoll waiters that are added to p be required to pass the same set of POLL* events. IE the first EPOLL_CTL_ADD that passes EPOLLEXCLUSIVE establishes the set POLL* flags to be used by any other epfds that are added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. However, I think it might be somewhat confusing interface as we would have to reference count the number of users for that set, and so userspace would have to keep track of that count, or we would need a more involved interface. It also adds some shared state that we'd have store somewhere. I don't think anybody will want to bloat __wait_queue_head for this. I think what we could do instead, is to simply restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE such that it can only be specified with EPOLLIN and/or EPOLLOUT. So that way if the wakeup includes 'POLLIN' and not 'POLLOUT', we can stop once we hit the first idle waiter that specifies the EPOLLIN bit, since any remaining waiters that only have 'POLLOUT' set wouldn't need to be woken. Likewise, we can do the same thing if 'POLLOUT' is in the wakeup bit set and not 'POLLIN'. If both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' are set in the wake bit set (there is at least one example of this I saw in fs/pipe.c), then we just wake the entire exclusive list. Having both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' both set should not be on any performance critical path, so I think that's ok (in fs/pipe.c its in pipe_release()). We also continue to include EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP by default in any exclusive set. Thus, the user can specify EPOLLERR and/or EPOLLHUP but is not required to do so. Since epoll waiters may be interested in other events as well besides EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP, these can still be added by doing a 'dup' call on the target fd and adding that as one normally would with EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Since I think that the POLLIN and POLLOUT events are what we are interest in balancing, I think that the 'dup' thing could perhaps be added to only one of the waiter threads. However, I think that EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP should be sufficient for the majority of use-cases. Since EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is intended to be used with a target fd shared among multiple epfds, where between 1 and n of the epfds may receive an event, it does not satisfy the semantics of EPOLLONESHOT where only 1 epfd would get an event. Thus, it is not allowed to be specified in conjunction with EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. EPOLL_CTL_MOD is also not allowed if the fd was previously added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. It seems with the limited number of flags to not be as interesting, but this could be relaxed at some further point. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-05 23:37:04 +00:00
if (op == EPOLL_CTL_MOD)
goto error_tgt_fput;
if (op == EPOLL_CTL_ADD && (is_file_epoll(tf.file) ||
(epds.events & ~EPOLLEXCLUSIVE_OK_BITS)))
goto error_tgt_fput;
}
epoll: add EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag Currently, epoll file descriptors or epfds (the fd returned from epoll_create[1]()) that are added to a shared wakeup source are always added in a non-exclusive manner. This means that when we have multiple epfds attached to a shared fd source they are all woken up. This creates thundering herd type behavior. Introduce a new 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag that can be passed as part of the 'event' argument during an epoll_ctl() EPOLL_CTL_ADD operation. This new flag allows for exclusive wakeups when there are multiple epfds attached to a shared fd event source. The implementation walks the list of exclusive waiters, and queues an event to each epfd, until it finds the first waiter that has threads blocked on it via epoll_wait(). The idea is to search for threads which are idle and ready to process the wakeup events. Thus, we queue an event to at least 1 epfd, but may still potentially queue an event to all epfds that are attached to the shared fd source. Performance testing was done by Madars Vitolins using a modified version of Enduro/X. The use of the 'EPOLLEXCLUSIVE' flag reduce the length of this particular workload from 860s down to 24s. Sample epoll_clt text: EPOLLEXCLUSIVE Sets an exclusive wakeup mode for the epfd file descriptor that is being attached to the target file descriptor, fd. Thus, when an event occurs and multiple epfd file descriptors are attached to the same target file using EPOLLEXCLUSIVE, one or more epfds will receive an event with epoll_wait(2). The default in this scenario (when EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is not set) is for all epfds to receive an event. EPOLLEXCLUSIVE may only be specified with the op EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-01-20 22:59:24 +00:00
/*
* At this point it is safe to assume that the "private_data" contains
* our own data structure.
*/
ep = f.file->private_data;
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
/*
* When we insert an epoll file descriptor, inside another epoll file
* descriptor, there is the change of creating closed loops, which are
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
* better be handled here, than in more critical paths. While we are
* checking for loops we also determine the list of files reachable
* and hang them on the tfile_check_list, so we can check that we
* haven't created too many possible wakeup paths.
