Minki/linux
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git synced 2024-11-10 14:11:52 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
master
linux/drivers/cxl/Makefile

22 lines
688 B
Makefile
Raw Permalink Normal View History

cxl/mem: Introduce a driver for CXL-2.0-Type-3 endpoints The CXL.mem protocol allows a device to act as a provider of "System RAM" and/or "Persistent Memory" that is fully coherent as if the memory was attached to the typical CPU memory controller. With the CXL-2.0 specification a PCI endpoint can implement a "Type-3" device interface and give the operating system control over "Host Managed Device Memory". See section 2.3 Type 3 CXL Device. The memory range exported by the device may optionally be described by the platform firmware memory map, or by infrastructure like LIBNVDIMM to provision persistent memory capacity from one, or more, CXL.mem devices. A pre-requisite for Linux-managed memory-capacity provisioning is this cxl_mem driver that can speak the mailbox protocol defined in section 8.2.8.4 Mailbox Registers. For now just land the initial driver boiler-plate and Documentation/ infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> (v1) Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://www.computeexpresslink.org/download-the-specification Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-02-17 04:09:50 +00:00
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
cxl/port: Fix CXL port initialization order when the subsystem is built-in When the CXL subsystem is built-in the module init order is determined by Makefile order. That order violates expectations. The expectation is that cxl_acpi and cxl_mem can race to attach. If cxl_acpi wins the race, cxl_mem will find the enabled CXL root ports it needs. If cxl_acpi loses the race it will retrigger cxl_mem to attach via cxl_bus_rescan(). That flow only works if cxl_acpi can assume ports are enabled immediately upon cxl_acpi_probe() return. That in turn can only happen in the CONFIG_CXL_ACPI=y case if the cxl_port driver is registered before cxl_acpi_probe() runs. Fix up the order to prevent initialization failures. Ensure that cxl_port is built-in when cxl_acpi is also built-in, arrange for Makefile order to resolve the subsys_initcall() order of cxl_port and cxl_acpi, and arrange for Makefile order to resolve the device_initcall() (module_init()) order of the remaining objects. As for what contributed to this not being found earlier, the CXL regression environment, cxl_test, builds all CXL functionality as a module to allow to symbol mocking and other dynamic reload tests. As a result there is no regression coverage for the built-in case. Reported-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/20241004212504.1246-1-gourry@gourry.net Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Tested-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/172988474904.476062.7961350937442459266.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
2024-10-25 19:32:55 +00:00
# Order is important here for the built-in case:
# - 'core' first for fundamental init
# - 'port' before platform root drivers like 'acpi' so that CXL-root ports
# are immediately enabled
# - 'mem' and 'pmem' before endpoint drivers so that memdevs are
# immediately enabled
# - 'pci' last, also mirrors the hardware enumeration hierarchy
PM: CXL: Disable suspend The CXL specification claims S3 support at a hardware level, but at a system software level there are some missing pieces. Section 9.4 (CXL 2.0) rightly claims that "CXL mem adapters may need aux power to retain memory context across S3", but there is no enumeration mechanism for the OS to determine if a given adapter has that support. Moreover the save state and resume image for the system may inadvertantly end up in a CXL device that needs to be restored before the save state is recoverable. I.e. a circular dependency that is not resolvable without a third party save-area. Arrange for the cxl_mem driver to fail S3 attempts. This still nominaly allows for suspend, but requires unbinding all CXL memory devices before the suspend to ensure the typical DRAM flow is taken. The cxl_mem unbind flow is intended to also tear down all CXL memory regions associated with a given cxl_memdev. It is reasonable to assume that any device participating in a System RAM range published in the EFI memory map is covered by aux power and save-area outside the device itself. So this restriction can be minimized in the future once pre-existing region enumeration support arrives, and perhaps a spec update to clarify if the EFI memory map is sufficent for determining the range of devices managed by platform-firmware for S3 support. Per Rafael, if the CXL configuration prevents suspend then it should fail early before tasks are frozen, and mem_sleep should stop showing 'mem' as an option [1]. Effectively CXL augments the platform suspend ->valid() op since, for example, the ACPI ops are not aware of the CXL / PCI dependencies. Given the split role of platform firmware vs OS provisioned CXL memory it is up to the cxl_mem driver to determine if the CXL configuration has elements that platform firmware may not be prepared to restore. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CAJZ5v0hGVN_=3iU8OLpHY3Ak35T5+JcBM-qs8SbojKrpd0VXsA@mail.gmail.com [1] Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/165066828317.3907920.5690432272182042556.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-04-22 22:58:11 +00:00
obj-y += core/
