linux/io_uring/kbuf.h

224 lines
5.7 KiB
C
Raw Permalink Normal View History

// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
#ifndef IOU_KBUF_H
#define IOU_KBUF_H
#include <uapi/linux/io_uring.h>
enum {
/* ring mapped provided buffers */
IOBL_BUF_RING = 1,
/* ring mapped provided buffers, but mmap'ed by application */
IOBL_MMAP = 2,
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
/* buffers are consumed incrementally rather than always fully */
IOBL_INC = 4,
};
struct io_buffer_list {
/*
* If ->buf_nr_pages is set, then buf_pages/buf_ring are used. If not,
* then these are classic provided buffers and ->buf_list is used.
*/
union {
struct list_head buf_list;
struct {
struct page **buf_pages;
struct io_uring_buf_ring *buf_ring;
};
io_uring: free io_buffer_list entries via RCU mmap_lock nests under uring_lock out of necessity, as we may be doing user copies with uring_lock held. However, for mmap of provided buffer rings, we attempt to grab uring_lock with mmap_lock already held from do_mmap(). This makes lockdep, rightfully, complain: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.7.0-rc1-00009-gff3337ebaf94-dirty #4438 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ buf-ring.t/442 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00020e1480a8 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000dc226190 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: vm_mmap_pgoff+0x124/0x264 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (&mm->mmap_lock){++++}-{3:3}: __might_fault+0x90/0xbc io_register_pbuf_ring+0x94/0x488 __arm64_sys_io_uring_register+0x8dc/0x1318 invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c -> #0 (&ctx->uring_lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire+0x19a0/0x2d14 lock_acquire+0x2e0/0x44c __mutex_lock+0x118/0x564 mutex_lock_nested+0x20/0x28 io_uring_validate_mmap_request.isra.0+0x4c/0x140 io_uring_mmu_get_unmapped_area+0x3c/0x98 get_unmapped_area+0xa4/0x158 do_mmap+0xec/0x5b4 vm_mmap_pgoff+0x158/0x264 ksys_mmap_pgoff+0x1d4/0x254 __arm64_sys_mmap+0x80/0x9c invoke_syscall+0x5c/0x17c el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x108/0x130 do_el0_svc+0x2c/0x38 el0_svc+0x4c/0x94 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x118/0x124 el0t_64_sync+0x168/0x16c From that mmap(2) path, we really just need to ensure that the buffer list doesn't go away from underneath us. For the lower indexed entries, they never go away until the ring is freed and we can always sanely reference those as long as the caller has a file reference. For the higher indexed ones in our xarray, we just need to ensure that the buffer list remains valid while we return the address of it. Free the higher indexed io_buffer_list entries via RCU. With that we can avoid needing ->uring_lock inside mmap(2), and simply hold the RCU read lock around the buffer list lookup and address check. To ensure that the arrayed lookup either returns a valid fully formulated entry via RCU lookup, add an 'is_ready' flag that we access with store and release memory ordering. This isn't needed for the xarray lookups, but doesn't hurt either. Since this isn't a fast path, retain it across both types. Similarly, for the allocated array inside the ctx, ensure we use the proper load/acquire as setup could in theory be running in parallel with mmap. While in there, add a few lockdep checks for documentation purposes. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c56e022c0a27 ("io_uring: add support for user mapped provided buffer ring") Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2023-11-28 00:54:40 +00:00
struct rcu_head rcu;
};
__u16 bgid;
/* below is for ring provided buffers */
__u16 buf_nr_pages;
__u16 nr_entries;
__u16 head;
__u16 mask;
__u16 flags;
atomic_t refs;
};
struct io_buffer {
struct list_head list;
__u64 addr;
__u32 len;
__u16 bid;
__u16 bgid;
};
enum {
/* can alloc a bigger vec */
KBUF_MODE_EXPAND = 1,
/* if bigger vec allocated, free old one */
KBUF_MODE_FREE = 2,
};
struct buf_sel_arg {
struct iovec *iovs;
size_t out_len;
size_t max_len;
unsigned short nr_iovs;
unsigned short mode;
};
void __user *io_buffer_select(struct io_kiocb *req, size_t *len,
unsigned int issue_flags);
int io_buffers_select(struct io_kiocb *req, struct buf_sel_arg *arg,
unsigned int issue_flags);
int io_buffers_peek(struct io_kiocb *req, struct buf_sel_arg *arg);
void io_destroy_buffers(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx);
int io_remove_buffers_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