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
*
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
* We do not need to take the global 'epumutex' on EPOLL_CTL_ADD when
* the epoll file descriptor is attaching directly to a wakeup source,
* unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the
* 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex toplogies such as loops and
* deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple
* EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations.
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
*/
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, 0);
epoll: limit paths The current epoll code can be tickled to run basically indefinitely in both loop detection path check (on ep_insert()), and in the wakeup paths. The programs that tickle this behavior set up deeply linked networks of epoll file descriptors that cause the epoll algorithms to traverse them indefinitely. A couple of these sample programs have been previously posted in this thread: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/25/297. To fix the loop detection path check algorithms, I simply keep track of the epoll nodes that have been already visited. Thus, the loop detection becomes proportional to the number of epoll file descriptor and links. This dramatically decreases the run-time of the loop check algorithm. In one diabolical case I tried it reduced the run-time from 15 mintues (all in kernel time) to .3 seconds. Fixing the wakeup paths could be done at wakeup time in a similar manner by keeping track of nodes that have already been visited, but the complexity is harder, since there can be multiple wakeups on different cpus...Thus, I've opted to limit the number of possible wakeup paths when the paths are created. This is accomplished, by noting that the end file descriptor points that are found during the loop detection pass (from the newly added link), are actually the sources for wakeup events. I keep a list of these file descriptors and limit the number and length of these paths that emanate from these 'source file descriptors'. In the current implemetation I allow 1000 paths of length 1, 500 of length 2, 100 of length 3, 50 of length 4 and 10 of length 5. Note that it is sufficient to check the 'source file descriptors' reachable from the newly added link, since no other 'source file descriptors' will have newly added links. This allows us to check only the wakeup paths that may have gotten too long, and not re-check all possible wakeup paths on the system. In terms of the path limit selection, I think its first worth noting that the most common case for epoll, is probably the model where you have 1 epoll file descriptor that is monitoring n number of 'source file descriptors'. In this case, each 'source file descriptor' has a 1 path of length 1. Thus, I believe that the limits I'm proposing are quite reasonable and in fact may be too generous. Thus, I'm hoping that the proposed limits will not prevent any workloads that currently work to fail. In terms of locking, I have extended the use of the 'epmutex' to all epoll_ctl add and remove operations. Currently its only used in a subset of the add paths. I need to hold the epmutex, so that we can correctly traverse a coherent graph, to check the number of paths. I believe that this additional locking is probably ok, since its in the setup/teardown paths, and doesn't affect the running paths, but it certainly is going to add some extra overhead. Also, worth noting is that the epmuex was recently added to the ep_ctl add operations in the initial path loop detection code using the argument that it was not on a critical path. Another thing to note here, is the length of epoll chains that is allowed. Currently, eventpoll.c defines: /* Maximum number of nesting allowed inside epoll sets */ #define EP_MAX_NESTS 4 This basically means that I am limited to a graph depth of 5 (EP_MAX_NESTS + 1). However, this limit is currently only enforced during the loop check detection code, and only when the epoll file descriptors are added in a certain order. Thus, this limit is currently easily bypassed. The newly added check for wakeup paths, stricly limits the wakeup paths to a length of 5, regardless of the order in which ep's are linked together. Thus, a side-effect of the new code is a more consistent enforcement of the graph depth. Thus far, I've tested this, using the sample programs previously mentioned, which now either return quickly or return -EINVAL. I've also testing using the piptest.c epoll tester, which showed no difference in performance. I've also created a number of different epoll networks and tested that they behave as expectded. I believe this solves the original diabolical test cases, while still preserving the sane epoll nesting. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-01-13 01:17:43 +00:00
if (op == EPOLL_CTL_ADD) {
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
if (!list_empty(&f.file->f_ep_links) ||
is_file_epoll(tf.file)) {
full_check = 1;
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
mutex_lock(&epmutex);
if (is_file_epoll(tf.file)) {
error = -ELOOP;
if (ep_loop_check(ep, tf.file) != 0) {
clear_tfile_check_list();
goto error_tgt_fput;
}
} else
list_add(&tf.file->f_tfile_llink,
&tfile_check_list);
mutex_lock_nested(&ep->mtx, 0);
if (is_file_epoll(tf.file)) {
tep = tf.file->private_data;
mutex_lock_nested(&tep->mtx, 1);
}
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
}
}
/*
* Try to lookup the file inside our RB tree, Since we grabbed "mtx"
* above, we can be sure to be able to use the item looked up by
* ep_find() till we release the mutex.
*/
epi = ep_find(ep, tf.file, fd);
error = -EINVAL;
switch (op) {
case EPOLL_CTL_ADD:
if (!epi) {
epds.events |= EPOLLERR | EPOLLHUP;
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
error = ep_insert(ep, &epds, tf.file, fd, full_check);
} else
error = -EEXIST;
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
if (full_check)
clear_tfile_check_list();
break;
case EPOLL_CTL_DEL:
if (epi)
error = ep_remove(ep, epi);
else
error = -ENOENT;
break;
case EPOLL_CTL_MOD:
if (epi) {
epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT In the current implementation of the EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag (added for 4.5-rc1), if epoll waiters create different POLL* sets and register them as exclusive against the same target fd, the current implementation will stop waking any further waiters once it finds the first idle waiter. This means that waiters could miss wakeups in certain cases. For example, when we wake up a pipe for reading we do: wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM); So if one epoll set or epfd is added to pipe p with POLLIN and a second set epfd2 is added to pipe p with POLLRDNORM, only epfd may receive the wakeup since the current implementation will stop after it finds any intersection of events with a waiter that is blocked in epoll_wait(). We could potentially address this by requiring all epoll waiters that are added to p be required to pass the same set of POLL* events. IE the first EPOLL_CTL_ADD that passes EPOLLEXCLUSIVE establishes the set POLL* flags to be used by any other epfds that are added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. However, I think it might be somewhat confusing interface as we would have to reference count the number of users for that set, and so userspace would have to keep track of that count, or we would need a more involved interface. It also adds some shared state that we'd have store somewhere. I don't think anybody will want to bloat __wait_queue_head for this. I think what we could do instead, is to simply restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE such that it can only be specified with EPOLLIN and/or EPOLLOUT. So that way if the wakeup includes 'POLLIN' and not 'POLLOUT', we can stop once we hit the first idle waiter that specifies the EPOLLIN bit, since any remaining waiters that only have 'POLLOUT' set wouldn't need to be woken. Likewise, we can do the same thing if 'POLLOUT' is in the wakeup bit set and not 'POLLIN'. If both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' are set in the wake bit set (there is at least one example of this I saw in fs/pipe.c), then we just wake the entire exclusive list. Having both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' both set should not be on any performance critical path, so I think that's ok (in fs/pipe.c its in pipe_release()). We also continue to include EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP by default in any exclusive set. Thus, the user can specify EPOLLERR and/or EPOLLHUP but is not required to do so. Since epoll waiters may be interested in other events as well besides EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP, these can still be added by doing a 'dup' call on the target fd and adding that as one normally would with EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Since I think that the POLLIN and POLLOUT events are what we are interest in balancing, I think that the 'dup' thing could perhaps be added to only one of the waiter threads. However, I think that EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP should be sufficient for the majority of use-cases. Since EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is intended to be used with a target fd shared among multiple epfds, where between 1 and n of the epfds may receive an event, it does not satisfy the semantics of EPOLLONESHOT where only 1 epfd would get an event. Thus, it is not allowed to be specified in conjunction with EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. EPOLL_CTL_MOD is also not allowed if the fd was previously added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. It seems with the limited number of flags to not be as interesting, but this could be relaxed at some further point. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-05 23:37:04 +00:00
if (!(epi->event.events & EPOLLEXCLUSIVE)) {
epds.events |= EPOLLERR | EPOLLHUP;
epoll: restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE to POLLIN and POLLOUT In the current implementation of the EPOLLEXCLUSIVE flag (added for 4.5-rc1), if epoll waiters create different POLL* sets and register them as exclusive against the same target fd, the current implementation will stop waking any further waiters once it finds the first idle waiter. This means that waiters could miss wakeups in certain cases. For example, when we wake up a pipe for reading we do: wake_up_interruptible_sync_poll(&pipe->wait, POLLIN | POLLRDNORM); So if one epoll set or epfd is added to pipe p with POLLIN and a second set epfd2 is added to pipe p with POLLRDNORM, only epfd may receive the wakeup since the current implementation will stop after it finds any intersection of events with a waiter that is blocked in epoll_wait(). We could potentially address this by requiring all epoll waiters that are added to p be required to pass the same set of POLL* events. IE the first EPOLL_CTL_ADD that passes EPOLLEXCLUSIVE establishes the set POLL* flags to be used by any other epfds that are added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. However, I think it might be somewhat confusing interface as we would have to reference count the number of users for that set, and so userspace would have to keep track of that count, or we would need a more involved interface. It also adds some shared state that we'd have store somewhere. I don't think anybody will want to bloat __wait_queue_head for this. I think what we could do instead, is to simply restrict EPOLLEXCLUSIVE such that it can only be specified with EPOLLIN and/or EPOLLOUT. So that way if the wakeup includes 'POLLIN' and not 'POLLOUT', we can stop once we hit the first idle waiter that specifies the EPOLLIN bit, since any remaining waiters that only have 'POLLOUT' set wouldn't need to be woken. Likewise, we can do the same thing if 'POLLOUT' is in the wakeup bit set and not 'POLLIN'. If both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' are set in the wake bit set (there is at least one example of this I saw in fs/pipe.c), then we just wake the entire exclusive list. Having both 'POLLOUT' and 'POLLIN' both set should not be on any performance critical path, so I think that's ok (in fs/pipe.c its in pipe_release()). We also continue to include EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP by default in any exclusive set. Thus, the user can specify EPOLLERR and/or EPOLLHUP but is not required to do so. Since epoll waiters may be interested in other events as well besides EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP, these can still be added by doing a 'dup' call on the target fd and adding that as one normally would with EPOLL_CTL_ADD. Since I think that the POLLIN and POLLOUT events are what we are interest in balancing, I think that the 'dup' thing could perhaps be added to only one of the waiter threads. However, I think that EPOLLIN, EPOLLOUT, EPOLLERR and EPOLLHUP should be sufficient for the majority of use-cases. Since EPOLLEXCLUSIVE is intended to be used with a target fd shared among multiple epfds, where between 1 and n of the epfds may receive an event, it does not satisfy the semantics of EPOLLONESHOT where only 1 epfd would get an event. Thus, it is not allowed to be specified in conjunction with EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. EPOLL_CTL_MOD is also not allowed if the fd was previously added as EPOLLEXCLUSIVE. It seems with the limited number of flags to not be as interesting, but this could be relaxed at some further point. Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Madars Vitolins <m@silodev.com> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> Cc: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2016-02-05 23:37:04 +00:00
error = ep_modify(ep, epi, &epds);
}
} else
error = -ENOENT;
break;
}
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
if (tep != NULL)
mutex_unlock(&tep->mtx);
mutex_unlock(&ep->mtx);
error_tgt_fput:
epoll: do not take global 'epmutex' for simple topologies When calling EPOLL_CTL_ADD for an epoll file descriptor that is attached directly to a wakeup source, we do not need to take the global 'epmutex', unless the epoll file descriptor is nested. The purpose of taking the 'epmutex' on add is to prevent complex topologies such as loops and deep wakeup paths from forming in parallel through multiple EPOLL_CTL_ADD operations. However, for the simple case of an epoll file descriptor attached directly to a wakeup source (with no nesting), we do not need to hold the 'epmutex'. This patch along with 'epoll: optimize EPOLL_CTL_DEL using rcu' improves scalability on larger systems. Quoting Nathan Zimmer's mail on SPECjbb performance: "On the 16 socket run the performance went from 35k jOPS to 125k jOPS. In addition the benchmark when from scaling well on 10 sockets to scaling well on just over 40 sockets. ... Currently the benchmark stops scaling at around 40-44 sockets but it seems like I found a second unrelated bottleneck." [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use `bool' for boolean variables, remove unneeded/undesirable cast of void*, add missed ep_scan_ready_list() kerneldoc] Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Tested-by: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@sgi.com> Cc: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Cc: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@nelhage.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2013-11-12 23:10:18 +00:00
if (full_check)
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
mutex_unlock(&epmutex);
fdput(tf);
error_fput:
fdput(f);
error_return:
return error;
}
/*
* Implement the event wait interface for the eventpoll file. It is the kernel
* part of the user space epoll_wait(2).
*/
static int do_epoll_wait(int epfd, struct epoll_event __user *events,
int maxevents, int timeout)
{
int error;
struct fd f;
struct eventpoll *ep;
/* The maximum number of event must be greater than zero */
if (maxevents <= 0 || maxevents > EP_MAX_EVENTS)
return -EINVAL;
/* Verify that the area passed by the user is writeable */
Remove 'type' argument from access_ok() function Nobody has actually used the type (VERIFY_READ vs VERIFY_WRITE) argument of the user address range verification function since we got rid of the old racy i386-only code to walk page tables by hand. It existed because the original 80386 would not honor the write protect bit when in kernel mode, so you had to do COW by hand before doing any user access. But we haven't supported that in a long time, and these days the 'type' argument is a purely historical artifact. A discussion about extending 'user_access_begin()' to do the range checking resulted this patch, because there is no way we're going to move the old VERIFY_xyz interface to that model. And it's best done at the end of the merge window when I've done most of my merges, so let's just get this done once and for all. This patch was mostly done with a sed-script, with manual fix-ups for the cases that weren't of the trivial 'access_ok(VERIFY_xyz' form. There were a couple of notable cases: - csky still had the old "verify_area()" name as an alias. - the iter_iov code had magical hardcoded knowledge of the actual values of VERIFY_{READ,WRITE} (not that they mattered, since nothing really used it) - microblaze used the type argument for a debug printout but other than those oddities this should be a total no-op patch. I tried to fix up all architectures, did fairly extensive grepping for access_ok() uses, and the changes are trivial, but I may have missed something. Any missed conversion should be trivially fixable, though. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2019-01-04 02:57:57 +00:00
if (!access_ok(events, maxevents * sizeof(struct epoll_event)))
return -EFAULT;
/* Get the "struct file *" for the eventpoll file */
f = fdget(epfd);
if (!f.file)
return -EBADF;
/*
* We have to check that the file structure underneath the fd
* the user passed to us _is_ an eventpoll file.
*/
error = -EINVAL;
if (!is_file_epoll(f.file))
goto error_fput;
/*
* At this point it is safe to assume that the "private_data" contains
* our own data structure.
*/
ep = f.file->private_data;
/* Time to fish for events ... */
error = ep_poll(ep, events, maxevents, timeout);
error_fput:
fdput(f);
return error;
}
SYSCALL_DEFINE4(epoll_wait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events,
int, maxevents, int, timeout)
{
return do_epoll_wait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);
}
/*
* Implement the event wait interface for the eventpoll file. It is the kernel
* part of the user space epoll_pwait(2).
*/
SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd, struct epoll_event __user *, events,
int, maxevents, int, timeout, const sigset_t __user *, sigmask,
size_t, sigsetsize)
{
int error;
sigset_t ksigmask, sigsaved;
/*
* If the caller wants a certain signal mask to be set during the wait,
* we apply it here.
*/
error = set_user_sigmask(sigmask, &ksigmask, &sigsaved, sigsetsize);
if (error)
return error;
error = do_epoll_wait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);
restore_user_sigmask(sigmask, &sigsaved);
return error;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
COMPAT_SYSCALL_DEFINE6(epoll_pwait, int, epfd,
struct epoll_event __user *, events,
int, maxevents, int, timeout,
const compat_sigset_t __user *, sigmask,
compat_size_t, sigsetsize)
{
long err;
sigset_t ksigmask, sigsaved;
/*
* If the caller wants a certain signal mask to be set during the wait,
* we apply it here.
*/
err = set_compat_user_sigmask(sigmask, &ksigmask, &sigsaved, sigsetsize);
if (err)
return err;
err = do_epoll_wait(epfd, events, maxevents, timeout);
restore_user_sigmask(sigmask, &sigsaved);
return err;
}
#endif
static int __init eventpoll_init(void)
{
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
struct sysinfo si;
si_meminfo(&si);
/*
* Allows top 4% of lomem to be allocated for epoll watches (per user).
*/
max_user_watches = (((si.totalram - si.totalhigh) / 25) << PAGE_SHIFT) /
epoll: introduce resource usage limits It has been thought that the per-user file descriptors limit would also limit the resources that a normal user can request via the epoll interface. Vegard Nossum reported a very simple program (a modified version attached) that can make a normal user to request a pretty large amount of kernel memory, well within the its maximum number of fds. To solve such problem, default limits are now imposed, and /proc based configuration has been introduced. A new directory has been created, named /proc/sys/fs/epoll/ and inside there, there are two configuration points: max_user_instances = Maximum number of devices - per user max_user_watches = Maximum number of "watched" fds - per user The current default for "max_user_watches" limits the memory used by epoll to store "watches", to 1/32 of the amount of the low RAM. As example, a 256MB 32bit machine, will have "max_user_watches" set to roughly 90000. That should be enough to not break existing heavy epoll users. The default value for "max_user_instances" is set to 128, that should be enough too. This also changes the userspace, because a new error code can now come out from EPOLL_CTL_ADD (-ENOSPC). The EMFILE from epoll_create() was already listed, so that should be ok. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: use get_current_user()] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> Reported-by: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2008-12-01 21:13:55 +00:00
EP_ITEM_COST;
BUG_ON(max_user_watches < 0);
epoll: prevent creating circular epoll structures In several places, an epoll fd can call another file's ->f_op->poll() method with ep->mtx held. This is in general unsafe, because that other file could itself be an epoll fd that contains the original epoll fd. The code defends against this possibility in its own ->poll() method using ep_call_nested, but there are several other unsafe calls to ->poll elsewhere that can be made to deadlock. For example, the following simple program causes the call in ep_insert recursively call the original fd's ->poll, leading to deadlock: #include <unistd.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> int main(void) { int e1, e2, p[2]; struct epoll_event evt = { .events = EPOLLIN }; e1 = epoll_create(1); e2 = epoll_create(2); pipe(p); epoll_ctl(e2, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e1, &evt); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, p[0], &evt); write(p[1], p, sizeof p); epoll_ctl(e1, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, e2, &evt); return 0; } On insertion, check whether the inserted file is itself a struct epoll, and if so, do a recursive walk to detect whether inserting this file would create a loop of epoll structures, which could lead to deadlock. [nelhage@ksplice.com: Use epmutex to serialize concurrent inserts] Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Signed-off-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Reported-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Tested-by: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@ksplice.com> Cc: <stable@kernel.org> [2.6.34+, possibly earlier] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-25 22:44:12 +00:00
/*
* Initialize the structure used to perform epoll file descriptor
* inclusion loops checks.
*/
ep_nested_calls_init(&poll_loop_ncalls);
epoll: avoid calling ep_call_nested() from ep_poll_safewake() ep_poll_safewake() is used to wakeup potentially nested epoll file descriptors. The function uses ep_call_nested() to prevent entering the same wake up queue more than once, and to prevent excessively deep wakeup paths (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS). However, this is not necessary since we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. This saves extra function calls, and avoids taking a global lock during the ep_call_nested() calls. I have, however, left ep_call_nested() for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case, since ep_call_nested() keeps track of the nesting level, and this is required by the call to spin_lock_irqsave_nested(). It would be nice to remove the ep_call_nested() calls for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case as well, however its not clear how to simply pass the nesting level through multiple wake_up() levels without more surgery. In any case, I don't think CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is generally used for production. This patch, also apparently fixes a workload at Google that Salman Qazi reported by completely removing the poll_safewake_ncalls->lock from wakeup paths. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507920533-8812-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:02 +00:00
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
/* Initialize the structure used to perform safe poll wait head wake ups */
epoll: fix epoll's own poll Fix a bug inside the epoll's f_op->poll() code, that returns POLLIN even though there are no actual ready monitored fds. The bug shows up if you add an epoll fd inside another fd container (poll, select, epoll). The problem is that callback-based wake ups used by epoll does not carry (patches will follow, to fix this) any information about the events that actually happened. So the callback code, since it can't call the file* ->poll() inside the callback, chains the file* into a ready-list. So, suppose you added an fd with EPOLLOUT only, and some data shows up on the fd, the file* mapped by the fd will be added into the ready-list (via wakeup callback). During normal epoll_wait() use, this condition is sorted out at the time we're actually able to call the file*'s f_op->poll(). Inside the old epoll's f_op->poll() though, only a quick check !list_empty(ready-list) was performed, and this could have led to reporting POLLIN even though no ready fds would show up at a following epoll_wait(). In order to correctly report the ready status for an epoll fd, the ready-list must be checked to see if any really available fd+event would be ready in a following epoll_wait(). Operation (calling f_op->poll() from inside f_op->poll()) that, like wake ups, must be handled with care because of the fact that epoll fds can be added to other epoll fds. Test code: /* * epoll_test by Davide Libenzi (Simple code to test epoll internals) * Copyright (C) 2008 Davide Libenzi * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or * (at your option) any later version. * * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the * GNU General Public License for more details. * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA * * Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> * */ #include <sys/types.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <errno.h> #include <signal.h> #include <limits.h> #include <poll.h> #include <sys/epoll.h> #include <sys/wait.h> #define EPWAIT_TIMEO (1 * 1000) #ifndef POLLRDHUP #define POLLRDHUP 0x2000 #endif #define EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN 100L #define EPOLL_TF_LOOP (1 << 0) struct epoll_test_cfg { long size; long flags; }; static int xepoll_create(int n) { int epfd; if ((epfd = epoll_create(n)) == -1) { perror("epoll_create"); exit(2); } return epfd; } static void xepoll_ctl(int epfd, int cmd, int fd, struct epoll_event *evt) { if (epoll_ctl(epfd, cmd, fd, evt) < 0) { perror("epoll_ctl"); exit(3); } } static void xpipe(int *fds) { if (pipe(fds)) { perror("pipe"); exit(4); } } static pid_t xfork(void) { pid_t pid; if ((pid = fork()) == (pid_t) -1) { perror("pipe"); exit(5); } return pid; } static int run_forked_proc(int (*proc)(void *), void *data) { int status; pid_t pid; if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) exit((*proc)(data)); if (waitpid(pid, &status, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return WIFEXITED(status) ? WEXITSTATUS(status): -2; } static int check_events(int fd, int timeo) { struct pollfd pfd; fprintf(stdout, "Checking events for fd %d\n", fd); memset(&pfd, 0, sizeof(pfd)); pfd.fd = fd; pfd.events = POLLIN | POLLOUT; if (poll(&pfd, 1, timeo) < 0) { perror("poll()"); return 0; } if (pfd.revents & POLLIN) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLIN\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLOUT) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLOUT\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLERR) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLERR\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLHUP\n"); if (pfd.revents & POLLRDHUP) fprintf(stdout, "\tPOLLRDHUP\n"); return pfd.revents; } static int epoll_test_tty(void *data) { int epfd, ifd = fileno(stdin), res; struct epoll_event evt; if (check_events(ifd, 0) != POLLOUT) { fprintf(stderr, "Something is cooking on STDIN (%d)\n", ifd); return 1; } epfd = xepoll_create(1); fprintf(stdout, "Created epoll fd (%d)\n", epfd); memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; xepoll_ctl(epfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, ifd, &evt); if (check_events(epfd, 0) & POLLIN) { res = epoll_wait(epfd, &evt, 1, 0); if (res == 0) { fprintf(stderr, "Epoll fd (%d) is ready when it shouldn't!\n", epfd); return 2; } } return 0; } static int epoll_wakeup_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write must come after the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested wakeup code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_poll_safewake() * By having the check_events() (hence poll(2)) happens first, * we have poll wait queue filled up, and the write(2) in the * child will trigger the wakeup chain. */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { sleep(1); write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } res = check_events(epfd, 2000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } static int epoll_poll_chain(void *data) { struct epoll_test_cfg *tcfg = data; int i, res, epfd, bfd, nfd, pfds[2]; pid_t pid; struct epoll_event evt; memset(&evt, 0, sizeof(evt)); evt.events = EPOLLIN; epfd = bfd = xepoll_create(1); for (i = 0; i < tcfg->size; i++) { nfd = xepoll_create(1); xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, nfd, &evt); bfd = nfd; } xpipe(pfds); if (tcfg->flags & EPOLL_TF_LOOP) { xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, epfd, &evt); /* * If we're testing for loop, we want that the wakeup * triggered by the write to the pipe done in the child * process, triggers a fake event. So we add the pipe * read size with EPOLLOUT events. This will trigger * an addition to the ready-list, but no real events * will be there. The the epoll kernel code will proceed * in calling f_op->poll() of the epfd, triggering the * loop we want to test. */ evt.events = EPOLLOUT; } xepoll_ctl(bfd, EPOLL_CTL_ADD, pfds[0], &evt); /* * The pipe write mush come before the poll(2) call inside * check_events(). This tests the nested f_op->poll calls code in * fs/eventpoll.c:ep_eventpoll_poll() * By having the pipe write(2) happen first, we make the kernel * epoll code to load the ready lists, and the following poll(2) * done inside check_events() will test nested poll code in * ep_eventpoll_poll(). */ if ((pid = xfork()) == 0) { write(pfds[1], "w", 1); exit(0); } sleep(1); res = check_events(epfd, 1000) & POLLIN; if (waitpid(pid, NULL, 0) != pid) { perror("waitpid"); return -1; } return res; } int main(int ac, char **av) { int error; struct epoll_test_cfg tcfg; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing TTY events\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_test_tty, NULL); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short wakeup chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing short poll chain\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == POLLIN ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = EPOLL_MAX_CHAIN; tcfg.flags = 0; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing long poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy wakeup chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_wakeup_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); tcfg.size = 3; tcfg.flags = EPOLL_TF_LOOP; fprintf(stdout, "\n********** Testing loopy poll chain (HOLD ON)\n"); error = run_forked_proc(epoll_poll_chain, &tcfg); fprintf(stdout, error == 0 ? "********** OK\n": "********** FAIL (%d)\n", error); return 0; } Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org> Cc: Pavel Pisa <pisa@cmp.felk.cvut.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-03-31 22:24:10 +00:00
ep_nested_calls_init(&poll_safewake_ncalls);
epoll: avoid calling ep_call_nested() from ep_poll_safewake() ep_poll_safewake() is used to wakeup potentially nested epoll file descriptors. The function uses ep_call_nested() to prevent entering the same wake up queue more than once, and to prevent excessively deep wakeup paths (deeper than EP_MAX_NESTS). However, this is not necessary since we are already preventing these conditions during EPOLL_CTL_ADD. This saves extra function calls, and avoids taking a global lock during the ep_call_nested() calls. I have, however, left ep_call_nested() for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case, since ep_call_nested() keeps track of the nesting level, and this is required by the call to spin_lock_irqsave_nested(). It would be nice to remove the ep_call_nested() calls for the CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC case as well, however its not clear how to simply pass the nesting level through multiple wake_up() levels without more surgery. In any case, I don't think CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is generally used for production. This patch, also apparently fixes a workload at Google that Salman Qazi reported by completely removing the poll_safewake_ncalls->lock from wakeup paths. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507920533-8812-1-git-send-email-jbaron@akamai.com Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Salman Qazi <sqazi@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-17 23:29:02 +00:00
#endif
/*
* We can have many thousands of epitems, so prevent this from
* using an extra cache line on 64-bit (and smaller) CPUs
*/
BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(void *) <= 8 && sizeof(struct epitem) > 128);
/* Allocates slab cache used to allocate "struct epitem" items */
epi_cache = kmem_cache_create("eventpoll_epi", sizeof(struct epitem),
0, SLAB_HWCACHE_ALIGN|SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
/* Allocates slab cache used to allocate "struct eppoll_entry" */
pwq_cache = kmem_cache_create("eventpoll_pwq",
sizeof(struct eppoll_entry), 0, SLAB_PANIC|SLAB_ACCOUNT, NULL);
return 0;
}
fs_initcall(eventpoll_init);