cxl/port: Fix CXL port initialization order when the subsystem is built-in When the CXL subsystem is built-in the module init order is determined by Makefile order. That order violates expectations. The expectation is that cxl_acpi and cxl_mem can race to attach. If cxl_acpi wins the race, cxl_mem will find the enabled CXL root ports it needs. If cxl_acpi loses the race it will retrigger cxl_mem to attach via cxl_bus_rescan(). That flow only works if cxl_acpi can assume ports are enabled immediately upon cxl_acpi_probe() return. That in turn can only happen in the CONFIG_CXL_ACPI=y case if the cxl_port driver is registered before cxl_acpi_probe() runs. Fix up the order to prevent initialization failures. Ensure that cxl_port is built-in when cxl_acpi is also built-in, arrange for Makefile order to resolve the subsys_initcall() order of cxl_port and cxl_acpi, and arrange for Makefile order to resolve the device_initcall() (module_init()) order of the remaining objects. As for what contributed to this not being found earlier, the CXL regression environment, cxl_test, builds all CXL functionality as a module to allow to symbol mocking and other dynamic reload tests. As a result there is no regression coverage for the built-in case. Reported-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/20241004212504.1246-1-gourry@gourry.net Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Tested-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/172988474904.476062.7961350937442459266.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
2024-10-25 19:32:55 +00:00
obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PORT) += cxl_port.o
cxl/acpi: Introduce the root of a cxl_port topology While CXL builds upon the PCI software model for enumeration and endpoint control, a static platform component is required to bootstrap the CXL memory layout. Similar to how ACPI identifies root-level PCI memory resources, ACPI data enumerates the address space and interleave configuration for CXL Memory. In addition to identifying host bridges, ACPI is responsible for enumerating the CXL memory space that can be addressed by downstream decoders. This is similar to the requirement for ACPI to publish resources via the _CRS method for PCI host bridges. Specifically, ACPI publishes a table, CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT), which includes a list of CXL Memory resources, CXL Fixed Memory Window Structures (CFMWS). For now, introduce the core infrastructure for a cxl_port hierarchy starting with a root level anchor represented by the ACPI0017 device. Follow on changes model support for the configurable decode capabilities of cxl_port instances, i.e. CXL switch support. Co-developed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162325449515.2293126.15303270193010154608.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-09 16:01:35 +00:00
obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_ACPI) += cxl_acpi.o
cxl/pmem: Add initial infrastructure for pmem support Register an 'nvdimm-bridge' device to act as an anchor for a libnvdimm bus hierarchy. Also, flesh out the cxl_bus definition to allow a cxl_nvdimm_bridge_driver to attach to the bridge and trigger the nvdimm-bus registration. The creation of the bridge is gated on the detection of a PMEM capable address space registered to the root. The bridge indirection allows the libnvdimm module to remain unloaded on platforms without PMEM support. Given that the probing of ACPI0017 is asynchronous to CXL endpoint devices, and the expectation that CXL endpoint devices register other PMEM resources on the 'CXL' nvdimm bus, a workqueue is added. The workqueue is needed to run bus_rescan_devices() outside of the device_lock() of the nvdimm-bridge device to rendezvous nvdimm resources as they arrive. For now only the bus is taken online/offline in the workqueue. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162379909706.2993820.14051258608641140169.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-15 23:18:17 +00:00
obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PMEM) += cxl_pmem.o
cxl/port: Fix CXL port initialization order when the subsystem is built-in When the CXL subsystem is built-in the module init order is determined by Makefile order. That order violates expectations. The expectation is that cxl_acpi and cxl_mem can race to attach. If cxl_acpi wins the race, cxl_mem will find the enabled CXL root ports it needs. If cxl_acpi loses the race it will retrigger cxl_mem to attach via cxl_bus_rescan(). That flow only works if cxl_acpi can assume ports are enabled immediately upon cxl_acpi_probe() return. That in turn can only happen in the CONFIG_CXL_ACPI=y case if the cxl_port driver is registered before cxl_acpi_probe() runs. Fix up the order to prevent initialization failures. Ensure that cxl_port is built-in when cxl_acpi is also built-in, arrange for Makefile order to resolve the subsys_initcall() order of cxl_port and cxl_acpi, and arrange for Makefile order to resolve the device_initcall() (module_init()) order of the remaining objects. As for what contributed to this not being found earlier, the CXL regression environment, cxl_test, builds all CXL functionality as a module to allow to symbol mocking and other dynamic reload tests. As a result there is no regression coverage for the built-in case. Reported-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/20241004212504.1246-1-gourry@gourry.net Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Tested-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/172988474904.476062.7961350937442459266.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
2024-10-25 19:32:55 +00:00
obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_MEM) += cxl_mem.o
obj-$(CONFIG_CXL_PCI) += cxl_pci.o
cxl/mem: Introduce a driver for CXL-2.0-Type-3 endpoints The CXL.mem protocol allows a device to act as a provider of "System RAM" and/or "Persistent Memory" that is fully coherent as if the memory was attached to the typical CPU memory controller. With the CXL-2.0 specification a PCI endpoint can implement a "Type-3" device interface and give the operating system control over "Host Managed Device Memory". See section 2.3 Type 3 CXL Device. The memory range exported by the device may optionally be described by the platform firmware memory map, or by infrastructure like LIBNVDIMM to provision persistent memory capacity from one, or more, CXL.mem devices. A pre-requisite for Linux-managed memory-capacity provisioning is this cxl_mem driver that can speak the mailbox protocol defined in section 8.2.8.4 Mailbox Registers. For now just land the initial driver boiler-plate and Documentation/ infrastructure. Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> (v1) Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Link: https://www.computeexpresslink.org/download-the-specification Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210217040958.1354670-2-ben.widawsky@intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-02-17 04:09:50 +00:00