int io_remove_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
int io_provide_buffers_prep(struct io_kiocb *req, const struct io_uring_sqe *sqe);
int io_provide_buffers(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned int issue_flags);
int io_register_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg);
int io_unregister_pbuf_ring(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg);
int io_register_pbuf_status(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg);
void __io_put_kbuf(struct io_kiocb *req, int len, unsigned issue_flags);
bool io_kbuf_recycle_legacy(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags);
void io_put_bl(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, struct io_buffer_list *bl);
struct io_buffer_list *io_pbuf_get_bl(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx,
unsigned long bgid);
int io_pbuf_mmap(struct file *file, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
static inline bool io_kbuf_recycle_ring(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
/*
* We don't need to recycle for REQ_F_BUFFER_RING, we can just clear
* the flag and hence ensure that bl->head doesn't get incremented.
* If the tail has already been incremented, hang on to it.
* The exception is partial io, that case we should increment bl->head
* to monopolize the buffer.
*/
if (req->buf_list) {
req->buf_index = req->buf_list->bgid;
req->flags &= ~(REQ_F_BUFFER_RING|REQ_F_BUFFERS_COMMIT);
return true;
}
return false;
}
static inline bool io_do_buffer_select(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
if (!(req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECT))
return false;
return !(req->flags & (REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED|REQ_F_BUFFER_RING));
}
static inline bool io_kbuf_recycle(struct io_kiocb *req, unsigned issue_flags)
{
if (req->flags & REQ_F_BL_NO_RECYCLE)
return false;
if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED)
return io_kbuf_recycle_legacy(req, issue_flags);
if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_RING)
return io_kbuf_recycle_ring(req);
return false;
}
/* Mapped buffer ring, return io_uring_buf from head */
#define io_ring_head_to_buf(br, head, mask) &(br)->bufs[(head) & (mask)]
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
static inline bool io_kbuf_commit(struct io_kiocb *req,
struct io_buffer_list *bl, int len, int nr)
{
if (unlikely(!(req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFERS_COMMIT)))
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
return true;
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_BUFFERS_COMMIT;
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
if (unlikely(len < 0))
return true;
if (bl->flags & IOBL_INC) {
struct io_uring_buf *buf;
buf = io_ring_head_to_buf(bl->buf_ring, bl->head, bl->mask);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(len > buf->len))
len = buf->len;
buf->len -= len;
if (buf->len) {
buf->addr += len;
return false;
}
}
bl->head += nr;
return true;
}
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
static inline bool __io_put_kbuf_ring(struct io_kiocb *req, int len, int nr)
{
struct io_buffer_list *bl = req->buf_list;
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
bool ret = true;
if (bl) {
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
ret = io_kbuf_commit(req, bl, len, nr);
req->buf_index = bl->bgid;
}
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_BUFFER_RING;
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
return ret;
}
static inline void __io_put_kbuf_list(struct io_kiocb *req, int len,
struct list_head *list)
{
if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_RING) {
__io_put_kbuf_ring(req, len, 1);
} else {
req->buf_index = req->kbuf->bgid;
list_add(&req->kbuf->list, list);
req->flags &= ~REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED;
}
}
static inline void io_kbuf_drop(struct io_kiocb *req)
{
lockdep_assert_held(&req->ctx->completion_lock);
if (!(req->flags & (REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED|REQ_F_BUFFER_RING)))
return;
/* len == 0 is fine here, non-ring will always drop all of it */
__io_put_kbuf_list(req, 0, &req->ctx->io_buffers_comp);
}
static inline unsigned int __io_put_kbufs(struct io_kiocb *req, int len,
int nbufs, unsigned issue_flags)
{
unsigned int ret;
if (!(req->flags & (REQ_F_BUFFER_RING | REQ_F_BUFFER_SELECTED)))
return 0;
ret = IORING_CQE_F_BUFFER | (req->buf_index << IORING_CQE_BUFFER_SHIFT);
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
if (req->flags & REQ_F_BUFFER_RING) {
if (!__io_put_kbuf_ring(req, len, nbufs))
ret |= IORING_CQE_F_BUF_MORE;
} else {
__io_put_kbuf(req, len, issue_flags);
io_uring/kbuf: add support for incremental buffer consumption By default, any recv/read operation that uses provided buffers will consume at least 1 buffer fully (and maybe more, in case of bundles). This adds support for incremental consumption, meaning that an application may add large buffers, and each read/recv will just consume the part of the buffer that it needs. For example, let's say an application registers 1MB buffers in a provided buffer ring, for streaming receives. If it gets a short recv, then the full 1MB buffer will be consumed and passed back to the application. With incremental consumption, only the part that was actually used is consumed, and the buffer remains the current one. This means that both the application and the kernel needs to keep track of what the current receive point is. Each recv will still pass back a buffer ID and the size consumed, the only difference is that before the next receive would always be the next buffer in the ring. Now the same buffer ID may return multiple receives, each at an offset into that buffer from where the previous receive left off. Example: Application registers a provided buffer ring, and adds two 32K buffers to the ring. Buffer1 address: 0x1000000 (buffer ID 0) Buffer2 address: 0x2000000 (buffer ID 1) A recv completion is received with the following values: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 4096b of data is available at 0x1000000, the start of that buffer, and that more data from this buffer will be coming. Now the next receive comes in: cqe->res 0x2010 (8k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x11 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 0) which tells the application that 8k is available where the last completion left off, at 0x1001000. Next completion is: cqe->res 0x5000 (20k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x1 (CQE_F_BUFFER set, buffer ID 0) and the application now knows that 20k of data is available at 0x1003000, which is where the previous receive ended. CQE_F_BUF_MORE isn't set, as no more data is available in this buffer ID. The next completion is then: cqe->res 0x1000 (4k bytes received) cqe->flags 0x10001 (CQE_F_BUFFER|CQE_F_BUF_MORE set, buffer ID 1) which tells the application that buffer ID 1 is now the current one, hence there's 4k of valid data at 0x2000000. 0x2001000 will be the next receive point for this buffer ID. When a buffer will be reused by future CQE completions, IORING_CQE_BUF_MORE will be set in cqe->flags. This tells the application that the kernel isn't done with the buffer yet, and that it should expect more completions for this buffer ID. Will only be set by provided buffer rings setup with IOU_PBUF_RING INC, as that's the only type of buffer that will see multiple consecutive completions for the same buffer ID. For any other provided buffer type, any completion that passes back a buffer to the application is final. Once a buffer has been fully consumed, the buffer ring head is incremented and the next receive will indicate the next buffer ID in the CQE cflags. On the send side, the application can manage how much data is sent from an existing buffer by setting sqe->len to the desired send length. An application can request incremental consumption by setting IOU_PBUF_RING_INC in the provided buffer ring registration. Outside of that, any provided buffer ring setup and buffer additions is done like before, no changes there. The only change is in how an application may see multiple completions for the same buffer ID, hence needing to know where the next receive will happen. Note that like existing provided buffer rings, this should not be used with IOSQE_ASYNC, as both really require the ring to remain locked over the duration of the buffer selection and the operation completion. It will consume a buffer otherwise regardless of the size of the IO done. Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2024-08-09 17:20:45 +00:00
}
return ret;
}
static inline unsigned int io_put_kbuf(struct io_kiocb *req, int len,
unsigned issue_flags)
{
return __io_put_kbufs(req, len, 1, issue_flags);
}
static inline unsigned int io_put_kbufs(struct io_kiocb *req, int len,
int nbufs, unsigned issue_flags)
{
return __io_put_kbufs(req, len, nbufs, issue_flags);
}
#endif