cxl/port: Fix CXL port initialization order when the subsystem is built-in When the CXL subsystem is built-in the module init order is determined by Makefile order. That order violates expectations. The expectation is that cxl_acpi and cxl_mem can race to attach. If cxl_acpi wins the race, cxl_mem will find the enabled CXL root ports it needs. If cxl_acpi loses the race it will retrigger cxl_mem to attach via cxl_bus_rescan(). That flow only works if cxl_acpi can assume ports are enabled immediately upon cxl_acpi_probe() return. That in turn can only happen in the CONFIG_CXL_ACPI=y case if the cxl_port driver is registered before cxl_acpi_probe() runs. Fix up the order to prevent initialization failures. Ensure that cxl_port is built-in when cxl_acpi is also built-in, arrange for Makefile order to resolve the subsys_initcall() order of cxl_port and cxl_acpi, and arrange for Makefile order to resolve the device_initcall() (module_init()) order of the remaining objects. As for what contributed to this not being found earlier, the CXL regression environment, cxl_test, builds all CXL functionality as a module to allow to symbol mocking and other dynamic reload tests. As a result there is no regression coverage for the built-in case. Reported-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/20241004212504.1246-1-gourry@gourry.net Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Tested-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/172988474904.476062.7961350937442459266.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
2024-10-25 19:32:55 +00:00
cxl_port-y := port.o
cxl/acpi: Introduce the root of a cxl_port topology While CXL builds upon the PCI software model for enumeration and endpoint control, a static platform component is required to bootstrap the CXL memory layout. Similar to how ACPI identifies root-level PCI memory resources, ACPI data enumerates the address space and interleave configuration for CXL Memory. In addition to identifying host bridges, ACPI is responsible for enumerating the CXL memory space that can be addressed by downstream decoders. This is similar to the requirement for ACPI to publish resources via the _CRS method for PCI host bridges. Specifically, ACPI publishes a table, CXL Early Discovery Table (CEDT), which includes a list of CXL Memory resources, CXL Fixed Memory Window Structures (CFMWS). For now, introduce the core infrastructure for a cxl_port hierarchy starting with a root level anchor represented by the ACPI0017 device. Follow on changes model support for the configurable decode capabilities of cxl_port instances, i.e. CXL switch support. Co-developed-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/162325449515.2293126.15303270193010154608.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2021-06-09 16:01:35 +00:00
cxl_acpi-y := acpi.o
cxl/pmem: Introduce nvdimm_security_ops with ->get_flags() operation Add nvdimm_security_ops support for CXL memory device with the introduction of the ->get_flags() callback function. This is part of the "Persistent Memory Data-at-rest Security" command set for CXL memory device support. The ->get_flags() function provides the security state of the persistent memory device defined by the CXL 3.0 spec section 8.2.9.8.6.1. Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/166983609611.2734609.13231854299523325319.stgit@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
2022-11-30 19:21:36 +00:00
cxl_pmem-y := pmem.o security.o
cxl/port: Fix CXL port initialization order when the subsystem is built-in When the CXL subsystem is built-in the module init order is determined by Makefile order. That order violates expectations. The expectation is that cxl_acpi and cxl_mem can race to attach. If cxl_acpi wins the race, cxl_mem will find the enabled CXL root ports it needs. If cxl_acpi loses the race it will retrigger cxl_mem to attach via cxl_bus_rescan(). That flow only works if cxl_acpi can assume ports are enabled immediately upon cxl_acpi_probe() return. That in turn can only happen in the CONFIG_CXL_ACPI=y case if the cxl_port driver is registered before cxl_acpi_probe() runs. Fix up the order to prevent initialization failures. Ensure that cxl_port is built-in when cxl_acpi is also built-in, arrange for Makefile order to resolve the subsys_initcall() order of cxl_port and cxl_acpi, and arrange for Makefile order to resolve the device_initcall() (module_init()) order of the remaining objects. As for what contributed to this not being found earlier, the CXL regression environment, cxl_test, builds all CXL functionality as a module to allow to symbol mocking and other dynamic reload tests. As a result there is no regression coverage for the built-in case. Reported-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Closes: http://lore.kernel.org/20241004212504.1246-1-gourry@gourry.net Tested-by: Gregory Price <gourry@gourry.net> Fixes: 8dd2bc0f8e02 ("cxl/mem: Add the cxl_mem driver") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@intel.com> Cc: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Tested-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Reviewed-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/172988474904.476062.7961350937442459266.stgit@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com>
2024-10-25 19:32:55 +00:00
cxl_mem-y := mem.o
cxl_pci-y := pci.o
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink